TRUMP WINS AGAIN! Cannot be removed for fake erection

[Mike Honcho 4,159]

2 minutes ago, MDC said:

You could’ve just said “No, I can’t find a single Geek who supported the BLM riots.”

Your obsession with trannies is already well documented, man-bag.  

From the post directly above your post, I wouldn't say he limits himself to trannies. 

[Maximum Overkill 825]

 

[lickin_starfish 1,521]

 

[Maximum Overkill 825]

 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,970]

There were plenty of “experts” that said this case was legit.  Lol. 

[Maximum Overkill 825]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

The only Geeks who defend violent riots are Trumpers. 1/6 was a selfie fest or government setup!   

 

 

[Patented Phil 874]

12 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

Suck my c0ck, Phylis!

 

11 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

Bunch of kweers up in here

Last I checked you’re the only guy in here asking another guy to suck his c0ck.

I get it… you’re frustrated.  You embarrassed yourself and you look foolish.  But a blow job from another guy isn’t going to fix that.

[Thornton Melon 549]

2 hours ago, edjr said:

Michelle Wu for POTUS  

 

[supermike80 1,343]

How can we ever forget this diddy???

 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,970]

7 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

How can we ever forget this diddy???

 

Every one  of them should be deported. 

[Maximum Overkill 825]

MORE LIBERAL RACISTS

 

 

[Maximum Overkill 825]

2 hours ago, MDC said:

You could’ve just said “No, I can’t find a single Geek who supported the BLM riots.”

Your obsession with trannies is already well documented, man-bag.  

. Encourages Tranny violence vs normal Americans, even voted Democrat. 

 

 

[MDC 5,979]

8 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

. Encourages Tranny violence vs normal Americans, even voted Democrat. 

 

 

You have an inexhaustible supply of tranny pics.  

[Maximum Overkill 825]

3 minutes ago, MDC said:

You have an inexhaustible supply of tranny pics.  

See where we're going?

 

 

[Tree of Knowledge 921]

40 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

How can we ever forget this diddy???

 

Self important d-bags

[Fnord 1,188]

17 hours ago, shorepatrol said:

This is clownshoes of the hightest order. 

Let's hear your thoughts then.

[IGotWorms 3,441]

5 hours ago, Patented Phil said:

 

Last I checked you’re the only guy in here asking another guy to suck his c0ck.

I get it… you’re frustrated.  You embarrassed yourself and you look foolish.  But a blow job from another guy isn’t going to fix that.

‘Twas not a literal invitation Phyllis. Hate to break it to you  

[gas 89]

7 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Go look at the Colorado State Supreme Court.  That's an example of communism.  I mean, all you need to do is look in the political mirror.  It's not that hard.  Yes, there are a lot of ignorant people posting here, I'm responding to one of them.

You are the poster child for ignorance.   You have no focking clue what communism is.  

Communism (from Latin communis, 'common, universal') is a left-wing to far-left sociopolitical, philosophical, and economic ideology within the socialist movement, whose goal is the creation of a communist society, a socioeconomic order centered around common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and ...

So, how does the Colorado Supreme Court work into this ideology?

 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,970]

Leftard jerkoffs That throw around fascist at at every turn are upset with anyone saying communist. Go away dope. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,206]

1 hour ago, gas said:

You are the poster child for ignorance.   You have no focking clue what communism is.  

Communism (from Latin communis, 'common, universal') is a left-wing to far-left sociopolitical, philosophical, and economic ideology within the socialist movement, whose goal is the creation of a communist society, a socioeconomic order centered around common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and ...

So, how does the Colorado Supreme Court work into this ideology?

 

 

So your claim is that communism is only economical... and since what the Colorado Supreme Court did was governmental, it wasn't communism? 

 

I'll concede to your point if you can correct me on what form of government tries and convicts a citizen of a crime that they were never charged with.  I mean, I think we all can agree that it's not a Democratic Republic/Free society.  Let me know which one it is.

[Fnord 1,188]

32 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I'll concede to your point if you can correct me on what form of government tries and convicts a citizen of a crime that they were never charged with.  I mean, I think we all can agree that it's not a Democratic Republic/Free society.  Let me know which one it is.

"The Government" did not try or convict anyone. A very small group of people did their jobs: interpret law and the constitution. They ruled that based on the law and available evidence that Trump committed, or aided and abetted, insurrection. SCOTUS disagreed, case closed. You'll notice SCOTUS did not give an opinion on Trump’s culpability, only that the states aren't allowed to remove him from the ballot.

You can believe those that made the rulings did it in a partisan manner; I won't argue with you. But at no point were these rulings made by trial, or have any sort of prosecutory heft. What you're suggesting happened, didn't happen. At least not in the way you're trying to frame it.

