Release the FISA memo

[Hardcore troubadour 16,007]

 

It's sad you're still buying into the MSM's narrative of this.

 

Nunes and Gowdy created the document as a compilation of Intelligence that the HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE (HIC) received. That can't be disputed. Again, the Dems aren't calling the memo's content false; they're saying the Republicans are cherry picking facts. So whatever the memo contains, it's already agreed they're facts.

 

And why wasn't more of this revealed? Because Fusion GPS couldn't get anyone to publish the Dossier despite shopping it around. They did eventually pay journalists which was for..........................what? Russia story narratives.

 

 

She should. And WOOD Those eyes......

And that rack.

[SenatorRock 708]

Dems just leaked a copy of their counter-memo:

 

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUwCpR3VQAUOnJg?format=jpg&name=orig

[Sho Nuff 720]

Dems just leaked a copy of their counter-memo:

 

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUwCpR3VQAUOnJg?format=jpg&name=orig

Nothing like a copy cat of the memes about Nunes memo.

[SenatorRock 708]

Nothing like a copy cat of the memes about Nunes memo.

 

This was the only meme about Nunes memo I saw:

 

http://northwestlibertynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/hillary-jail.jpg

[drobeski 3,061]

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/29/dan-bongino-has-a-theory-devin-nunes-memo-contains-references-to-obama-pdbs-and-fisa-documents/#more-145186

 

Dan Bongino Has a Theory Devin Nunes Memo Contains References To Obama PDBs and FISA Documents

Posted by sundance

Former Secret Service Agent Dan Bongino appeared on Tucker Carlson TV show tonight to discuss the release of Chairman Devin Nunes intelligence memo.

 

During the segment Mr. Bongino highlighted his theory that Chairman Nunes memo not only holds references to the DOJ and FBI use of fraudulent FISA702 application evidence, but that the memo also contains compartmented intelligence exclusive to former President Obamas Presidential Daily Briefings (PDBs). WATCH:

 

 

.

 

If true, this exclusive Bongino revelation could be explosive. Lets explore.

 

 

 

 

What exactly is The Nunes Memo? From all indications it is an outline written by senior intelligence committee staff, with major input from Devin Nunes describing evidence, people and events who conspired back in 2016 and 2017. In essence it is a summary of facts, that Chairman Nunes knows to exist.

 

No-one actually knows what the underlying supportive material is, because no-one, other than Chairman Devin Nunes, has seen the full material in the context of his reference.

 

People are *assuming* the memo is heavily written around FISA-702 issues and documents (FISA application, Steele Dossier, wiretaps, surveillance, intercepts etc.), but no-one actually knows what is behind the memo, other than Devin Nunes. There could be much more than just FISA evidence.

 

Now, as we go forward with this well be lost unless we have a full understanding of the March 2017 outline about The Nunes Paradox SEE HERE Remember, the issue on March 22nd, 2017 was:

 

[] Our research indicates that Chairman Devin Nunes, a gang of eight member, reviewed intelligence reports (most likely PDBs) that were assembled exclusively for the office of the President (Obama). That is why he went to the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) Information Facility to review.

 

The intelligence product would be delivered to that SCIF system for his review, most likely by the ODNI. It would be removed from that SCIF system after his review. No systems are connected.

 

Nunes stated the intelligence product he reviewed was not related to Russia, or the FBI Russian counter-intelligence investigation. So the product itself was likely a product for the President, that was not part of the ongoing FBI counter-intel product.

 

Again, this is why it seems likely it was part of a PDB unless it was a separate product, apart from the PDB, which was created for the Office of the President. [i view the latter as highly doubtful because it would be too risky for the President to be asking for specific stand alone intel on something Trump.]

 

♦ Now, HERE IS WHERE YOU NEED TO PUT ON A Politics only FILTER.

 

Couldnt Adam Schiff (another gang of eight member) go look at the same intelligence as Nunes did?

 

Yes. However, purely from the standpoint of politics: why would he?

