Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
JustinCharge

the left slowly pushes to normalize pedophilia

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Raven Fan said:

Anything like this even outside work would get someone fired from most companies.

He should have been gone already. 

I will take your word for it, but even this suprises me.   Politicians, CEO, business owners? I can see that.    

I would be surprised if porn videos and kinks get people removed from the vast majority of jobs in the country.  Again, I could be wrong and not thinking hard enough this am. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/8/2022 at 11:17 AM, MDC said:

Where did you meet that teenager you dated a few years ago?

In your mom's basement. So home, to you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, craftsman said:

In your mom's basement. So home, to you. 

Took you a while. Busy posting as Raven Fan?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, MDC said:

Took you a while. Busy posting as Raven Fan?

Decades of the same schtick. Accusing people of being an alias and never being right. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, MDC said:

Took you a while. Busy posting as Raven Fan?

Why would you accuse me of posting like that moron?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Decades of the same schtick. Accusing people of being an alias and never being right. 

Decades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/7/2022 at 10:47 AM, BuckSwope said:

@Sean Mooney if you listen to pods, today's The Daily had one about book challenges that you might dig.  

 

In general, I think each side of the debate should probably ask themselves some questions:

Side A:    Is it possible to write more LBGTQ+ materials without explicit sex stuff?  Shouldn't it be easy to replace a book like Gender Queer with a book that addresses the same situations without the details that get materials flagged?    There needs to be the ability to meet people a little way towards the middle and have enough appropriate materials if we are going to have a line in the sand about sexually explicit materials.  

Side B:   If it's all about the sexually explicit situations, shouldn't your objections be applied evenly?   How come the lists never have things like John Greene or Stephen King books on them, that when you look also have explicit sexual situations in them?   How come when you start winning school board seats you don't implement policies like "no books with any BJ references" instead of "no books that mention gender fluidity"?   

1.  Stephen King books are not written towards elementary age children and will not be in elementary schools classrooms and libraries.  

2.  Stephen King is not trying to groom children into identifying as a different gender and steering them down a path of sterilization.

Side A are narcissistic authoritarian perverts.   There is no comparison.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, jonmx said:

1.  Stephen King books are not written towards elementary age children and will not be in elementary schools classrooms and libraries.  

2.  Stephen King is not trying to groom children into identifying as a different gender and steering them down a path of sterilization.

Side A are narcissistic authoritarian perverts.   There is no comparison.  

1. Most of the examples I've seen of the books like Gender Queer and others are in HS and public library settings.  That is my frame of reference when talking about this topic, so examples like Stephen King and John Greene have relevance.   

2.  Is a lot of speculation and projecting as to what the intent of the author is, and certainly what the intent of school librarians and teachers are. 

 

This is a perfect example of what I was talking about with Voltaire, though.   Example by example, I'd guess we agree on 90% of what should and shouldn't be in school, but the fight reverts to intent and labels all the time instead.   We somehow don't talk about when and where examples like the books in question should be available, we fight about if the school librarian is a groomer for having the book available. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, craftsman said:

This is mdc's life in a nutshell. 

Yours is posting with Tardcore on Christmas. 🎄 😞 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, jonmx said:

1.  Stephen King books are not written towards elementary age children and will not be in elementary schools classrooms and libraries.  

2.  Stephen King is not trying to groom children into identifying as a different gender and steering them down a path of sterilization.

Side A are narcissistic authoritarian perverts.   There is no comparison.  

BAHAHAHAHAHA

Oh look, it's the board Pedo accusing others of "grooming children into identifying as a different gender and steering them down a path of sterilization."  What's the purpose for their devious plot retard?  And maybe an actual pedo like yourself could be "groomed" but normal folks don't just change sexual preferences or identifies because some freak tells them about it.

Since you're a weak minded bit*h I can see why you'd worry about it for yourself.

Get a life you phuking loser, pedo weirdo.  Everyone is aware you're nothing but a freak with a kid fetish.

Get help loser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I realize it's not a perfect example, I just bring it up as a common example that would be in a lot of libraries, and I have also meet people upset about "sexual content" in books but have no problem with their kids reading King and other things.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BuckSwope said:

I realize it's not a perfect example, I just bring it up as a common example that would be in a lot of libraries, and I have also meet people upset about "sexual content" in books but have no problem with their kids reading King and other things.  

Why would you bring logic into it?

