Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
JustinCharge

Biden took $5mm bribe from Ukraine - Burisma - FBI

Recommended Posts

I bet Dark Brandon is quaking in his boots over the bigly evidence of his rampant corruption...oh wait, he's actually laughing at the pathetic deplorables as they rally around their orange master before he's sent to prison.

Love this for you deplorables. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news, it appears as though media is now concerned about financial corruption. Link   I guess this is progress?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Why would the fbi first lie about this existing and then redacting a non classified document and demand that the only way congress can view this supposedly non existent document is in a scif? 
 

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/remarks/grassley-fbi-redacted-references-to-recordings-in-biden-allegation-shared-with-congress

They didn’t lie about any of it. It’s an unsubstantiated claim by an unnamed source who supposedly heard it from an unnamed whistleblower. It’s total crap. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

They didn’t lie about any of it. It’s an unsubstantiated claim by an unnamed source who supposedly heard it from an unnamed whistleblower. It’s total crap. 

Of course you would try to deny this :lol: like clockwork, any time the left gets caught red handed I can always count on your retarded ass to defend them. Newsflash: it happened? They have proof, AND audio recordings :lol: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

They didn’t lie about any of it. It’s an unsubstantiated claim by an unnamed source who supposedly heard it from an unnamed whistleblower. It’s total crap. 

Says the guy who tattooed the Steele  dossier on his chest he was so proud they got trump

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

They didn’t lie about any of it. It’s an unsubstantiated claim by an unnamed source who supposedly heard it from an unnamed whistleblower. It’s total crap. 

There are tapes.

The FBI knew there were tapes. 

The FBI lied about the tapes.

The FBI redacted text about the tapes, under the guise of “sources and methods”.

The FBI is withholding pertinent info to cover for Biden.

This alone confirms the FBI is compromised which also confirms you’re a suckboy. 

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Reality said:

Lordy...  Starting to understand the push to indict Trump.

 

Shocked there isnt any mention of this in the nation news.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Reality said:

Lordy...  Starting to understand the push to indict Trump.

 

People who cannot read are easily fooled. This source CLAIMED he had the recordings. But other than his claim, there is no evidence they actually exist. The headline is written as if the Senate has these recordings. They do not. They have an FBI document showing that some anonymous guy claimed to have them. 

Also, do you even know what an FD-1023 form is? It’s intelligence from a confidential source that was never verified… aka BS.

Anybody who is buying this nonsense is incredibly gullible.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Biden needs to go. Grassley is 89 , to quote the late John Silber “When you've had a long life and you're ripe, then it's time to go”. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, dogcows said:

It’s intelligence from a confidential source that was never verified… aka BS.

Oh, like the Steele Dossier

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, HellToupee said:

Oh, like the Steele Dossier

Yes. Which shows how hypocritical (or gullible?) you are for posting it as actual evidence here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dogcows said:

Yes. Which shows how hypocritical (or gullible?) you are for posting it as actual evidence here.

I posted a US Senator . At best he’s telling the truth , at worst he’s lying like Adam Schiff has done countless times

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, HellToupee said:

I posted a US Senator . At best he’s telling the truth , at worst he’s lying like Adam Schiff has done countless times

Whenever you’re wrong, you deflect to something else? Pathetic. Take the L. Grassley is almost 90 but still smart enough to fool you.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dogcows said:

People who cannot read are easily fooled. This source CLAIMED he had the recordings. But other than his claim, there is no evidence they actually exist. The headline is written as if the Senate has these recordings. They do not. They have an FBI document showing that some anonymous guy claimed to have them. 

Also, do you even know what an FD-1023 form is? It’s intelligence from a confidential source that was never verified… aka BS.

Anybody who is buying this nonsense is incredibly gullible.

