wiffleball 4,790 Posted February 17, 2018 How many more years you giving Mueller to prove collusion? Lol In related news, the gop-controlled Congress has announced that they're going to yet again open up investigations into Hillary Clinton. This coming after 5 years of multiple investigations that led nowhere. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/24/hillary-clinton-email-investigation-congress-trump#ampshare=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/24/hillary-clinton-email-investigation-congress-trump Lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted February 17, 2018 Lol In related news, the gop-controlled Congress has announced that they're going to yet again open up investigations into Hillary Clinton. This coming after 5 years of multiple investigations that led nowhere. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/24/hillary-clinton-email-investigation-congress-trump#ampshare=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/24/hillary-clinton-email-investigation-congress-trump Lol poor Wiff. I'm embarrassed for you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,595 Posted February 17, 2018 Watching them take L after L has become quite the spectacle. They have nothing left to lose (its all gone) so they double down and shift the narrative. Sad Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted February 17, 2018 I think you either didnt read the findings, youve decided on your own that the findings are lies, or youre a mouthpiece/troll. But carry on. you are in the running with sho for biggest dumb on fft. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,515 Posted February 17, 2018 you are in the running with sho for biggest dumb ###### on fft. He appears very worked up about the Trump/ Russia hoax going bye-bye. Hopes dashed, soul crushed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,934 Posted February 17, 2018 How many millions did Muller spend to find 13 Twitter trolls? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted February 17, 2018 poor Wiff. I'm embarrassed for you. I feel sad for any wives and children of these kooks. (on the bright side the kids are probably from someone else's sperm and the wives are being satisfied elsewhere while these loons type away on the internet) They have been screaming since day 1 "russia collusion". That was the entire purpose of the special counsel. Now they realize the only collusion is between the dems and russia so they are trying to pretend it was never about collusion. muh russia twitter trolls! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,934 Posted February 17, 2018 Who would win? A woman with the main stream media on her side, celebrities shilling for her day in and day out, and a billion dollar presidential campaign. vs 13 Russian trolls on twitter and a facebook ad? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,790 Posted February 17, 2018 They have been screaming since day 1 "russia collusion". That was the entire purpose of the special counsel. The Justice Department is appointing former FBI Director Robert Mueller as a special counsel to oversee the growing probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and possible ties to associates of President Trump. "In my capacity as acting Attorney General, I determined that it is in the public interest for me to exercise my authority and appoint a Special Counsel to assume responsibility for this matter," Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said in a statement. "My decision is not a finding that crimes have been committed or that any prosecution is warranted. I have made no such determination," Rosenstein continued. "What I have determined is that based upon the unique circumstances, the public interest requires me to place this investigation under the authority of a person who exercises a degree of independence from the normal chain of command." OOOPS! No wonder you kids keep changing aliases. LOL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,790 Posted February 17, 2018 https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+times+has+trump+used+the+word+collusion&rlz=1C1NHXL_enUS700US700&oq=how+many+times+has+trump+used+the+word+collusion&aqs=chrome..69i57.13531j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Trump uses the word collusion 23 times in 30 minutes. Trump uses the word collusion 7 times in one answer. Trump deniies collusion 16 times in one interview etc lol. well SOMEbody is stuck on collusion... lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted February 17, 2018 The Justice Department is appointing former FBI Director Robert Mueller as a special counsel to oversee the growing probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and possible ties to associates of President Trump. "In my capacity as acting Attorney General, I determined that it is in the public interest for me to exercise my authority and appoint a Special Counsel to assume responsibility for this matter," Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said in a statement. "My decision is not a finding that crimes have been committed or that any prosecution is warranted. I have made no such determination," Rosenstein continued. "What I have determined is that based upon the unique circumstances, the public interest requires me to place this investigation under the authority of a person who exercises a degree of independence from the normal chain of command." OOOPS! No wonder you kids keep changing aliases. LOL nobody believes mueller was appointed to investigate russian meddling. fbi serves that purpose. mueller was appointed to investigate russian collusion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,515 Posted February 17, 2018 If illegal aliens and Muslims in other countries, according to the left, have constitutional rights, how come the Russians don't? What about their first amendment rights? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 17, 2018 nobody believes mueller was appointed to investigate russian meddling. fbi serves that purpose. mueller was appointed to investigate russian collusion. Shut up troll Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,790 Posted February 17, 2018 nobody believes mueller was appointed to investigate russian meddling. fbi serves that purpose. mueller was appointed to investigate russian collusion. Oh well, as long as you bolded it. Mueller was appointed because your idiot president fired the head of the FBI you dumb fuk. LOL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,703 Posted February 17, 2018 Friday’s grand jury indictment in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election destroys Democratic claims that the Trump presidential campaign colluded with Russia to win the race, and that the Russian interference cost Hillary Clinton the election. It is now time for Mueller to look into real election interference and collusion with the Russians by the Democrats. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted February 17, 2018 I'm not sure how many times I've been on this board saying the collusion isn't a crime in and of itself. I've even explained it using a birthday party as I recall. But you can tell the Trump's lawyers from day one have just hammered that into his head. He just literally and randomly screams out no collusion! No collusion! Polly wants a cracker! Today's indictments had nothing to do with collusion or not. So Trump running around like he's been Vindicated just shows that he didn't read the ###### document and he has no idea the issues. Like I said, the most damning thing is that not only did he not implement the sanctions originally. The fact that he's still not doing it in light of these indictments is incredibly damning. Even Trump's dimmest followers can get The Narrative of hey the Russians tried to mess with our democracy, why aren't we punishing them? No COLLUSION!!! Squaaaak,! I dont know where youre getting the idea that colluding with a hostile foreign power to disrupt the US presidential election wouldnt be a crime. Itd likely be treason and certainly something short of that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 17, 2018 Fridays grand jury indictment in Special Counsel Robert Muellers investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election destroys Democratic claims that the Trump presidential campaign colluded with Russia to win the race, and that the Russian interference cost Hillary Clinton the election. It is now time for Mueller to look into real election interference and collusion with the Russians by the Democrats.Where did you copy this lie from?These indictments destroy what? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 17, 2018 Lol In related news, the gop-controlled Congress has announced that they're going to yet again open up investigations into Hillary Clinton. This coming after 5 years of multiple investigations that led nowhere. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/24/hillary-clinton-email-investigation-congress-trump#ampshare=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/24/hillary-clinton-email-investigation-congress-trump Lol Any of those investigations carried out under a Republican Department of Justice? Sh!t is about to actually be investigated Without the protection of a Holder or Lynch DOJ. For someone that claims not to like Hillary or has railed against her you sure as h*** seem bent on defending her at every turn. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 825 Posted February 17, 2018 How many more years you giving Mueller to prove collusion? Dont we usually let something get to 1 before asking how many MORE its going to take? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 17, 2018 Looks like a big nothing burger as far as collusion goes. Where does Mueller go from here? These indictments are nothing more than a stage prop a.k.a. justification for having started the probe to begin with. They could also be viewed as further justification to keep the probe going in spite of knowing this was all just a big set up by the Clinton campaign along with senior members of the FBI and DOJ. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 17, 2018 Dont we usually let something get to 1 before asking how many MORE its going to take? We're closing in on 2 years FFS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 825 Posted February 17, 2018 We're closing in on 2 years FFS Ummm... In May 2017, Mueller was appointed by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein as special counsel overseeing an ongoing investigation into alleged foreign electoral intervention by Russia in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[3] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,934 Posted February 17, 2018 Any of those investigations carried out under a Republican Department of Justice? Sh!t is about to actually be investigated Without the protection of a Holder or Lynch DOJ. For someone that claims not to like Hillary or has railed against her you sure as h*** seem bent on defending her at every turn. We already know she committed crimes the fbi, doj and hitlery have already admitted it. But they let her off the hook because she didn't mean to do it, and what difference at this point does it make? