drobeski 3,061 Posted January 30, 2018 Anyone with a focking clue?well that rules you out, maybe you can have someone who has a clue list the reasons why Steele is more credible than nunes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted January 30, 2018 a. the FBI people you are discussing (McCabe, Comey...and so on) are Republicans. b. you mean a panel, led by republicans, information only viewed by Gowdy and his staffers (republicans) and a memo written by Nunes (a very shady republican) is going to not be bad about the GOP? No focking ###### sherlock. The memo is designed for one thing...to put doubt on the ongoing investigations surrounding the 2016 election. This seems painfully obvious to any thinking person. lol, moving those goal posts. the talking points now are "McCabe, Comey, Mueller are all corrupt sacks of " but they are muh Republicans! (Republicans whose criminal activities occurred under the direction of an Obama presidency). Oops. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted January 30, 2018 A memo without underlying support is almost meaningless to normal people. And the author of the memo hasnt seen the underlying documentation himself. Yet opined on it. Um...Schiff who has seen has called it out big time. But what would henknow about intel work...right? I don't know where you are getting these talking points from but they are 100% wrong and make you look like a fool. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 462 Posted January 30, 2018 You didnt look at your cards very well Chief. They are both goofy looking fockers Hey. What do you think Trump did with Stormy Daniels? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 30, 2018 well that rules you out, maybe you can have someone who has a clue list the reasons why Steele is more credible than nunes.Mi6 agent who helped bring down FIFA officials vs guy who lies constantly about interactions with Trump and sensitive information? Like that nightbje went to the WH claiming he had to show them classified info from his source...turns out...he went there because they were the source and the information was BS. Yeah...that you find Nunes credible is hilarious and very fitting for you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 30, 2018 lol, moving those goal posts. the talking points now are "McCabe, Comey, Mueller are all corrupt sacks of ######" but they are muh Republicans! (Republicans whose criminal activities occurred under the direction of an Obama presidency). Oops. I moved no goalposts. I never claimed they are corrupt pieces of . I highly disagree with that assessment. Im laughing at the claim that this is allbad for democrats and proof of some democrat conspiracy...yet the targets and those the GOP and this admin are going after have been republicans. This isnt new...Rosenstein, Mueller and Coney have been republicans for a while. McCabe is more cloudy...wife ran as a dem...but he voted in R primaries in the past. Obummer also hilarious...almost as good as claiming Obama hired Flynn first so that cant be Trumps fault. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted January 30, 2018 Mi6 agent who helped bring down FIFA officials vs guy who lies constantly about interactions with Trump and sensitive information? Like that nightbje went to the WH claiming he had to show them classified info from his source...turns out...he went there because they were the source and the information was BS. Yeah...that you find Nunes credible is hilarious and very fitting for you. he went to the white house to read the PDBs which showed obama and crew conspiring to sabotage a duly elected president. He is a hero, a patriot and you support scumbag anti american scumbags and its all going to come out. Let that sink it, you support the enemy of America Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 30, 2018 I don't know where you are getting these talking points from but they are 100% wrong and make you look like a fool. Wrong? I posted the document from the DOJ stating Nunes hadnt seen the underlying information. And Schiff has been all over discussing the memo. So what part of what I stated was 100% wrong or some talking point. Try facts...back it up with a credible source...or realize I know what the fock Im talking about and have supported it well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 30, 2018 Hey. What do you think Trump did with Stormy Daniels? Probably knocked one out then watched shark week and had her spank him with Forbes magazine? Did all that happen...who the fock really knows. Did he fock her and lay her off? Evidence suggests that happened yes. The other is just for fun (like the pee tape). If it happened...just shows he is one strange guy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,340 Posted January 30, 2018 I believe it is based on Nunes history...the number of stories of what he hasnt actually viewed to come to this conclusion. By both dem and rep criticizing it and the methodology as they know it. Do you believe they will show background info? But you wholeheartedly believe an unsubstantiated report about Russian Golden Showers. Fantastic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 30, 2018 But you wholeheartedly believe an unsubstantiated report about Russian Golden Showers. Fantastic. Link? Or are you going to keep lying with that? Failure to prove this assertion is an admission that you are lying. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,340 Posted January 30, 2018 Wait. Now you don't like unnamed sources???? :rofl: Holy ! Did that just happen? Did Sloflake actually come out against unnamed sources? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 30, 2018 Holy ######! Did that just happen? Did Sloflake actually come out against unnamed sources? Ive been skeptical of single unnamed sources for pretty much ever. Have a link to show otherwise? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,340 Posted January 30, 2018 Hey. What do you think Trump did with Stormy Daniels? Golden Showers? Sloflake will believe anything as long as it references Golden Showers because that HAS to be true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 30, 2018 Wrong? I posted the document from the DOJ stating Nunes hadnt seen the underlying information. And Schiff has been all over discussing the memo. So what part of what I stated was 100% wrong or some talking point. Try facts...back it up with a credible source...or realize I know what the fock Im talking about and have supported it well. That simply isn't true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 30, 2018 Golden Showers? Sloflake will believe anything as long as it references Golden Showers because that HAS to be true. No link to your lie about me yet? 3 posts in a row by you...3 posts about me based in false assertions. Dude... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,340 Posted January 30, 2018 No link to your lie about me yet? 3 posts in a row by you...3 posts about me based in false assertions. Dude... False assertions? What? You literally believe the fake dossier. You've been defending it here and on the Snowflake Board at FBG for at least a year now. Even doubling down on it after evidence came out it was suspect at best. The links are ALL OF YOUR POSTS. Feel free to go back and peruse all 300K posts of yours since your "I' won't be posting here much" claim. Which, of course, is another lie. So not only do you believe in fake dossiers that insist on Golden Showers, but you're also a straight up liar. I see you've been getting your ass handed to you once again in here. You should probably had back to the safespace at FBGs - like you said you were going to do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 462 Posted January 30, 2018 Probably knocked one out then watched shark week and had her spank him with Forbes magazine? Did all that happen...who the fock really knows. Did he fock her and lay her off? Evidence suggests that happened yes. The other is just for fun (like the pee tape). If it happened...just shows he is one strange guy. Oh NOOOOOOOEESSSSSS, ShoNuff! https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2018/01/30/stormy-daniels-official-statement-on-alleged-affair-with-trump-could-spell-big-trouble-for-jimmy-kimmel/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,007 Posted January 30, 2018 he went to the white house to read the PDBs which showed obama and crew conspiring to sabotage a duly elected president. He is a hero, a patriot and you support scumbag anti american scumbags and its all going to come out. Let that sink it, you support the enemy of America Shonuff = The enemy within Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 30, 2018 Oh NOOOOOOOEESSSSSS, ShoNuff! https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2018/01/30/stormy-daniels-official-statement-on-alleged-affair-with-trump-could-spell-big-trouble-for-jimmy-kimmel/ Yet another lie the Clown bought into. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 30, 2018 False assertions? What? You literally believe the fake dossier. You've been defending it here and on the Snowflake Board at FBG for at least a year now. Even doubling down on it after evidence came out it was suspect at best. The links are ALL OF YOUR POSTS. Feel free to go back and peruse all 300K posts of yours since your "I' won't be posting here much" claim. Which, of course, is another lie. So not only do you believe in fake dossiers that insist on Golden Showers, but you're also a straight up liar. I see you've been getting your ass handed to you once again in here. You should probably had back to the safespace at FBGs - like you said you were going to do. Link me to one post where I have believed as you stated in above posts about the golden showers. Yes...that is a false assertion zAnynclaim that I believe in the dossier 100% as you are claiming is also false. What I have defended are its exis...its writer...and the items from it that have been corroborated. All of my posts? You cant find one max. Not a single one. Ass handed to me? BS...Ive defemded these false claims and provided links when making assertions. Nearly yiur entire existence here at FFT has been to troll me and make unsubstantiated claims and insults towards me. You are a useless twit. Prove your claims Max...or admit you are a liar. That is your task. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,007 Posted January 30, 2018 No link to your lie about me yet? 3 posts in a row by you...3 posts about me based in false assertions. Dude... Good grief man. You and Worms were going over the lines of succession the night the pee-pee dossier came out. You had Trump impeached. Delusional. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 30, 2018 Oh NOOOOOOOEESSSSSS, ShoNuff! https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2018/01/30/stormy-daniels-official-statement-on-alleged-affair-with-trump-could-spell-big-trouble-for-jimmy-kimmel/ So is she lying now...or the numerous times she claimed it happened? Any explanation for the fake LLC set up right about the time of the supposed payment? With a payment out totally nearly the exact amount claimed that was settled? And oh noes? How old are you? And why would this even bother me? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 30, 2018 https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/30/oh-lordy-fbi-director-wray-sent-counterintelligence-official-to-review-memo-prior-to-committee-vote/#more-145221 Catherine Herridge – Two senior FBI officials have now reviewed a controversial Republican staff memo alleging abuses of government surveillance programs during the 2016 presidential campaign, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News – adding that the officials “could not point to any factual inaccuracies.” The two officials – one from the bureau’s counterintelligence division and the other from the legal division – followed up after an initial review of the memo during a rare Sunday trip to Capitol Hill by FBI Director Christopher Wray. The House Intelligence Committee voted late Monday along party lines to release the memo, prompting a backlash from Democratic lawmakers. Top Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff called it a “very sad day.” President Trump has five working days to review the contents but is widely expected not to block its release. After the contentious committee vote Monday night, the source confirmed that House staffers physically took the memo over to the White House for the president. (read more) Now, there is no explanation as to the sub-department origin of the Main Justice official, or whether that person was from the DOJ National Security Division. However, on the other side of the Justice Department, the official is identified as ‘counterintelligence’. Understanding the sensitivity of the matter (no pun intended), Director Wray likely sent a top official from Main Justice, and likely the top official within the FBI Counterintelligence division. The top official within FBI counterintelligence is still the same official present during the 2016/2017 “Trump Operation”. That top counterintelligence official is Bill Priestap. If Director Wray sent FBI Director of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap to the House SCIF to review the content, and Bill Priestap said he “could not point to any factual inaccuracies”, then it is virtually certain that Priestap is cooperating (ie. flipped). Some more details on the FBI having reviewed the Memo and found no inaccuracies. Priestap rolling could spell more trouble all the way up to Barry. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,711 Posted January 30, 2018 Link? Or are you going to keep lying with that? Failure to prove this assertion is an admission that you are lying. Why don’t you provide a link to you claiming the Russian Golden Showers Story was fake. That would be a slam dunk and shut the board up! It would be your first win. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted January 31, 2018 https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/30/oh-lordy-fbi-director-wray-sent-counterintelligence-official-to-review-memo-prior-to-committee-vote/#more-145221 Some more details on the FBI having reviewed the Memo and found no inaccuracies. Priestap rolling could spell more trouble all the way up to Barry. that sundance at CTH kills it. By far the best investigative reporter out there. Has been all over this scam from the get go and right on every time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 Why dont you provide a link to you claiming the Russian Golden Showers Story was fake. That would be a slam dunk and shut the board up! It would be your first win. So wait...you want me to prove a negative? A. Are yiu that dumb? B. When someone makes an assertion...especially that many times...its uo to them to prove the assertion when called out. He is a liar...you know it...he knows it....everyone knows it...but you wont admit it and neither will he. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 that sundance at CTH kills it. By far the best investigative reporter out there. Has been all over this scam from the get go and right on every time.Same unnamed source from the Fox Story.Yet you buy it immediately. The hypocrisy is so damn good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 31, 2018 that sundance at CTH kills it. By far the best investigative reporter out there. Has been all over this scam from the get go and right on every time. And been out in front of almost everyone on different aspects of this. They called Priestrap rolling a month or so ago. Another link to Obama that I'd forgotten about from that site: https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/mary-jacoby-1.jpg?w=640&h=129 Mary Jacoby (wife of Glenn Simpson) visited the White House in April of 2016; right when Operation Trump began. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 Oh NOOOOOOOEESSSSSS, ShoNuff! https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2018/01/30/stormy-daniels-official-statement-on-alleged-affair-with-trump-could-spell-big-trouble-for-jimmy-kimmel/ https://twitter.com/jdiamond1/status/958465258091372544Why are her signatures different? Why no denial in Inside edition last week? Why the change in stories she originally told and told friends? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorepatrol 1,871 Posted January 31, 2018 Just because someone isn't "officially" investigating doesn't mean they are not involved. Haven't you ever seen Billions? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 31, 2018 https://twitter.com/jdiamond1/status/958465258091372544 Why are her signatures different? She was c0ckeyed back in the day? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 462 Posted January 31, 2018 So is she lying now...or the numerous times she claimed it happened? Any explanation for the fake LLC set up right about the time of the supposed payment? With a payment out totally nearly the exact amount claimed that was settled? And oh noes? How old are you? And why would this even bother me? Just demonstrating what you "don't" fall for, Sho. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 Just demonstrating what you "don't" fall for, Sho. What did I fall for?I stated I believed she banged him...and was paid off. Her denial (under her stage name now...and with different signature styles) contradicts her previous statements. So what did I fall for again Mensa? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 462 Posted January 31, 2018 What did I fall for? I stated I believed she banged him...and was paid off. Her denial (under her stage name now...and with different signature styles) contradicts her previous statements. So what did I fall for again Mensa? You presumed something happened that an (alleged) participant said did not. Twice. And now you have to imagine reasons why she's lying, and you're not. It's spectacular! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 You presumed something happened that an (alleged) participant said did not. Twice. And now you have to imagine reasons why she's lying, and you're not. It's spectacular! I believe it happened...based on mutliple things. The alleged participant has also told stories that it did happen. As well as evidence suggesting the payment to her happened. (as posted in the actual thread about it...but you brought it up in this thread for some reason with the whole childish oh noeeeesss thing.). Try again...for a Mensa mind...you really aren't very bright. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 31, 2018 You'd think the way Slo windmills his arms while frothing at the mouth that he'd at least land one shot on us but nope. He truly is hopelessly insane. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 462 Posted January 31, 2018 I believe it happened...based on mutliple things. The alleged participant has also told stories that it did happen. As well as evidence suggesting the payment to her happened. (as posted in the actual thread about it...but you brought it up in this thread for some reason with the whole childish oh noeeeesss thing.). Try again...for a Mensa mind...you really aren't very bright. Aw. Reduced to ad hominem so quickly? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 Aw. Reduced to ad hominem so quickly? For the guy who started the conversation with oh noeeessss you want to go there? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 462 Posted January 31, 2018 For the guy who started the conversation with oh noeeessss you want to go there? Don't you know what an ad hom is? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