 

If Representative Schiff saw the same intelligence that substantiates Nunes he couldnt keep up the fake outrage and false narrative. Right now Schiff can say anything about it he wants because he hasnt seen it. If Schiff actually sees the intelligence Nunes saw he loses that ability. He would also lose the ability to criticize, ridicule and/or marginalize Devin Nunes. (read more Critical to understand)

 

Back in March and April 2017, it was more valuable, politically, at least initially, for ranking member Adam Schiff never to go look at the same information compiled within the Eisenhower SCIF for Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes to see. Schiff did, eventually, go to see the information, but he waited a week to do so.

 

Absent of knowledge of the underlying evidence, Adam Schiff could say anything he wanted about Nunes and work to isolate him. Simultaneously, because the information was highly classified, Nunes could never explain it or defend himself. Thus Nunes was stuck in the compartmented intelligence box; thats The Nunes Paradox.

 

Sneaky Schiff used a week of Nunes being in this boxed-in position, knowing Nunes could not defend himself, to demand Nunes step aside from the House Intelligence Russia investigation. It worked.

 

However, all the way through to today no-one except Devin Nunes has any idea the totality of what Nunes actually witnessed in March 2017, and what he was later able to connect to that evidence after the FISA Court release (late April 2017) [Nunes could see unredacted FISC opinion], and also overlay evidence provided to the House Intelligence Committee.

 

However, we have an idea of the earlier evidence Nunes saw from his March 22nd, 2017, statements and we can also overlay the FISA court information .

 

It is important to note here that President Trump nominated Senator Dan Coats as ODNI on January 5th, 2017 however, Democrats held up that nomination until March 16th, 2017. It is not coincidental that immediately following DNI Dan Coats ability to provide information, Chairman Devin Nunes begins reporting his concerns. It was also Dan Coats who declassified the FISA court opinion on April 28th, 2017.

 

After Devin Nunes review the information March 22nd 2017, Nunes stated the intelligence product he reviewed was: not related to Russia, or the FBI Russian counter-intelligence investigation.

 

House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Devin Nunes, then held a brief press conference and stated he has been provided intelligence reports brought to him by unnamed sources that include significant information about President-Elect Trump and his transition team. Later it was reported the incoming White House National Security Council may have assisted Nunes with information at the Eisenhower SCIF.

 

WATCH:

 

 

 

1.) On numerous occasions the [Obama] intelligence community incidentally collected information about U.S. citizens involved in the Trump transition.

 

2.) Details about U.S. persons associated with the incoming administration; details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.

 

3.) Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition members were unmasked.

 

4.) Fourth and finally, I want to be clear; none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities.

 

The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its subsequent dissemination, to determine a few things here that I want to read off:

 

Who was aware of it?

 

Why it was not disclosed to congress?

 

Who requested and authorized the additional unmasking?

 

Whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates?

 

And whether any laws, regulations or procedures were violated?

 

I have asked the Directors of the FBI, NSA and CIA to expeditiously comply with my March 15th (2017) letter -that you all received a couple of weeks ago- and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities.

 

Again, this is why the intelligence reports seem likely to have been political opposition research -that was part of Obamas PDB unless it was a separate intelligence product, apart from the PDB, which was created for the Office of the President. [i view the latter as highly doubtful because it would be too risky for the President to be asking for specific stand alone intelligence against political adversaries, ie candidate Donald Trump.]

 

Additionally, there is further evidence that surfaced a week after Nunes expressed his March 22nd, 2017 concerns. April 4th, 2017 Susan Rice appears:

 

With a general set of narrative talking points in hand President Obamas Former National Security Adviser, Susan Rice, appeared April 4th, 2017, on MSNBC for an interview with Andrea Mitchell. This is the We-Have-To-Respond-phase, to the push-back that was an outcome of Evelyn Farkas earlier statements on the same network.

 

Andrea Mitchell is considered a trustworthy ally of the Clinton/Obama political networks; as such, it is not a surprise to see Mitchell selected as the interviewer. Mitchells use of wording carefully guides Susan Rice through the narrow path of self-incrimination by providing plausible deniability for verbal missteps.

