*Official 2020 Election Thread*

[dogcows 1,030]

18 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

Well yeah I pointed that out myself.  Every major event can be viewed as yet another thing that damages trust more.  The 2016 election caused democrats to not trust elections.  COVID  and the coverage of it has damaged trust the people have in their doctors and the medical field.  BLM is a loss of trust in cops.  The 2020 election has caused republicans to stop trusting elections.  It just gets worse and worse. 

WTF? Dems trust elections. They voted big-time in 2018 and 2020. It’s funny that you think trust in elections is lower in 2020 than 2016; then why did 30 million more people vote in 2020? We have a very trustworthy election system in America. Maybe not everybody likes it (people in high-population states might feel the electoral college system favors rural states), but for many decades, it has been reliable, free of fraud, and thanks to the civil rights progress in the 60s, quite inclusive. Nothing is perfect, including our election system, but is there a country that does it better?

[dogcows 1,030]

2 minutes ago, drobeski said:

Anything different about this election ? Of the top of your empty head ?

An incumbent president that refuses to concede!

Let me guess though - you’re parroting Donny by implying that because people mailed in votes, all those votes are fraudulent? You know millions of people mailed in votes in 2016 too, right? And every election? But I guess if the oompa-loompa at 1600 Pennsylvania ave says Mail-in votes are fraudulent, it must be true. You can just skip ahead to posting another video of people randomly stuffing old newspapers into a suitcase and call it voter fraud.

[Mike Honcho 5,274]

7 minutes ago, drobeski said:

He may, but the supreme court is not finished yet in either case. Clueless idiot.  

If at first you don't succeed, find a dumber option...good strategy. 

[OldMaid 2,130]

13 minutes ago, drobeski said:

He may, but the supreme court is not finished yet in either case. Clueless idiot.  

That’s gonna leave a hell of a rope burn when it slips through those little grubby fingers of yours.

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

3 hours ago, Fireballer said:

What did I miss? Is it over?  

 

3 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Then why no explanation? That would have been easy enough to state. 

Because that one is a waste of time since there is another case that is the same with more states involved (10 right now). He gave an order that all the defendants (PA,GA, WI, AZ...) have to respond by THURS individually. They can't group all their responses together so now it's more than once case. It has snowballed into 4 cases basically.

He didn't throw out the case as the left is saying. He's consolidating it which is the correct thing to do since time is short. What he does from there will be more than a one line response but he will have to address the concerns of 10 states right now and likely more by THURS on why those states get to break Federal election laws when everyone else did not. 

What's stopping a Red state from doing the same thing next time? It's not even political at this point. No election will ever be fair again for any state. Left doesn't even understand that aspect. They can't see two feet in front of their face as usual. It will backfire on them when TX and FLA decide phuck it, we'll cheat as well.

 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

11 minutes ago, dogcows said:

An incumbent president that refuses to concede!

Let me guess though - you’re parroting Donny by implying that because people mailed in votes, all those votes are fraudulent? You know millions of people mailed in votes in 2016 too, right? And every election? But I guess if the oompa-loompa at 1600 Pennsylvania ave says Mail-in votes are fraudulent, it must be true. You can just skip ahead to posting another video of people randomly stuffing old newspapers into a suitcase and call it voter fraud.

Yup, Newbie. The village idiot returns. 

[drobeski 3,061]

8 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

That’s gonna leave a hell of a rope burn when it slips through those little grubby fingers of yours.

Grubby fingers ?  Just admit you're an uninformed pile of sh!t idiot and move on. 

[dogcows 1,030]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Yup, Newbie. The village idiot returns. 

Says the person that believes Mail-in votes are fraudulent, with zero evidence other than Trump tweeted it...

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Yup, Newbie. The village idiot returns. 

And ignoring Stacey Abramas never conceded and Hillary telling Biden NOT TO CONCEDE even before the election..meh. Takes a special amount of brain power to be the village idiot. 

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

1 minute ago, dogcows said:

Says the person that believes Mail-in votes are fraudulent, with zero evidence other than Trump tweeted it...

Pages of mail in voter fraud:

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8urdZR3/voter-fraud-nov-17th-6-months-of/

 

[dogcows 1,030]

Just now, FlyinHeadlock said:

And ignoring Stacey Abramas never conceded and Hillary telling Biden NOT TO CONCEDE even before the election..meh. Takes a special amount of brain power to be the village idiot. 

