Liberals have moved on to partisan hack witch hunts on ONLY conservative SC Justices now..

[TBayXXXVII 2,480]

1 hour ago, Fnord said:

So your contention here is that they are asking for an investigation into Thomas for purely political reasons, not because he's accepting enormous unreported gifts from a Republican donor that, oh yeah, also regularly has cases decided by the court?

My contention is that everything the Democrats do against a Republican, the #1 (and #2, and #3.... ), factor is political.  Also, that there'd be ZERO interest in Thomas if he were a Democrat.  I tried this with Gutterboy, but he proved me wrong when I said that even he would agree with that, but I'll try it with you... as far as that last sentence, even you would agree with that.  Am I right?

[MDC 7,118]

23 minutes ago, RLLD said:

If there is evidence that Thomas violated the law, but they either fail to prosecute or ultimately do not convict, then you are free to remain convinced he perhaps did something wrong.  Absolution through the legal system is not actual absolution.

If I said that I’d admit that I was wrong about Thomas absent definitive proof of wrongdoing, and an investigation failed to deliver that proof, it would be a total biich move to continue to insist that he did something wrong anyway. 

 

[seafoam1 2,798]

EVERYTHING the liberals do is geared towards taking down opponents. There is no disputing this with any rational argument. 

[RLLD 4,143]

41 minutes ago, MDC said:

If I said that I’d admit that I was wrong about Thomas absent definitive proof of wrongdoing, and an investigation failed to deliver that proof, it would be a total biich move to continue to insist that he did something wrong anyway. 

 

Up to you, and of course please do decide for others as you please......we know how you like to do that. 

[MDC 7,118]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

Up to you, and of course please do decide for others as you please......we know how you like to do that. 

Only for those who say one thing and do another.

Hypocrites and weasels.  

[Baker Boy 1,687]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aoc-files-articles-impeachment-against-justices-alito-thomas-alleges-unchecked-corruption
 

AOC files articles of impeachment against Justices Alito, Thomas, alleges 'unchecked corruption'

AOC argues Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas' presence on the court is a 'constitutional crisis'

[Fnord 2,051]

1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

My contention is that everything the Democrats do against a Republican, the #1 (and #2, and #3.... ), factor is political.  Also, that there'd be ZERO interest in Thomas if he were a Democrat.  I tried this with Gutterboy, but he proved me wrong when I said that even he would agree with that, but I'll try it with you... as far as that last sentence, even you would agree with that.  Am I right?

No. I won't claim politics aren't involved obviously, as they assuredly are. But chalking up all of Trump’s legal entanglements to partisan fukkery by Dems is just absurd. 

That said, I'm not sure where AOC is coming from tying Alito into this. He's a partisan POS, but based on what I've seen, I don't think he's deserving of impeachment. Thomas, though? Fuk that scumbag, he has no business being on SCOTUS for another second.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,912]

The left wing press knew about a flag on a vacation home but Biden being fragile and senile somehow got by them.   

[seafoam1 2,798]

Just now, Fnord said:

No. I won't claim politics aren't involved.

Good for you. 

[TimHauck 2,599]

Maybe I missed it, did any righties call out the OP @cyclone24 for lying in the thread title?

[seafoam1 2,798]

25 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Maybe I missed it, did any righties call out the OP @cyclone24 for lying in the thread title?

Let's see if any libtards call you out for lying about the thread title. 

[TimHauck 2,599]

7 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Let's see if any libtards call you out for lying about the thread title. 

You don’t think the title is a lie?

[GutterBoy 2,898]

https://newrepublic.com/post/183683/clarence-thomas-free-trip-putin-hometown-russia-democrats-say

Of course Thomas took a free trip to Russia.

[seafoam1 2,798]

2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

You don’t think the title is a lie?

No.

[cyclone24 1,912]

4 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Maybe I missed it, did any righties call out the OP @cyclone24 for lying in the thread title?

What did I lie about? Stop trying to recruit other liberal goofballs on here to have your back when nobody knows what you’re talking about. 
 

AOC filed articles of impeachment against shockingly the two Republicans. So you might want to think this one through.

[TimHauck 2,599]

2 hours ago, cyclone24 said:

AOC filed articles of impeachment against shockingly the two Republicans. So you might want to think this one through.

Is articles of impeachment a lawsuit?

I do see that a Republican (who himself was found guilty of fraud) filed a lawsuit against Thomas a few months back though.

[Voltaire 5,181]

There sure seem to be a lot of left wing lawyers percolating anxiously with trillions of lawsuit ideas.

