vomit 502 Posted April 27, 2022 14 minutes ago, JustinCharge said: no this is about YOU. you are championing twitter for banning hate speech, yet they ban trump and keep putin and the ayatollah. so you think putin and the ayatollah are not hate speech yet trump is hate speech. it shows you are a crazy partisan hack that should be laughed at. It doesn't matter what I think, little boy, it's about what twitter thinks. I'm not championing twitter, I'm just speaking the truth, and the truth is that not one single person has gotten banned from twitter for speaking conservative ideals. I don't know what Putin or the Ayatollah tweet, I don't follow them. Of course Putin is a monster, but I'm sure he's smart enough not to tweet "Murdered 15 more ukes today, FAWK YEAH WHO'S WITH ME", therefore he won't get banned. Twitter has never once banned a person based on their ideology, only their tweets. You're too immature and stupid to understand any of this, but the people who do, they are all laughing at you. also, NUCLEAR WAR LOOK OUT!!! Made you look. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vomit 502 Posted April 27, 2022 6 minutes ago, Djgb13 said: I can’t believe y’all are entertaining that retard gutterpedo. His posts alone serve to make fun of him so it’s like low hanging fruit. Dude makes it too easy Keep posting you retarded puppet. Are you between patients now, Doc? Or is it the 7th inning stretch? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DonS 3,304 Posted April 27, 2022 11 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: He tweeted a great hummus recipe last week, good follow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,720 Posted April 27, 2022 1 minute ago, vomit said: Oh did hurt your wittle feewlings, lil fagg0t? Your overlords would cancel and dox you if they knew you used the 'F' word. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,793 Posted April 27, 2022 54 minutes ago, vomit said: suck my d!ck I think that makes you the phag... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,793 Posted April 27, 2022 So it's more like a morning after poison pill. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vomit 502 Posted April 27, 2022 3 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,793 Posted April 27, 2022 Honestly, 44 billion,? This guy's jackassery along with all the Russian oligarchs? Makes the argument for socialism. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,821 Posted April 27, 2022 10 minutes ago, wiffleball said: Honestly, 44 billion,? This guy's jackassery along with all the Russian oligarchs? Makes the argument for socialism. Russia doesn’t have Oligarchs. They have gangsters that kick up to Putin and are allowed to operate with his permission. There’s no citizens United and dark money PAC’s in Russia. If you want to find actual oligarchs, head to the Hamptons in summer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,339 Posted April 27, 2022 29 minutes ago, wiffleball said: I think that makes you the phag... Lol this dude is losing his focking mind and it’s hilarious. When the entire board laughs at you, even the left leaning ones, you know you must be focking up. He’s literally been here all day arguing nonstop. We know he doesn’t have a job just from that alone Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,035 Posted April 27, 2022 5 hours ago, vomit said: it was never banned you total focking idiot. It was temporarily suspended twice- once because it was deemed to be harrassing people with what it was writing. It was Twitter's call. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,035 Posted April 27, 2022 "Russia doesn't have oligarchs must be one of the new logic lines the right has to parrot everywhere." Say it enough times and it might be true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,821 Posted April 27, 2022 Just now, Sean Mooney said: "Russia doesn't have oligarchs must be one of the new logic lines the right has to parrot everywhere." Say it enough times and it might be true. Nah, I’m the only one saying that. That’s because I know what one is. Liberals toss that word around like they do racist. Maybe someone will pick up on it, but probably not. Look how I have to beat off illiterate morons when I say it. It’s not worth it. But you’re welcome. I tried. Sometimes the student just doesn’t want to learn. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Utilit99 4,099 Posted April 27, 2022 Public school teachers are pedos AND idiots. Go figure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,035 Posted April 27, 2022 26 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Nah, I’m the only one saying that. That’s because I know what one is. Liberals toss that word around like they do racist. Maybe someone will pick up on it, but probably not. Look how I have to beat off illiterate morons when I say it. It’s not worth it. But you’re welcome. I tried. Sometimes the student just doesn’t want to learn. Just cause you say something doesn't make it true. You could just focus on saying normal things rather than making up nonsense Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,821 Posted April 27, 2022 3 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: Just cause you say something doesn't make it true. You could just focus on saying normal things rather than making up nonsense Explain how it’s nonsense. Hint: consult with a dictionary. Read slow. Concentrate on the words “political influence”. As we have found out, they don’t have any. I rest my case. Make yours now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,060 Posted April 27, 2022 2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Russia doesn’t have Oligarchs. They have gangsters that kick up to Putin and are allowed to operate with his permission. There’s no citizens United and dark money PAC’s in Russia. If you want to find actual oligarchs, head to the Hamptons in summer. This man hates America Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,035 Posted April 27, 2022 There are some rumblings that Musk is not actually going to buy Twitter at this point. Tesla stock has dropped since Musk announced he was buying Twitter as many investors believe the money will come from Musk selling Tesla stock. There is also some ongoing stuff with China where half the Tesla vehicles are produced and some of his Tweets seem to indicate he is losing interest in all of it. On top of it- Twitter stock is trading 11% below what he offered which is surprising. No idea if he is going to back out or not but there was some talk that was the ultimate pump and dump type deal that was going to happen but he couldn't see the best spot to bail out so he won't get involved in the first place. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,035 Posted April 28, 2022 2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Explain how it’s nonsense. Hint: consult with a dictionary. Read slow. Concentrate on the words “political influence”. As we have found out, they don’t have any. I rest my case. Make yours now. You are basically saying you want to use the dictionary definition (something you have decried when I suggest it) and have all but admitted it is silly and you are making it up....yet the onus is on me to argue against it? One can not argue against nonsense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,821 Posted April 28, 2022 5 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: This man hates America Because I called them gangsters instead of oligarchs? Gangsters aren’t good guys either. Worse actually. I’m pointing out what you hysterical ninnies have been saying all along. That Putin is a brutal authoritarian. Oligarchs can’t exist under a regime like Putins. He controls them, they don’t control him. You know I'm right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Utilit99 4,099 Posted April 28, 2022 10 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: This man hates America Liberals like you hate America. It's well proven. And it's tiring. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,821 Posted April 28, 2022 13 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: You are basically saying you want to use the dictionary definition (something you have decried when I suggest it) and have all but admitted it is silly and you are making it up....yet the onus is on me to argue against it? One can not argue against nonsense. “Political influence”. That dictionary needs to be updated. You see kid, things happen over the course of time that reveal what we once thought was true simply isn’t. If the so called oligarchs had the kind of influence that is necessary to be defined as an oligarch, the business with Ukraine wouldn’t be happening like it is. The “oligarchs” are losing their fortunes and some of them are being disappeared or killed. In an oligarchy, the politician goes away, not the oligarch. Get it? You know I’m right. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,035 Posted April 28, 2022 1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said: “Political influence”. That dictionary needs to be updated. You see kid, things happen over the course of time that reveal what we once thought was true simply isn’t. If the so called oligarchs had the kind of influence that is necessary to be defined as an oligarch, the business with Ukraine wouldn’t be happening like it is. The “oligarchs” are losing their fortunes and some of them are being disappeared or killed. In an olighachy, the politician goes away, nit the oligarch. Get it? You know I’m right. You think you are right. You just sound dumb trying to play semantics. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Utilit99 4,099 Posted April 28, 2022 Liberal public school teachers are so stupid they just can't shut it when they are getting beat up. Freaking groomers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,821 Posted April 28, 2022 2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: You think you are right. You just sound dumb trying to play semantics. Oligharch and gangster aren’t separated by semantics. They are clearly different. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,471 Posted April 28, 2022 1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said: You think you are right. You just sound dumb trying to play semantics. see heres the issue, he is 100% right, left leaning people continue to change the literal definition of words, and when you say thats not what it means, you claim semantics and say you know what I am saying words like woman, man, racist, homophobic, transphobic, white nationalist, oligarch, literally have different connotations than intended words have meaning, if you change what they mean and can't agree on that it makes discussion impossible, which is what they want 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,821 Posted April 28, 2022 7 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said: see heres the issue, he is 100% right, left leaning people continue to change the literal definition of words, and when you say thats not what it means, you claim semantics and say you know what I am saying words like woman, man, racist, homophobic, transphobic, white nationalist, oligarch, literally have different connotations than intended words have meaning, if you change what they mean and can't agree on that it makes discussion impossible, which is what they want Yup. They are so blinded by partisanship that they can’t even recognize that I’m not saying anything good about Putin. I’m actually acknowledging what they say about him. But by calling those gangsters oligarchs means our oligarchs can’t actually be oligarchs because they are nothing like those evil Russians. Our guys are nice, like Bezos and the Koch brothers. They’re for gay marriage and amnesty for undocumented immigrants after all. They can’t possibly wield undue influence and use it for their own gains and ideology. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,471 Posted April 28, 2022 1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Yup. They are so blinded by partisanship that they can’t even recognize that I’m not saying anything good about Putin. I’m actually acknowledging what they say about him. But by calling those gangsters oligarchs means our oligarchs can’t actually be oligarchs because they are nothing like those evil Russians. Our guys are nice, like Bezos and the Koch brothers. They’re for gay marriage and amnesty for undocumented immigrants after all. So good. the United States is the biggest Oligarchy in the world just like we invade the most countries Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,035 Posted April 28, 2022 9 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said: see heres the issue, he is 100% right, left leaning people continue to change the literal definition of words, and when you say thats not what it means, you claim semantics and say you know what I am saying words like woman, man, racist, homophobic, transphobic, white nationalist, oligarch, literally have different connotations than intended words have meaning, if you change what they mean and can't agree on that it makes discussion impossible, which is what they want Let me be very clear- I don't give a flying motherfuck about how dummies on the left try to redefine words. I just don't. It's dumb. It sounds dumb when they do it. It sounds equally dumb to me when someone is sitting on a motherfucking message board trying to say "There are no oligarchs in Russia because blah blah blah....." Two groups of people or two people saying stupid made up does not mean one is right and one is wrong. It means they are both are morons. As to "oligarch" the actual definition of the word is most closely associated with people of Russian descent. I didn't make that up. Putin is just ignoring them right now. It doesn't mean they cease to exist. It means Putin is insane. And if the distinction trying to be made is "I'm calling them gangsters and not oligarchs because blah blah blah...." it's just someone trying to be a douche. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,471 Posted April 28, 2022 2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: Let me be very clear- I don't give a flying motherfuck about how dummies on the left try to redefine words. I just don't. It's dumb. It sounds dumb when they do it. It sounds equally dumb to me when someone is sitting on a motherfucking message board trying to say "There are no oligarchs in Russia because blah blah blah....." Two groups of people or two people saying stupid made up does not mean one is right and one is wrong. It means they are both are morons. As to "oligarch" the actual definition of the word is most closely associated with people of Russian descent. I didn't make that up. Putin is just ignoring them right now. It doesn't mean they cease to exist. It means Putin is insane. so what, lots of words have different origins (remember when Nazi meant Nationalist Socialist Party? Now it means white dude thats conservative) you are saying that Russia is an oligarchy, when quite frankly its a totalitarian dictatorship lead by the presumably richest leader in the world in order for it to be an oligarch, it would mean that Russia could not function without the rich people pulling the strings (which is the United States), and thats just not the case 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,821 Posted April 28, 2022 4 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: Let me be very clear- I don't give a flying motherfuck about how dummies on the left try to redefine words. I just don't. It's dumb. It sounds dumb when they do it. It sounds equally dumb to me when someone is sitting on a motherfucking message board trying to say "There are no oligarchs in Russia because blah blah blah....." Two groups of people or two people saying stupid made up does not mean one is right and one is wrong. It means they are both are morons. As to "oligarch" the actual definition of the word is most closely associated with people of Russian descent. I didn't make that up. Putin is just ignoring them right now. It doesn't mean they cease to exist. It means Putin is insane. Are you Fockin kidding me, teacher? You think oligarchy started in modern day Russia? While Russia still had Czars oligarchs were running the show here. Ever hear of the robber barons? My god. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,035 Posted April 28, 2022 1 minute ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said: so what, lots of words have different origins (remember when Nazi meant Nationalist Socialist Party? Now it means white dude thats conservative) you are saying that Russia is an oligarchy, when quite frankly its a totalitarian dictatorship lead by the presumably richest leader in the world in order for it to be an oligarch, it would mean that Russia could not function without the rich people pulling the strings (which is the United States), and thats just not the case This is where HT should be yelling and calling you "kid" telling you to read things Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,821 Posted April 28, 2022 1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said: This is where HT should be yelling and calling you "kid" telling you to read things Why would I do that? You’re all focked up man, can’t see straight. This makes no sense Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,821 Posted April 28, 2022 Sean Mooney thinks oligarchs just came about under Putin. Because a biased dictionary said so, and he isn’t bright enough to see through it. Next thing he’ll say is that Wikipedia is a real encyclopedia with no bias either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,035 Posted April 28, 2022 14 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Sean Mooney thinks oligarchs just came about under Putin. Because a biased dictionary said so, and he isn’t bright enough to see through it. Next thing he’ll say is that Wikipedia is a real encyclopedia with no bias either. Are you so dense that you don't know oligarchs in Russia became a thing at least- AT LEAST- when Gorbachev was in power? It came about as Russia began to privatize more and more. And a "biased dictionary"? You need to have your head examined. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,821 Posted April 28, 2022 6 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: Are you so dense that you don't know oligarchs in Russia became a thing at least- AT LEAST- when Gorbachev was in power? And a "biased dictionary"? You need to have your head examined. Yeah, ok. There isn’t one dictionary. You should know that. Oligarchs can’t be defined by one country. Many countries have them, and had them way before Russia. Using Russia, and only Russia to define the subject is a clear case of bias. Like I said, you aren’t bright enough to see it because you suffer from what you accuse fox viewers of: confirmation bias. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,035 Posted April 28, 2022 Just now, Hardcore troubadour said: Yeah, ok. There isn’t one dictionary. You should know that. Oligarchs can’t be defined by one country. Many countries have them, and had them say before Russia. Using Russia and only Russia to define the subject is clear case of bias. Like I said, you aren’t bright enough to see it because you suffer from what you accuse fox viewers of: confirmation bias. I've said before the etymology of the word predates Russia. The definitions basically say "most recent examples..." It isn't saying it is just Russia nor has any one argued that You are literally arguing things no one has said. Get your head examined. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cloaca du jour 2,153 Posted April 28, 2022 I love all the lib celebs leaving twitter. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites