VP Debate: Vance vs Walz

[Gepetto 1,289]

54 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

He texted me that he got banned.

Welcome to the FFToday Geek Club forearm Mr. McBonokon. Have fun and be good.

[Herbivore 1,115]

I hope the soft loser that reported Probst would admit it.

[Reality 3,099]

3 minutes ago, Herbivore said:

I hope the soft loser that reported Probst would admit it.

You have to be a special kind of stupid to think somebody who has been banned multiple times needs anybody to report them.

[McBonokon 13]

4 minutes ago, Reality said:

You have to be a special kind of stupid to think somebody who has been banned multiple times needs anybody to report them.

There's the admission.

[Herbivore 1,115]

7 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

There's the admission.

he is a soft loser

[jerryskids 6,567]

1 hour ago, McBonokon said:

Can't believe Jeff probst got banned for that.  Mods must not be survivor fans.

Hey Rusty!  I appreciate your play on @McBokonon.  I actually met him live, when he came back to AZ, along with Autumn Wind.  

Hopefully you don't blame me for Meph getting banned.  I've never reported anyone, and certainly wouldn't do it for the first time for someone who simply posted opinion posts ending in moron or idiot.  Stupidity is not a reason to get banned.   

[McBonokon 13]

5 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Hey Rusty!  I appreciate your play on @McBokonon.  I actually met him live, when he came back to AZ, along with Autumn Wind.  

Hopefully you don't blame me for Meph getting banned.  I've never reported anyone, and certainly wouldn't do it for the first time for someone who simply posted opinion posts ending in moron or idiot.  Stupidity is not a reason to get banned.   

I wouldn't think you would report meph, but the reported and deleted post was a reply to you.  Not a good look for you, but it was probably reality/Brahma bulls/eternal shiny that did the reporting and ensuing bannation.

[jerryskids 6,567]

11 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

I wouldn't think you would report meph, but the reported and deleted post was a reply to you.  Not a good look for you, but it was probably reality/Brahma bulls/eternal shiny that did the reporting and ensuing bannation.

Not a good look for me, Rusty?   

[McBonokon 13]

3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Not a good look for me, Rusty?   

Well meph did make you look pretty silly in this thread.  Then his last reply disappears and he gets banned.  But again probably not you.

[jerryskids 6,567]

1 minute ago, McBonokon said:

Well meph did make you look pretty silly in this thread.  Then his last reply disappears and he gets banned.  But again probably not you.

Actually, he didn't.  I posted links, he said words ending with insults.  I can see that you think that's a big win, but I don't expect you to have a high bar.  

[Horseman 2,367]

4 hours ago, McBonokon said:

Keep hammering that report button.  It's all you got.

RIP GutterBoy 

RIP Shooter McGavin

RIP Jeff Probst

RIPPing them off pretty frequently here. You know who isnt a winner. Lets call him a Life Loser.

 

[TimHauck 2,621]

9 hours ago, McBonokon said:

Can't believe Jeff probst got banned for that.  Mods must not be survivor fans.

For calling someone a dummy?

8 hours ago, Strike said:

I agree that is a relatively mild post to get suspended for.  But Probst and/or his other aliases have been banned a bunch of times.  And he's only been back less than a week and all he's done is insult and troll.  Maybe Mike is just sick of him? 

If it was for calling someone a dummy, lol at saying “relatively” mild.  You and pretty much everyone here have posted stuff 10x worse.  It is odd that Mike seems to rarely visit here, yet Gutter gets banned or suspended more than anyone else despite not really posting anything worse than anyone else.  Would certainly suggest some thin skinned life loser is repeatedly reporting him.  My bet is on one of a couple other people with multiple aliases - @F1erce / @Djgb13 / @Vyse / @Stryker Ryker / @WhiskeyCash  or @Horseman / @Jose M / @RogerDodger / think he’s got one more that I’m forgetting, both of which who consistently post far worse stuff than Gutter.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,941]

Idiots think he’s actually getting banned. 

