Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
vuduchile

Kavanaugh sexual misconduct in High School

Recommended Posts

I answered your second question.

With what? Majority Constitutionalists?

 

You said that policy and SC rulings will ruin our way of life. It must be based on something that was done already. What would you want to see SCOTUS change?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember folks, if a woman has consensual sex with you in 2018, and sometime down the road she regrets having that consensual sex, you raped her.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Democrats now saying they don't want the findings of the FBI "investigation " made public. Shameless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember folks, if a woman has consensual sex with you in 2018, and sometime down the road she regrets having that consensual sex, you raped her.

Yep. Even if she doesn't bring it up until 2053. And my guess is Feinstein and Pelosi will still be alive and acting like the undead they are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Democrats now saying they don't want the findings of the FBI "investigation " made public. Shameless.

 

Because there most likely has been an investigation going on for weeks into how all of this went down. Perhaps the FBI has a paper trail between the Dems on the Judiciary and Ford/her lawyers..............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Is it? I've wondered that. I have a distant cousin with a PhD; my mom addressed his Christmas card as "Dr. and Mrs. ..." and I always thought that was a bit much. I also have a few friends with PhDs who people occasionally address as "Doctor." I never do though. :dunno:

Anyone who demands/desires to be addressed as Dr. ..., is likely a doosh. Even those with an M.D.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys are ridiculous.

 

Lefties: He tried to rape this girl!

Also Lefties: Well, maybe he didn't but he lied about drinking beer. He can't be a SC judge now!

 

Righties: The dems are despicable for taking advantage of and treating this poor woman the way they did.

Also Righties: This lying drugged up b;tch piece of shat is too ugly to ever even get spoken to, much less raped. Focking cu|\|t..

Agree, but it's really silly that Kav found a need to lie about teenage nonsense. He'd have come across much better admitting he drank a lot when he was young, too much, and probably did some stupid sh!t along the way. And the Devil's Triangle drinking game? :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't think these libs are lying or being coached? There is no way they could get in trouble for saying something under oath about someone drinking nearly 4 decades ago even if they lie. It's all just leftist hate spewing out garbage. Years and years and years later some chick comes out of the woodwork and runs to the most evil and hate-filled senator out there and complains about something she can't even verbalize without a lawyer telling her what to say. And even then she sounds stupid and confused.

 

This chick has a past of saying garbage about the right, so much so she had to scrub as much of her comments off the internet as she could possibly eliminate. You have no clue.

 

Talk about intolerance.

I guess it's possible, but it seems far more likely a dude drank too much, and made overly aggressive advances on a chick. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude, yur so full of ######. It's clear your left bias has clouded your brain. None of the accusations or "evidence" has been compelling.

 

Just admit you hate Trump and that's the reason. There is ZERO chance you would be offering up these weak-@ss reasons if Kav was a Democrat. ZERO.

 

You need PROOF. It's what we ask for in a country where you are innocent until PROVEN guilty.

 

Unless you're asking to go back to the old Salem Witch Trial form of Justice? I think after all this that really is what the left wants.

Nah. I already stated my opinion. Trump has nothing to do with it, nor does Kav's political affiliation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Drinking problem? Teenagers and college kids getting drunk constitutes a drinking problem? It's called having a social life. You people suck. I wish you were Canadian.

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont doubt thats the case. The part in the letter about begging girls to stay with a house full of guys and "welcoming them with open...anyways..." could cause a problem. That could be perceived as innuendo for running a train. Or, just disregard for females. Im not knockin too hard on the guy. Hell, I could see myself writing that letter back in the early 90s. That stuff doesnt define you as an adult. Im just saying that hes gonna get hammered over it.

Congrats, a reasonable explanation, rather than ignoring the behavior and attacking the women involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is just silly.

 

1. I think that he partied it up and had drunken fun. Probably was inappropriate with these ladies. So weren't 99.99% of the rest of the men in that era.

2. Boofing as far as I knew until today was, indeed, farting. My wife asks me all the time if I just boofed, so apparently we need to rethink the words we use

3. Kavanaugh's problem is that they are going to catch him in lies to Congress. He is lying about what he did or did not do and he is lying about some recent timelines. It will come back and bite him in the ass.

Almost right, except I think 99.99% is overstated. Maybe a majority of men have had some drunken impropriety, but plenty don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ford's ex boyfriend told the Senate Judiciary Committee that he witnessed Ford coaching someone on how to beat a polygraph test.

 

In her sworn testimony last week she was asked if she ever had discussions about how to take a polygraph test. Her answer: Never.

 

Looks like the Republicans laid a perjury trap and she walked right into it. This explains why the left has been so hell bent on accusing Kavanaugh of perjury. They always project their sins on others.

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1047286907795906560

If true, that is pretty bad. Still just he-said, she-said though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree, but it's really silly that Kav found a need to lie about teenage nonsense. He'd have come across much better admitting he drank a lot when he was young, too much, and probably did some stupid sh!t along the way. And the Devil's Triangle drinking game? :rolleyes:

He didn't lie. You repeating that constantly doesn't make it true. Once again, you have zero evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree, but it's really silly that Kav found a need to lie about teenage nonsense. He'd have come across much better admitting he drank a lot when he was young, too much, and probably did some stupid sh!t along the way. And the Devil's Triangle drinking game? :rolleyes:

He said, verbatim, " We drank beer. sometimes we had too many" You just making it up now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did she lie?

