Nothing on New Mex Governor gun ban?

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,308]

who are these authoritarian governors who think they have any right to not abide by the consitution

https://www.governor.state.nm.us/2023/09/08/governor-announces-statewide-enforcement-plan-for-gun-violence-fentanyl-reduction-plan-includes-30-day-suspension-of-concealed-open-carry-in-albuquerque-and-bernalillo-county/

[jonnyutah 266]

Did she break any fences? Until then :yawn: 

[Dizkneelande 1,093]

Strange how it’s always the left peeing on the constitution 

[Dizkneelande 1,093]

https://x.com/michellewhitzel/status/1700369102441742456?s=46&t=Fib7p2nPeGXuJiuDfFsfmA

[Engorgeous George 2,271]

A rather expansive view of the term "public health emergency".  So expansive as to be wrong.

[Hawkeye21 2,390]

 

[Dizkneelande 1,093]

The commie left will not stop until they have total control. 

[BuckSwope 654]

Weird, I thought the right was about protecting kids and battling our fentanyl problem.  

[BuckSwope 654]

Disagree about how she did it, f0ck that, but didn't see much I disagreed with as far as regulation changes.    Health emergency to get your way, though? Nah.  

[Drizzay 712]

"Emergency"

[Stryker Ryker 188]

Hopefully this woman gets taken out. She is VERY dangerous and is violating the constitution. It’s treason. Plain and simple. And she should face the harshest punishment which is death 

[Cdub100 3,879]

Just another democrat overreach that will be struck down by the courts. Dems truly hate our Constitution. 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

24 minutes ago, Stryker Ryker said:

Hopefully this woman gets taken out by a bullet to the dome. 

[Dizkneelande 1,093]

55 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

Disagree about how she did it, f0ck that, but didn't see much I disagreed with as far as regulation changes.    Health emergency to get your way, though? Nah.  

“Neither the legislature nor any executive or judicial may disregard the provisions of the constitution incase of emergency”

[jonmx 2,425]

26 minutes ago, Stryker Ryker said:

Hopefully this woman gets taken out by a bullet to the dome. She is VERY dangerous and is violating the constitution. It’s treason. Plain and simple. And she should face the harshest punishment which is death 

 

She is just a pimple to the much bigger problem at the federal level.  This is a trial balloon to see how far they can push it.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,226]

Looking forward to Trump declaring an emergency and booting Bidens illegals. Let’s play. 

[BuckSwope 654]

42 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

“Neither the legislature nor any executive or judicial may disregard the provisions of the constitution incase of emergency”

Gee, thanks.  I can read, and if you could when it comes to my posts, you would understand that I agree with you.   

[Mike Honcho 5,250]

Good, something needed to be done to stop Alec Baldwin

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,308]

5 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Good, something needed to be done to stop Alec Baldwin

that might be your best comment ever

[The Real timschochet 6,585]

Looks like it’s probably overreach. 

But the deep concern that some here profess to have for the Constitution is awfully selective, IMO. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,308]

6 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Looks like it’s probably overreach. 

But the deep concern that some here profess to have for the Constitution is awfully selective, IMO. 

jeezus, probably an overreach?  Nothing you say after that is valid

of course you support "climate" lockdowns so really not surprised

 

[Dizkneelande 1,093]

19 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Looks like it’s probably overreach. 

But the deep concern that some here profess to have for the Constitution is awfully selective, IMO. 

What parts are selective?

[Hawkeye21 2,390]

21 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Looks like it’s probably overreach. 

But the deep concern that some here profess to have for the Constitution is awfully selective, IMO. 

Where are you going with this?  What she is doing is pretty bad, not "probably overreach." 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,226]

24 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Looks like it’s probably overreach. 

But the deep concern that some here profess to have for the Constitution is awfully selective, IMO. 

“Probably”. Yeah, probably. 

[The Real timschochet 6,585]

23 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

What parts are selective?

Most of those here complaining about this Constitutional infringement are supporting a candidate for President who had publicly stated that he means to abrogate the Constitution. That’s why it’s selective. 

[Dizkneelande 1,093]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

Most of those here complaining about this Constitutional infringement are supporting a candidate for President who had publicly stated that he means to abrogate the Constitution. That’s why it’s selective. 

Could you provide examples? I believe Biden was also just tagged for 1st amendment violations. 

[The Real timschochet 6,585]

22 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Where are you going with this?  What she is doing is pretty bad, not "probably overreach." 

