Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 ahhhh following CNNs fake breaking news I see. Horse schit as usual. Why am I not surprised you cant try to answer.My post had zero to do with CNN. Nor is it horse . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 All these attacks.. Good Lord dude, take a breath. I'm asking for this process to be transparent as possible. There is obviously some serious issues with this entire thing. I am shocked that you are against transparency. Transparency? This memo has zero to do with transparency. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 31, 2018 Simple solution; declassify it all. There's a multitude of sins in there by Dems. A boatload of people fired/demoted. Of course the FBI has reservations about ANY of the truth getting out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted January 31, 2018 Looks like Bloombergs source was better than Fox. https://twitter.com/katiebowill/status/958754904461512704 Official FBI statement. Lol That is some blue check that works for the Hill, not the FBI. There has been nothing released from the FBI with a name attached to it. FAKE NEWS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 Lol That is some blue check ###### that works for the Hill, not the FBI. There has been nothing released from the FBI with a name attached to it. FAKE NEWS. It was the official statement from the FBI. Ill say...if this is nothing but a parody account...its genius. If you really believe the stuff you post...you should be in a padded room. https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-statement-on-hpsci-memo I look forward to you ignoring your own ignorance and not admitting you are not smart. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,125 Posted January 31, 2018 There aren't issues with inaccuracies, so it's time to complain about context. That's where we are. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 that sundance at CTH kills it. By far the best investigative reporter out there. Has been all over this scam from the get go and right on every time. Ahh...good times...when you learn Fox and your Little Treehouse were full of crap....agagain n. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 There aren't issues with inaccuracies, so it's time to complain about context. That's where we are. You dont seem to understand plain English with what the FBI said...and context is pretty damn important. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 31, 2018 You dont seem to understand plain English with what the FBI said...and context is pretty damn important.So the same people that abused our trust has reservations and asking we should just trust them? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 748 Posted January 31, 2018 Can someone please provide a Take on the news that Strzok sought to reopen the Hillary investigation? Thanks. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/01/31/politics/strzok-fbi-comey-clinton-letter/index.html?__twitter_impression=true Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,534 Posted January 31, 2018 After reading quite a bit of this thread, I think it's time I start selling a product that prevents the Deep State from reading your thoughts, it will work a lot like this: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted January 31, 2018 Can someone please provide a Take on the news that Strzok sought to reopen the Hillary investigation? Thanks. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/01/31/politics/strzok-fbi-comey-clinton-letter/index.html?__twitter_impression=true first off, CNN...second off we're going with "a source familiar with Strzok thinking"Laughable 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 748 Posted January 31, 2018 first off, CNN...second off we're going with "a source familiar with Strzok thinking" Laughable Ok, how about the emails they're referring to then? http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/01/31/strzok.email.pdf Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 Can someone please provide a Take on the news that Strzok sought to reopen the Hillary investigation? Thanks. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/01/31/politics/strzok-fbi-comey-clinton-letter/index.html?__twitter_impression=true Posted it in the other thread...they dont care. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 748 Posted January 31, 2018 Posted it in the other thread...they dont care. Really. I am almost positive they'd be interested in an original email from Strzok reopening the investigation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,534 Posted January 31, 2018 first off, CNN...second off we're going with "a source familiar with Strzok thinking" Laughable Ok, how about the emails they're referring to then? http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/01/31/strzok.email.pdf Oooh, I better get some popcorn, cause I just know that with this post you are going to entice Drobe into a well-thought out and logical debate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 Ok, how about the emails they're referring to then? http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/01/31/strzok.email.pdf Rope a dope with a CNN link and the emails are the haymaker. Also great from drobeski...believes Fox and Treehouse automatically despite them being shown to be liars often. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,125 Posted January 31, 2018 You dont seem to understand plain English with what the FBI said...and context is pretty damn important. Meh, more attacks, we'll see how it plays out fella. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 31, 2018 Can someone please provide a Take on the news that Strzok sought to reopen the Hillary investigation? Thanks. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/01/31/politics/strzok-fbi-comey-clinton-letter/index.html?