And I don't think even our resident pedo-obsessed weirdos have found sexually explicit books in elementary school libraries.  It's been middle school and up.  Many of the books are still inappropriate but big difference in the maturity of the potential reader. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

1. Most of the examples I've seen of the books like Gender Queer and others are in HS and public library settings.  That is my frame of reference when talking about this topic, so examples like Stephen King and John Greene have relevance.   

2.  Is a lot of speculation and projecting as to what the intent of the author is, and certainly what the intent of school librarians and teachers are. 

 

This is a perfect example of what I was talking about with Voltaire, though.   Example by example, I'd guess we agree on 90% of what should and shouldn't be in school, but the fight reverts to intent and labels all the time instead.   We somehow don't talk about when and where examples like the books in question should be available, we fight about if the school librarian is a groomer for having the book available. 

I think normal people agree on what should be appropriate for children.   But there is a radical cult that has taken over education departments at Universities and teacher associations which are advancing this gender ideology and pushing it onto young children at the youngest age possible.  This is an issue in many elementary schools across the country but is at a pandemic levels in states like Califoria and Oregon.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone know any second graders that read Stephen King? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, jonmx said:

I think normal people agree on what should be appropriate for children.   But there is a radical cult that has taken over education departments at Universities and teacher associations which are advancing this gender ideology and pushing it onto young children at the youngest age possible.  This is an issue in many elementary schools across the country but is at a pandemic levels in states like Califoria and Oregon.  

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Please find me more than 2 stories of inappropriate books being in elementary schools in Cali or Oregon you phuking nutjob.

Pandemic issue?  Like you think most kids are being "groomed" for some reason.  Again, what's the ultimate payoff for these supposed "groomers"?   Shouldn't they just have joined churches or boy scouts and been free to molest kids to their hearts content?  This whole "grooming" thing seems like it's a lot of work.

Stupid moron pedo.  PANDEMIC LEVELS!!!@@@####

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol...it is really funny how the narcissistic authoritarian perverts know exactly who I am talking about without even saying their names.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any Stephen King books targeted at elementary school kids, with covers of the book meant to draw them in? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Any Stephen King books targeted at elementary school kids, with covers of the book meant to draw them in? 

No.  And if you actually read my posts and not do this dumb crap, you would know the answer.  

When that happens, you and I will be full agreement about its removal, teachers removal, etc.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

No.  And if you actually read my posts and not do this dumb crap, you would know the answer.  

When that happens, you and I will be full agreement about its removal, teachers removal, etc.  

Sorry, no. Bringing Stephen King up in the first place is the problem. It was an attempt to reason this stuff. There is no reasoning it. You should stop doing it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jonmx said:

I think normal people agree on what should be appropriate for children.   But there is a radical cult that has taken over education departments at Universities and teacher associations which are advancing this gender ideology and pushing it onto young children at the youngest age possible.  This is an issue in many elementary schools across the country but is at a pandemic levels in states like Califoria and Oregon.  

IMO there are 2 levels to this "debate"

1.  If the material and situation is inappropriate for kids, especially in a school setting.  

2.   Frequency, motivations, labels.   

 

Again, we and I am guessing all if not damn near all of us will agree on #1 most of the time.     

#2 is where you and many others lose me, and also IMO chase many normal people to your cause when you start in about pandemic levels and radical cults, and grooming.   You then take a further mistep by frequently telling people you think are on the other side of the aisle as you that because they don't agree with you on #2 or meet your level of outrage too, that they are part of the problem and are supporters of this stuff.   When in fact, they agree with you on #1 and have said as much.     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

IMO there are 2 levels to this "debate"

1.  If the material and situation is inappropriate for kids, especially in a school setting.  

2.   Frequency, motivations, labels.   

 

Again, we and I am guessing all if not damn near all of us will agree on #1 most of the time.     

#2 is where you and many others lose me, and also IMO chase many normal people to your cause when you start in about pandemic levels and radical cults, and grooming.   You then take a further mistep by frequently telling people you think are on the other side of the aisle as you that because they don't agree with you on #2 or meet your level of outrage too, that they are part of the problem and are supporters of this stuff.   When in fact, they agree with you on #1 and have said as much.     

