How do people still defend and vote for Dems

[JustinCharge 2,397]

49 minutes ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

What's the long term impact of taking state legislature houses? Redistricting and gerrymandering.

Another impact is the ability to call a constitutional convention.   You need 33 state legislatures to call a CC.  The GOP has 28.  Really close now.  You need 38 state legislatures to vote yes to enact an amendment.  For the moment, that is too far away but latinos and blacks are shifting rightward so if we get another 10 years it may be possible.  In some ways, this is bigger than winning the federal government because the GOP could ram through supermassive changes.

[Wade Garrett 155]

1 minute ago, JustinCharge said:

Another impact is the ability to call a constitutional convention.   You need 33 state legislatures to call a CC.  The GOP has 28.  Really close now.  You need 38 state legislatures to vote yes to enact an amendment.  For the moment, that is too far away but latinos and blacks are shifting rightward so if we get another 10 years it may be possible.
 

latinos and blacks are shifting rightward?  hahahahaha

Every dying segment of the electorate, old people, christians, and the uneducated vote bigly R.  Each one of these populations is thankfully shrinking and being replaced by the young, educated, and non-sky fairy believers. 

[thegeneral 3,208]

5 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

Another impact is the ability to call a constitutional convention.   You need 33 state legislatures to call a CC.  The GOP has 28.  Really close now.  You need 38 state legislatures to vote yes to enact an amendment.  For the moment, that is too far away but latinos and blacks are shifting rightward so if we get another 10 years it may be possible.  In some ways, this is bigger than winning the federal government because the GOP could ram through supermassive changes.

Nah. We’ll just change the rules via the deep state machine. 

[seafoam1 3,017]

30 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Big presentation at the LARPIng convention?!?

No chance I would screw your mom. The sluts at those conventions are dirty. 

[The Real timschochet 6,758]

32 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Big presentation at the LARPIng convention?!?

This made me laugh. Lightning bolt! 

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

3 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

latinos and blacks are shifting rightward?  hahahahaha

 

 

 

 

How Republicans Flipped 4 Congressional Seats in New York

The grueling midterm battles that arose from New York’s redistricting chaos continued on Wednesday...Republicans have flipped four seats, including that of Sean Patrick Maloney, the chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, whose concession constituted a humiliating loss for Democrats.....With supermajorities in Albany, Democrats in New York had hoped to use redistricting to cement their grip on the state and perhaps even offset some of the influence of Republicans in other states. ....

On Long Island, Republicans won all four congressional seats — flipping two....In New York’s Third Congressional District, the Democratic activist and businessman Robert Zimmerman lost to George Santos....The contest appeared to be the first in New York history to pit two openly gay men against one another for a seat in Congress. The district was previously held by Representative Tom Suozzi, a Democrat who launched an unsuccessful run for governor earlier this year.

In the Fourth Congressional District on the South Shore, the retired police detective Anthony D’Esposito, a Republican, defeated the Democrat and law professor Laura Gillen, to claim the district formerly held by Representative Kathleen Rice, a Democrat.

The Republican Andrew Garbarino held onto his seat in the Second Congressional District. And on the eastern tip of Long Island, the Republican Nicholas LaLota defeated his Democratic opponent, Bridget Fleming, in the race to fill Representative Lee Zeldin’s seat.

In New York’s Hudson Valley, a handful of noteworthy races led to close contests. The region has become a battleground in recent years, as shifting demographics have made some rural and suburban areas redder and turned some small cities, such as Kingston, into liberal strongholds. Mr. Maloney lost his seat in New York’s 17th Congressional District to Mike Lawler, a Republican assemblyman representing parts of Rockland County...

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/09/nyregion/ny-house-races-redistricting.html

 

*****

The answer to your "question" is to look at hard Blue strongholds. The head of the DCCC got his lunch handed to him. Where he literally had all the advantages in play. 

The "context" you are ignoring is Team Blue's war on the working class.  A college educated young black woman who came from a wealthy family is less likely to move to the "right"  What about all the working class ones? Certain the GOP won't get a majority of them, but Republicans don't need a majority of them. They just need enough of them to tip elections in their direction. 

Hating Republicans don't change the core dynamics on if Team Blue, particularly in hard Blue districts where they don't have any longstanding major challenges to power, helps the basic material needs of those who are a paycheck and a half away from being homeless. 