__twitter_impression=true Covered ad nauseum before. Go research how the New York dept of FBI held Weiner's laptop for WEEKS without letting Comey know about it. They HAD to reopen it then immediately shut it back down. "Nothing changed" was their story yet we know there was massive evidence of Huma lying to FBI, and classified info was in peril. There is no way to paint Strzok in a positive light man. To try and do so merely damages your credibilty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 31, 2018 Why was Strzok removed from #4 at FBI and demoted to H.R.? Seriously, the attempt to paint his credibilty in a positive light is just focking laughable bordering on dellusional. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted January 31, 2018 It was the official statement from the FBI. Ill say...if this is nothing but a parody account...its genius. If you really believe the stuff you post...you should be in a padded room. https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-statement-on-hpsci-memo I look forward to you ignoring your own ignorance and not admitting you are not smart. Okay. Finally a real source. However, there is still no name attached. Only Wray and 2? others in the FBI have seen the memo. At least half a dozen in the FBI that we know of have been demoted, reassigned, or fired because of their actions. It makes sense there are some in the FBI who are terrified of the memo being released. Unless we see Wray or one of the other 2 guys who saw the memo discredit it then this is still FAKE NEWS. Wray still removed McCabe within hours of reading the memo. I suppose it was coincidence? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted January 31, 2018 Can someone please provide a Take on the news that Strzok sought to reopen the Hillary investigation? Thanks. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/01/31/politics/strzok-fbi-comey-clinton-letter/index.html?__twitter_impression=true Strzok, who co-wrote what appears to be the first draft that formed the basis of the letter Comey sent to Congress, also supported reopening the Clinton investigation once the emails were discovered on disgraced former Rep. Anthony Weiner's laptop, according to a source familiar with Strzok's thinking. "according to a source familiar with Strzok's thinking" "thinking" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 748 Posted January 31, 2018 Covered ad nauseum before. Go research how the New York dept of FBI held Weiner's laptop for WEEKS without letting Comey know about it. They HAD to reopen it then immediately shut it back down. "Nothing changed" was their story yet we know there was massive evidence of Huma lying to FBI, and classified info was in peril. There is no way to paint Strzok in a positive light man. To try and do so merely damages your credibilty. Hey I just asked for your POV. However as to your point are you claiming that NYPD specifically tried to impede the investigation and affect the election? I'd be willing to defend them like I would all law enforcement. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 Meh, more attacks, we'll see how it plays out fella.Ive talked about context from the start. And its hard to not call you iutbfor blatantly not understanding the words of the FBI and claiming as to have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted January 31, 2018 Ok, how about the emails they're referring to then? http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/01/31/strzok.email.pdf Looks like a CYA statement to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2018 Okay. Finally a real source. However, there is still no name attached. Only Wray and 2? others in the FBI have seen the memo. At least half a dozen in the FBI that we know of have been demoted, reassigned, or fired because of their actions. It makes sense there are some in the FBI who are terrified of the memo being released. Unless we see Wray or one of the other 2 guys who saw the memo discredit it then this is still FAKE NEWS. Wray still removed McCabe within hours of reading the memo. I suppose it was coincidence? Th first was a real source containing the actual FBI statement and you called it fake news. The Bloomberg source was real as well. Unlike the Fox piece that you salivated over. You were proven wrong...again. Its the official FBI statement...Wray is the director. Nice try to spin this. Im a few pages in to the House committee transcript in the vote...thus far Nunes is coming off really bad and Schiff showing he is a patriot. As I predicted this wont be a good look for you or your deep state conspiracy nuts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 748 Posted January 31, 2018 Looks like a CYA statement to me. Ok thanks for taking a look. I did ask for takes and you gave your POV. I appreciate it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 31, 2018 Hey I just asked for your POV. However as to your point are you claiming that NYPD specifically tried to impede the investigation and affect the election? I'd be willing to defend them like I would all law enforcement. The NY branch of FBI.....PLEASE PLEASE go read up on it before asking for futher clarification. The was an internal struggle within the FBI to prosecute Hillary. We're seeing that bear out now as one after another FBIwhistle blowers are talking to I.G. about McCabe, Strzok and Comey. The IG launched a third investigation into McCabe wondering why the Email investigation stalled once it hit his desk. Lisa Page was McCabe's legal counsel and Strzok lover. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 31, 2018 Th first was a real source containing the actual FBI statement and you called it fake news. The Bloomberg source was real as well. Unlike the Fox piece that you salivated over. You were proven wrong...again. Its the official FBI statement...Wray is the director. Nice try to spin this. Im a few pages in to the House committee transcript in the vote...thus far Nunes is coming off really bad and Schiff showing he is a patriot. As I predicted this wont be a good look for you or your deep state conspiracy nuts. That simply isn't true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,007 Posted January 31, 2018 Oooh, I better get some popcorn, cause I just know that with this post you are going to entice Drobe into a well-thought out and logical debate. Troll gonna troll. Sad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 748 Posted January 31, 2018 The NY branch of FBI.....PLEASE PLEASE go read up on it before asking for futher clarification. The was an internal struggle within the FBI to prosecute Hillary. We're seeing that bear out now as one after another FBIwhistle blowers are talking to I.G. about McCabe, Strzok and Comey. The IG launched a third investigation into McCabe wondering why the Email investigation stalled once it hit his desk. Lisa Page was McCabe's legal counsel and Strzok lover. Sorry I did that, but to be clear NYPD recovered the laptop and transferred it to FBI SDNY or EDNY. But I'm aware of the issue. I think you skipped over my point about your claiming that FBI NYFO delayed reviewing the emails or turning over data to pressure Comey. You're actually arguing for that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 748 Posted January 31, 2018 Covered ad nauseum before. Go research how the New York dept of FBI held Weiner's laptop for WEEKS without letting Comey know about it. To be specific - you're arguing this happened and also that it's a good thing? Isn't this the sort of thing you're claiming Strzok & Co. did? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,996 Posted January 31, 2018 first off, CNN...second off we're going with "a source familiar with Strzok thinking" Laughable MY FAVORITE INFORMANT!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,996 Posted January 31, 2018 The NY branch of FBI.....PLEASE PLEASE go read up on it before asking for futher clarification. The was an internal struggle within the FBI to prosecute Hillary. We're seeing that bear out now as one after another FBIwhistle blowers are talking to I.G. about McCabe, Strzok and Comey. The IG launched a third investigation into McCabe wondering why the Email investigation stalled once it hit his desk. Lisa Page was McCabe's legal counsel and Strzok lover. Q Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 748 Posted January 31, 2018 Q Ok same question for you - if McCabe is under investigation by the IG for stalling the Abedin email review why isn't FF's claim that the FBI NYFO delayed transfer of the data a huge problem in terms of political influence? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,125 Posted January 31, 2018 Ive talked about context from the start. And its hard to not call you iutbfor blatantly not understanding the words of the FBI and claiming as to have. You're far to invested in this, you can only see this issue from the prism of your political bias. If what is being alleged is true, we have to be transparent about it and fix the problem now. We can't allow these entities to be politicized. Our democracy is on the line. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted February 1, 2018 You're far to invested in this, you can only see this issue from the prism of your political bias. If what is being alleged is true, we have to be transparent about it and fix the problem now. We can't allow these entities to be politicized. Our democracy is on the line. I give you credit for trying to talk common sense to this rube. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,340 Posted February 1, 2018 Th first was a real source containing the actual FBI statement and you called it fake news. The Bloomberg source was real as well. Unlike the Fox piece that you salivated over. You were proven wrong...again. Its the official FBI statement...Wray is the director. Nice try to spin this. Im a few pages in to the House committee transcript in the vote...thus far Nunes is coming off really bad and Schiff showing he is a patriot. As I predicted this wont be a good look for you or your deep state conspiracy nuts. This is simply a flat out lie. AND this is also funny coming from the guy who zealously believes in all conspiracies that his liberal masters at the DNC and MSNBC tell him are going on (Russian Golden Showers anyone?). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 1, 2018 You're far to invested in this, you can only see this issue from the prism of your political bias. If what is being alleged is true, we have to be transparent about it and fix the problem now. We can't allow these entities to be politicized. Our democracy is on the line. Im seeing the issue from the facts rather than the crap Rock and others have been spewing about the memo. Thus far everything that has come out about this has supported my contention on this. Your own bias is clouding you once again. You all just cant admit to being wrong and duped. Ive been consistent from the start in this. Nunes cannot be trusted. A memo withoutbcintextvand support is nearly worthless (and apparently the FBI agrees with me and calls into question how it affects its accuracy) What is being alleged should be investigated and is by the OIG. That isnt Nunes or this memo...this is political cover he is trying to provide and little more it seems. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 1, 2018 This is simply a flat out lie. AND this is also funny coming from the guy who zealously believes in all conspiracies that his liberal masters at the DNC and MSNBC tell him are going on (Russian Golden Showers anyone?). Do I need to give you another try Max? A. Please tell us and show where my post yiubare quoting is a lie. B. On your secret Nd claim...please show where I believe any conspiracy of my liberal masters including where I have ever link to msnbc or believed in the golden showers thing? This is multiple times now you have made the false claims of msnbc and the golden shower thing. Youve been asked before to back up your claim and you failed. At this point you are doing nothing but spreading lies about me here to troll. Back up your claims or just go away Max. You offer nothing to this board or any board you have been on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites