More grooming from the left

[Utilit99 4,099]

mooney defends the this disease to the end. 

Dude should be locked up. 

now timehack is joining in.

Liberals are pedophiles. Just like creepy joe. 

[Reality 3,121]

 

[Utilit99 4,099]

5 minutes ago, Reality said:

 

mooney loves it.

[TimHauck 3,046]

56 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

What does "discuss being gay" mean?  

Teach them what it means to be gay (based on your definition of that being determined by “who they sleep with”)

[TimHauck 3,046]

45 minutes ago, DonS said:

According to you it was "most likely" kids just being taught about rainbows.  What does 20 years ago vs now have to do with anything if it was purely about rainbows as you insisted? 

I said the lesson was inspired by gay pride.  But just may not have specifically taught gay pride.  It could have just been about teaching them about acceptance of all people.  So “grooming” them to be accepting of gays in the future once they learn what it actually means

[Utilit99 4,099]

13 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I said the lesson was inspired by gay pride.  But just may not have specifically taught gay pride.  It could have just been about teaching them about acceptance of all people.  So “grooming” them to be accepting of gays in the future once they learn what it actually means

A whole bunch of maybe. 

It's grooming and it's sick.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,631]

38 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Teach them what it means to be gay (based on your definition of that being determined by “who they sleep with”)

That should take a few minutes. How about they spend the rest of the time on academics? Such a crazy request. 

[Voltaire 5,378]

4 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Let’s Get Biden To Quit 

Let’s Get Biden* To Run Again 

[Fireballer 2,657]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Teach them what it means to be gay (based on your definition of that being determined by “who they sleep with”)

I don't see the point.  Again, you're singling out a group of people to teach about based on who they have sex with. Literally, that's the only distinguishable characteristic thats different from hetero people. This isn't a school lesson.  

[huskyhater75 242]

On 5/29/2022 at 4:10 PM, Djgb13 said:

Nothing to see here. Just a child on stage with drag queens shaking his booty and collecting money from the crowd. I bet gutterpedo and the rest of the board libs won’t find anything wrong with this and will call us the actual pedophiles Seems like the go to move in the libs playbook is to accuse everyone else of stuff they’re guilty of

 

 

You can and will twist your sons birthday party into anything you want to,won't you? Pathetic...............................

[TimHauck 3,046]

7 hours ago, Utilit99 said:

A whole bunch of maybe. 

It's grooming and it's sick.

Grooming to abuse them?

[Baker Boy 1,705]

3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Grooming to abuse them?

Grooming is abusing them.

[TimHauck 3,046]

30 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

Grooming is abusing them.

Grooming them for what?  To be accepting of people that are different?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,631]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Grooming them for what?  To be accepting of people that are different?

Adults shouldn’t be talking to young children about sex unless they are your own or the parents are ok with it.  Why is that so Fockin hard to grasp? 

[TimHauck 3,046]

4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Adults shouldn’t be talking to young children about sex unless they are your own or the parents are ok with it.  Why is that so Fockin hard to grasp? 

How old is "young"?  And once again, I have a feeling this teacher didn't even talk to these kids about sex.

[Djgb13 2,339]

9 hours ago, huskyhater75 said:

You can and will twist your sons birthday party into anything you want to,won't you? Pathetic...............................

You’re still here? I was sure you got banned for going nuts  

[Fireballer 2,657]

 

19 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Grooming them for what?  To be accepting of people that are different?

How are gay people different, Tim?

[TimHauck 3,046]

3 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

 

How are gay people different, Tim?

answer my question first

[Baker Boy 1,705]

32 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Grooming them for what?  To be accepting of people that are different?

It is not about accepting them it is about celebrating them.

When I was in school they brought in cops, firefighters, etc. 

[Fireballer 2,657]

16 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

answer my question first

What question?

[TimHauck 3,046]

2 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

What question?

What are the children in that classroom being groomed for?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,631]

41 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

How old is "young"?  And once again, I have a feeling this teacher didn't even talk to these kids about sex.

Whatever the parent says is young.  Again, is this so hard to fockin grasp? Don’t talk to kids about sex and personal matters unless the parent says it’s ok. That’s some bigoted request? 

[TimHauck 3,046]

16 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Whatever the parent says is young.  Again, is this so hard to fockin grasp? Don’t talk to kids about sex and personal matters unless the parent says it’s ok. That’s some bigoted request? 

It's an unreasonable request because schools can't cater to the wishes of each individual parent.   Parents should know what their kids are learning, but each individual parent doesn't get to decide when their specific kid learns about certain topics.

[jerryskids 6,941]

22 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

What are the children in that classroom being groomed for?

You are all over the place in this thread but I'll be your huckleberry.

I believe you are saying they are being groomed to be accepting of LGBTQ+ folks.  Presumably this is through positive associations regarding the flag and whatever the teacher discussed about such people.  As they get older, they will see the flag and channel that earlier positive influence.  Am I close?

If so, what happens when that same kid is a teen, a socially awkward kid with hormones all over the place, might he/she channel those same positive associations to sample that lifestyle?  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,631]

6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

It's an unreasonable request because schools can't cater to the wishes of each individual parent.   Parents should know what their kids are learning, but each individual parent doesn't get to decide when their specific kid learns about certain topics.

They shouldn’t do it all.  Again, a simple concept. If a kid asks a question, tell them to ask their parents. Then the teacher can follow up with the parent. Very easy.  Do the schools have to address everything? They don’t. Why this? 

[TimHauck 3,046]

4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They shouldn’t do it all.  Again, a simple concept. If a kid asks a question, tell them to ask their parents. Then the teacher can follow up with the parent. Very easy.  Do the schools have to address everything? They don’t. Why this? 