 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,970]

3 minutes ago, Fnord said:

"The Government" did not try or convict anyone. A very small group of people did their jobs: interpret law and the constitution. They ruled that based on the law and available evidence that Trump committed, or aided and abetted, insurrection. SCOTUS disagreed, case closed. You'll notice SCOTUS did not give an opinion on Trump’s culpability, only that the states aren't allowed to remove him from the ballot.

You can believe those that made the rulings did it in a partisan manner; I won't argue with you. But at no point were these rulings made by trial, or have any sort of prosecutory heft. What you're suggesting happened, didn't happen. At least not in the way you're trying to frame it.

 

 

Unreal.  The basics of our country get by you. Like someone being able to face their accuser and defend themselves before they are handed down a punishment. “Did their jobs”. You’re not an American anymore.  You just live here. American in name only. You should move. 

[Fnord 1,188]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Unreal.  The basics of our country get by you you. Like someone being able to face their accuser and defend themselves before they are handed down a punishment. “Did their jobs”. You’re not an American anymore.  You just live here. American in name only. You should move. 

Big shock to everyone that YOU don't see the nuance. Or ANY nuance, really. One of the necessities of being a MAGAMOOK. 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,970]

40 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Big shock to everyone that YOU don't see the nuance. Or ANY nuance, really. One of the necessities of being a MAGAMOOK. 

Oh, the nuance. We’re going to punish someone without charging them or giving them an opportunity to defend themselves. An HOA would have the same level of legitimacy if they came up with this garbage. Perhaps you ought to pick up one of those pocket constitutions and read some of it. It seems to have escaped you. It’s not just a book of rules.  

[Fnord 1,188]

6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Oh, the nuance. We’re going to punish someone without charging them or giving them an opportunity to defend themselves. A HOA would have the same level of legitimacy if they came up with this garbage. Perhaps you ought to pick up one of those pocket constitutions and read some of it. It seems to have escaped you. It’s not just a book of rules.  

Turns out the Constitution doesn't have an algorithm within it that easily interprets text over 2 centuries old and applies it to every modern day situation. That's why there are lawyers and judges; to make decisions that are not clearly laid out within the text. When doing their interpretation, a working knowledge of detail and nuance is pretty important. Your inability to reconcile that fact within your own addled brain is not my problem. 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,970]

13 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Turns out the Constitution doesn't have an algorithm within it that easily interprets text over 2 centuries old and applies it to every modern day situation. That's why there are lawyers and judges; to make decisions that are not clearly laid out within the text. When doing their interpretation, a working knowledge of detail and nuance is pretty important. Your inability to reconcile that fact within your own addled brain is not my problem. 

Well, being actually charged and given an opportunity  to defend yourself before being punished doesn’t require any modern technology to figure out. Even a liberal that isn’t infected with TDS can figure that out. You people are so far gone and can’t see it because you have such self assurance you are right because you think you are on the just side. You’re not. You just don’t like the other side. Stop thinking it’s anymore than that and perhaps you won’t lose your way so easily. You’re not fighting fascism or a despot. He’s just a guy You don’t like. 

[shadrap 123]

1 hour ago, Fnord said:

"The Government" did not try or convict anyone. A very small group of people did their jobs: interpret law and the constitution. They ruled that based on the law and available evidence that Trump committed, or aided and abetted, insurrection. SCOTUS disagreed, case closed. You'll notice SCOTUS did not give an opinion on Trump’s culpability, only that the states aren't allowed to remove him from the ballot.

You can believe those that made the rulings did it in a partisan manner; I won't argue with you. But at no point were these rulings made by trial, or have any sort of prosecutory heft. What you're suggesting happened, didn't happen. At least not in the way you're trying to frame it.

 

 

unreal this post.  "very small group of people did their jobs".  unreal.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,970]

52 minutes ago, shadrap said:

unreal this post.  "very small group of people did their jobs".  unreal.

Seriously. Nah, they didn’t go out of their way and go way behind the scope of their duties. It just came across their desk.  They had no choice really. Un Fockin believable what these people can be convinced of. Then again, they get told men can get pregnant and go along with it. 

[Horseman 1,593]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Seriously. Nah, they didn’t go out of their way and go way behind the scope of their duties. It just came across their desk.  They had no choice really. Un Fockin believable what these people can be convinced of. Then again, they get told men can get pregnant and go along with it. 

One of the judges they got normally handled parking ticket court.  

[Hardcore troubadour 12,970]

35 minutes ago, Horseman said:

One of the judges they got normally handled parking ticket court.  

