Release the FISA memo

[Hardcore troubadour 16,007]

such a sheep

The democrats and shiff for brains will hook a few fish with their little game, shocking you're devouring the bait. No really, it's shocking.

Nothing from you on proven russia collusion wirh democrats. Another shock.

Hack much?

In a confidence game, or scam, Wiffleball would be referred to as "the mark ". A pigeon. A Sucker.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

So here's a shocker. Trump's playing politics with the memos. He had no problem releasing Nunez is bullshit, but suddenly won't release the much clearer one that clesrs up the bullshit.

So Schiff, the same guy who got trolled fabulously by radio hosts out of Russia with the promise at naked pics of Trump tries pulling a shell game and the only one he fools with it is you lemmings on the left.

 

Another Democratic boomerang.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/09/doj-official-rachel-brand-resigns/

 

 

Another body hits the floor. Some parts of the swamp drain faster than others.

[SaintsInDome2006 748]

Guys can I get your thoughts on some Strzok-Page texts?

[SaintsInDome2006 748]

"Ok I may vote for Trump."

[drobeski 3,061]

Guys can I get your thoughts on some Strzok-Page texts?

the ones where they discuss removing Obamas name from Hillarys free pass letter?

[SaintsInDome2006 748]

the ones where they discuss removing Obamas name from Hillarys free pass letter?

 

No, I thought maybe the one above where Strzok says he may vote for Trump.

 

Or maybe this one where Strzok calls the DOJ, who actually calls the shots on whether to charge someone, "Putzes."

[TimmySmith 2,783]

Read the texts. If anything they show the sadness of Lisa Page trying to navigate her way through a male dominated society while being played by Strzok. Secondly they reaffirm the reality that no one in DC these days cares about classified info. Which works great for Trump.

[SaintsInDome2006 748]

 

What are we up to? 6? 8? 10? Obama era DOJ/FBI/Intel leadership resigning, retiring, reassigning in disgrace.

 

Rachel Brand was nominated by President Donald Trump.

[SenatorRock 708]

 

Rachel Brand was nominated by President Donald Trump.

I was not referring to her in my post, she did not announce her resignation until 2/9.

 

But let's take a look at Ms Brand.

 

 

She was sworn in as the United States Associate Attorney General on May 22, 2017, after being nominated to the position by President Donald Trump and confirmed by the United States Senate.

She served as Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Policy in the George W. Bush administration and was appointed by President Barack Obama to serve on the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board.

 

 

It appears she is more of an establishment pick than a Trump pick.

 

As we have learned over the last 15 months, keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

 

And lol at her appointment by Obama. "Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board", such irony.

 

My take: she is knee deep in the FISA abuse. Heat from Honest Horowitz forced her to resign, or she has flipped and is a cooperating witness.

[SenatorRock 708]

https://thefederalist.com/2018/02/10/hillary-clintons-fingerprints-fbis-investigation-trumps-russia-ties/

 

A significant part of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s basis for investigating the Trump campaign’s Russia ties is looking more and more like a political hit job carried out by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign. Her campaign’s fingerprints are on at least three separate pieces of information fed to the FBI, including the Christopher Steele dossier Republicans say formed the basis of a secret warrant obtained to spy on Trump campaign associate Carter Page.

A former State Department official confirmed on the record Thursday that Clinton associates were funneling information to Steele as he was compiling a dossier commissioned and paid for by the Clinton campaign and DNC. That’s on top of the recent revelation that a top Department of Justice official fed the FBI information compiled by his wife, who was working for the firm Clinton and the DNC were paying to dig up dirt on Trump, Fusion GPS.

 

 

 

1. Clinton ally Sidney Blumenthal funneled information to the FBI through a contact at the State Department.

2. Steele was at that same time compiling a dossier paid for by the Clinton campaign and the DNC.

3. A top DOJ official fed the FBI research on Trump from his wife also paid for by the Clinton campaign and the DNC.

 

 

the best timeline

[12th Man 884]

Poor wiffle.