 

You already know the routine. MSNBC is the favorable proprietary venue. Mitchell plays the role of media-legal-adviser, her client is Susan Rice. Live interviews are always the greatest risk (see: Evelyn Farkas) The full interview is below:

 

 

 

However, that said, there are some interesting aspects to the interview:

 

Susan Rice @00:51 Let me explain how this works. I was a National Security Adviser, my job is to protect the American people and the security of our country. Thats the same as the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and CIA Director.; and every morning, to enable us to do that, we receive from the intelligence community a compilation of intelligence reports that the IC, the intelligence community, has selected for us on a daily basis to give us the best information as to whats going on around the world.

 

[Note, Susan Rice is describing the PDB]

 

I received those reports, as did other officials, and there were occasions when I would receive a report in which, uh, a U.S Person was referred to. Name, uh, not provided, just U.S. Person.

 

And sometimes in that context, in order to understand the importance in the report and assess its significance, it was necessary to find out or request, who that U.S. official was.

 

OK, so right there, in the very beginning of the forward narrative, Susan Rice is confirming the unmasking request(s) which can be pinned upon her, are directly related to her need to understand -on behalf of President Obama- intelligence for the Presidents Daily Briefing (the PDB). This was a previous question now answered.

 

This is EXPLOSIVE, and heres why.

 

Remember, the Presidents Daily Brief under President Obama went to almost everyone at top levels in his administration. Regarding the Obama PDB:

 

[] But while through most of its history the document has been marked For the Presidents Eyes Only, the PDB has never gone to the president alone. The most restricted dissemination was in the early 1970s, when the book went only to President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, who was dual-hatted as national security adviser and secretary of state.

 

In other administrations, the circle of readers has also included the vice president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with additional White House staffers.

 

By 2013, Obamas PDB was making its way to more than 30 recipients, including the presidents top strategic communications aide and speechwriter, and deputy secretaries of national security departments. (link)

 

Pay attention to that last part. According to the Washington Post outline Obamas PDBs were going to: top strategic communications aide, Ben Rhodes, and Deputy Secretaries of national security departments.

 

In the interview, Susan Rice defined the Obama national security departments to include: State Defense (Pentagon includes NSA) and CIA, NSA ODNI etc.

 

So under Obamas watch the list of recipients was massive and included Asst. Secretaries of national security departments like the DOJ-National Security Division (John P Carlin) and FBI Counterintelligence Division (Bill Priestap). Massive numbers of administration officials including the DOJ and FBI had access to the PDB.

 

See where this is going?

 

Susan Rice is admitting to unmasking names within intelligence reports to give her context for how they pertain to the overall briefing material. That briefing material is the PDB. That PDB goes to dozens of political people and political entities, including the DOJ and FBI units investigating candidate Donald Trump.

 

This is the widespread distribution of intelligence information that former Asst. Deputy of Defense, Evelyn Farkas was discussing. Now, we go back to Farkass March 2nd, 2017 MSNBC statement for additional context:

 

 

 

I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can get as much intelligence as you can before President Obama leaves the administration.

 

Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.

 

So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to the Hill. Thats why you had the leaking.

 

[Link to Farkas MSNBC Interview and Transcript]

 

That right there is the story. With dozens of people with access to President Obamas PDB, Rices unmasking of the intelligence report names gave dozens of people direct access to unmasked intelligence including Obama officials who could, perhaps did, use the PDB for specific and intentional political purposes, as outlined by Evelyn Farkas who was ultimately one of the recipients of the unmasked intelligence.

 

Additionally, that same material went directly to the people in the DOJ-NSD and FBI Counterintelligence who were conducting the Trump Operation.

 

The DOJ and FBI officials could comply with FISA-702 minimization rules (hiding of U.S. persons names etc.) knowing full well that the unmasking could be done by the recipient of the FISA-702 source material, which would then be relayed back to the DOJ and FBI officials; the small group.

 

 

 

If you know how concentric circle political safety is constructed, you will notice that Susan Rice was then hugging the security of the Presidency. To take Rice down amid all of this unmasking, means to take down President Obama back in March 2017 this was a safe play on her part.

 

Reverse the safety. No-one in ideological media or allies in congress were going to allow President Obama to be taken down; ergo, everyone will protect Susan Rice and by extension President Obama. They had no choice.

