Cancel Bud Light! Maga Hissy Fit!

[League Champion 1,909]

2 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

You're grilling up bass?  Largemouth bass?

Bass is disgusting. We catch fresh water Tilapia here, much more tasty and they put up a decent fight. I don't know anyone who eats bass. 

[Reality 3,121]

16 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Just look at them. They wanted this to fail so bad. That’s why they just can’t admit defeat, even though it’s clear as day. There had to be a glitch, a flaw, an excuse. The best they can come up with to safe face, to no one but themselves , is a weak ass accusation of hypocrisy. After all , they are smart and the boycotters are dumb. They are Ruled  by their emotions and fragile egos, like adolescents. And women. 

They think it's silly, yet, spend all day talking about it. We know their thoughts, there's really no reason for them to ever post in this thread again. Yet, here they are, spending their entire day telling folks how silly this all is. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,308]

2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

@RaiderHaters Revenge thinks so

Yes absolutely. Convert as many as possibly. Mulvaney is a wackjob psychopath. Not a normal tranny in the slightest 

[RogerDodger 797]

8 minutes ago, Reality said:

They think it's silly, yet, spend all day talking about it. We know their thoughts, there's really no reason for them to ever post in this thread again. Yet, here they are, spending their entire day telling folks how silly this all is. 

The effeminates that think boycotting a beer is silly are the same ones that think a freak of nature like Mulvaney is normal.  There is no reconciling that.  

 

[League Champion 1,909]

5 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Not a normal tranny in the slightest 

Quote of the Year "normal tranny".

[Fireballer 2,641]

50 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

They did.  They all gave Mulvaney free products and paid her to make a social media post. Unless maybe your attempted gotcha is Bud Light putting Mulvaney’s face on 1 can, but that’s laughable if you think that made the difference between a massive boycott and a blip.

Why did they make a can for Mulvaney?

[TimHauck 2,718]

48 minutes ago, Reality said:

They think it's silly, yet, spend all day talking about it. We know their thoughts, there's really no reason for them to ever post in this thread again. Yet, here they are, spending their entire day telling folks how silly this all is. 

And here is @Reality with his usual schtick of only commenting on other posters and not the actual topic…

[TimHauck 2,718]

19 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Why did they make a can for Mulvaney?

Lol, I called it

[Gladiators 1,981]

Lol at TimHauck accusing others of an attempted gotcha...he's precious.

[TimHauck 2,718]

2 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

Lol at TimHauck accusing others of an attempted gotcha...he's precious.

Takes one to know one right?

[GutterBoy 2,898]

4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

And here is @Reality with his usual schtick of only commenting on other posters and not the actual topic…

Seems as though all these dopes love posting in this thread about how we love posting in this thread.

[Fireballer 2,641]

5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Lol, I called it

You missed the nuance that previous BL drinkers see,  but you can’t. I guess you called it, alright.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

7 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

You missed the nuance that previous BL drinkers see,  but you can’t. I guess you called it, alright.

Nuance

What an ass hole.

[Sagging Scrot 44]

1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

Nuance

What an ass hole.

You defend pedos

[jerryskids 6,710]

3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

But is it women actually doing most of the complaining in those situations Baker Boy mentions?  I’d bet not, even if you want to claim the reason is they’re against it but they just don’t speak out because they don’t want to be labeled anti-trans.  Which is exactly why I would think we would have seen more men complaining about Maybelline, if Mulvaney promoting a brand is such a big issue.  

The “erasing women” argument is that by hiring Mulvaney they could have hired a real woman instead.  If your argument is that “well they can also hire a woman,” then now you’re getting it.  Because that’s exactly why some of us find the backlash against Bud Light odd, because literally all Mulvaney did was make an Instagram post and they sent some cans including one with a face on it.  It’s not like Bud Light invested millions marketing to trannies and got rid of all the rest of their marketing.  And again Nike is selling an image too, if Bud Light’s image was tarnished by Mulvaney, then Nike’s should have been too.

I explained by BL got boycotted, and I've explained the differences between BL and Nike/Maybelline.  You either don't like my explanations or don't understand them.  Carry on.   

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,008]

1 minute ago, Sagging Scrot said:

You defend pedos

But...but...but....he used to be a conservative don't forget!!!! 

Trump made him do a complete 180!!!!  

[League Champion 1,909]

3 minutes ago, Sagging Scrot said:

You defend pedos

They must, they voted for one 

[TimHauck 2,718]

11 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

You missed the nuance that previous BL drinkers see,  but you can’t. I guess you called it, alright.

Lol; you’re really making the argument that putting Mulvaney’s face on a can is what makes the Bud Light boycott make more sense than boycotting Nike or Maybelline?  Even the idiot righties here aren’t making that ridiculous argument.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,308]

For the record I’ve boycotted Nike for decades. Slave child labor is my Main reason 

[Sagging Scrot 44]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

But...but...but....he used to be a conservative don't forget!!!! 

Trump made him do a complete 180!!!!  

His wife wishes she did a 180 in the aisle

[Fireballer 2,641]

3 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Nuance

What an ass hole.

You and Tim are about on par with your lack of analytical ability,, so it’s not shocking that you had to chime in and add nothing.  

[TimHauck 2,718]

Just now, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

For the record I’ve boycotted Nike for decades. Slave child labor is my Main reason 

No apple products for you either?

[GutterBoy 2,898]

1 minute ago, Fireballer said:

You and Tim are about on par with your lack of analytical ability,, so it’s not shocking that you had to chime in and add nothing.  

As opposed you pointing out that the difference between the promotions involved an aluminum can.  Thanks for pointing that out, douche bag.  We never would have figured that out.