[SenatorRock 708]

where this is all headed:

 

https://pics.onsizzle.com/i-assume-youll-want-a-cell-facing-mecca-30818656.png

[wiffleball 4,797]

So Nunez memo omitted Salient facts and that's why. DOJ didn't want it released.

 

Follow up memo adds those facts and now Trump is saying he can't release it?

 

The funniest part is Trump took to Twitter of course to not about the memos content but that it was too long. No kidding. This a day after it was reported the Trump doesn't even read his daily briefing because it's just too many words for his attention span.

 

I swear you can't make this stuff up.

 

I mean for Pete's sake even Little Bush could manage to read his ptb everyday.

[wiffleball 4,797]

Trump doesn't want to do the hard stuff you know like reading and stuff. He just wants to have parades. It's like having a five-year-old for president.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,340]

So Nunez memo omitted Salient facts and that's why. DOJ didn't want it released.

 

Follow up memo adds those facts and now Trump is saying he can't release it?

 

The funniest part is Trump took to Twitter of course to ###### not about the memos content but that it was too long. No kidding. This a day after it was reported the Trump doesn't even read his daily briefing because it's just too many words for his attention span.

 

I swear you can't make this stuff up.

 

I mean for Pete's sake even Little Bush could manage to read his ptb everyday.

 

Huh? That's as far from the truth as you can get. It wasn't released because Schiff put sensitive national security details IN THE MEMO. Something the Nunez' memo was careful not to do.

 

And, if you actually read up on it, Schiff and the Democrats purposefully put those in there to put the WH in a bad light. It was a DESIGNED ploy by the left so if they didn't release it rubes like you would go "OMG! WHY WON'T HE RELEASE IT?!?!?!" (which you just did) and if they did release it rubes like you would go "OMG! WHY WOULD HE RELEASE SENSITIVE NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION?!?!?"

 

The Schiff memo itself, boiled down, is nothing but a bunch of lies to distract from the fact that the DNC and Clinton campaign were 1) colluding w/Russia themselves and 2) using the FBI as a weapon to go after political enemies. Yeah, I get it, the truth hurts you but you have to face it regardless.

 

Do you guys ever get tired of being marionettes of the DNC?

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,340]

Trump doesn't want to do the hard stuff you know like reading and stuff. He just wants to have parades. It's like having a five-year-old for president.

 

Says the guy who just made a post about the Schiff memo that was a complete fabrication and directly in line with the DNC Talking Points for Sheep and Marionettes^TM.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Guys can I get your thoughts on some Strzok-Page texts?

Yes as a whole they are really really damning. At best, the guy Strzok seemed to me to be somewhat manipulated by Lisa Page. At worst These to envision themselves as saviors of America when in reality they are destroying everything in America is about.

 

You can point to one text here or there that might look decent in your eyes however in total it really is just one part of a corrupt administration that sought to undermine an election (both Primary and General). They simply couldn't take a chance with Bernie or Trump.

[Reality 3,125]

So Nunez memo omitted Salient facts and that's why. DOJ didn't want it released.

 

Follow up memo adds those facts and now Trump is saying he can't release it?

 

The funniest part is Trump took to Twitter of course to ###### not about the memos content but that it was too long. No kidding. This a day after it was reported the Trump doesn't even read his daily briefing because it's just too many words for his attention span.

 

I swear you can't make this stuff up.

 

I mean for Pete's sake even Little Bush could manage to read his ptb everyday.

Honestly, it's really sad what you've become.

[SenatorRock 708]

word on the street is that Priestap is the one who flipped, sometime last year, and has been cooperating with OIG.

[SenatorRock 708]

Now we know why Comey decided to open an investigation into the illegal emails (and alleged videos of Schumer banging a teenage boy) on Weiner's laptop after sitting on them for a month, hoping the election would come and go without the public learning about them.

 

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/text-messages-congress-comey-600x492.jpg

 

 

Peter Strzok was the Chief of the Counterespionage Section during the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server. He also hated Donald Trump, as did his lover Lisa Page.