[McBonokon 13]

7 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Actually, he didn't.  I posted links, he said words ending with insults.  I can see that you think that's a big win, but I don't expect you to have a high bar.  

You posted a link to a far right wing propaganda piece supporting your statement that the left wants to do away with the first amendment.  You stated that Tim walz wants to restrict free speech.  I don't know if you're just trolling but those two statements are clearly false and probst did a good job debating that point albeit with the colorful insults that ultimately led to his demise.

[McBonokon 13]

26 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Idiots think he’s actually getting banned. 

$100 says he was banned.  Bet?

[Hardcore troubadour 14,941]

10 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

$100 says he was banned.  Bet?

25. For charity.  

[McBonokon 13]

18 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

25. For charity.  

Done.  PM sent.

Send me your donation receipt. Thanks.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,941]

39 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

Done.  PM sent.

Send me your donation receipt. Thanks.

Will do. 

[Reality 3,099]

10 hours ago, McBonokon said:

There's the admission.

 

10 hours ago, Herbivore said:

he is a soft loser

 

10 hours ago, McBonokon said:

I wouldn't think you would report meph, but the reported and deleted post was a reply to you.  Not a good look for you, but it was probably reality/Brahma bulls/eternal shiny that did the reporting and ensuing bannation.

Never reported anybody, no need. Never even looked into how.

The trash sound here seems to take itself out.

[McBonokon 13]

14 minutes ago, Reality said:

 

 

Never reported anybody, no need. Never even looked into how.

The trash sound here seems to take itself out.

Never even looked into how   another tell.  You're bad at lying.

More evidence is your obsession with gutter that seems oddly personal and vicious.

https://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/search/?&q=Gutter&author=Reality&search_and_or=or

[Maximum Overkill 1,740]

1 hour ago, McBonokon said:

Done.  PM sent.

Send me your donation receipt. Thanks.

You good BOYO?  

[Maximum Overkill 1,740]

12 hours ago, McBonokon said:

Poohaas that don't like being embarrassed.

BOYO, I'm worried for you 

[Reality 3,099]

15 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

Never even looked into how   another tell.  You're bad at lying.

More evidence is your obsession with gutter that seems oddly personal and vicious.

https://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/search/?&q=Gutter&author=Reality&search_and_or=or

If believing I got your umpteenth handle banned makes you feel better, have at it.

 

[seafoam1 2,803]

24 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

Never even looked into how   another tell.  You're bad at lying.

More evidence is your obsession with gutter that seems oddly personal and vicious.

https://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/search/?&q=Gutter&author=Reality&search_and_or=or

poor pimpledoosh. 

[MDC 7,133]

8 hours ago, Horseman said:

RIP GutterBoy 

RIP Shooter McGavin

RIP Jeff Probst

RIPPing them off pretty frequently here. You know who isnt a winner. Lets call him a Life Loser.

 

I’d say the life loser is the person or people who keep reporting them. That never seemed to happen before certain Geeks showed up here.

[BrahmaBulls 628]

12 minutes ago, MDC said:

I’d say the life loser is the person or people who keep reporting them. That never seemed to happen before certain Geeks showed up here.

I think the life loser is the guy with 20 something aliases lined up ready to go.  But to each his own.

[seafoam1 2,803]

15 minutes ago, MDC said:

I’d say the life loser is the person or people who keep reporting them. That never seemed to happen before certain Geeks showed up here.

Or rather the guy who has spent the last 30 years of his life posting on this website ad nauseum. You. 

[TimHauck 2,621]

17 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Or rather the guy who has spent the last 30 years of his life posting on this website ad nauseum. You. 

Irony alert

[jerryskids 6,567]

3 hours ago, McBonokon said:

You posted a link to a far right wing propaganda piece supporting your statement that the left wants to do away with the first amendment.  You stated that Tim walz wants to restrict free speech.  I don't know if you're just trolling but those two statements are clearly false and probst did a good job debating that point albeit with the colorful insults that ultimately led to his demise.