Says the other guy who loves the Steele dossier more than the Bible 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, HellToupee said:

Oh, like the Steele Dossier

Correct.  The important distinction is that the evidence toward Biden does not conform to political bias, and therefore those crimes are permissable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/10/2023 at 11:56 AM, Wade Garrett said:

I bet Dark Brandon is quaking in his boots over the bigly evidence of his rampant corruption...oh wait, he's actually laughing at the pathetic deplorables as they rally around their orange master before he's sent to prison.

Love this for you deplorables. 

 Idiot 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is disappointing the Republicans are not starting the impeachment process.  I hate they refuse to play dirty like the Democrats.  This is a lot worse than the Trump Ukraine phone call.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RLLD said:

Correct.  The important distinction is that the evidence toward Biden does not conform to political bias, and therefore those crimes are permissable.

I know that most people here don’t really care about the details. It’s all about one-liners and the most shallow reading possible of every situation. But for those who might care just a little bit….

The “Steele Dossier” was unverified Intel… just like this stuff. Why are you all so angry about it? It’s nothing more than a footnote in the Mueller Report, which acknowledges that it’s unverified. It is not relied upon by Mueller for any of its charging decisions. Because… how could it be? He actually had to indict and convict people, and “unnamed sources” with unverified information just won’t cut it in a court of law.

People here are absolutely correct to point out that the Steele Dossier was unverified intelligence. But you can’t have your cake and eat it too. If you acknowledge that, then you shouldn’t regurgitate all the unverified intel being put forth regularly from the various GOP committees investigating Biden.

It seems to me that unverified intel can be a good investigative tool, but it is not evidence of wrongdoing. Many times it doesn’t pan out, or turns out to be partially or completely false. The GOP committees know this but they are trotting it out to get the rubes fired up.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, dogcows said:

People who cannot read are easily fooled. This source CLAIMED he had the recordings. But other than his claim, there is no evidence they actually exist. The headline is written as if the Senate has these recordings. They do not. They have an FBI document showing that some anonymous guy claimed to have them. 

Also, do you even know what an FD-1023 form is? It’s intelligence from a confidential source that was never verified… aka BS.

Anybody who is buying this nonsense is incredibly gullible.

The source isn’t anonymous to the FBI. It wasn’t some crackpot making a phone call to the FBI. He’s a registered confidential source that has been paid by the FBI.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let’s bring in a special counsel to review the matter just like RUSSIA!

I think Rudi Giuliani would be an impeccable choice to serve as special counsel to head up the Biden Crime Family investigation 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, dogcows said:

I know that most people here don’t really care about the details. It’s all about one-liners and the most shallow reading possible of every situation. But for those who might care just a little bit….

The “Steele Dossier” was unverified Intel… just like this stuff. Why are you all so angry about it? It’s nothing more than a footnote in the Mueller Report, which acknowledges that it’s unverified. It is not relied upon by Mueller for any of its charging decisions. Because… how could it be? He actually had to indict and convict people, and “unnamed sources” with unverified information just won’t cut it in a court of law.

People here are absolutely correct to point out that the Steele Dossier was unverified intelligence. But you can’t have your cake and eat it too. If you acknowledge that, then you shouldn’t regurgitate all the unverified intel being put forth regularly from the various GOP committees investigating Biden.

It seems to me that unverified intel can be a good investigative tool, but it is not evidence of wrongdoing. Many times it doesn’t pan out, or turns out to be partially or completely false. The GOP committees know this but they are trotting it out to get the rubes fired up.

The dossier was indeed unverified, and the DOJ folks knew it, but ignored that fact and took action to ensure they could pursue.  In every instance where opportunity arose, they went after Trump.

THIS IS GOOD. THIS IS HOW IT SHOULD BE.

Now we have plenty of evidence of Democrats likely being engaged in chicanery, and they are not being pursued.

Now....give me the same effort put on Trump for Biden, clearly there is enough there.

Give me protection from POWER.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, RLLD said:

The dossier was indeed unverified, and the DOJ folks knew it, but ignored that fact and took action to ensure they could pursue.  In every instance where opportunity arose, they went after Trump.