In this exchange posted online Peter Strzok admits the DOJ was forced to tell Congress about the Weiner laptop emails only because George Toscas at the DOJ found out about them.

The FBI sat on this evidence for a month before turning it over to Congress and only because they couldn’t hide it from George Toscas.

Strzok’s attitude towards Congress: “F them.”

 

 

Per The New York Times: “As the meeting broke up, George Z. Toscas, a national security prosecutor, ribbed Mr. Comey. “I guess you’re the Federal Bureau of Matters now,” Mr. Toscas said, according to two people who were there.”

 

[Hardcore troubadour 16,007]

Federal Bureau of Matters. Priceless. Well done Mr. Toscas. Well done. Nice job making the FBI into a punchline, Comey, Lynch, Hillary, Obama

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Another rumor was that the Loretta Lynch was promised Scalia's seat by Bill Clinton if she makes the email investigation go away.

 

Supposed to be one the tarmac meeting was about.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/11/sunday-talks-extensive-devin-nunes-interview-with-maria-bartiromo/#more-145735

 

So now it's being released the FBI/DOJ were STILL spying on Carter Page to see what he was telling Congress.

[SenatorRock 708]

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/11/sunday-talks-extensive-devin-nunes-interview-with-maria-bartiromo/#more-145735

 

So now it's being released the FBI/DOJ were STILL spying on Carter Page to see what he was telling Congress.

 

Chairman Devin Nunes keeps a big picture focus while also describing how corrupt officials within the DOJ and FBI continued to use the “Title-1” surveillance warrant in 2017 to monitor and track all of the communication between Carter Page and congress. In essence, the ‘small group’ within the DOJ and FBI were likely spying on the congressional investigation into their own unlawful activity. WATCH:

 

 

Insanity.

[lickin_starfish 2,027]

But have you heard how many scoops of ice cream Trump gets for dessert?

[drobeski 3,061]

But have you heard how many scoops of ice cream Trump gets for dessert?

Did you see his bald spot ?

[drobeski 3,061]

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/11/2017-state-department-spox-the-steele-dossier-was-never-used-for-fisa-application/#more-145746

 

 

2017: State Department Spox: The Steele Dossier Was Never Used for FISA Application

Posted by sundance

Its always an interesting exercise to take new and confirmed information and go back to see the claims from the key stakeholders when the initial trail of the information was discovered. This is one such example from July 2017.

 

 

 

Now that Chairman Devin Nunes, Chuck Grassley and the key players themselves, have discovered and admitted the U.S. State Department was heavily involved in passing along Clinton opposition research to Chris Steele to create the Clinton-Steele Dossier, its interesting to look at how the former State Department spokesperson -in place during all the events- responded last year when the Clinton-Steele Dossier was thought to be part of the underlying evidence for the DOJ/FBI FISA application.

 

Former State Department spokesperson Marie Harf, a person in direct and continuous contact with all the principle agents during the 2016 information flow, was confronted in July 2017 and adamantly denied the dossier was part of the FISA application. WATCH:

 

 

Looking beyond the transparent lying and subsequent collapse of credibility, the key takeaway here is how State Department officials knew what was going on in 2016, recognized the risk presented by that action in 2017, and were willing to walk the plank because they were certain none of it would ever come to light.

 

 

Jonathan Winer [] In 2013, I returned to the State Department at the request of Secretary of State John F. Kerry, whom I had previously served as Senate counsel. Over the years, Steele and I had discussed many matters relating to Russia. He asked me whether the State Department would like copies of new information as he developed it.

 

I contacted Victoria Nuland, a career diplomat who was then assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, and shared with her several of Steeles reports. She told me they were useful and asked me to continue to send them. Over the next two years, I shared more than 100 of Steeles reports with the Russia experts at the State Department, who continued to find them useful. None of the reports related to U.S. politics or domestic U.S. matters, and the reports constituted a very small portion of the data set reviewed by State Department experts trying to make sense of events in Russia. (read more)

 

(Grassley Memo page #6)

 

Mr Winer WaPo: [] In September 2016, Steele and I met in Washington and discussed the information now known as the dossier. Steeles sources suggested that the Kremlin not only had been behind the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign but also had compromised Trump and developed ties with his associates and campaign.