[Fireballer 2,641]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Lol; you’re really making the argument that putting Mulvaney’s face on a can is what makes the Bud Light boycott make more sense than boycotting Nike or Maybelline?  Even the idiot righties here aren’t making that ridiculous argument.

Again, have you though at all about why they made the can? Just a  “face on a can”?  You sticking with that?

[League Champion 1,909]

Just now, Fireballer said:

Just a  “face on a can”?  You sticking with that?

Because he's a flaming queer, because he's annoying, because he looks like a God Damn freak show, because he represents Bud Light clientele, because it fits their agenda?? 

ALL OF THE ABOVE

[RogerDodger 797]

16 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I explained by BL got boycotted, and I've explained the differences between BL and Nike/Maybelline.  You either don't like my explanations or don't understand them.  Carry on.   

You could explain it to him again, but, you can't make him understand it. I'd bet on that.  

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,008]

1 minute ago, RogerDodger said:

You could explain it to him again, but, you can't make him understand it. I'd bet on that.  

He's over in the Gender Dysphoria thread advocating for child mutilation and experimentation so, yeah, he's not understanding anything anytime soon.

[TimHauck 2,718]

19 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I explained by BL got boycotted, and I've explained the differences between BL and Nike/Maybelline.  You either don't like my explanations or don't understand them.  Carry on.   

Don’t agree with them.  Carry on.

[TimHauck 2,718]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

He's over in the Gender Dysphoria thread advocating for child mutilation and experimentation so, yeah, he's not understanding anything anytime soon.

Who?

[jerryskids 6,710]

16 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Don’t agree with them.  Carry on.

Can you at least explain to me why I as a man should give a fock what Maybelline does?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,230]

Maybelline. STFU.  

[Reality 3,121]

41 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Seems as though all these dopes love posting in this thread about how we love posting in this thread.

You're consumed with this shlt, all day, every day.  Are you somehow accusing me of being wrong?

That would be very odd if so.

How many times do you think you've posted in the thread alone? 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,008]

20 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Who?

dogcow

[BuckSwope 654]

6 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Can you at least explain to me why I as a man should give a fock what Maybelline does?

You yourself probably shouldn't.  I think the point is not all the boycotters are men, and some of you have women in the household who use those products.   I think in general it's a fair question to ask why the large outcry over one but not the other overall.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,230]

4 minutes ago, Reality said:

You're consumed with this shlt, all day, every day.  Are you somehow accusing me of being wrong?

That would be very odd if so.

How many times do you think you've posted in the thread alone? 

They wanted it so bad. Gutterboy was posting tweets from dopes saying how the boycott won’t work and y’all ain’t gonna do shitt.  Lol. Forget Hawkeye. That guy wanted it more than Gutterboy. It’s like he was personally offended.  

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,008]

19 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They wanted it so bad. Gutterboy was posting tweets from dopes saying how the boycott won’t work and y’all ain’t gonna do shitt.  Lol. Forget Hawkeye. That guy wanted it more than Gutterboy. It’s like he was personally offended.  

Yeah, he's over in the Disney thread trying to convince everyone that Disney isn't losing money.  Losing Money is the new "Making Money" now with him and his girlfriends.

[Gepetto 1,341]

10 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

Maybe some of you can use this app to do your shopping for you.  Gives you a woke rating.

 

Maybe you should watch it again to make sure you buy the right brand of Tampons for yourself.  

[TimHauck 2,718]

50 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Can you at least explain to me why I as a man should give a fock what Maybelline does?

The same reason someone without kids gives a fock about trans people in locker rooms or girls/womens sports.   Because they want to stand up for what they think is right in order to defend real women and protect them from being replaced.

For example, here’s one of our resident white knights who seems very concerned with this particular aspect of transgenderism, posting about it in multiple different threads:

On 6/3/2023 at 4:57 PM, Reality said:

It's too bad Democrats don't actually support women. Constantly trying to replace them, sad.

Nice to see a strong Republican stand up for other women. 

 

 

On 4/12/2023 at 6:39 PM, Reality said:

Sure, woman of the year, a dude. Fastest female athlete swimmer, a dude. Female power lifting champ, a dude. Female cycling champ, a dude. On and on...

 

So, I’m surprised someone like the idiot above wouldn’t be more concerned with Maybelline.  Especially now that they not only partnered with Mulvaney at the same time Bud Light did, but didn’t “heed the warning” from the Bud Light boycott and have now also partnered with a bearded person.  But it actually seems like some of the usual suspects (Libs of Tiktok, Ben Shapiro, etc) are picking this up so maybe in a few days the people in here saying “who gives a fock about Maybelline” might actually start giving a fock about Maybelline once they’ve been given their marching orders.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,230]

Still trying to sell the Maybelline angle. Lol. 

[5-Points 3,467]

11 hours ago, Strike said:

Not sure what this means.  Some people aren't coming back, and in this country that is their right.  Why are some people so invested in BL getting all their customers back?  That's what BL thought was going to happen and they basically ignored the boycott when it first happened.  Only after sustained lost sales did they start to take it seriously.  It's not like the people they lost quit drinking beer.  Coors, Miller, and other brands sales are up as BL sales are down.  And that's ok.  Other businesses can use this as an example, not that they can't support woke causes, but to tread lightly especially when the causes you support aren't really your core market.

I thought I was pretty clear. You made your point. You got what you wanted. You made BL pay for their mistake and you sent what's his nuts back into obscurity. 

My concern is for the tens of thousands of employees who had nothing to do with any of this and many of whom, ironically enough, probably share the political beliefs of those who are currently threatening their livelihoods. 

You made your point. If your goal is to bankrupt the company and put alot of people out of work, you're no better than the fascists you claim to despise. In fact, you're worse because you just spent years railing against them and here you are engaging in the very same behavior. 

This thought that it is only AB who is paying for this is very narrow minded and extremely shortsighted.