 

Well you are very naive.  The idea that kids wen from being .03% transgender to being 3% transgender in a 10 year period did not just magically happen because society is more accepting.  This is being pushed on kids.  It is clearly in the curriculum in the teacher education at Universities as well as being pushed in the continuing education stuff offered by the teachers associations.  Certainly some of the explosion in the growth of trangenderism is from online sources like tik-tok, but a lot of it is being brought into the classroom of young children under the guise of being inclusive.  Grade schools that have LBGT+ clubs are also a prime path for the grooming.   Many if not most schools in California will provide questionnaires to first graders on what their preferred genders and pronouns are, as if the really understand the consequences.  This is far from a problem in just a few schools.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jonmx said:

 

Well you are very naive.  The idea that kids wen from being .03% transgender to being 3% transgender in a 10 year period did not just magically happen because society is more accepting.  This is being pushed on kids.  It is clearly in the curriculum in the teacher education at Universities as well as being pushed in the continuing education stuff offered by the teachers associations.  Certainly some of the explosion in the growth of trangenderism is from online source like tik-tok, but a lot of it is being brought into the classroom of young children under the guise of being inclusive.  Grade schools that have LBGT+ clubs are also a prime path for the grooming.   Many if not most schools in California will provide questionnaires to first graders on what their preferred genders and pronouns are, as if the really understand the consequences.  This is far from a problem in just a few schools.  

lololololol

Show your work on the boled pedo weird.   Most would be thousands of schools.

Also, where's your example of the PANDEMIC!!@@@### of inappropriate books in elementary school libraries in Cali and Oregon.  Again, there are thousands of schools so I'm expecting to see hundreds of examples.

SHOW YOUR WORK WEIRDO PEDO

I'm here.  You can no longer just get away with pathetic statements without getting called out and demanded to show proof.

SHOW YOUR WORK WEIRDO PEDO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jonmx said:

 

Well you are very naive.  The idea that kids wen from being .03% transgender to being 3% transgender in a 10 year period did not just magically happen because society is more accepting.  This is being pushed on kids.  It is clearly in the curriculum in the teacher education at Universities as well as being pushed in the continuing education stuff offered by the teachers associations.  Certainly some of the explosion in the growth of trangenderism is from online source like tik-tok, but a lot of it is being brought into the classroom of young children under the guise of being inclusive.  Grade schools that have LBGT+ clubs are also a prime path for the grooming.   Many if not most schools in California will provide questionnaires to first graders on what their preferred genders and pronouns are, as if the really understand the consequences.  This is far from a problem in just a few schools.  

See jon, this is probably the most rational and nuanced post I've seen from you on the subject.   I largely agree with what you posted there too.   Like I said, tone down the hysterics and hyperbole and people will read and respond to good points.  

You've been around on these boards enough to know that this is not how discussions usually go here or online in general.   It usually starts with something like - "this is evil, evidence of liberals justifying grooming, pedos pushing sick crap, etc.." and a link to a movie or a library that has a book.    Then the fight about the frequency and it being one example ensues.   

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, BuckSwope said:

You are the one focusing on the "freaks".   I say leave people alone. (That said, I still have 0 clue why there is so much of this out there of people posting themselves.  People are truly dumb if think none if this will be dug through and leaked. ) 

All I ask for is equal application of outrage and rules.  Either people's sexual kinks and activities affect their job, or it doesn't.  

I could care less if that means this dude being tied up for spankings or you searching through step-sis porn on your phone.   

Depends if he needed a security clearance, or maybe even just a background check.  Working with nuclear materials, I would think so.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Depends if he needed a security clearance, or maybe even just a background check.  Working with nuclear materials, I would think so.  

Ok then - what would be flagged in that scenario on a background check?   

Sexual kinks?  Posting them to other (I assumed) adults?  

 

I will admit to my ignorance of what exactly goes into a background check for positions like this or in general.   I was half joking, but if all it takes is people posting sex pics online or having freaky kinks to fail something like that, I would be surprised.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, avoiding injuries said:

Can a cEnTeRiSt here explain how this person got appointed to the position he currently has with all this (no pun intended) baggage?

 

I’m not really familiar with Instagram. Are any of the pictures on the right Brinton?  The one on the left (which is also on the right and was not posted by Brinton) isn’t, right?  If none of those photos are of Brinton or were posted by Brinton, I don’t think that should be cause for discipline at work.

The luggage stealing yes should cause firing.  Which really doesn’t make sense, they probably have to be making like $200k a year right?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Raven Fan said:

Anything like this even outside work would get someone fired from most companies.

He should have been gone already. 

I don’t think I would have ever got fired for that. Now if I said come see me at insert my company name here then that’s definitely grounds for termination

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, BuckSwope said:

I realize it's not a perfect example, I just bring it up as a common example that would be in a lot of libraries, and I have also meet people upset about "sexual content" in books but have no problem with their kids reading King and other things.  