 

I was allowed to review, but not to keep, a copy of these reports to enable me to alert the State Department. I prepared a two-page summary and shared it with Nuland, who indicated that, like me, she felt that the secretary of state needed to be made aware of this material.

 

[] In late September, I spoke with an old friend, Sidney Blumenthal While talking about that hacking, Blumenthal and I discussed Steeles reports. He showed me notes gathered by a journalist I did not know, Cody Shearer, that alleged the Russians had compromising information on Trump of a sexual and financial nature. On my own, I shared a copy of these notes with Steele, to ask for his professional reaction. I agreed to let him keep a copy of the Shearer notes. I did not expect them to be shared with anyone in the U.S. government. But I learned later that Steele did share them with the FBI (link)

 

The bigger story behind the 2017 interview with Marie Harf, when contrast against 2018 reality, is recognition of how vast the network of people were within the entire effort to launder political campaign opposition research -provided by Hillary Clinton- to create surveillance upon the Trump campaign.

 

Officials at the top of the FBI and Department of Justice; officials in the intelligence apparatus of the ODNI, CIA and NSA; and officials at the top of the U.S. Department of State to include Secretary John Kerry; were all working in common political cause.

 

Beyond the political talking points, when you simply point out the provable facts the Director of the FBI, Attorney General of the United States and the Secretary of State, were all deeply within the information loop theres no way possible to extract President Obama from the network. This is how the collapsing house of cards eventually brings down the office of the presidency.

 

What would be the fall-back, or alternative, narrative?

 

The talking points are still a few weeks away, but theres only one possible angle: The President was unaware of the action of his Attorney General, FBI Director, Director of National Intelligence, CIA Director and Secretary of State?

[Cdub100 3,996]

So Nunez memo omitted Salient facts and that's why. DOJ didn't want it released.

 

Follow up memo adds those facts and now Trump is saying he can't release it?

 

The funniest part is Trump took to Twitter of course to ###### not about the memos content but that it was too long. No kidding. This a day after it was reported the Trump doesn't even read his daily briefing because it's just too many words for his attention span.

 

I swear you can't make this stuff up.

 

I mean for Pete's sake even Little Bush could manage to read his ptb everyday.

 

Don't be a liar like slownut

[SenatorRock 708]

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/11/2017-state-department-spox-the-steele-dossier-was-never-used-for-fisa-application/#more-145746

 

 

2017: State Department Spox: The Steele Dossier Was Never Used for FISA Application

Posted by sundance

Its always an interesting exercise to take new and confirmed information and go back to see the claims from the key stakeholders when the initial trail of the information was discovered. This is one such example from July 2017.

 

 

 

Now that Chairman Devin Nunes, Chuck Grassley and the key players themselves, have discovered and admitted the U.S. State Department was heavily involved in passing along Clinton opposition research to Chris Steele to create the Clinton-Steele Dossier, its interesting to look at how the former State Department spokesperson -in place during all the events- responded last year when the Clinton-Steele Dossier was thought to be part of the underlying evidence for the DOJ/FBI FISA application.

 

Former State Department spokesperson Marie Harf, a person in direct and continuous contact with all the principle agents during the 2016 information flow, was confronted in July 2017 and adamantly denied the dossier was part of the FISA application. WATCH:

 

 

Looking beyond the transparent lying and subsequent collapse of credibility, the key takeaway here is how State Department officials knew what was going on in 2016, recognized the risk presented by that action in 2017, and were willing to walk the plank because they were certain none of it would ever come to light.

 

 

Jonathan Winer [] In 2013, I returned to the State Department at the request of Secretary of State John F. Kerry, whom I had previously served as Senate counsel. Over the years, Steele and I had discussed many matters relating to Russia. He asked me whether the State Department would like copies of new information as he developed it.