You like to mock others without context. Odds are that you are simply another low information voter. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,416]

Democrats need black and Latino voters. At some point you have to come through for them. A shitty job and a promise of citizenship, maybe, ain’t enough.  Right now all the left have is Trump.  I don’t think those groups are too excited about the green new deal and criminals having a field day. Look at Oakland. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,416]

Hey look inner city blacks, you can get a subsidy on a 60k electric car! Can’t charge it anywhere , and it will most likely be stolen or stripped, but hey, we got a planet to save, and you’re on it! 

[BuckSwope 654]

Not sure how much "defending" I do of them, but I think any rational person should be open to voting for any of the parties.   I can't imagine crossing off a name just because I see a D or an R next to their name.    I don't see either party as being head and shoulders over the other or any less crazy currently, so that's where I stand.   Here in WI there were a few "stop the steal" loons running who legit could have had major ramifications here so I thought that was a good time to vote D over R during one of the last votes, just to use one example.   

I tend to vote on issues that have wider consequences - election integrity, education, health care, etc. locally and state - add in things like climate and foreign issues for national elections.   The culture war du jour doesn't effect how I vote.   It's usally a scatter shot of D, R, I locall/state and 3rd party for national elections, but recently it's skewed a tad against Rs for stop the steal reasons I mentioned.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,416]

The democrats have one more presidential election cycle of relevance. Once Trump is gone what are they going to tell working and poor people? Get green jobs? Lol. 

[Wade Garrett 155]

13 minutes ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

 

 

How Republicans Flipped 4 Congressional Seats in New York

The grueling midterm battles that arose from New York’s redistricting chaos continued on Wednesday...Republicans have flipped four seats, including that of Sean Patrick Maloney, the chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, whose concession constituted a humiliating loss for Democrats.....With supermajorities in Albany, Democrats in New York had hoped to use redistricting to cement their grip on the state and perhaps even offset some of the influence of Republicans in other states. ....

On Long Island, Republicans won all four congressional seats — flipping two....In New York’s Third Congressional District, the Democratic activist and businessman Robert Zimmerman lost to George Santos....The contest appeared to be the first in New York history to pit two openly gay men against one another for a seat in Congress. The district was previously held by Representative Tom Suozzi, a Democrat who launched an unsuccessful run for governor earlier this year.

In the Fourth Congressional District on the South Shore, the retired police detective Anthony D’Esposito, a Republican, defeated the Democrat and law professor Laura Gillen, to claim the district formerly held by Representative Kathleen Rice, a Democrat.

The Republican Andrew Garbarino held onto his seat in the Second Congressional District. And on the eastern tip of Long Island, the Republican Nicholas LaLota defeated his Democratic opponent, Bridget Fleming, in the race to fill Representative Lee Zeldin’s seat.

In New York’s Hudson Valley, a handful of noteworthy races led to close contests. The region has become a battleground in recent years, as shifting demographics have made some rural and suburban areas redder and turned some small cities, such as Kingston, into liberal strongholds. Mr. Maloney lost his seat in New York’s 17th Congressional District to Mike Lawler, a Republican assemblyman representing parts of Rockland County...

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/09/nyregion/ny-house-races-redistricting.html

 

*****

The answer to your "question" is to look at hard Blue strongholds. The head of the DCCC got his lunch handed to him. Where he literally had all the advantages in play. 

The "context" you are ignoring is Team Blue's war on the working class.  A college educated young black woman who came from a wealthy family is less likely to move to the "right"  What about all the working class ones? Certain the GOP won't get a majority of them, but Republicans don't need a majority of them. They just need enough of them to tip elections in their direction. 

Hating Republicans don't change the core dynamics on if Team Blue, particularly in hard Blue districts where they don't have any longstanding major challenges to power, helps the basic material needs of those who are a paycheck and a half away from being homeless. 

You like to mock others without context. Odds are that you are simply another low information voter. 

Check out the voting patterns in 2020 friend.  Blacks will vote 85%+ for dems overall and hispanics around 60%.  The R strongholds of the old, uneducated, and christian are ALL losing ground quite bigly in the political landscape.  Rs have lost the suburbs completely now and rely on the dying rural areas.

Rs as a national party will cease to be relevant by 28.  Demographics are destiny boyo. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,416]

I live in the suburbs in NY. My district just voted out Maloney, one of the highest ranking dems.

[thegeneral 3,208]

24 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

No chance I would screw your mom. The sluts at those conventions are dirty. 

My mom is 89 years old you sick fock! She’s also way out of your league.