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 17, 2018 Ummm... In May 2017, Mueller was appointed by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein as special counsel overseeing an ongoing investigation into alleged foreign electoral intervention by Russia in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[3] The investigation started in July 2016 according to Comey. You agreeing that was just an excuse to spy on Trump campaign then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,934 Posted February 17, 2018 How many millions did Muller spend to find 13 Twitter trolls? I would still like to know this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 825 Posted February 17, 2018 The investigation started in July 2016 according to Comey. You agreeing that was just an excuse to spy on Trump campaign then? Whichever one of you I quoted asked how many more years we should give Mueller to prove collusion. We havent give Mueller 1 yet. The fact that you cant respond to even those particular facts without trying to twist them into something you can claim Im wrong about is symbolic of why discussing anything serious on this message board is pointless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 17, 2018 I dont know where youre getting the idea that colluding with a hostile foreign power to disrupt the US presidential election wouldnt be a crime. Itd likely be treason and certainly something short of that.obama better hope not Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 17, 2018 Whichever one of you I quoted asked how many more years we should give Mueller to prove collusion. We havent give Mueller 1 yet. The fact that you cant respond to even those particular facts without trying to twist them into something you can claim Im wrong about is symbolic of why discussing anything serious on this message board is pointless. The investigation into Trump's connections to Russians started when? July 2016. Mueller has used all that surveillance in addition to his own investigating and we're back to the beginning; Russian trolls organized some sparsely attended Pro-Trump and Anti-Trump things that had ZERO bearing on the election. So the investigation has been going on for nearly two years with nothing to show for it other than some garbage trying to justify their illegal spying. Mueller WAS the end game (insurance policy) for the conspiracy that involved HRC/DNC/Obama/FBI/DOJ/Fusion GPS. The ONLY card he has left to play is trying to interview Trump to get him to try and catch him with any consistencies with the illegal spying or illegal seizing of the Transition emails. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 17, 2018 obama better hope notSwing and a miss Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 441 Posted February 17, 2018 How do Trump supporters see things ending as a practical matter? Let's say the claims in or about the memo, the administration, DOJ, and FBI officials and agents, etc., are true. What is the practical mechanism for how this concludes? Do you mind just sort of explaining which of these will be true? - FISA court reverses its own order. - Mueller cases are thrown out in his court. - Trump fires Mueller and he isn't replaced. - A second special prosecutor is appointed and prosecutes officials or Hillary campaign officials. - Something else (explain). Two years from now what do you will see as having happened which will vindicate Trump? I'll hang up and listen. Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 825 Posted February 17, 2018 The investigation into Trump's connections to Russians started when? July 2016. Mueller has used all that surveillance in addition to his own investigating and we're back to the beginning; Russian trolls organized some sparsely attended Pro-Trump and Anti-Trump things that had ZERO bearing on the election. So the investigation has been going on for nearly two years with nothing to show for it other than some garbage trying to justify their illegal spying. Mueller WAS the end game (insurance policy) for the conspiracy that involved HRC/DNC/Obama/FBI/DOJ/Fusion GPS. The ONLY card he has left to play is trying to interview Trump to get him to try and catch him with any consistencies with the illegal spying or illegal seizing of the Transition emails. And Columbine happened 19 years ago. Investigations into stopping these tragedies probably started before then, but the point is Trump is using 2 decades worth of investigation as well as his own work. Yet he has done nothing to help with his 20 years of investigating? How many more decades you going to give him to do something about this? Same logic. You can either answer the question, admit your a hypocrite, admit youre off on this one, or try and make an argument that they are very different. Im hoping you choose the latter, as knowing you live in an alternate reality makes it easier to stop discussing things with you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 17, 2018 And Columbine happened 19 years ago. Investigations into stopping these tragedies probably started before then, but the point is Trump is using 2 decades worth