 

I contacted Victoria Nuland, a career diplomat who was then assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, and shared with her several of Steeles reports. She told me they were useful and asked me to continue to send them. Over the next two years, I shared more than 100 of Steeles reports with the Russia experts at the State Department, who continued to find them useful. None of the reports related to U.S. politics or domestic U.S. matters, and the reports constituted a very small portion of the data set reviewed by State Department experts trying to make sense of events in Russia. (read more)

 

(Grassley Memo page #6)

 

Mr Winer WaPo: [] In September 2016, Steele and I met in Washington and discussed the information now known as the dossier. Steeles sources suggested that the Kremlin not only had been behind the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign but also had compromised Trump and developed ties with his associates and campaign.

 

I was allowed to review, but not to keep, a copy of these reports to enable me to alert the State Department. I prepared a two-page summary and shared it with Nuland, who indicated that, like me, she felt that the secretary of state needed to be made aware of this material.

 

[] In late September, I spoke with an old friend, Sidney Blumenthal While talking about that hacking, Blumenthal and I discussed Steeles reports. He showed me notes gathered by a journalist I did not know, Cody Shearer, that alleged the Russians had compromising information on Trump of a sexual and financial nature. On my own, I shared a copy of these notes with Steele, to ask for his professional reaction. I agreed to let him keep a copy of the Shearer notes. I did not expect them to be shared with anyone in the U.S. government. But I learned later that Steele did share them with the FBI (link)

 

The bigger story behind the 2017 interview with Marie Harf, when contrast against 2018 reality, is recognition of how vast the network of people were within the entire effort to launder political campaign opposition research -provided by Hillary Clinton- to create surveillance upon the Trump campaign.

 

Officials at the top of the FBI and Department of Justice; officials in the intelligence apparatus of the ODNI, CIA and NSA; and officials at the top of the U.S. Department of State to include Secretary John Kerry; were all working in common political cause.

 

Beyond the political talking points, when you simply point out the provable facts the Director of the FBI, Attorney General of the United States and the Secretary of State, were all deeply within the information loop theres no way possible to extract President Obama from the network. This is how the collapsing house of cards eventually brings down the office of the presidency.

 

What would be the fall-back, or alternative, narrative?

 

The talking points are still a few weeks away, but theres only one possible angle: The President was unaware of the action of his Attorney General, FBI Director, Director of National Intelligence, CIA Director and Secretary of State?

 

 

sundance should be in the running with Sara Carter for a Pulitzer.

 

It is amazing to see all of these pieces fall into place.

 

Horowitz has 450 people working for him.

 

The Mueller investigation is just a dog and pony show for the useful idiots.

 

Biggest scandal in US history.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

 

 

sundance should be in the running with Sara Carter for a Pulitzer.

 

Horowitz has 450 people working for him.

 

Biggest scandal in US history.

They won't win anything for their work. Way too many globalists with Obama creme in their cracks that have a say in the Pulitzers to legitimize the work they've done. They, along with all the Trump supporters should just receive thanks from a grateful nation.

 

Horowitz is another Patriot. Obama appointed yet objective so how will the left spin his findings? Ignore them? Grand jury empanelment shortly after his report comes out then indictments/criminal referrals.

 

Yes, biggest scandal in U.S. history but left leaners think Trump tweeting is what is making the U.S. look bad. We're a focking joke if we don't deal with these conspirators most severely.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/02/12/michael-goodwin-did-hillary-clinton-pull-off-dirtiest-dirty-trick-in-us-presidential-history.html

 

There are many more layers of the onion to peel, but heres where we are now: It increasingly appears that the Clinton machine was the secret, original source of virtually all the allegations about Trump and Russia that led to the FBI investigation.

 

In addition, the campaign and its associates, including Steele, were behind the explosion of anonymously sourced media reports during the fall of 2016 about that investigation.

 

Thus, the Democratic nominee paid for and created allegations against her Republican opponent, gave them to law enforcement, then tipped friendly media to the investigation. And it is almost certain FBI agents supporting Clinton were among the anonymous sources.

 

In fact, the Clinton connections are so fundamental that there probably would not have been an FBI investigation without her involvement.