[BunnysBastatrds 2,307]

 I hope this goes to the Supreme Court 

[seafoam1 2,798]

57 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Is articles of impeachment a lawsuit?

I do see that a Republican (who himself was found guilty of fraud) filed a lawsuit against Thomas a few months back though.

[The Real timschochet 6,391]

It’s not a lie, (I don’t think it was deliberate) it’s just not accurate. There’s no lawsuit. There’s a call for an investigation, and AOC introduced articles of impeachment. You can criticize this if you want but it shouldn’t be called “a lawsuit”. 
 

 

[Maximum Overkill 1,739]

 

 

[RLLD 4,143]

16 hours ago, MDC said:

Only for those who say one thing and do another.

Hypocrites and weasels.  

Self reflection from you.....nice....

[TimHauck 2,599]

17 hours ago, MDC said:

If I said that I’d admit that I was wrong about Thomas absent definitive proof of wrongdoing, and an investigation failed to deliver that proof, it would be a total biich move to continue to insist that he did something wrong anyway. 

 

This reminds me of the twitter thread.

Geek club righties:  we have evidence Twitter interfered with the election!!

(turns out there wasn’t)

Geek club righties:  we don’t need evidence it’s obvious it happened!!

[TBayXXXVII 2,480]

17 hours ago, Fnord said:

No. I won't claim politics aren't involved obviously, as they assuredly are. But chalking up all of Trump’s legal entanglements to partisan fukkery by Dems is just absurd. 

That said, I'm not sure where AOC is coming from tying Alito into this. He's a partisan POS, but based on what I've seen, I don't think he's deserving of impeachment. Thomas, though? Fuk that scumbag, he has no business being on SCOTUS for another second.

LOL, it's 100% politics.  As I said, there is no doubt that if Thomas were a Democrat, that there would be no investigation.  None.  At all.  In fact, it probably wouldn't have even been brought up.  Don't kid yourself on that.

Don't kid yourself about Trump either.  Clinton could've had the same charges brought up against her, but where are they?  No where.  That's all you need to know.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,912]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

This reminds me of the twitter thread.

Geek club righties:  we have evidence Twitter interfered with the election!!

(turns out there wasn’t)

Geek club righties:  we don’t need evidence it’s obvious it happened!!

It was proven to have happened.  Tim just making shitt up. 

[MDC 7,118]

2 hours ago, RLLD said:

Self reflection from you.....nice....

You should try it sometime!  

[RLLD 4,143]

10 minutes ago, MDC said:

You should try it sometime!  

Oh but of course, but watching you describe yourself is something of a reward unto itself. 

[cyclone24 1,912]

9 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

It’s not a lie, (I don’t think it was deliberate) it’s just not accurate. There’s no lawsuit. There’s a call for an investigation, and AOC introduced articles of impeachment. You can criticize this if you want but it shouldn’t be called “a lawsuit”. 
 

 

Fair. It’s not a lawsuit necessarily as much  as  a partisan investigation. Of everything going on with that story I’m not sure why would one would get hung up on that one phrase but OK sure.

[squistion 1,944]

13 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

Fair. It’s not a lawsuit necessarily as much as a partisan investigation. Of everything going on with that story I’m not sure why would one would get hung up on that one phrase but OK sure.

If you agree then the thread title should be changed. 

[Mike Honcho 5,085]

18 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

Fair. It’s not a lawsuit necessarily as much  as  a partisan investigation. Of everything going on with that story I’m not sure why would one would get hung up on that one phrase but OK sure.

Sad that only side is interested in why a SCOTUS Justice is getting 5 million in gifts...unless maybe that side already knows why.

[cyclone24 1,912]

39 minutes ago, squistion said:

If you agree then the thread title should be changed. 

I’m not really into the whole liberal word semantics they like to play. With everything in the story if that gets you twisted up? I’m not gonna bat an eye about it. 
 

But sure I’ll change it for you….whew..much better. Got that ugly word “sue” out… which is ironic coming from the left that word would bother you guys. It’s your default setting for anything you guys don’t like.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,828]

4 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

Sad that only side is interested in why a SCOTUS Justice is getting 5 million in gifts...unless maybe that side already knows why.

Which, of course, is weird considering your side was never interested in any of that either until your own rules were used against you.

Just sayin'.   

[seafoam1 2,798]

4 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

Sad that only side is interested in why a SCOTUS Justice is getting 5 million in gifts...unless maybe that side already knows why.

Sad that liberals appoint a liberal female judge who doesn't know what a woman is to the SC.