Based on the testimony she gave under oath she had numerous inconsistencies that would indicate she was lying. You can actually view the report compiled by Rachel Mitchell who questioned her. So based on that report it looks like she was, per Mitchell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess it's possible, but it seems far more likely a dude drank too much, and made overly aggressive advances on a chick. :dunno:

 

Only because you want to believe it. The more likely scenario is not to believe someone who can't provide ANY details and won't provide the sole evidence (her shrink's notes).

 

If true, that is pretty bad. Still just he-said, she-said though.

 

No; it means she's been caught in a lie under oath. At this point you can't seriously still believe her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He didn't lie. You repeating that constantly doesn't make it true. Once again, you have zero evidence.

I don't think pen actually keeps up with the facts, just the blurbs on CNN and Facebook.

 

The left has moved from gang rapes to lying about:

 

- the definition of boof. Fart? Butt Fock? We know they are obsessed with anal penetration so it make sense. Personally, I never heard the term boof outside of teen wolf. BuFu on the other hand was a slang term we had for butt . But BuFu is not the term under review. Boof. Wtf?

 

- Was Devil's Triangle a drinking game or sex term? Considering nobody has ever heard or used the term Devil's Triangle in reference to sex this is a huge stretch as well. Everyone has heard of Devil's Three way or Devil's Threesome. Nobody has ever heard of Devil's Triangle though. Was it a drinking game? Who knows. I had a chick tell me she played it growing up. Other than that I never heard of it. However, 3 glasses in a triangle that you bounce quarters into? Definitely sounds like a drinking game, in fact it sounds like the precursor to beer pong.

 

- Drank beers vs blacking out. Kavanaugh never denied drinking beer or getting drunk. He readily admitted to it. He did state he never blacked out. How do you prove that or disprove that? I have probably blacked out 100 times in my life but I definitely had friends in college who were responsible yet heacy drinkers who did not black out.

 

 

They ran out of ammo with their fake gang rapes and are now trying to convict a man based on yearbook slang. And the casual observer hears it repeated enough they will believe it is possible. And then you have the deranged lunatics who are resorting to violence over this. They can't be helped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on the testimony she gave under oath she had numerous inconsistencies that would indicate she was lying. You can actually view the report compiled by Rachel Mitchell who questioned her. So based on that report it looks like she was, per Mitchell.

Mitchell's report say's the evidence is weak...and I agree. It doesn't say she is lying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not accepting personal responsibility for anything. Key word: we.

You're kidding, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're kidding, right?

No.

 

Granted, I don't think it disqualifies him from being confirmed. But I don't think he is some innocent bystander whose life is being destroyed by the allegations either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No matter what side you're on, really really bad precedents being set.

 

Not used to the right fighting back or showing a backbone? Welcome to Trump's Republican Party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No.

 

Granted, I don't think it disqualifies him from being confirmed. But I don't think he is some innocent bystander whose life is being destroyed by the allegations either.

So, you think it's more likely than not that he participated in numerous gang rapes and drugged girls?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Not used to the right fighting back or showing a backbone? Welcome to Trump's Republican Party.

Dude, get some sleep. Wtf?

 

Not used to the right fighting back? After 7 years of multiple Congressional investigations? Yeah, this is all so new.

 

I can't believe I have to Spekl the shiit out for you. It's bad on both sides. I don't think we should be digging back to when somebody's in freaking High School for any job.

 

That's the precedent, you nimrod.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess it's possible, but it seems far more likely a dude drank too much, and made overly aggressive advances on a chick. :dunno:

no it doesnt, at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, you think it's more likely than not that he participated in numerous gang rapes and drugged girls?

No. I think he drank too much, sometimes became belligerent and sometimes a little handsy. And I think he wants to portray himself as better than that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude, get some sleep. Wtf?

 

Not used to the right fighting back? After 7 years of multiple Congressional investigations? Yeah, this is all so new.

 

I can't believe I have to Spekl the shiit out for you. It's bad on both sides. I don't think we should be digging back to when somebody's in freaking High School for any job.

 

That's the precedent, you nimrod.

 

What is the bad precedent on the right? And there's a new DOJ to actually do something against the political corruption and criminality.

 

I'm at work BTW...........why else would I be wasting time trying to talk sense to you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nor does CBF's testimony imply a massive democratic conspiracy.

the actions of Feinstein and co do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nor does CBF's testimony imply a massive democratic conspiracy.

 

No, that would be CBF's and attorneys' ties to the Dems. Her lying about the polygraph makes an already dubious case look even more like a political hit job.

 

Also, follow the GoFundMe monies...........what's it up to now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. I think he drank too much, sometimes became belligerent and sometimes a little handsy. And I think he wants to portray himself as better than that.

So being accused of gang rape in front of the country doesn't rise to the level of ruining your name? His kids are subjected to that mind you. And he lost a job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So being accused of gang rape in front of the country doesn't rise to the level of ruining your name? His kids are subjected to that mind you. And he lost a job.

 

Actually come January (when it was to start) he'll be busy being a SCOTUS. 53-47

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×