 

Back to the interview and note how when shifting from rehearsed talking point (script) to cognitive explanation of Rices point , the noun shifts from U.S. Person to U.S. Official:

 

I received those reports, as did other officials, and there were occasions when I would receive a report in which, uh, a U.S Person was referred to. Name, uh, not provided, just U.S. Person.

 

And sometimes in that context, in order to understand the importance in the report and assess its significance, it was necessary to find out or request, who that U.S. official was.

 

Its subtle (like a Freudian slip), but Rice accidentally outlines her filter, her psychological trigger, for when to request the unmasking. Shes looking for the politics behind the intelligence. Shes looking for U.S. Officials in masked intelligence reports.

 

Mrs. Rice then follows up with a hypothetical example that is ridiculous as she describes. The example provided (a sketchy dude in moms basement) would NEVER reach the level of PDB; it would be pre-filtered, researched and reviewed for value. The PDB NEVER contains such banal information as Rice describes.

 

The interview goes much further. There is a lot of news in this interview. There is also a tremendous amount of double-speak and self-contradiction; in some cases between sentences that follow each other.

 

Notice how Susan Rice contradicts herself about what the intelligence community puts into the PDB. Rice states the PDB intel community, those assembling the information, to be very specific: James Clapper (DNI), James Comey (FBI), John Brennan (CIA) and Defense Department (which would be the Pentagon and NSA Mike Rogers), and she states they would never send the President innocuous things unworthy of review (like a dude in moms basement):

 

 

 

.

 

Summary: In addition to the FISA702 material, and the material given by the current DOJ and FBI to Devin Nunes, there are strong indications the PDB material is part of the underlying information which backstops the Nunes Memo.

 

Devin Nunes, Admiral Mike Rogers and ODNI Dan Coats likely know exactly what Nunes has seen and where all of the underlying evidence is located. No-one else does, including Adam Schiff, despite having read the Nunes memo.

 

The important part of the House Memo release will be within the *footnotes* and *citations*, and the need to declassify that material will be the next phase in the sunlight.

 

Now we can see how Nunes brilliantly reversed the Paradox?

 

With help from a few friends:

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,340]

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/29/dan-bongino-has-a-theory-devin-nunes-memo-contains-references-to-obama-pdbs-and-fisa-documents/#more-145186

 

Dan Bongino Has a Theory Devin Nunes Memo Contains References To Obama PDBs and FISA Documents

Posted by sundance

Former Secret Service Agent Dan Bongino appeared on Tucker Carlson TV show tonight to discuss the release of Chairman Devin Nunes intelligence memo.

 

 

Uhmmm...yeah. But does it contain any references to Golden Showers? Otherwise SloCuck won't believe it. It doesn't matter if it's true or not. He'll believe it.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

 

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/29/dan-bongino-has-a-theory-devin-nunes-memo-contains-references-to-obama-pdbs-and-fisa-documents/#more-145186

Dan Bongino Has a Theory Devin Nunes Memo Contains References To Obama PDBs and FISA Documents
Posted by sundance
Former Secret Service Agent Dan Bongino appeared on Tucker Carlson TV show tonight to discuss the release of Chairman Devin Nunes intelligence memo.

Summary: In addition to the FISA702 material, and the material given by the current DOJ and FBI to Devin Nunes, there are strong indications the PDB material is part of the underlying information which backstops the Nunes Memo.

Devin Nunes, Admiral Mike Rogers and ODNI Dan Coats likely know exactly what Nunes has seen and where all of the underlying evidence is located. No-one else does, including Adam Schiff, despite having read the Nunes memo.

The important part of the House Memo release will be within the *footnotes* and *citations*, and the need to declassify that material will be the next phase in the sunlight.

Now we can see how Nunes brilliantly reversed the Paradox?

With help from a few friends:

Good post. I read some of the PDB material last night and wondered just where that all ties in. This breaks it down so even a SloTard could understand it.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,340]

 

Good post. I read some of the PDB material last night and wondered just where that all ties in. This breaks it down so even a SloTard could understand it.