I have a problem with my son reading sexually explicit books at age 11. And I would have twice as much problem with him reading about gay sex as well

if my son turns out gay so be it. I have no problem with it whatsoever. And I think it’s perfectly fine. However I don’t think normalization of it in literature is a step in the right direction. It’s all downhill after that

ive always been of the mind you can have all your gay marriages and stuff but there. The problem is after they get it they don’t stop

which is why I’m also a 100% absolutist on the 2A. If there was a decision that for 100 years we would ban those scary ar looking guns but after agreeing there would never be another firearms discussion I would sit down and listen. But we who support the 2a know it’s never going to stop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

Ok then - what would be flagged in that scenario on a background check?   

Sexual kinks?  Posting them to other (I assumed) adults?  

 

I will admit to my ignorance of what exactly goes into a background check for positions like this or in general.   I was half joking, but if all it takes is people posting sex pics online or having freaky kinks to fail something like that, I would be surprised.  

I'm no expert either, although I've had background checks before.  One concern is if you have anything which could compromise you, like outstanding debts/bankruptcies, or in more general something for which you could be blackmailed.  

ETA: The criteria varies by security level of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can bring up the church, Boy Scouts and Republicans with wide stances all you want. The fact remains that it’s the democrats pushing this garbage. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

Ok then - what would be flagged in that scenario on a background check?   

Sexual kinks?  Posting them to other (I assumed) adults?  

 

I will admit to my ignorance of what exactly goes into a background check for positions like this or in general.   I was half joking, but if all it takes is people posting sex pics online or having freaky kinks to fail something like that, I would be surprised.  

Here is a good editorial about the red flags that should have been seen regarding Sam Brinton.  It appears no one ever checked out the stories he told that made him so endeared to the alphabet crowd:

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/12/sam-brintons-story-always-good-true/

But basically he's been full of sh*t since he came on to the scene, but no one was willing to do the leg work to verify it. His story was just TOOOO compelling to an alphabet person to question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

 

The luggage stealing yes should cause firing.  Which really doesn’t make sense, they probably have to be making like $200k a year right?

 

Winona Ryder got busted for shoplifting after she had made it.   It's an indication of mental issues.  So, while he should be removed from his post for committing felonies, he should also be removed because those felonies are indicative of mental issues. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They should hire me to vet these people. I knew he had mental issues the first time I saw him with Rich Levine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Strike said:

Winona Ryder got busted for shoplifting after she had made it.   It's an indication of mental issues.  So, while he should be removed from his post for committing felonies, he should also be removed because those felonies are indicative of mental issues. 

True

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

I have a problem with my son reading sexually explicit books at age 11. And I would have twice as much problem with him reading about gay sex as well

if my son turns out gay so be it. I have no problem with it whatsoever. And I think it’s perfectly fine. However I don’t think normalization of it in literature is a step in the right direction. It’s all downhill after that

ive always been of the mind you can have all your gay marriages and stuff but there. The problem is after they get it they don’t stop

which is why I’m also a 100% absolutist on the 2A. If there was a decision that for 100 years we would ban those scary ar looking guns but after agreeing there would never be another firearms discussion I would sit down and listen. But we who support the 2a know it’s never going to stop

I would as well, depending on how exactly we define this.   Here's the thing though, most of the time I see this topic brought up, it's in a High School or a public library where the common books are being challenged.   As far as I've seen something like Gender Queer hasn't shown up in an Elementary Library.   Anybody can correct me on that and I will stand corrected.    A High School deals with kids from 14 to adults as they turn 18.  That is far different than an 11 year old.  

I also understand and acknowledge there have been examples involving kids at age 11 that people have taken issue with.   The examples I've seen have more to do with Drag Queen story hour and discussing things like pronouns and genders, not overly sexually explicit books.   

I don't understand or agree with your line in the sand of gay/straight, but respect it and that's your call as a parent.     I also understand we still might have a differing opinion about what sexually explicit should be defined as that might make us disagree on a few examples.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Strike said:

Here is a good editorial about the red flags that should have been seen regarding Sam Brinton.  It appears no one ever checked out the stories he told that made him so endeared to the alphabet crowd:

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/12/sam-brintons-story-always-good-true/

But basically he's been full of sh*t since he came on to the scene, but no one was willing to do the leg work to verify it. His story was just TOOOO compelling to an alphabet person to question.

Thanks for the link.  It was an interesting read.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×