Biden Administration’s Plans To Restrict Home Appliances Confirmed

[seafoam1 3,517]

 

Biden Administration’s Plans To Restrict Home Appliances Confirmed (msn.com)

It has recently been confirmed that the Biden Administration has plans to put major restrictions on home appliances across the US.

In a conference involving the White House Press Secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, reporters asked her about the administration’s fight against such appliances. The reporter pointed out that the administration has held a firm stance in opposition to appliances such as: “gas stoves, air conditioning units… refrigerators, washing machines, dishwashers, now water heaters…”

Instead of letting the markets and capitalism run its course, the Biden Administration plans to use their status to enforce nationwide restrictions on the less efficient, but less costly home appliances. In order to make this happen the administration is hoping to regulate the less efficient, in effect getting rid of all cheaper options. 

[Mike Honcho 5,546]

Good, finally Seafoam posting positive news.

[seafoam1 3,517]

2 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Good, finally Seafoam posting positive news.

Talk about a waste of life. Here you are old creep. 

[seafoam1 3,517]

If a republican did this the liberals would be screeching about it hurting the poor black community.

[Hawkeye21 2,457]

Leave our appliances alone.  The government already focked up the quality of them years ago.

[jerryskids 7,196]

3 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

If a republican did this the liberals would be screeching about it hurting the poor black community.

This would be a big issue here, although our minorities are more Hispanic and Native.  If they try to take our cheap AC, there will be blood.

[Tree of Knowledge 2,256]

The proletariat will suffer while the elites crank up the AC with their doors open in their beach mansions that will never see sea levels rise

Stay woke comrades and enjoy eating bugs  

 

[weepaws 3,425]

Right or Left this government has one agenda, destroy this country. I feel bad for those appliances lol.  

Hebrews. 11:1.  Faith. 

God bless.  

[MTSkiBum 1,626]

All of our appliances are 30 years old, our fridge still uses freon.

They will be repaired and not replaced.

Although, since they are so old they barely have issues. We had only a single issue with the fridge and no other issues with any of our other appliances.

 

 

Not counting hot water heater which gets replaced ever 7-9 years due to moronic homebuilders putting it in the attic.

[avoiding injuries 1,655]

18 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Right or Left this government has one agenda, destroy this country. 

Serious question… hypothetically, if you were trying to destroy this country intentionally, what would you do different than the Build Back Better agenda?

(not “you” personally, I just quoted your post)

[seafoam1 3,517]

1 minute ago, MTSkiBum said:

All of our appliances are 30 years old, our fridge still uses freon.

They will be repaired and not replaced.

Although, since they are so old they barely have issues. We had only a single issue with the fridge and no other issues with any of our other appliances.

 

 

Not counting hot water heater which gets replaced ever 7-9 years due to moronic homebuilders putting it in the attic.

Water heater in the attic? Don't think I've ever seen that before. 

[seafoam1 3,517]

1 minute ago, avoiding injuries said:

Serious question… hypothetically, if you were trying to destroy this country intentionally, what would you do different than the Build Back Better agenda?

Well, we could start pouring money into financing foreign wars. 

Oh wait...

I got it. We could open our borders.

Oh wait...

No stoves or air conditioners!!!

Oh wait...

[TBayXXXVII 2,679]

4 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

Serious question… hypothetically, if you were trying to destroy this country intentionally, what would you do different than the Build Back Better agenda?

(not “you” personally, I just quoted your post)

Build Back Better would be the perfect model to follow.

[seafoam1 3,517]

42 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

This would be a big issue here, although our minorities are more Hispanic and Native.  If they try to take our cheap AC, there will be blood.

Imagine in the south with no air. Uggh. 

[Dizkneelande 1,136]

Bidenomics means middle class destruction. The poors can be bribed and bought. The richers don’t suffer their consequences. You will own nothing, eat bugs and be happy. Keep voting for leftists.

[BuckSwope 654]

You can pry my old stove from my cold, dead hands. 

[Dizkneelande 1,136]

1 minute ago, BuckSwope said:

You can pry my old stove from my cold, dead hands. 

You vote for this. 

[seafoam1 3,517]

1 minute ago, Dizkneelande said:

Bidenomics means middle class destruction. The poors can be bribed and bought. The richers don’t suffer their consequences. You will own nothing, eat bugs and be happy. Keep voting for leftists.

The question I have is why do liberals support this? Do they just want flat out communism? 

[Mike Honcho 5,546]

59 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Talk about a waste of life. Here you are old creep. 

 

Quote

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

So more energy efficient products that will create a healthier environment creating innumerable benefits.  Seems the administration is doing exactly what they charged to do. Again, thanks for posting the good news.

[seafoam1 3,517]

Just now, Mike Honcho said:

 

So more energy efficient products that will create a healthier environment creating innumerable benefits.  Seems the administration is doing exactly what they charged to do. Again, thanks for posting the good news.

You don't know what "general welfare" means is all you said there. 

[Dizkneelande 1,136]

4 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

So more energy efficient products that will create a healthier environment creating innumerable benefits.  Seems the administration is doing exactly what they charged to do. Again, thanks for posting the good news.

When has the government made anything better?

[weepaws 3,425]

22 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

Serious question… hypothetically, if you were trying to destroy this country intentionally, what would you do different than the Build Back Better agenda?