THIS IS GOOD. THIS IS HOW IT SHOULD BE.

Now we have plenty of evidence of Democrats likely being engaged in chicanery, and they are not being pursued.

Now....give me the same effort put on Trump for Biden, clearly there is enough there.

Give me protection from POWER.

All they do is lie and gaslight. The dossier was used to approve the fisa warrants which allowed them to spy on the Trump campaign. Zero None Nada of the charges from the Mueller team were related to Russian collusion. All process crimes. They were charged for lying about something that never happened. Fact. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, RLLD said:

The dossier was indeed unverified, and the DOJ folks knew it, but ignored that fact and took action to ensure they could pursue.  In every instance where opportunity arose, they went after Trump.

THIS IS GOOD. THIS IS HOW IT SHOULD BE.

Now we have plenty of evidence of Democrats likely being engaged in chicanery, and they are not being pursued.

Now....give me the same effort put on Trump for Biden, clearly there is enough there.

Give me protection from POWER.

Again, you go with the shallowest reading of the facts possible. The supposed action on the Steele Dossier amounted to basically nothing, as you can see if you ever took the time to even skim through the Mueller report. Or the Durham report. But instead you apparently choose to believe the right-wing talking points about the evil Steele dossier. 

And… how do you know whether these leads were already followed up on? Seems to me they tried to verify and weren’t able to. Meaning this Intel is most likely false.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dizkneelande said:

All they do is lie and gaslight. The dossier was used to approve the fisa warrants which allowed them to spy on the Trump campaign. Zero None Nada of the charges from the Mueller team were related to Russian collusion. All process crimes. They were charged for lying about something that never happened. Fact. 

Again, you never looked into the details, and just regurgitate talking points. Steele Dossier was included among many pieces of evidence in a warrant request. And it was noted in that request that the info was NOT verified. Examination after the fact shows the dossier most likely had no effect on the warrant decision, and although it probably should have been excluded, the verified evidence outside of the dossier was more than enough to justify the warrant. But sure, just keep believing the talking points from Gym Jordan and company, repeated ad nauseum and without question by Fox.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Again, you never looked into the details, and just regurgitate talking points. Steele Dossier was included among many pieces of evidence in a warrant request. And it was noted in that request that the info was NOT verified. Examination after the fact shows the dossier most likely had no effect on the warrant decision, and although it probably should have been excluded, the verified evidence outside of the dossier was more than enough to justify the warrant. But sure, just keep believing the talking points from Gym Jordan and company, repeated ad nauseum and without question by Fox.

Are you really trying to get idiot cultist to understand logic?  You'd have better luck trying to reason with a rabid racoon.  The only thing cultist understand is that which is repeated to them over and over like the brainless zombies they are.

Lock her up

Build that wall

Mexicans are rapist and murderers

Shove bleach and light up your ass to cure covid

LOLOLOLOLOL

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kids in cages! Why wasn’t anyone charged over that? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Kids in cages! Why wasn’t anyone charged over that? 

Who do you think should have been charged and with what?

I can tell you exactly why your orange master was charged boyo. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Again, you go with the shallowest reading of the facts possible. The supposed action on the Steele Dossier amounted to basically nothing, as you can see if you ever took the time to even skim through the Mueller report. Or the Durham report. But instead you apparently choose to believe the right-wing talking points about the evil Steele dossier. 

And… how do you know whether these leads were already followed up on? Seems to me they tried to verify and weren’t able to. Meaning this Intel is most likely false.

Not shallow at all. The evidence is there.  Now lets hold power accountable.  Period.

We have enough evidence on Biden that we would have already mauled Trump with many times over.  All I ask, is that Biden is also held accountable. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RLLD said:

We have enough evidence on Biden that we would have already mauled Trump with many times over.  All I ask, is that Biden is also held accountable. 