Stacey Abrams: “I acknowledge that former Secretary of State Brian Kemp will be certified as the victor in the 2018 gubernatorial election.”

And are you STILL talking about Hillary? Maybe Trump could do one more investigation of her emails before he leaves office, just for old times sake?

[Hawkeye21 2,399]

1 minute ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

Pages of mail in voter fraud:

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8urdZR3/voter-fraud-nov-17th-6-months-of/

 

What are they waiting for?  The evidence is all right there. Trump wins!

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

1 minute ago, dogcows said:

Stacey Abrams: “I acknowledge that former Secretary of State Brian Kemp will be certified as the victor in the 2018 gubernatorial election.”

And are you STILL talking about Hillary? Maybe Trump could do one more investigation of her emails before he leaves office, just for old times sake?

Why was Hillary still talking about Trump? Or any election? 

[dogcows 1,030]

Just now, FlyinHeadlock said:

Pages of mail in voter fraud:

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8urdZR3/voter-fraud-nov-17th-6-months-of/

 

Somebody needs to stop freebasing conspiracy theories. That site is off-the-charts insane.

[shorepatrol 1,870]

Just now, dogcows said:

Stacey Abrams: “I acknowledge that former Secretary of State Brian Kemp will be certified as the victor in the 2018 gubernatorial election.”

And are you STILL talking about Hillary? Maybe Trump could do one more investigation of her emails before he leaves office, just for old times sake?

Gotta get that egg recipe tuned up brother. I don't wanna have to tell her twice. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

4 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Says the person that believes Mail-in votes are fraudulent, with zero evidence other than Trump tweeted it...

Some are. Link to me claiming they all are and I’ll take a hiatus until inauguration. Go! 

[dogcows 1,030]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Why was Hillary still talking about Trump? Or any election? 

Hillary has nothing to do with anything. She could say “I actually voted for Trump” and nobody would care one way or the other. She is old news, and the Dems moved on quickly from her. That’s why they are taking over the White House in a month. Trumpers still obsessing over her.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

Just now, dogcows said:

Hillary has nothing to do with anything. She could say “I actually voted for Trump” and nobody would care one way or the other. She is old news, and the Dems moved on quickly from her. That’s why they are taking over the White House in a month. Trumpers still obsessing over her.

August isn’t that old. Current election cycle. You miss that? 

[dogcows 1,030]

1 minute ago, shorepatrol said:

Gotta get that egg recipe tuned up brother. I don't wanna have to tell her twice. 

I’m sure lots of ladies just can’t wait to enjoy your baby carrot.

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said:

What are they waiting for?  The evidence is all right there. Trump wins!

Because the Judges in those states are staunch left. Like the one today still saying the President can't pardon people. Funny he never said a word about any other Presidential pardon for people who did far worse. Not once his whole career. Just this time. He's an idiot if you actually followed the case. He gave Flynn a lecture on treason when both sides said, wait he wasn't charged with treason, only lying to the FBI. At that point the judge said he was sorry. He's an effin moron. 

[dogcows 1,030]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

August isn’t that old. Current election cycle. You miss that? 

Nobody but Trumpers are listening to her. Zzzz... you telling me she said that was the first I heard of it. It’s the Trumpers that stick with a loser after he lost.

[Fireballer 2,642]

5 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Stacey Abrams: “I acknowledge that former Secretary of State Brian Kemp will be certified as the victor in the 2018 gubernatorial election.”

 

Thats a concession?  Lmao.  That translates to "I know I got cheated, but nothing I can do about it"

[dogcows 1,030]

Just now, Fireballer said:

Thats a concession?  Lmao.  That translates to "I know I got cheated, but nothing I can do about it"

And yet Trump can’t even manage THAT. Sore loser doesn’t even begin to cover it.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

1 minute ago, dogcows said:

And yet Trump can’t even manage THAT. Sore loser doesn’t even begin to cover it.

You have yet to call Abrams fat. Yet it’s all you ever say about Trump. Afraid you’ll be called a racist? 

[Fnord 2,265]

I will never cease to be amazed, terrified and highly entertained by the Trumpers that fancy themselves Constitutional Patriots that are screaming for SCOTUS to overturn a legitimate election. No worries about disenfranchising 80 million+ voters, 200 years of precedent, potential widespread social unrest and violence and the fact they're supporting a complete fraud who's only goal is to bilk his supporters out of more cash. 