No it’s bad at all. There is nothing in the Constitution that protects the supposed rights of open carry or concealed carry of firearms- that’s not any part of the Second Amendment. I fully support restricting these privileges- they’re not rights. 
 

It’s probably overreach because I don’t think a governor has the authority to do it- that would be normally the task of the state legislature. But then I don’t know exactly how New Mexico works so that’s why I wrote “probably”. 

[The Real timschochet 6,585]

2 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Could you provide examples? I believe Biden was also just tagged for 1st amendment violations. 

Sure. 

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html

Biden’s actions could be interpreted by some as interfering with the 1st Amendment. Others will disagree. Trump however has said he wants to do away with the Constitution. That’s a very different animal. 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

Sure. 

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html

Biden’s actions could be interpreted by some as interfering with the 1st Amendment. Others will disagree. Trump however has said he wants to do away with the Constitution. That’s a very different animal. 

Not to mention that whole insurrection thing.

But anyway, glad conservatives are back to supporting the Constitution. And they’re right: this governor obviously doesn’t have the authority to override it.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,226]

6 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Sure. 

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html

Biden’s actions could be interpreted by some as interfering with the 1st Amendment. Others will disagree. Trump however has said he wants to do away with the Constitution. That’s a very different animal. 

Ok Stretch Armstrong. 

[Strike 5,385]

14 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

No it’s bad at all. There is nothing in the Constitution that protects the supposed rights of open carry or concealed carry of firearms- that’s not any part of the Second Amendment. I fully support restricting these privileges- they’re not rights. 
 

It’s probably overreach because I don’t think a governor has the authority to do it- that would be normally the task of the state legislature. But then I don’t know exactly how New Mexico works so that’s why I wrote “probably”. 

The SCOTUS disagrees with you but don't let that stop you.

[MTSkiBum 1,620]

2 hours ago, Stryker Ryker said:

Hopefully this woman gets taken out by a bullet to the dome. She is VERY dangerous and is violating the constitution. It’s treason. Plain and simple. And she should face the harshest punishment which is death 

 

That is a little more extreme than I expected from you. Although admittedly I skip reading a lot of political threads.

[The Real timschochet 6,585]

6 minutes ago, Strike said:

The SCOTUS disagrees with you but don't let that stop you.

Yes a majority disagree. I side with the dissenters on this one. So no I won’t let it stop me. 

[Dizkneelande 1,093]

16 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Sure. 

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html

Biden’s actions could be interpreted by some as interfering with the 1st Amendment. Others will disagree. Trump however has said he wants to do away with the Constitution. That’s a very different animal. 

So basically what every elected democrat did when bush and trump won. Got it. You have any examples of actual violations like the ones the left has been tagged by the courts over? The left seems to have a problem with repeated violations of the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 10th. 

[Dizkneelande 1,093]

17 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Not to mention that whole insurrection thing.

But anyway, glad conservatives are back to supporting the Constitution. And they’re right: this governor obviously doesn’t have the authority to override it.

Why didn’t he get charged with insurrection?

[Dizkneelande 1,093]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

Yes a majority disagree. I side with the dissenters on this one. So no I won’t let it stop me. 

The right to bear arms shall not be infringed is pretty clear to most. 

[Strike 5,385]

The governor was asked about her oath to uphold the Constitution and she literally said that oath is not absolute.  She knows what she did is unconstitutional but doesn't care.  I hate when politicians do this.  Such a waste of resources.  There should be a law that when a politician does something blatantly unconstitutional they are removed from and banned from holding public office due to incompetence.

[The Real timschochet 6,585]

4 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

So basically what every elected democrat did when bush and trump won. Got it. You have any examples of actual violations like the ones the left has been tagged by the courts over? The left seems to have a problem with repeated violations of the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 10th. 

I’ve never heard of any politician call for the termination of the Constitution before Trump did. You can dismiss it, try to compare it to people who have complained about other elections, but he said it. And you still support him. That’s why your love of the Constitution seems selective to me. Sorry. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,226]

Remember when Obama had multiple members of the press arrested? Libtards don’t. HT farms remembers. Trump never did that. 

[Dizkneelande 1,093]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

I’ve never heard of any politician call for the termination of the Constitution before Trump did. You can dismiss it, try to compare it to people who have complained about other elections, but he said it. And you still support him. That’s why your love of the Constitution seems selective to me. Sorry. 

Regardless of your out of context CNN article can you point to an actual constitutional violation or is innuendo all you have? The fifth circuit just ruled Biden violated the first amendment. If you can’t give an example of an actual violation then sit down and shut up.