False. Just plain false. Like you, I’ve seen the evidence trotted out by GOP lawmakers and it’s evidence of nothing. But they know you hate Biden so you’ll believe whatever they say. 🐑

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dogcows said:

False. Just plain false. Like you, I’ve seen the evidence trotted out by GOP lawmakers and it’s evidence of nothing. But they know you hate Biden so you’ll believe whatever they say. 🐑

Plenty of evidence, in fact, MORE evidence than they had on Trump.  Not false in any manner of speaking.

Suspicion alone was enough to spend years pursuing Trump.  And you know what, I like that.  I want them to keep doing it.

Pretending that politicians are good people is the most inane thing we do.  This business of allowing Biden, and others, to be corrupt with no effort to even vet it.....that makes me nervous

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Plenty of evidence, in fact, MORE evidence than they had on Trump.  Not false in any manner of speaking.

Suspicion alone was enough to spend years pursuing Trump.  And you know what, I like that.  I want them to keep doing it.

Pretending that politicians are good people is the most inane thing we do.  This business of allowing Biden, and others, to be corrupt with no effort to even vet it.....that makes me nervous

What evidence?  Or do you consider hearsay from an informant who won't come forward and won't produce the actual evidence is now evidence?

Weird. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dogcows said:

Again, you never looked into the details, and just regurgitate talking points. Steele Dossier was included among many pieces of evidence in a warrant request. And it was noted in that request that the info was NOT verified. Examination after the fact shows the dossier most likely had no effect on the warrant decision, and although it probably should have been excluded, the verified evidence outside of the dossier was more than enough to justify the warrant. But sure, just keep believing the talking points from Gym Jordan and company, repeated ad nauseum and without question by Fox.

Yeah I’m the one with the talking points. There was never once any verified evidence. NONE ZILCH. You know how I know? Because I read the fisa warrant just like I read the Mueller report and the Durham report.. Here it is all 85 pages of it 

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/FISA Warrant Application for Carter Page.pdf

 It’s all based on lies that we know are lies because they said they were lies. And they did this 4 times. They knew the dossier was fake. They knew Cater Page wasn’t a Russian asset. They had to run 2 informants against Papadopoulos who recorded no fewer than 174 EXCULPATORY STATEMENTS including repeated denials Trump campaign colluded w Russia, yet NOT 1 was included in FISA apps. 

Now show me from the Mueller investigation which person or persons were charged with colluding with Russia to swing the 2016 election? You cant because nobody was. Once again you commies just deflect from the topic at hand. The Biden family is a criminal enterprise. Who’s the big guy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Wade Garrett said:

What evidence?  Or do you consider hearsay from an informant who won't come forward and won't produce the actual evidence is now evidence?

Weird. 

Well I think the laptop that the media, DOJ and Democrats worked so hard to discredit being ultimately admitted to be real is a key first element.  Then the contents revealing shady business dealings, and of course we know the Joe is "the bug guy", I mean lets not be obtuse here.  Finally we have the recordings that one key informant had the good sense to create at our disposal now, on which is it being asserted we have Hunter and Joe negotating the payouts.

Look, I get it, your political bias is more important that our sanctity.....but we actually need the kind of effort they used on Trump here, and not just on Biden....on ALL of them,.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RLLD said:

Well I think the laptop that the media, DOJ and Democrats worked so hard to discredit being ultimately admitted to be real is a key first element.  Then the contents revealing shady business dealings, and of course we know the Joe is "the bug guy", I mean lets not be obtuse here.  Finally we have the recordings that one key informant had the good sense to create at our disposal now, on which is it being asserted we have Hunter and Joe negotating the payouts.

Look, I get it, your political bias is more important that our sanctity.....but we actually need the kind of effort they used on Trump here, and not just on Biden....on ALL of them,.

So the laptop of a crackhead that never mentions Biden nor has any direct evidence is now evidence?  And pray tell how do we know Biden is the big guy?  Because of one throw away sentence?

Just LOL

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×