Hillary's greatest dirtiest trick. She's behind most if not all of the crap in the Dossier and fed it to Christopher Steele whom they used his name and reputation to give it legitimacy.

[Mr. Hand 482]

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/02/12/michael-goodwin-did-hillary-clinton-pull-off-dirtiest-dirty-trick-in-us-presidential-history.html

 

 

Hillary's greatest dirtiest trick. She's behind most if not all of the crap in the Dossier and fed it to Christopher Steele whom they used his name and reputation to give it legitimacy.

It's amazing that sho and other liberals deny any of this taking place and how corrupt Hillary, the Dems and Obama are. They were out to get Trump anyway they could.

[SaintsInDome2006 748]

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/02/12/michael-goodwin-did-hillary-clinton-pull-off-dirtiest-dirty-trick-in-us-presidential-history.html

 

 

Hillary's greatest dirtiest trick. She's behind most if not all of the crap in the Dossier and fed it to Christopher Steele whom they used his name and reputation to give it legitimacy.

I have a question - if Hillary was behind Steele's report, why did the Shearer report, which she did commission, have to go through Blumenthal to Winer to Steele to the FBI, and not directly from Hillary to Steele or directly from Hillary to Fusion? If Steele was working for Hillary he would have just gotten the Shearer memo directly from her.

 

And why would Hillary even bother to commission a second report?

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

I have a question - if Hillary was behind Steele's report, why did the Shearer report, which she did commission, have to go through Blumenthal to Winer to Steele to the FBI, and not directly from Hillary to Steele or directly from Hillary to Fusion? If Steele was working for Hillary he would have just gotten the Shearer memo directly from her.

There was a need for insulation and multisourcing. Thus why she funneled money through Perkins Coie to pay Fusion GPS. Any direct ties to Hillary would have been sniffed out.

 

They used Nellie Ohr (Fusion GPS employee) to feed her husband Michael Ohr #4 at DOJ to further bolster this garbage.

[Mr. Hand 482]

I have a question - if Hillary was behind Steele's report, why did the Shearer report, which she did commission, have to go through Blumenthal to Winer to Steele to the FBI, and not directly from Hillary to Steele or directly from Hillary to Fusion? If Steele was working for Hillary he would have just gotten the Shearer memo directly from her.

 

And why would Hillary even bother to commission a second report?

Oh Saints....how far you keep reaching!

[TimmySmith 2,783]

I have a question - if Hillary was behind Steele's report, why did the Shearer report, which she did commission, have to go through Blumenthal to Winer to Steele to the FBI, and not directly from Hillary to Steele or directly from Hillary to Fusion? If Steele was working for Hillary he would have just gotten the Shearer memo directly from her.

Are you claiming he didn't? Seems clearer every day he got it from her camp. Her camp being the DNC, Fusion, and the FBI/DOJ. I assume you aren't meaning from her actual hand because that might comprise the stupidest thing ever posted here.

[lickin_starfish 2,027]

Are you claiming he didn't? Seems clearer every day he got it from her camp. Her camp being the DNC, Fusion, and the FBI/DOJ. I assume you aren't meaning from her actual hand because that might comprise the stupidest thing ever posted here.

Well, he probably thinks she wiped her server with a cloth, so...

[Strike 6,030]

I have a question - if Hillary was behind Steele's report, why did the Shearer report, which she did commission, have to go through Blumenthal to Winer to Steele to the FBI, and not directly from Hillary to Steele or directly from Hillary to Fusion? If Steele was working for Hillary he would have just gotten the Shearer memo directly from her.

 

And why would Hillary even bother to commission a second report?

 

You sound like a defense attorney. It's really not up to anyone to explain why Hitlery did things a certain way. Defense attorneys love to deflect from the facts in this manner.

[SaintsInDome2006 748]

Are you claiming he didn't? Seems clearer every day he got it from her camp. Her camp being the DNC, Fusion, and the FBI/DOJ. I assume you aren't meaning from her actual hand because that might comprise the stupidest thing ever posted here.

 

Read Grassley's letter, it says he got it from Wimer.