James Comey Fired.

[Strike 5,992]

Being a stay at home Mom for kids who are in school all day is not a job. I think the reason you are so angry is that your wife wears the pants in your family and you can't do anything about it.

 

it's not that she wears the pants, it's the size of the strap-on she wears INSIDE them.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Who posted in: James Comey Fired.

 

Member name Posts Sho Nuff 86

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for the update whining about post counts...have anything to add to the conversation?

No? Got it...

[Sho Nuff 720]

I said talk to me when people start getting indicted. Until then I'll let you do all the hyperventilating over it.

Not hyperventilating at all.

People often mistake posting a lot about a topic for being unhinged or mad or whatever.

Im simply reporting what I read and replying to posts. Always quite calm about it too...because its a message board...its meant for such discussion.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Being a stay at home Mom for kids who are in school all day is not a job. I think the reason you are so angry is that your wife wears the pants in your family and you can't do anything about it.

 

Being a stay at home dad is part of what I do.

Im not angry at all.

and I can do quite a bit about a lot of things here...

But thanks for once again proving your ignorance.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

Thanks. So that should be the end of this.

Why cut off the rest of what he said?

Why deny the timing of this looks bad?

 

Sad sad sad...oh, thats right, you don't even support Trump either right?

[Mr. Hand 482]

Always quite calm about it too

[mobb_deep 920]

Now Drumpf is threatening Comey, LOL. You can't make this sh!t up. Wow.

 

The President says the former FBI head had 'better hope that there are no "tapes" of our conversations'

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,433]

 

Thanks. So that should be the end of this.

... and now you know why people don't respond to you.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Now Drumpf is threatening Comey, LOL. You can't make this sh!t up. Wow.

 

The President says the former FBI head had 'better hope that there are no "tapes" of our conversations'

 

Id guess Comey would hope there were tapes.

And now that the president has inferred there are tapes of that conversation...there may be demands for such tapes and any that have been made of other conversations.

What do you think other world leaders think of a tweet like that? "was he taping us?" "will he tape me?"

 

Innocent guys always threaten people too...

[12th Man 884]

ShoFlake is unhinged. Wow!

[12th Man 884]

 

Being a stay at home dad is part of what I do.

Im not angry at all.

and I can do quite a bit about a lot of things here...

But thanks for once again proving your ignorance.

Keep repeating that. One day you will believe it.

[drobeski 3,061]

 

So...there is sufficient evidence on Flynn to request his financial documents?

Are you trying to take the side that Flynn did nothing wrong?

 

The level of denial by Trump fans is something quite interesting.

Flynn should bleach bit them and smash them with a hammer to appease the left idiots.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Flynn should bleach bit them and smash them with a hammer to appease the left idiots.

 

Hillary!!!

 

BTW...you all need a new talking point (so does Trump) now that Clapper has refuted the crap that he said there was no collusion.

 

https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/863064116625375235

[MDC 7,842]

 

Thanks for the update whining about post counts...have anything to add to the conversation?

No? Got it...

Who's whining? I'm laughing.

 

Get help Mr Mom.

[wiffleball 4,797]

I only saw the headline. WTF did Trump think would come of threatening Comey?

And, wow. They talked about Nixon's legendary (near mental) paranoia, he's got nothing on Trump.

 

What was the 'or else' part of his threat?

 

"Don't you dare reveal the truth or, um, ..."

 

Maybe you shouldn't have made him a private citizen Donny.

Maybe if you thought before you acted...

 

Not to mention, all that does is add more fuel to the case for Obstruction. Really dumb move.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Threatens Comey.

States also that he is so active that his surrogates can't get information correct when in press briefings...and that he may just want to do away with them for written reports (their written account of things was also inaccurate).

 

So...no press briefings...just and edict from the king right?

 

Also takes credit for China allowing US Beef...they just agreed.

 

Oh wait...this is from September? Thanks Obama.

https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2016/09/22/china-moves-reopen-market-us-beef

[NewbieJr 541]

I only saw the headline. WTF did Trump think would come of threatening Comey?

And, wow. They talked about Nixon's legendary (near mental) paranoia, he's got nothing on Trump.

 

What was the 'or else' part of his threat?

 

"Don't you dare reveal the truth or, um, ..."

 

Maybe you shouldn't have made him a private citizen Donny.

Maybe if you thought before you acted...

 

Not to mention, all that does is add more fuel to the case for Obstruction. Really dumb move.

Maybe the dumb fock thinks he can fire him again.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

 

Thanks for the update whining about post counts...have anything to add to the conversation?

No? Got it...

 

 

Not hyperventilating at all.

People often mistake posting a lot about a topic for being unhinged or mad or whatever.

Im simply reporting what I read and replying to posts. Always quite calm about it too...because its a message board...its meant for such discussion.

 

 

 

Being a stay at home dad is part of what I do.