[Wade Garrett 155]

8 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I live in the suburbs in NY. My district just voted out Maloney, one of the highest ranking dems.

Oh man, the Rs picked up like NINE entire house seats during 22 when Trumpflation was raging.  Of course the dems picked up a Senate seat during extremely challenging times thanks to the disaster left by Trump. 

Dems are in bigly trouble!!!

[seafoam1 3,017]

4 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

My mom is 89 years old you sick fock! She’s also way out of your league.

So she's an ex dusgusting liberal who got nailed throughout the 60s. Big deal. She sucked at raising kids and made it a living for food and her next high.

[thegeneral 3,208]

3 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

So she's an ex dusgusting liberal who got nailed throughout the 60s. Big deal. She sucked at raising kids and made it a living for food and her next high.

What a creepy shetbird you are. Complete loser

[Hardcore troubadour 15,416]

Democrats “Straight White men are the cause of all of the problems!!!!”  
 

Straight white cucks that vote  for democrats:  “Not me, I’m one of the good ones, it’s those other guys”.  
 

 

[seafoam1 3,017]

58 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

What a creepy shetbird you are. Complete loser

Nope. Just calling out your mom and your liberal disfunctional family. Terrible for America.

[Wade Garrett 155]

1 hour ago, seafoam1 said:

So she's an ex dusgusting liberal who got nailed throughout the 60s. Big deal. She sucked at raising kids and made it a living for food and her next high.

Wow cultist show with every post what POSs they are.

You suck.

[thegeneral 3,208]

6 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Nope. Just calling out your mom and your liberal disfunctional family. Terrible for America.

A rough day of quilting and needlepoint for you I see. It’s ok, Seafoam you can lash out. Tomorrow will be better. 

[seafoam1 3,017]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

A rough day of quilting and needlepoint for you I see. It’s ok, Seafoam you can lash out. Tomorrow will be better. 

Make shlt up all you want. You lose. You are unable to handle anything real.

[Wade Garrett 155]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

A rough day of quilting and needlepoint for you I see. It’s ok, Seafoam you can lash out. Tomorrow will be better. 

Imagine being so low IQ that your master is Donald Trump.

Holy phuking mental retardation Batman!

[seafoam1 3,017]

18 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Imagine being so low IQ that your master is ANYONE liberal.!

You live it everyday and love being a pvssy. Pvssy. 

[Wade Garrett 155]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

You live it everyday and love being a pvssy. Pvssy. 

Why did Trump kill so many people in Afghanistan?

[thegeneral 3,208]

26 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Make shlt up all you want. You lose. You are unable to handle anything real.

It is well known Seafoam1 is the finest quilter around. Don’t be shy! It’s a real talent.

[seafoam1 3,017]

46 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Why did Trump kill so many people in Afghanistan?

Who did he kill? I have the biden murders.

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

4 hours ago, Wade Garrett said:

Check out the voting patterns in 2020 friend.  Blacks will vote 85%+ for dems overall and hispanics around 60%.  The R strongholds of the old, uneducated, and christian are ALL losing ground quite bigly in the political landscape.  Rs have lost the suburbs completely now and rely on the dying rural areas.Rs as a national party will cease to be relevant by 28.  Demographics are destiny boyo. 

 

 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,855]

12 hours ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

It's a good question

1) Low information voters ( the average American adult is spending very little time on national politics and the majority of them get their daily current events/news from social media, which nearly all leans hard activist left) 

2) Legacy voters ( if your closest social group, your general career field and your family all lean voting a certain way, odds are you will go into that direction too. Same for getting a college education, smoking or being a single parent. Certainly there are outliers, but these trends happen for a reason. It also explains why the hard push exists to sexualize children in public schools, 79 percent of all LGBT voters in 2020 voted for Democrats. AT MINIMUM from exit polling. Since LGBT can't have children of their own, they need to indoctrinate yours instead) 

3) Single issue voters ( some will vote solely on something like abortion, or gun control, or climate change, etc, etc) 

4) People voting AGAINST TRUMP but not directly for Biden ( basically put anyone up against Biden in 2024 not named Trump and the GOP and Republicans win POTUS) 

 

******

 

And you have to create two separates lanes here. Why it happened in 2020 and why it might or might not happen in 2024

White Evangelical Voters - Will not be happy with Team Blue's stances on abortion and what's going on in public schools

Suburban Women Voters - Transgenders in sports plus inflation hitting gasoline and grocery costs, plus lack of law and order in many major areas is going to hit Team Blue hard here

Military Vote - Afghanistan was a total disaster. Leaving billions in high tech weapons, paid for with our tax dollars, to hand them over to terrorists, to kill generations of future American soldiers. 

