Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
GutterBoy

Ohio issue 1 fails

Recommended Posts

Seems like a net positive for the people  :thumbsup:

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical Republican/Facist move.  They whine about how "the people" don't have power when the Democrats are in charge....and then the first thing they look to do when they take control is try to make it harder for "the people" to have power. Good for the sensible people of Ohio.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, zsasz said:

Typical Republican/Facist move.  They whine about how "the people" don't have power when the Democrats are in charge....and then the first thing they look to do when they take control is try to make it harder for "the people" to have power. Good for the sensible people of Ohio.

Killing children easily without consequences = power? :blink:

Focking liberals. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Killing children easily without consequences = power? :blink:

Focking liberals. 

Funny, they're not children until they can survive on their own.  Until then a fetus is nothing but a parasite boyo. 

Like the kind you have living in your gut due to your complete lack of cleanliness. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Killing children easily without consequences = power? :blink:

Focking liberals. 

You're as clueless as usual.  With dopes like you as the mouthpiece....it's easy to see why people  don't trust Conservativism; even though it is the more attractive of the political ideology.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Killing children easily without consequences = power? :blink:

Focking liberals. 

We should not overlook the societal good here.   Just look at the low quality of youth we have.  Parents are not great.

Why in gods name would we ever want someone willing to kill their offspring to raise a child? It makes no sense.

We absolutely want to avoid sluts raising kids. 

  • Thanks 3
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Killing children easily without consequences = power? :blink:

Focking liberals. 

Issue #1 was on Amendments to the  Ohio Constitution.  You don't believe the people should have a say in how their government should be run, sounds pretty authoritarian to me.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Issue #1 was on Amendments to the  Ohio Constitution.  You don't believe the people should have a say in how their government should be run, sounds pretty authoritarian to me.  

Agree with this.   Would also note that dillution of assigned authority is the same thing as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, zsasz said:

Typical Republican/Facist move.  They whine about how "the people" don't have power when the Democrats are in charge....and then the first thing they look to do when they take control is try to make it harder for "the people" to have power. Good for the sensible people of Ohio.

Yeah, fascists always let the people vote on proposals. 

What a dope.  :doh:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, zsasz said:

Typical Republican/Facist move.  They whine about how "the people" don't have power when the Democrats are in charge....and then the first thing they look to do when they take control is try to make it harder for "the people" to have power. Good for the sensible people of Ohio.

 

43 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

Yeah, fascists always let the people vote on proposals. 

What a dope.  :doh:

LOL @5-Points, I was just about to say the same thing.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The defeat of Issue 1 on Tuesday keeps in place a simple majority threshold for passing future constitutional amendments, rather than the 60% supermajority that was proposed. 

 

Seems like a constitution should be hard to change and not just the whims of the idiot public on a random tuesday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, zsasz said:

Typical Republican/Facist move.  They whine about how "the people" don't have power when the Democrats are in charge....and then the first thing they look to do when they take control is try to make it harder for "the people" to have power. Good for the sensible people of Ohio.

So what your saying is that if the people in the minority vote democrat, then putting the minority view first is all about diversity fairness and equity and equality.  But if that minority happens to vote republican then majority should rule as that is fair and just.  Got it. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Putin looks at this sort of result and decides the us is a lost cause and will eventually need to be nuked before the cancer that is wokism spreads to russia. 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

Issue #1 was on Amendments to the  Ohio Constitution.  You don't believe the people should have a say in how their government should be run, sounds pretty authoritarian to me.  

utilit99 is so stupid he doesn't understand what he is even arguing for at this point. 

Or worse- he does understand and doesn't care.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

The defeat of Issue 1 on Tuesday keeps in place a simple majority threshold for passing future constitutional amendments, rather than the 60% supermajority that was proposed. 

 

Seems like a constitution should be hard to change and not just the whims of the idiot public on a random tuesday.

Agreed.  I presumed that the amendment was to make abortion illegal, and I was going to say that I don't think that is something that should be in a constitution.

Arizona had proposed a similar 60% super majority years ago; I voted for it, but it was shot down there as well IIRC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, League Champion said:

I'm glad you're celebrating dead babies. All because Democrat Women can't keep their legs closed. Be proud.


All women keep their legs closed for you. :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shouldn’t they all been out buying Powerball tickets for yesterday’s Mega Millions drawing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, League Champion said:

 can't keep their legs closed.

 

3 hours ago, RLLD said:

sluts raising kids. 

The right will always show their true colors, disdain for women.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

 

The right will always show their true colors, disdain for women.

I think women are great.  Its just when they kill kids because their deeds resulted in an inconvenient outcome that I think they cross the line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I think women are great.  Its just when they kill kids because their deeds resulted in an inconvenient outcome that I think they cross the line.

their deeds?  A woman can get pregnant by herself?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

 

LOL @5-Points, I was just about to say the same thing.

:thumbsup:

It's good to know the meaning of the words you choose to use. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I think women are great.  Its just when they kill kids because their deeds resulted in an inconvenient outcome that I think they cross the line.

Weird how the right cries about incels but when women actually have sex with dudes it's all of a sudden on the woman.  Republicans really do hate women.