Im not angry at all.

and I can do quite a bit about a lot of things here...

But thanks for once again proving your ignorance.

 

 

Why cut off the rest of what he said?

Why deny the timing of this looks bad?

 

Sad sad sad...oh, thats right, you don't even support Trump either right?

 

 

 

Id guess Comey would hope there were tapes.

And now that the president has inferred there are tapes of that conversation...there may be demands for such tapes and any that have been made of other conversations.

What do you think other world leaders think of a tweet like that? "was he taping us?" "will he tape me?"

 

Innocent guys always threaten people too...

 

 

 

Hillary!!!

 

BTW...you all need a new talking point (so does Trump) now that Clapper has refuted the crap that he said there was no collusion.

 

https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/863064116625375235

 

 

Threatens Comey.

States also that he is so active that his surrogates can't get information correct when in press briefings...and that he may just want to do away with them for written reports (their written account of things was also inaccurate).

 

So...no press briefings...just and edict from the king right?

 

Also takes credit for China allowing US Beef...they just agreed.

 

Oh wait...this is from September? Thanks Obama.

https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2016/09/22/china-moves-reopen-market-us-beef

 

 

Seven individual posts in one page alone. Yeah...............Full Metal Focking Retard.

 

http://imgur.com/gallery/c22GCFY

[wiffleball 4,797]

I would think the one thing that we can all agree upon is that we've all had experience with at least one

"out there" / crazy person in our life. Either that weird kid at school, a relative no one talks about, whatever.

 

The one thing they all have in common is that they all just get worse (and 'double down') as the pressure increases.

The last thing you want to do is confront them with any kind of reality check.

 

It seems like we're seeing that with Trump. Just a near-weekly unravelling.

Even his biggest, blindest fans here have to be seeing that.

Honestly, I think the next logical shoe to drop will be the staff starts peeling off.

It's not like the job's going to get any easier. And, the press is notorious for smelling blood.

- Especially when you've treated them like crap and called them "the enemy", don't be looking for any leniency.

 

Scarily, the BEST thing that could happen to him is the worst thing that could happen to us;

A major (real this time - not Bowling Green) terrorist attack or flat-out war.

Historically, it's been great for Presidential ratings in the short term.

 

And even more scary is the fact that this loon is just crazy enough to start a war for ratings purposes.

[NewbieJr 541]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seven individual posts in one page alone. Yeah...............Full Metal Focking Retard.

 

http://imgur.com/gallery/c22GCFY

You're equally sad for going through the effort of making that post.

[drobeski 3,061]

 

Hillary!!!

 

BTW...you all need a new talking point (so does Trump) now that Clapper has refuted the crap that he said there was no collusion.

 

https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/863064116625375235

what ? It's a great strategy, no ? You and the wiffs of the world certainly didn't get your twats tied in a knot when Hillary was using those methods of obstruction and destruction. I think if team Trump used the same methods we might see a reduction in the vaginal swelling of you and the wiffles of the world ? Or could it be that you life failing jobless losers are just big time hypocritical hacks ?

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seven individual posts in one page alone. Yeah...............Full Metal Focking Retard.

 

http://imgur.com/gallery/c22GCFY

 

As usual...can't reply to content...must count and then attack.

You are a focking idiot.

[Sho Nuff 720]

what ? It's a great strategy, no ? You and the wiffs of the world certainly didn't get your twats tied in a knot when Hillary was using those methods of obstruction and destruction. I think if team Trump used the same methods we might see a reduction in the vaginal swelling of you and the wiffles of the world ? Or could it be that you life failing jobless losers are just big time hypocritical hacks ?

 

Hillary isn't relevant.

And plenty said she focked up...she did. Nobody defended her doing those things non-stop like you all do with everything Trump.

And no...deflections has always been your only weak ass strategy, nothing great about it.

 

Jobless and losers huh? Once again...when you are wrong...you go all out wrong.

And hypocrisy...Id say you are neck deep in it...but, well, you know.

[cbfalcon 827]

So I tried to get one lib to answer this. He declined, which is pretty typical of the libs around here when asked REAL questions. Maybe another can. Is Trump not allowed to fire someone he deems incompetent as long as they have an investigation open on him? So if Comey kept the investigation open for 8 years Trump couldn't fire him? Anyone care to tackle this simple question?

 

Most would argue that Trump can fire someone that has an investigation open on him.

Most would also argue that said investigation cannot play any part in Trump's reasoning for firing that person, or it's Obstruction of Justice.

 

Considering that Trump himself cited the investigation in his logic for firing Comey, considering Sarah Huck Sanders said ending the Russian investigation was part of the reasoning for firing Comey, and considering Trump mentioned the investigation in his letter to Comey, it just feels like the investigation played a part in the thought process to fire Comey. But that's just my gut feeling on it.