All the while b!tching about Activist Judges and election cheating! Unbelievable people don't see how it's absolutely impossible to reconcile these actions without being ginormous partisan hypocrites. And not just a little bit ignorant.

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

8 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Thats a concession?  Lmao.  That translates to "I know I got cheated, but nothing I can do about it"

I do believe Stacey got cheated. Kemp controlled the cards for the machines and they magically failed in black communities. Odds of that happening are about 0. On the other hand, she is also a known fraudster. She just got out frauded in the end. 

[shorepatrol 1,870]

16 minutes ago, dogcows said:

I’m sure lots of ladies just can’t wait to enjoy your baby carrot.

Not being a woman helps. Big guns, loud pipes. You wouldn't understand. Your wife does

[Reality 3,121]

We're just going to have to suspend belief this election cycle. Republicans picked up seats in the House, dominated state legislatures across the country, will probably hold onto the Senate.

All that while watching Biden benefit from statistical impossibilities at 3am when counting was supposed to have stopped through the obvious harvesting of mail in ballots. It is what is, mid terms should be interesting. Democrats don't realize they actually got their teeth kicked in. Good job getting the Presidency, now you have to actually govern.. We'll see how that works out.

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

1 minute ago, Fnord said:

I will never cease to be amazed, terrified and highly entertained by the Trumpers that fancy themselves Constitutional Patriots that are screaming for SCOTUS to overturn a legitimate election. No worries about disenfranchising 80 million+ voters, 200 years of precedent, potential widespread social unrest and violence and the fact they're supporting a complete fraud who's only goal is to bilk his supporters out of more cash. 

All the while b!tching about Activist Judges and election cheating! Unbelievable people don't see how it's absolutely impossible to reconcile these actions without being ginormous partisan hypocrites. And not just a little bit ignorant.

Elections were already overturned this election for a few people due to fraud of vote switching but I think you call that a "glitch". The FBI calls election machine tampering "glitches". If you don't believe me look up the FBI classified document Reality Winner released that got her in jail. The FBI called the fraud in an election a "glitch" to cover it up. 

[dogcows 1,030]

4 minutes ago, Reality said:

We're just going to have to suspend belief this election cycle. Republicans picked up seats in the House, dominated state legislatures across the country, will probably hold onto the Senate.

All that while watching Biden benefit from statistical impossibilities at 3am when counting was supposed to have stopped through the obvious harvesting of mail in ballots. It is what is, mid terms should be interesting. Democrats don't realize they actually got their teeth kicked in. Good job getting the Presidency, now you have to actually govern.. We'll see how that works out.

“‘picked up seats” - but they still are in the minority in the house. It was just LESS of a loss than 2018. Republicans lost the HoR and the White House

[shorepatrol 1,870]

1 minute ago, dogcows said:

Your mom tried to explain it to me but I couldn’t understand what she was saying while she was biting her pillow.

Nobody believes you're man enough pookie 

[drobeski 3,061]

18 minutes ago, Fnord said:

I will never cease to be amazed, terrified and highly entertained by the Trumpers that fancy themselves Constitutional Patriots that are screaming for SCOTUS to overturn a legitimate election. No worries about disenfranchising 80 million+ voters, 200 years of precedent, potential widespread social unrest and violence and the fact they're supporting a complete fraud who's only goal is to bilk his supporters out of more cash. 

All the while b!tching about Activist Judges and election cheating! Unbelievable people don't see how it's absolutely impossible to reconcile these actions without being ginormous partisan hypocrites. And not just a little bit ignorant.

I'm amazed someone could call it a legitimate election. What do you base that on ?

[JustinCharge 2,397]

If the dems lost the House, the next day they would start complaining about gerrymandering again.  Haven't heard that since they took the House back.

[Fnord 2,265]

1 minute ago, JustinCharge said:

If the dems lost the House, the next day they would start complaining about gerrymandering again.  Haven't heard that since they took the House back.

Then you're not paying attention. 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

29 minutes ago, Fnord said:

I will never cease to be amazed, terrified and highly entertained by the Trumpers that fancy themselves Constitutional Patriots that are screaming for SCOTUS to overturn a legitimate election. No worries about disenfranchising 80 million+ voters, 200 years of precedent, potential widespread social unrest and violence and the fact they're supporting a complete fraud who's only goal is to bilk his supporters out of more cash. 