And btw, it's a parasite until it can live outside the mom on its own.  Even if that means with medical assistance.

So stop with the feminine appeal to emotions "they're killing babies boo hoo" nonsense.

Republicans are getting so stomped in '24.

buriful. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

their deeds?  A woman can get pregnant by herself?

Of course not, she has to first make the active decision to have sex....and then the further active decision to not use or demand the use of protection....and the natural outcome is potentially pregnancy...... so they roll the dice, and then if they manage to create life...well, just kill it....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Wade Garrett said:

Weird how the right cries about incels but when women actually have sex with dudes it's all of a sudden on the woman.  Republicans really do hate women.

And btw, it's a parasite until it can live outside the mom on its own.  Even if that means with medical assistance.

So stop with the feminine appeal to emotions "they're killing babies boo hoo" nonsense.

Republicans are getting so stomped in '24.

buriful. 

Use what ever rationale you want.  I support abortion....emphatically.....I am an ally.    I simply will not use some twisted logic to excuse myself from the moral crime of it. I am advocating for the murder of children, because I see it as a societal good.  I could try to let myself off the hook for this by fabricating reasons that perhaps make me feel like I am not wrong for it....but instead I accept that I am wrong....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RLLD said:

Use what ever rationale you want.  I support abortion....emphatically.....I am an ally.    I simply will not use some twisted logic to excuse myself from the moral crime of it. I am advocating for the murder of children, because I see it as a societal good.  I could try to let myself off the hook for this by fabricating reasons that perhaps make me feel like I am not wrong for it....but instead I accept that I am wrong....

No, your instincts are right.  Something that can't live outside its host is not a member of that species yet.  Even if it ultimately could become one.

It's most certainly not a child.  But I get that folks have different opinions on this.  But what the right needs to know is that the vast majority of americans want abortion legal and will come out and vote quite bigly to ensure they have it.

The right will get a reminder again in November '24.

buriful. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

their deeds?  A woman can get pregnant by herself?

Yes, she can. Birth control is plentiful and cheap. It's a choice 😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Wade Garrett said:

No, your instincts are right.  Something that can't live outside its host is not a member of that species yet.  Even if it ultimately could become one.

It's most certainly not a child.  But I get that folks have different opinions on this.  But what the right needs to know is that the vast majority of americans want abortion legal and will come out and vote quite bigly to ensure they have it.

The right will get a reminder again in November '24.

buriful. 

No, it is a human upon fertilization.  It is life.

I leave it to others to provide for themselves an escape from the immorality of it. I will not allow myself such a luxury.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't spread your legs if you don't have birth control. They also make the morning after pill. If you can't afford it then you shouldn't risk procreation anyhow. 🏆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Of course not, she has to first make the active decision to have sex....and then the further active decision to not use or demand the use of protection....and the natural outcome is potentially pregnancy...... so they roll the dice, and then if they manage to create life...well, just kill it....

So it's all up to the woman.  A man can't decide not to have sex, or insist on protection, or take any responsibility on the matter.  Good to know.  My whole life I was responsible in this matter but now I learn I shouldn't have been, it's the woman's problem.  Great take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, League Champion said:

Don't spread your legs if you don't have birth control. They also make the morning after pill. If you can't afford it then you shouldn't risk procreation anyhow. 🏆

You don't consider the morning after pill an abortion?  Interesting take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, League Champion said:

Yes, she can. 

I think we've achieved maximum stupidity at this point.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, RLLD said:

No, it is a human upon fertilization.  It is life.

I leave it to others to provide for themselves an escape from the immorality of it. I will not allow myself such a luxury.

Not everyone agrees on this though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

their deeds?  A woman can get pregnant by herself?

Others have pointed out that, barring rape, the answer is essentially yes, the woman controls who she has sex with and if birth control is used.  Your party of science doesn't like the science reality that females bear the offspring of just about every if not every sexual species, and that as such they need to be more judicious in their sexual choices.  So the solution is to kill unborn children at-will, WHEEE$#@!  Equity!

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

So it's all up to the woman.  A man can't decide not to have sex, or insist on protection, or take any responsibility on the matter.  Good to know.  My whole life I was responsible in this matter but now I learn I shouldn't have been, it's the woman's problem.  Great take.

It is.  You see no means no......so if a woman agrees to have sex, and then gets pregnant...yep, she made the choice to both a) have sex....and b) not use protection.  All she is really doing is removing the inconvenient outcome of her desire to have sex....

Now, if she is raped that is entirely different of course.

Regardless.......let them have at it.  I am delighted that they have abortions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

You don't consider the morning after pill an abortion?  Interesting take.

I told you my take. I'm not anti abortion on a whole. I understand medical emergencies. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Weird how the right cries about incels but when women actually have sex with dudes it's all of a sudden on the woman.  Republicans really do hate women.

And btw, it's a parasite until it can live outside the mom on its own.  Even if that means with medical assistance.

So stop with the feminine appeal to emotions "they're killing babies boo hoo" nonsense.

Republicans are getting so stomped in '24.

buriful. 

 

If this RLLD idiot was so concerned about the potential child that he would help create...then he should be intellectually honest enough by agreeing to not engage in coitus unless having a child is the desired outcome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×