[Strike 5,992]

 

Most would argue that Trump can fire someone that has an investigation open on him.

Most would also argue that said investigation cannot play any part in Trump's reasoning for firing that person, or it's Obstruction of Justice.

 

Considering that Trump himself cited the investigation in his logic for firing Comey, considering Sarah Huck Sanders said ending the Russian investigation was part of the reasoning for firing Comey, and considering Trump mentioned the investigation in his letter to Comey, it just feels like the investigation played a part in the thought process to fire Comey. But that's just my gut feeling on it.

 

Did the investigation stop when Comey was fired?

[Baker Boy 1,710]

Most would argue that Trump can fire someone that has an investigation open on him.

Most would also argue that said investigation cannot play any part in Trump's reasoning for firing that person, or it's Obstruction of Justice.

 

Considering that Trump himself cited the investigation in his logic for firing Comey, considering Sarah Huck Sanders said ending the Russian investigation was part of the reasoning for firing Comey, and considering Trump mentioned the investigation in his letter to Comey, it just feels like the investigation played a part in the thought process to fire Comey. But that's just my gut feeling on it.

Trump is not being investigated, I thought that was clear?

[cbfalcon 827]

 

Did the investigation stop when Comey was fired?

 

If someone working on a project gets fired, was that project obstructed?

 

 

 

ob·struct

• prevent or hinder (movement or someone or something in motion).
  "they had to alter the course of the stream and obstruct the natural flow of the water"

• deliberately make (something) difficult.

  "fears that the regime would obstruct the distribution of food"

   

   

 

 

 

[NewbieJr 541]

Trump is not being investigated, I thought that was clear?

Is that what Trump said Comey told him? lol He was counting on getting a few morons to believe him. Way to step up for him.

[cbfalcon 827]

Trump is not being investigated, I thought that was clear?

[Baker Boy 1,710]

Wait until the new guy reopens the Hillary email scandal. Get your popcorn ready.

[Baker Boy 1,710]

Is that what Trump said Comey told him? lol He was counting on getting a few morons to believe him. Way to step up for him.

No, Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley and Dianne Feinstein.

[NewbieJr 541]

Wait until the new guy reopens the Hillary email scandal. Get your popcorn ready.

That sh1t gon get stuck in yo dentures Pop

[MDC 7,842]

You're equally sad for going through the effort of making that post.

To be fair his post made me laugh but Sloflake's just made me sad.

[cbfalcon 827]

No, Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley and Dianne Feinstein.

 

These 2?

 

 

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) says the FBI must confirm whether the agency is investigating President Trump.

“It should confirm to the public whether it is or is not investigating the president. Because it has failed to make this clear, speculation has run rampant,” the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman said, according to a prepared statement for his committee’s executive business meeting.

Trump claimed in his termination letter to FBI Director James Comey this week that Comey told him “on three separate occasions” he was not under investigation.

Grassley said while he and the committee’s ranking member, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), have not heard anything to contradict this statement, they would like the agency to confirm following Comey’s dismissal.

Grassley and Feinstein, both briefed by Comey, are aware which individuals are under investigation by the FBI, he said. Grassley, saying he could not disclose whom the targets are, encouraged Comey to be transparent and tell the public what he shared with them.

“I said he should tell the public what he told Senator Feinstein and me about whether the FBI is or is not investigating the president,” he added.

Grassley said Comey did not want to list names or tell them whether the president was under investigation because it would lead to a “slippery slope” in which other names could ultimately be revealed.

“I understand why he took that position, but I don’t agree — at least not when it comes to the president and senior government officials. The American people deserve to know if senior government officials are under active criminal or intelligence investigation,” he said.

The Iowa senator said rumors and conspiracy theories about the FBI being out to get Trump further damages Americans' trust in the nation’s democracy.

“The intelligence community said that one of the Russians’ goals is to undermine the American public’s faith in our democratic institutions. Wild speculation that the FBI is targeting the president in a criminal or intelligence inquiry is not just irresponsible and unfounded,” he said. “It provides aid and comfort to the Russians and their goal of undermining faith in our democracy.”

 

 

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

That sh1t gon get stuck in yo dentures Pop

 

You would know about sh!t getting stuck in yer yap............

[MTSkiBum 1,626]

Never heard of him.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,908]

 

You would know about sh!t getting stuck in yer yap............

Zing!!

[Sho Nuff 720]

Trump is not being investigated, I thought that was clear?

 

Link? (and not to Trump's claim that he isn't)

[Sho Nuff 720]

Wait until the new guy reopens the Hillary email scandal. Get your popcorn ready.

 

Chewie...put all power to the rear defletor shields.

[Baker Boy 1,710]

And the Left still has not been able to find one person in the government to state that Trump is under investigation. Slo Flake has over 90 posts and presented no evidence that Trump is under investigation.