All the while b!tching about Activist Judges and election cheating! Unbelievable people don't see how it's absolutely impossible to reconcile these actions without being ginormous partisan hypocrites. And not just a little bit ignorant.

It looks partisan and hypocritical because you aren't seeing the cause.  People are not up in arms about the election.  Nor activist judges.  Nor cheating.  They are up in arms because at a very core level in their being they no longer trust the system.  They are attacking the entire system up and down as expressions of this.  This is what political destabilization looks like.  Law and order is going out the window.  ALL of it.  This is going to be extremely violent and bloody.

[OldMaid 2,130]

49 minutes ago, drobeski said:

Grubby fingers ?  Just admit you're an uninformed pile of sh!t idiot and move on. 

I prefer to sit back and watch you get your hopes dashed over and over again. Anyone with more than one brain cell knows this isn’t going anywhere. 

It’s quite entertaining though. 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

31 minutes ago, Reality said:

We're just going to have to suspend belief this election cycle. Republicans picked up seats in the House, dominated state legislatures across the country, will probably hold onto the Senate.

All that while watching Biden benefit from statistical impossibilities at 3am when counting was supposed to have stopped through the obvious harvesting of mail in ballots. It is what is, mid terms should be interesting. Democrats don't realize they actually got their teeth kicked in. Good job getting the Presidency, now you have to actually govern.. We'll see how that works out.

Unfortunately, there are two options as I see it: 

1. The republican side refuses to accept Biden's victory.  That's looking like a very violent option but, at the very least, the rank and file republicans are still following educated and trained republican leaders to try to guide us through to a better place.

2. Republican leaders try to do as you suggest.  Give Biden attaboys on winning the Presidency and challenge him to govern well.  If they do that, then you can be sure a far right radical politician will emerge to fill the vacuum they just created, someone willing to fight, and he or she will capture the bulk of GOP voters.  And then things are vastly worse than you can possibly imagine.

You are choosing the absolute worst solution on the board for the future of this nation.  That option will ruin everything.  Politicians cannot forget they are beholden to their constituents.  And if they do forget that, the constituents will find someone else.

This is REALLY not the moment for republicans to stand up and "try to be the better human being".

[JustinCharge 2,397]

The Supreme Court *can* rule in Texas vs Pennsylvania that equal protection was violated and the 4 states listed must find a different way to allocate electors.  Sounds like that result is unlikely.  Also, even if that occurs enough of those states would have to deny Biden electors to cause him to not win.  Again, that could be as little as 2 states.  If PA and either MI or GA do not send Biden any electors, he drops from 306 to 270.  Then all it takes is ONE unfaithful elector to drop Biden to 269 and Trump wins.  States do have laws requiring electors to vote for their popular vote winner, but for some states, that means they could vote for someone else and then get sued by the state and fined $2000 or something.

The Trump lawsuits that failed were also instrumental in Texas filing this suit.  While Trump went 1-4905347504 in court, each of those cases raised questions and provided evidence.  These questions and evidence were then compiled and filtered to help Texas do this.  So, technically Trump lost in court, but the losses were a path to get here where they can win.

[drobeski 3,061]

21 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

I prefer to sit back and watch you get your hopes dashed over and over again. Anyone with more than one brain cell knows this isn’t going anywhere. 

It’s quite entertaining though. 

Sure they do. Im sure you said the same thing about Trump beating Hillary,  and the Mueller scam, the impeachment.... blah blah blah. Let it play out and see where it goes. 

They cheated and states violated the constitution. Both facts. Neither can be argued.  They may get away with, they may not. 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

1 minute ago, JustinCharge said:

The Supreme Court *can* rule in Texas vs Pennsylvania that equal protection was violated and the 4 states listed must find a different way to allocate electors.  Sounds like that result is unlikely.  Also, even if that occurs enough of those states would have to deny Biden electors to cause him to not win.  Again, that could be as little as 2 states.  If PA and either MI or GA do not send Biden any electors, he drops from 306 to 270.  Then all it takes is ONE unfaithful elector to drop Biden to 269 and Trump wins.  States do have laws requiring electors to vote for their popular vote winner, but for some states, that means they could vote for someone else and then get sued by the state and fined $2000 or something.

It was funny when libtards we’re doing PSA’s in 2016 begging electors to not vote for Trump or not vote at all. Pretty funny if they gets put forward now and to see his they react.