These jackasses actually thought this was legit and had a chance. Lawrence Tribe said so. 9-0. Stfu. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,206]

13 hours ago, Fnord said:

"The Government" did not try or convict anyone. A very small group of people did their jobs: interpret law and the constitution. They ruled that based on the law and available evidence that Trump committed, or aided and abetted, insurrection. SCOTUS disagreed, case closed. You'll notice SCOTUS did not give an opinion on Trump’s culpability, only that the states aren't allowed to remove him from the ballot.

You can believe those that made the rulings did it in a partisan manner; I won't argue with you. But at no point were these rulings made by trial, or have any sort of prosecutory heft. What you're suggesting happened, didn't happen. At least not in the way you're trying to frame it.

 

 

LOL, you're an idiot!!

That's right, SCOTUS didn't give an opinion on Trump's culpability... it's because he was never charged or tried.

I can't believe the length you'll go to ignore what Colorado did.

The next time you want to play the victim and tell people not to paint a broad brush about Democrats?  Just come back to this post and realize that you were ok with the government convicting a citizen for a crime that he was never charged with... LOL, and even defended it!!!

[Dizkneelande 854]

15 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

LOL, you're an idiot!!

That's right, SCOTUS didn't give an opinion on Trump's culpability... it's because he was never charged or tried.

I can't believe the length you'll go to ignore what Colorado did.

The next time you want to play the victim and tell people not to paint a broad brush about Democrats?  Just come back to this post and realize that you were ok with the government convicting a citizen for a crime that he was never charged with... LOL, and even defended it!!!

They twist the justice system to persecute political opponents. Every fascist dictator who ever lived did this. The Dems 100% support lawfare. Every last one of them. Ergo, the Democrat party is a fascist party. 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,970]

1 hour ago, Dizkneelande said:

They twist the justice system to persecute political opponents. Every fascist dictator who ever lived did this. The Dems 100% support lawfare. Every last one of them. Ergo, the Democrat party is a fascist party. 

Great post 

[RLLD 3,558]

1 hour ago, Dizkneelande said:

They twist the justice system to persecute political opponents. Every fascist dictator who ever lived did this. The Dems 100% support lawfare. Every last one of them. Ergo, the Democrat party is a fascist party. 

The Fascists' portrayed themselves as "good" and pretended those opposed to them were evil as well.  The parallels between the modern Democrat and 1930's fascists' are remarkable....

[MDC 5,979]

We have Hitler!  

[Fnord 1,188]

4 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

LOL, you're an idiot!!

That's right, SCOTUS didn't give an opinion on Trump's culpability... it's because he was never charged or tried.

I can't believe the length you'll go to ignore what Colorado did.

The next time you want to play the victim and tell people not to paint a broad brush about Democrats?  Just come back to this post and realize that you were ok with the government convicting a citizen for a crime that he was never charged with... LOL, and even defended it!!!

You (and several others) have serious comprehension problems. Point out where I said I was good with the CO ruling or defended it. Go ahead, I'll wait.

I was pointing out that your take was just flat untrue. You fukin guys can't even believe what others tell you about their opinions. Just make assumptions and skip right to assigning intent where there was none. Makes sense you all are willing to sacrifice your own principles to vote for Trump. Sad.

[Fnord 1,188]

17 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You people are so far gone and can’t see it because you have such self assurance you are right because you think you are on the just side. You’re not. You just don’t like the other side. Stop thinking it’s anymore than that and perhaps you won’t lose your way so easily. You’re not fighting fascism or a despot. He’s just a guy You don’t like. 

I could make this exact statement about you and "your side." Difference is that many on "your side" don't just hate Biden. You hate all libs and everything they stand for. 

Also, I never supported what the CO Supreme Court did. Let that knock around in your hollow skull for a bit.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,970]

6 minutes ago, Fnord said:

I could make this exact statement about you and "your side." Difference is that many on "your side" don't just hate Biden. You hate all libs and everything they stand for. 

Also, I never supported what the CO Supreme Court did. Let that knock around in your hollow skull for a bit.

Not everything they stand for. But that doesn’t matter anymore because of how focked up you people are on everything else. There was a time when liberals were a necessary counter to the police state, military intervention and corporations.  Thise things doesn’t seem to interest you clowns anymore. You love the FBI/ CIA and corporations and defense contractors now. Trump ruined you. 

[Fnord 1,188]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Not everything they stand for. But that doesn’t matter anymore because of how focked up you people are on everything else. There was a time when liberals were a necessary counter to the police state, military intervention and corporations.  Thise things doesn’t seem to interest you clowns anymore. You love the FBI/ CIA and corporations and defense contractors now. Trump ruined you. 

I'm still interested in all of those things. So are most liberals. Don't confuse us with the whackjob leftists. I don't call you a racist, despite that group being in the bag for Republicans.

How about you don't tell me what I think. You'll be wrong in most cases.

[edjr 5,734]

bump