(not “you” personally, I just quoted your post)

No hypothetically, I don’t seek to destroy, I seek to Left up.  

God bless. 

[Mike Honcho 5,546]

3 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

You don't know what "general welfare" means is all you said there. 

 

Quote

Historically, promoting the general welfare has meant improving transportation, promoting agriculture and industry, protecting health and the environment, and seeking ways to solve social and economic problems.

Seems I'm spot on.

 

[seafoam1 3,517]

3 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

So more energy efficient products that will create a healthier environment creating innumerable benefits.  Seems the administration is doing exactly what they charged to do. Again, thanks for posting the good news.

And your liberal "domestic tranquility"? How's that working out in your liberal run cities like St. Louis, Baltimore, Chicago, and San Fran Shlthole?

[seafoam1 3,517]

1 minute ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

Seems I'm spot on.

 

Anybody can google a definition of a word or phrase and cut and paste it. 

I'm talking about the stupid measures taken and the fear mongering reasons behind them that the this destructive liberal administration has been doing. 

[Fnord 2,639]

Why do conservatives hate public safety so much? So many of you just automatically default to seeing overreach when all that's going on (with this topic, at least) is changes being made for health reasons.

[seafoam1 3,517]

1 minute ago, Fnord said:

Why do conservatives hate public safety so much? So many of you just automatically default to seeing overreach when all that's going on (with this topic, at least) is changes being made for health reasons.

Here's a solution. No appliances needed: 

 

[Fireballer 2,693]

1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

So more energy efficient products that will create a healthier environment creating innumerable benefits. 

Link?

[gas 170]

1 hour ago, Dizkneelande said:

When has the government made anything better?

Seatbelts, flame resistant kids pajamas, clean drinking water, clean air, etc.   You stooopid MAGAts fought every one of them.

[seafoam1 3,517]

4 minutes ago, gas said:

Seatbelts, flame resistant kids pajamas, clean drinking water, clean air, etc.   You stooopid MAGAts fought every one of them.

Flame resistant kid pajamas. 

You focking liberals need them to survive. Else you will all flame up your kids. 

Clean air.  Yeah, government gave us clean air. 

Why does everybody drink bottled water now? 

 

 

[Dizkneelande 1,136]

53 minutes ago, gas said:

Seatbelts, flame resistant kids pajamas, clean drinking water, clean air, etc.   You stooopid MAGAts fought every one of them.

My water bill is over $1200 a year, it’s undrinkable and tastes like bleach. Once a quarter I get a testing summary with elevated levels of some contaminant and I live in a deep blue state in the Northeast. How has the government made that better? 

[Dizkneelande 1,136]

You would think the government spending a 100 trillion dollars the past 30 years we would have something more than mandatory seatbelt laws lobbied on behalf of the insurance industry.

[Fnord 2,639]

Just now, Dizkneelande said:

My water bill is over $1200 a year, it’s undrinkable and tastes like bleach. Once a quarter I get a testing summary with elevated levels of some contaminant and I live in a deep blue state in the Northeast. How has the government made that better? 

They haven't. At least partly because you continue to vote for people that don't GAF and consistently downplay the problems.

[seafoam1 3,517]

2 minutes ago, Fnord said:

They haven't. At least partly because you continue to vote for people that don't GAF and consistently downplay the problems.

Says a liberal voter... 

[Dizkneelande 1,136]

1 minute ago, Fnord said:

They haven't. At least partly because you continue to vote for people that don't GAF and consistently downplay the problems.

I’m surrounded by Democrats. We don’t have a single republican congressman or senator. The state house is 30-1 democrat. The governor, ag, ssos, all democrats.How have Republicans impacted my water bill and water quality? 

[seafoam1 3,517]

2 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

I’m surrounded by Democrats. We don’t have a single republican congressman or senator. The state house is 30-1 democrat. The governor, ag, ssos, all democrats.How have Republicans impacted my water bill and water quality? 

These liberal idiots don't understand. They think we all live in conservative run areas.

[Fnord 2,639]

4 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

I’m surrounded by Democrats. We don’t have a single republican congressman or senator. The state house is 30-1 democrat. The governor, ag, ssos, all democrats.How have Republicans impacted my water bill and water quality? 

Trying to stymie and defang the EPA, for one. Pushing against climate change. Disallowing clean water protections. Your boy Trump was big on that. I'm not trying to tell you your local democrats are doing a great job, just that the Republican Party is notoriously anti-regulation and pro-business, which is how we get into these messes.

[Dizkneelande 1,136]

7 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Trying to stymie and defang the EPA, for one. Pushing against climate change. Disallowing clean water protections. Your boy Trump was big on that. I'm not trying to tell you your local democrats are doing a great job, just that the Republican Party is notoriously anti-regulation and pro-business, which is how we get into these messes.

What impact does the Fed have on state water reservoirs and infrastructure? The second question is why would they have any impact? 

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

4 hours ago, Fnord said:

Why do conservatives hate public safety so much? So many of you just automatically default to seeing overreach when all that's going on (with this topic, at least) is changes being made for health reasons.

 

 

[Ron 'Tator Salad' White 121]

2 hours ago, Dizkneelande said:

I’m surrounded by Democrats. We don’t have a single republican congressman or senator. The state house is 30-1 democrat. The governor, ag, ssos, all democrats.How have Republicans impacted my water bill and water quality? 

It’s that evil 1 republicans fault