 

I doubt it. That boy ain't too bright.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

 

I doubt it. That boy ain't too bright.

 

I say I say I say the boy's about as sharp as a bowling ball.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

"Evil prevails when good men do nothing"

It's truly sad there are guys here who'd rather remain silent or defend these abuses by our government than stand up for the principles upon which this great nation was built.

Be a man FFS.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUwsCJIVQAAfIBa.jpg:large

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,340]

 

I say I say I say the boy's about as sharp as a bowling ball.

 

Sufferin' suckatash!

[SaintsInDome2006 747]

Do you guys know who has replaced McCabe?

 

You should look it up, he was on his team.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Do you guys know who has replaced McCabe?

 

You should look it up, he was on his team.

 

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/acting-fbi-deputy-director-david-211557070.html

 

'In line to succeed McCabe' doesn't make it so. Also, he might be a witness against McCabe/Comey soon.

[SaintsInDome2006 747]

 

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/acting-fbi-deputy-director-david-211557070.html

 

'In line to succeed McCabe' doesn't make it so. Also, he might be a witness against McCabe/Comey soon.

>>An FBI official who served as associate deputy director under James Comey and Andrew McCabe is replacing McCabe as acting deputy director, an FBI spokesman confirmed to Newsweek.<<

 

I'm not sure what else you need here. Baker's back on the team too.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

>>An FBI official who served as associate deputy director under James Comey and Andrew McCabe is replacing McCabe as acting deputy director, an FBI spokesman confirmed to Newsweek.<<

 

I'm not sure what else you need here. Baker's back on the team too.

For now............James Baker won't be for long. He's neck deep in that spying ring.

 

ETA And until they remove the term 'Acting' it's temporary.

 

As a senior official, Bowdich was also involved in conversations following reports about the so-called tarmac meeting between then–Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton while the FBI’s probe involving Hillary Clinton was ongoing. Documents show that Bowdich and Comey discussed the reports via email.

Wray needs to seriously look outside the Comey/McCabe family tree.

[SaintsInDome2006 747]

 

For now............James Baker won't be for long. He's neck deep in that spying ring.

Wray's already brought him back.

 

McCabe recused himself from the Hillary investigation when his wife told him she was running for office. Do you know who took over his role?

[Hardcore troubadour 16,007]

Wray's already brought him back.

 

McCabe recused himself from the Hillary investigation when his wife told him she was running for office. Do you know who took over his role?

Trump don't care. He knows they got nothin. Trumps been doing business in NYC for 40 years with a target on his back from every bull in town, city, state and federal. He's never been touched. They think he's stupid. He's been swimming with sharks forever. Not even a nibble.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

 

 

Wray's already brought him back.

McCabe recused himself from the Hillary investigation when his wife told him she was running for office. Do you know who took over his role?

McCabe only recused himself AFTER the uproar over Terry McAuliffe (Hillary's BFF) gave his wife $700,000. Are you deliberately trying to paint him as a man of integrity or just don't know he is bereft of it?

 

 

http://lacrossetribune.com/news/national/govt-and-politics/wapo-fbi-general-counsel-being-reassigned/article_28e41f02-f904-5ad8-ac1d-e235a7e71500.html

 

James A. Baker is being reassigned..................no longer FBI Special Counsel (relieved of duties)

[SaintsInDome2006 747]

 

McCabe only recused himself AFTER the uproar over Terry McAuliffe (Hillary's BFF) gave his wife $700,000. Are you deliberately trying to paint him as a man of integrity or just don't know he is bereft of it?

That's not accurate. Part of what's come out of the IG investigation is that McCabe informed the FBI his wife was running before she announced and he immediately recused himself. What you're thinking of is the WSJ story that came up when Hillary's emails were being revisited via Weiner/Abedin.

[Hardcore troubadour 16,007]

 

 

McCabe only recused himself AFTER the uproar over Terry McAuliffe (Hillary's BFF) gave his wife $700,000. Are you deliberately trying to paint him as a man of integrity or just don't know he is bereft of it?