Law Enforcement Vote - Rioting, looting and burning in 2020, Defund The Police and the general antagonism against LEOs in modern society, mostly coming from the hard left and the Progressives, but still clearly a Team Blue problem. 

Asian Voters - Typically later generations of college educated Asian Americans will vote Democrat. However, given "equity" and DEI that has gone to exclude Asians from being too successful is going to backfire for Team Blue. Also the violence against Asians, mostly from blacks, that is routinely ignored in Big Blue Cities is a problem

Hispanic/Latino Voters - The "pro-trans" extremism will drive away older voters here, but the false tease of student loan forgiveness and widespread 15 dollar minimum wage, plus the shutdowns that locked their kids out of school, and add in Jill Biden calling them "breakfast tacos" won't help. 

Pro Life Democrats - They are about 15-22 million strong in America, and if they operate as "single issue voters", they might flip for Republicans just to make sure Roe is never codified into federal law. Many might be low information voters on other issues, but the majority of them are high information on the abortion issue. Meaning Team Blue , like with the Woman's Health Protection Act, are showing signs of extremism in their policy BEYOND what most Americans are polled to approve of regarding abortion rights. 

The two major issues right now hurting Team Blue will be the economy/inflation and the Border Crisis. However the abortion issue will hurt the GOP come 2024.  Will parents worry more about the kids they can't feed today over the kids they might or might not have in the future? 

If it's Trump vs Biden 2.0 in 2024, odds are that Biden will win. As insane and idiotic as that becomes. 

If Trump manages to win, he will clearly engage in a "revenge tour" and go scorched earth against anyone perceived as an "enemy"

Put it this way, REMOVE TRUMP from professional politics, via someone else winning the RNC ticket in the 2024 primaries and Team Blue has nothing left. Most of what they have is hating Trump. Once you take that away, it's much easier to see how badly they've run this entire country into the ground. 

I respect your opinion on these issues and your posts are awesome.  What do you think the Democrats do if somehow Trump is not the GOP candidate?  Biden magically retires?

[Dizkneelande 1,097]

Without their ballot harvesting fraudsters, Dems would never win.

NYT - Millennials Are Not an Exception. They’ve Moved to the Right.

Fifteen years ago, a new generation of young voters propelled Barack Obama to a decisive victory that augured a new era of Democratic dominance.

Fifteen years later, those once young voters aren’t so young — and aren’t quite so Democratic.

In the 2020 presidential election, voters who were 18 to 29 in 2008 backed Joe Biden by 55 percent to 43 percent, according to our estimates, a margin roughly half that of Obama’s 12 years earlier.

The exit polls show it even closer, with Mr. Biden winning by just 51-45 among voters who were 18 to 27 in 2008 (exit polls report results among those 30 to 39, not 30 to 41 — the group that was 18 to 29 in 2008).

And last fall, the young voters of ’08 — by then 32 to 43 — preferred Democratic congressional candidates by just 10 points in Times/Siena polling.

 

[Fnord 2,264]

14 hours ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

Be SPECIFIC

I'm open to hearing what in my previous post that you consider to be "hard partisan" and "hard right" and "deep-red wishcasting" 

I have zero interest in a back-and-forth with you. But I thought you deserved a response.

15 hours ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

It's a good question

1) Low information voters ( the average American adult is spending very little time on national politics and the majority of them get their daily current events/news from social media, which nearly all leans hard activist left) But the most-engaged stories  that are spread across SM are frequently right-wing garbage. The political affiliations of those running these companies is a non-factor. It's the users' fascination with short, digestible, dumbed-down talking points and memes that drives the SM "news cycle" and those are predominantly right-wing in origin.

2) Legacy voters ( if your closest social group, your general career field and your family all lean voting a certain way, odds are you will go into that direction too. Same for getting a college education, smoking or being a single parent. Certainly there are outliers, but these trends happen for a reason. It also explains why the hard push exists to sexualize children in public schools, Hard-right talking point that has little basis in reality 79 percent of all LGBT voters in 2020 voted for Democrats. AT MINIMUM from exit polling. Since LGBT can't have children of their own, they need to indoctrinate yours instead) Bigoted garbage; be better Gekko.