You're right. No need for school at all.  Just have the parents teach them everything.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,631]

9 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You're right. No need for school at all.  Just have the parents teach them everything.

I didn’t say that, Hack. I’m not playing your stupid game. Also, gun thrown. 

[TimHauck 3,046]

9 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

You are all over the place in this thread but I'll be your huckleberry.

I believe you are saying they are being groomed to be accepting of LGBTQ+ folks.  Presumably this is through positive associations regarding the flag and whatever the teacher discussed about such people.  As they get older, they will see the flag and channel that earlier positive influence.  Am I close?

If so, what happens when that same kid is a teen, a socially awkward kid with hormones all over the place, might he/she channel those same positive associations to sample that lifestyle?  

To your question, yes.

So you're saying that they are "grooming" kids so that they themselves will become gay?  Not to abuse them?

Nonetheless, no I don't really believe "having positive associations" is going to significantly change the # of gay people in the world.    

[Hardcore troubadour 15,631]

I have asked this question before, but the defenders don’t seem to want to answer it. I’ll expound a bit. Most pedophilia crimes are not of the snatch and grab method. That’s very rare. So my question is, what would you call the interaction between a pedophile and their victim prior to the actual rape? Be it a priest, coach, teacher, relative etc? It’s not flirting. 

[TimHauck 3,046]

On 6/5/2022 at 11:55 AM, Hardcore troubadour said:

But the ones that do, how do they start? You can’t call what goes on between an adult and a minor flirting. So what it is it? 

 

On 6/5/2022 at 12:01 PM, TimHauck said:

Sure I guess you could call it grooming.  But it usually happens over the course of a few months since teachers usually only teach one grade, not like 10+ years like you people seem to be claiming.

 

 

[Voltaire 5,378]

44 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

It's an unreasonable request because schools can't cater to the wishes of each individual parent.   Parents should know what their kids are learning, but each individual parent doesn't get to decide when their specific kid learns about certain topics.

That's why school choice vouchers are necessary and parents via local school boards have to be vigilant and proactive in choosing teachers. do people have options. SCOTUS has an important case out of Maine that I hope will help with that. I mean I give two focks what they do with abortion, which is sucking the oxygen out of the room, not my issue. All I care about is school choice and that Maine case, and then hopefully sh1tcan Affirmatve Cr@ption next term.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,631]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

 

 

 

Ok then, you admit grooming exists. Great. Now how do you guard against it? 

[TimHauck 3,046]

1 minute ago, Voltaire said:

That's why school choice vouchers are necessary and parents via local school boards have to be vigilant and proactive in choosing teachers. do people have options. SCOTUS has an important case out of Maine that I hope will help with that. I mean I give two focks what they do with abortion, which is sucking the oxygen out of the room, not my issue. All I care about is school choice and that Maine case, and then hopefully sh1tcan Affirmatve Cr@ption next term.

I'm not familiar with the Maine case.   5 seconds of googling looks like the issue is something about "not including tuition funding for religious schools"?

Guess I'm getting off topic, but should school choice in your mind include giving poor kids the choice to attend rich schools?

[Voltaire 5,378]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I'm not familiar with the Maine case.   5 seconds of googling looks like the issue is something about "not including tuition funding for religious schools"?

Guess I'm getting off topic, but should school choice in your mind include giving poor kids the choice to attend rich schools?

In theory yes. I think they should be given vouchers that follow them to the school their parents want them to attend. In practice, a lot of the best public schools require either a lottery or a certain achievement level to get in and preferences go to the local students. Frankly, I'd like to see the money freed up to go to public and charter schools as per the parent's choice.

[TimHauck 3,046]

20 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Ok then, you admit grooming exists. Great. Now how do you guard against it? 

Off the top of my head:

Background checks and no 1-on-1 communication or interaction between teachers and students (texts, private tutoring, etc.)

[jerryskids 6,941]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

To your question, yes.

So you're saying that they are "grooming" kids so that they themselves will become gay?  Not to abuse them?

Nonetheless, no I don't really believe "having positive associations" is going to significantly change the # of gay people in the world.    

No, I'm saying that my 2nd paragraph is the "good intention," but the third paragraph is a natural "unintended consequence" of the action.  I've often stated here that to Left is the Embrace of Unintended Consequences.  

Unless of course you see that Pew poll that Maher showsed where each generation is generationally growing in spectrum; 20%+ and on a steep upward trajectory, and that that is all (or even a majority) physiological vs. environmental/behavioral.  

[TimHauck 3,046]

2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

No, I'm saying that my 2nd paragraph is the "good intention," but the third paragraph is a natural "unintended consequence" of the action.  I've often stated here that to Left is the Embrace of Unintended Consequences.  

Unless of course you see that Pew poll that Maher showsed where each generation is generationally growing in spectrum; 20%+ and on a steep upward trajectory, and that that is all (or even a majority) physiological vs. environmental/behavioral.  

But for one we don't know how much of it is the number is actually increasing as opposed to people more willing to admit it.

And even if it is increasing due to "environmental" factors, we don't know how much of it is due to what kids are hearing from teachers as opposed to what they're getting from social media, etc.

[wiffleball 4,793]

Empirically, I do tend to think the left grooms themselves better than those on the right. But that's just from the half a dozen times I've been to walmart.

[wiffleball 4,793]

Look if I smell s*** anytime in the middle of having sex, I'm out of there. Unless I'm having sex with Amber heard.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,631]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Off the top of my head:

Background checks and no 1-on-1 communication or interaction between teachers and students (texts, private tutoring, etc.)

They do background checks now, and I don’t think private texts between a teacher and a student are allowed. And yet there is still pedophilia on our schools.