 

 

http://lacrossetribune.com/news/national/govt-and-politics/wapo-fbi-general-counsel-being-reassigned/article_28e41f02-f904-5ad8-ac1d-e235a7e71500.html

 

James A. Baker is being reassigned..................no longer FBI Special Counsel (relieved of duties)

One week before the election. They all thought they were untouchable. It's a common theme in corruption scandals.

[SaintsInDome2006 747]

Trump don't care. He knows they got nothin. Trumps been doing business in NYC for 40 years with a target on his back from every bull in town, city, state and federal. He's never been touched. They think he's stupid. He's been swimming with sharks forever. Not even a nibble.

I think you're right, Trump doesn't really care.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

 

 

That's not accurate. Part of what's come out of the IG investigation is that McCabe informed the FBI his wife was running before she announced and he immediately recused himself. What you're thinking of is the WSJ story that came up when Hillary's emails were being revisited via Weiner/Abedin.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/emails-no-2-fbi-official-recused-self-from-clinton-probe-one-week-before-lection/


Here's my link..................post your link where he did so immediately.

 

 

ETA Important to note in that link is the reference McCabe uses "MYE Mid Year Exam" referencing the Clinton Email Investigation/Matter. Remember Strzok referenced being under greater pressure once Trump won the nomination to finish the MYE.

[SaintsInDome2006 747]

 

 

McCabe only recused himself AFTER the uproar over Terry McAuliffe (Hillary's BFF) gave his wife $700,000. Are you deliberately trying to paint him as a man of integrity or just don't know he is bereft of it?

 

 

http://lacrossetribune.com/news/national/govt-and-politics/wapo-fbi-general-counsel-being-reassigned/article_28e41f02-f904-5ad8-ac1d-e235a7e71500.html

 

James A. Baker is being reassigned..................no longer FBI Special Counsel (relieved of duties)

Actually my bad on Baker, I was thinking of Boente.

 

He's taken Baker's place.

[SaintsInDome2006 747]

 

 

http://freebeacon.com/politics/emails-no-2-fbi-official-recused-self-from-clinton-probe-one-week-before-lection/

 

 

Here's my link..................post your link where he did so immediately.

 

 

ETA Important to note in that link is the reference McCabe uses "MYE Mid Year Exam" referencing the Clinton Email Investigation/Matter. Remember Strzok referenced being under greater pressure once Trump won the nomination to finish the MYE.

I think this should help.

https://mobile.twitter.com/pwnallthethings/status/949835909461151744

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

 

 

I think this should help.
https://mobile.twitter.com/pwnallthethings/status/949835909461151744

A retort:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/report-mccabe-lashed-asked-resign-fbi-whistleblowers-warn-resignations-coming/

McCabe was furious with coworkers when they demanded he resign. A lot of whistleblowers coming forward to do housecleaning of McCabe and all his cronies.

He's just the first of many resignations to come supposedly.

 

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/958074565544079360

 

[Strike 6,030]

DRAIN THE SWAMP!!!!

 

[SenatorRock 708]

Summary: In addition to the FISA702 material, and the material given by the current DOJ and FBI to Devin Nunes, there are strong indications the PDB material is part of the underlying information which backstops the Nunes Memo.

 

Devin Nunes, Admiral Mike Rogers and ODNI Dan Coats likely know exactly what Nunes has seen and where all of the underlying evidence is located. No-one else does, including Adam Schiff, despite having read the Nunes memo.

 

 

 

Damn.

 

Thanks for posting that. It is probably tldr for most but well worth it.

 

Nunes, Rogers, and Coats are true American heroes.

 

 

Over/under on Obama admin that end up in prison or suicide?

 

10

[SenatorRock 708]

That's not accurate. Part of what's come out of the IG investigation is that McCabe informed the FBI his wife was running before she announced and he immediately recused himself. What you're thinking of is the WSJ story that came up when Hillary's emails were being revisited via Weiner/Abedin.

What was the date on the text between lover Stzok and Page where they referenced "what we discussed in Andy's office"

 

Just because someone isn't "officially" investigating doesn't mean they are not involved.

 

Haven't you ever seen Billions?