of investigation as well as his own work. Yet he has done nothing to help with his 20 years of investigating? How many more decades you going to give him to do something about this?Same logic. You can either answer the question, admit your a hypocrite, admit youre off on this one, or try and make an argument that they are very different. Im hoping you choose the latter, as knowing you live in an alternate reality makes it easier to stop discussing things with you. Don't even know where the fock you're going with that. Answer what question? Where do you think the Mueller investigation goes from here? What evidence exists that Trump worked with the Russians? If Mueller can't produce evidence that Trump or someone with his campaign worked with the Russians then WTF is he investigating? Or does it just keep going on til he interviews Trump and Trump says something that doesn't line up with all the illegal surveillance has produced? Admit it; that is what you and the left want; Trump out of office regardless of whether or not it had to do with Russia. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 17, 2018 How do Trump supporters see things ending as a practical matter? Let's say the claims in or about the memo, the administration, DOJ, and FBI officials and agents, etc., are true. What is the practical mechanism for how this concludes? Do you mind just sort of explaining which of these will be true? - FISA court reverses its own order. - Mueller cases are thrown out in his court. - Trump fires Mueller and he isn't replaced. - A second special prosecutor is appointed and prosecutes officials or Hillary campaign officials. - Something else (explain). Two years from now what do you will see as having happened which will vindicate Trump? I'll hang up and listen. Thanks. How should this end? The Mueller investigation is shut down with these 'Russians' charged to justify the expenditure of time, money and resources. Then Sessions names a TOTALLY removed official such as IG Horowitz as Special Counsel (in the interest of saving time) to investigate the FBI/DOJ in not only the FISA abuses but the Clinton Email investigation and the FBI's inaction regarding the Uranium One informant. There's plenty of evidence for a criminal referral for all the conspirators involved in Operation Trump. Obama, Lynch, Rice, Powers, Baker, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Rybicki, Page, Carlin, Ohrs, Fusion GPS, Crowdstrike, et al..... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted February 17, 2018 Swing and a missSho is curled up like an embryo pounding handfuls of Xanax 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 17, 2018 Sho is curled up like an embryo pounding handfuls of Xanax Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 825 Posted February 17, 2018 Admit it; that is what you and the left want; Trump out of office regardless of whether or not it had to do with Russia. Ive said many times on this message board.....Even if I despise someone, I dont want anyone to be found guilty or punished for something they are innocent of. Frankly, that scares the hell out of me, as that precedent is the point in which I potentially lose control of my own fate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 17, 2018 How do Trump supporters see things ending as a practical matter? Let's say the claims in or about the memo, the administration, DOJ, and FBI officials and agents, etc., are true. What is the practical mechanism for how this concludes? Do you mind just sort of explaining which of these will be true? - FISA court reverses its own order. - Mueller cases are thrown out in his court. - Trump fires Mueller and he isn't replaced. - A second special prosecutor is appointed and prosecutes officials or Hillary campaign officials. - Something else (explain). Two years from now what do you will see as having happened which will vindicate Trump? I'll hang up and listen. Thanks. he's been vindicated, actually he didnt need to be. I see the mueller special council finishing with nothing but egg on their face and peripheral garbage like they've gotten so far. I see the left and the in on the game corrupt MSM making his weak ass findings (like yesterdays) something. Anyone with an ounce of integrity and common sense will admit its the complete opposite. I see a second special counsel to go after all the real perpetrators of collusion and treason and hopefully they all end up behind bars where they belong. Then we'll have real permanent swamp drainage 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 17, 2018 he's been vindicated, actually he didnt need to be. I see the mueller special council finishing with nothing but egg on their face and peripheral garbage like they've gotten so far. I see the left and the in on the game corrupt MSM making his weak ass findings (like yesterdays) something. Anyone with an ounce of integrity and common sense will admit its the complete opposite. I see a second special counsel to go after all the real perpetrators of collusion and treason and hopefully they all end up behind bars where they belong. Then we'll have real permanent swamp drainage Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,934 Posted February 17, 2018 Congrats on finding those 13 twitter trolls. You must be so proud of the FBI and DOJ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 17, 2018 what's your endgame ? You too saints, endgame? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