3) Single issue voters ( some will vote solely on something like abortion, or gun control, or climate change, etc, etc) Plenty of right-wing single issue voters as well. Now that abortion has been greatly curtailed, do they continue voting straight Republican? Of course the single-issue gun owners will, despite there being no chance whatsoever of the widespread gun confiscation scenarios they've been listening to and parroting for years now. 

4) People voting AGAINST TRUMP but not directly for Biden ( basically put anyone up against Biden in 2024 not named Trump and the GOP and Republicans win POTUS) If you somehow believe that Trump has managed to convince MORE people to vote for him than did in 2020, I would question your tether to reality.

 

******

 

And you have to create two separates lanes here. Why it happened in 2020 and why it might or might not happen in 2024

White Evangelical Voters - Will not be happy with Team Blue's stances on abortion and what's going on in public schools The far-right dogma infiltrating school systems in places like Florida is going to have backlash, just maybe not among these particular voters. Of course, those with any sort of conscience or actual spiritual belief must be seriously self-loathing if they decide to cast a vote for a dude that is basically a 300-lb billboard advertising and glorifying each of the seven deadly sins in abundance.

Suburban Women Voters - Transgenders in sports plus inflation hitting gasoline and grocery costs, plus lack of law and order in many major areas is going to hit Team Blue hard here They care WAAAAAY more about abortion being safe and accessible than they do about a few transgender athletes. What a tiny, stupid "problem" this is.

Military Vote - Afghanistan was a total disaster. Leaving billions in high tech weapons, paid for with our tax dollars, to hand them over to terrorists, to kill generations of future American soldiers. 

Law Enforcement Vote - Rioting, looting and burning in 2020, Defund The Police and the general antagonism against LEOs in modern society, mostly coming from the hard left and the Progressives, but still clearly a Team Blue problem. I will always be fascinated by this viewpoint. The Defund the Police movement was smothered in the cradle and was never serious anyway. It was perpetuated by some loons, not rank-and-file liberals, contrary to popular right-wing belief. It also conveniently glosses over the mayhem that occurred on Jan. 6, which saw the Republican president's followers attempt to storm the Capitol building while engaging in hand-to-hand combat with those LEOs. Nowhere else has there been such an extreme example of aggression against law enforcement.

Asian Voters - Typically later generations of college educated Asian Americans will vote Democrat. However, given "equity" and DEI that has gone to exclude Asians from being too successful is going to backfire for Team Blue. Also the violence against Asians, mostly from blacks, that is routinely ignored in Big Blue Cities is a problem Meanwhile, Ron Desantis is trying to prevent Chinese Americans from owning property in Florida. But sure, the Asians will vote for him, cuz stuff and things. Wishcasting.

Hispanic/Latino Voters - The "pro-trans" extremism This is not a thing on the left. The drivers of this are the right wing media, because it foments outrage and gives all the good ol' god fearing Christians an easy target at which to direct their hate. The attention given this topic is absurd to the point of satire. will drive away older voters here, but the false tease of student loan forgiveness and widespread 15 dollar minimum wage, plus the shutdowns that locked their kids out of school, How is this a Hispanic/Latino issue specifically? and add in Jill Biden calling them "breakfast tacos" won't help. 

Pro Life Democrats - They are about 15-22 million strong in America, and if they operate as "single issue voters", Hint: they will not they might flip for Republicans just to make sure Roe is never codified into federal law. The vast majority of Americans are in favor of safe, accessible abortions. This issue will be an albatross for the right. It already has been. Many might be low information voters on other issues, but the majority of them are high information on the abortion issue. Are they? Got any data to back this claim? Meaning Team Blue , like with the Woman's Health Protection Act, are showing signs of extremism in their policy BEYOND what most Americans are polled to approve of regarding abortion rights. Keep telling yourself this. Perfect wish-casting example.

The two major issues right now hurting Team Blue will be the economy/inflation I guess team Red has to hope that inflation continues to skyrocket so they can blame Biden. The numbers are slowly improving, and at this point much of the inflation is being driven by corporate greed and the Border Crisis. However the abortion issue will hurt the GOP come 2024.  Will parents worry more about the kids they can't feed today over the kids they might or might not have in the future? 

If it's Trump vs Biden 2.0 in 2024, odds are that Biden will win. As insane and idiotic as that becomes. 

If Trump manages to win, he will clearly engage in a "revenge tour" and go scorched earth against anyone perceived as an "enemy" Do you MAGA guys actually WANT this? Are you so impervious to logic that you can't see the downstream effects of this idiocy? That's rhetorical; I know the answer. I hear you all complaining incessantly about weaponization of governmental institutions- but it's totally fine with you if Trump does it. 

Put it this way, REMOVE TRUMP from professional politics, via someone else winning the RNC ticket in the 2024 primaries and Team Blue has nothing left. Most of what they have is hating Trump. Once you take that away, it's much easier to see how badly they've run this entire country into the ground. Sure. Might as well vote for a guy who is under any number of indictments and may actually be a convicted felon by the time the '24 election rolls around! That will fix everything!  

 

[The Real timschochet 6,758]

29 minutes ago, Fnord said:

I have zero interest in a back-and-forth with you. But I thought you deserved a response.

 

I couldn’t agree more with your responses here. But I wouldn’t waste my time responding directly to GG any more. He’s intelligent, but not all there; he’s got some very sick views, and he is completely incapable of a back and forth discussion. 

[seafoam1 3,017]

32 minutes ago, Fnord said:

I have zero interest in a back-and-forth with you. But I thought you deserved a response.

 

You are so full of shlt. You prove how dumb liberals truly are. 

[Fnord 2,264]

3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I couldn’t agree more with your responses here. But I wouldn’t waste my time responding directly to GG any more. He’s intelligent, but not all there; he’s got some very sick views, and he is completely incapable of a back and forth discussion. 

I don't disagree, but I will continue to respond to him when it suits me. Aren't you and @thegeneral still engaging with suckfoam, who is the most pathetic troll I've ever seen? We'd all be better off if that useless pr1ck went away. At least Gekko has something quasi-intelligent to offer.

[Fnord 2,264]

6 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

You are so full of shlt. You prove how dumb liberals truly are. 

Speaking of the biggest, most useless troll...

[Mike Honcho 5,269]

20 hours ago, BillyKing said:

I’m honestly curious why anyone would willingly vote for them now. They’ve been caught in blatant lies, they’re pushing pedophilia, they’re pushing sexualization of kids, want Americans to have less freedoms, want gov and companies telling you what to think and do, have bank records of the actual president accepting money from China, etc. The list literally goes on and on. Every day that passes something new about either illegal activity by the Dems or them pushing a convicted rapist to be in a political office or them pushing for more kids to be sexualized. How can people, especially on this website, claim they’re “moral” and “want what’s best for America” yet they’re supporting this atrocious and obvious attempt to destroy our society and democracy. Baffles my mind. I know the republicans aren’t good and have corrupt people on their side but it is OVERWHELMINGLY the democrats who are like that and they’re unapologetic about it. In fact, they think they’re so morally superior they don’t see anything wrong with wanting to bang a child 

I don't think you are honestly curious at all. 

[thegeneral 3,208]

9 minutes ago, Fnord said:

I don't disagree, but I will continue to respond to him when it suits me. Aren't you and @thegeneral still engaging with suckfoam, who is the most pathetic troll I've ever seen? We'd all be better off if that useless pr1ck went away. At least Gekko has something quasi-intelligent to offer.

I can’t resist but yeah it’s really dumb of me

[The Real timschochet 6,758]

8 minutes ago, Fnord said:

I don't disagree, but I will continue to respond to him when it suits me. Aren't you and @thegeneral still engaging with suckfoam, who is the most pathetic troll I've ever seen? We'd all be better off if that useless pr1ck went away. At least Gekko has something quasi-intelligent to offer.

Just for fun and mostly with insults. I wouldn’t offer @seafoam1 anything approaching an intelligent response; it would be rude of me to go over his head like that. 

[seafoam1 3,017]

4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Just for fun and mostly with insults. I wouldn’t offer @seafoam1 anything approaching an intelligent response; it would be rude of me to go over his head like that. 

It's so easy to upset the feelers of the liberals. All one has to do is tell the truth and they go postal. 

Liberals are so focking stupid.

[Wade Garrett 155]

1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

It's so easy to upset the feelers of the liberals. All one has to do is tell the truth and they go postal. 

Liberals are so focking stupid.

lol, blue counties produce 75% of the GDP in this country.

Poor, dumb rural red areas produce...not much other than meth and pill addled trailer park residents.

[Fnord 2,264]

7 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Just for fun and mostly with insults. I wouldn’t offer @seafoam1 anything approaching an intelligent response; it would be rude of me to go over his head like that. 

I suppose that's fair. I still get into it with @jonmx, which is a fruitless waste of time; he's batshlt crazy.