[SaintsInDome2006 747]

 

 

A retort:

 

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/report-mccabe-lashed-asked-resign-fbi-whistleblowers-warn-resignations-coming/

 

McCabe was furious with coworkers when they demanded he resign. A lot of whistleblowers coming forward to do housecleaning of McCabe and all his cronies.

 

He's just the first of many resignations to come supposedly.

 

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/958074565544079360

 

I'm just pointing out that McCabe personally brought the conflict to the FBI Office of Integrity in March of 2015.

[SenatorRock 708]

Do you guys know who has replaced McCabe?

 

You should look it up, he was on his team.

It really is amazing how deep the ties go.

 

I was reading something the other day about Mueller and Comey as FBI 1&2 back in the day under Bush. Funny thing is they were drawing a line in the sand, threatening to quit, over NSA abuse. Talk about irony.

 

I find it hard to trust the new guy, Bowdich, because he was one of the top guys in the CA office when San Bernardino happened. Hard to believe an honest FBI man would have allowed that tragedy to happen.

 

Part of me still thinks that Comey and Mueller are white hats playing their part. They suffered through the corruption of Bush, Obama, and Clinton. The idealist in me wants to believe that they are here to make things right. If not, I hope they spend the rest of their days in federal you in the ass prison or eating some Clinton suicide bullets.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

If I were Wray, I'd get some field supervisor and not a bureaucrat for the job of Deputy Director. NFW would I trust anyone that was within Comey or McCabe's circle. If they didn't know how corrupt they were, they're incompetent. If they did know but said nothing, they're corrupt/balless.

[SenatorRock 708]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUwsCJIVQAAfIBa.jpg:large

 

Here is another handy dandy chart connecting the dots of the corruption of Obama admin and Hillary campaign.

 

https://i.redd.it/ppa40sgcy1b01.jpg

[SaintsInDome2006 747]

What was the date on the text between lover Stzok and Page where they referenced "what we discussed in Andy's office"

 

Just because someone isn't "officially" investigating doesn't mean they are not involved.

 

Haven't you ever seen Billions?

8/15/16, 2 days before Trump received his first IC briefing.

 

McCabe was involved at that point, but only because he had gotten promoted, after he had recused himself and after his wife had lost her race.

[SenatorRock 708]

8/15/16, 2 days before Trump received his first IC briefing.

 

McCabe was involved at that point, but only because he had gotten promoted, after he had recused himself and after his wife had lost her race.

 

I am starting to wonder if you are AI. You have an answer/link for everything

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

8/15/16, 2 days before Trump received his first IC briefing.

 

McCabe was involved at that point, but only because he had gotten promoted, after he had recused himself and after his wife had lost her race.

 

I'm not sure where you're getting that he recused himself from the Hillary Email investigation.

 

 

 

FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe recused himself from the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server just one week before the presidential election, according to new Justice Department records obtained by Judicial Watch, a government watchdog.

 

http://freebeacon.com/politics/emails-no-2-fbi-official-recused-self-from-clinton-probe-one-week-before-lection/

 

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/JW-v-DOJ-McCabe-ethics-01494-pg-12-2.pdf

 

The investigation into Clinton's email server didn't even begin until AFTER McCabe's wife had lost her State Senate election bid.

[drobeski 3,061]

Actually my bad on Baker, I was thinking of Boente.

 

He's taken Baker's place.

at least you claim "my bad" but still, you're wrong a lot in this attempt to defend these criminals.

[12th Man 884]

 

I doubt it. That boy ain't too bright.

Why do you think I started a Sho Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest thread? That kid is mentally ill.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

I am starting to wonder if you are AI. You have an answer/link for everything

He is informed by actual legit sources.

Unlike the crap you all believe

[TimmySmith 2,783]

The left is sold on the idea that because of the specter of the Russia/Trump investigation (1) the Democrats are clean (2) the FBI is clean. If that were true the Democrats and FBI would be pushing the release of the memo, because it's hogwash. Instead they are obstructing it, because it's hogwash. The left knows what the memo will do, it will throw a monkeywrench into this dog and pony Mueller investigation, that is planned to take up most of the Trump 1st term in an effort to prevent a 2nd.