You are as dumb as Meph.  I never said Walz was going to "do away" with the first amendment; that was Meph's strawman that you think was a good job debating.  I said he was a threat to it, meaning whittling away at our freedoms.

True or false:  Tim Walz has proposed policies that would restrict free speech?

Hint:  Here is the link I provided Meph that he probably ignored.  I expect you to as well, and respond with some Eeyore blather.   

https://www.google.com/search?q=tim+walz+on+speech+restrictions&oq=tim+w&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCAgAEEUYJxg7MggIABBFGCcYOzIKCAEQLhixAxiABDIGCAIQRRg8MgYIAxBFGDwyBggEEEUYQTIGCAUQRRhBMgYIBhBFGEEyBggHEEUYPNIBCDIwNDZqMGo5qAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

[seafoam1 2,803]

18 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Irony alert

CHINESE FLU!!!!  

[Horseman 2,367]

13 hours ago, McBonokon said:

He texted me that he got banned.

Text him back and tell him to take the hint. Imagine a grown as man spending that type of effort to hang around a place he's clearly not welcome.  Huge double L.  

[edjr 6,578]

Did you guys see where Vance was yesterday?

Yup. My home town! 

[McBonokon 13]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

You are as dumb as Meph.  I never said Walz was going to "do away" with the first amendment; that was Meph's strawman that you think was a good job debating.  I said he was a threat to it, meaning whittling away at our freedoms.

True or false:  Tim Walz has proposed policies that would restrict free speech?

Hint:  Here is the link I provided Meph that he probably ignored.  I expect you to as well, and respond with some Eeyore blather.   

https://www.google.com/search?q=tim+walz+on+speech+restrictions&oq=tim+w&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCAgAEEUYJxg7MggIABBFGCcYOzIKCAEQLhixAxiABDIGCAIQRRg8MgYIAxBFGDwyBggEEEUYQTIGCAUQRRhBMgYIBhBFGEEyBggHEEUYPNIBCDIwNDZqMGo5qAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Well you said it, I saw it.  You said "the left wants to do away with th first amendment" which I assumed was either trolling or hyperbole but then you doubled down on the walz talk.  But that post is deleted now.

[McBonokon 13]

1 hour ago, Horseman said:

Text him back and tell him to take the hint. Imagine a grown as man spending that type of effort to hang around a place he's clearly not welcome.  Huge double L.  

Good point @Horseman @RogerDodger @JuneJuly

[TimHauck 2,621]

4 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

Good point @Horseman @RogerDodger @JuneJuly

Ah that was the one I was forgetting.   You can also add @Jose M to your list as well
 

 Did HT pay up?

[jerryskids 6,567]

8 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

Well you said it, I saw it.  You said "the left wants to do away with th first amendment" which I assumed was either trolling or hyperbole but then you doubled down on the walz talk.  But that post is deleted now.

I didn't delete anything.  Also "wants to" is different than "can," so congrats on continuing Meph's dumb strawman.

Care to answer my true/false question?  Comment on my links?

Didn't think so.

[McBonokon 13]

10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Ah that was the one I was forgetting.   You can also add @Jose M to your list as well
 

 Did HT pay up?

Of course not

[McBonokon 13]

17 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I didn't delete anything.  Also "wants to" is different than "can," so congrats on continuing Meph's dumb strawman.

Care to answer my true/false question?  Comment on my links?

Didn't think so.

Well they are deleted.  If you want to deny you said it, ok.

Anyway, I think walz is wrong on what he said from a constitutional standpoint.

I am also unaware of any of his policies that will restrict free speech.  Care to name one?

[jerryskids 6,567]

1 minute ago, McBonokon said:

Well they are deleted.  If you want to deny you said it, ok.

Anyway, I think walz is wrong on what he said from a constitutional standpoint.

I am also unaware of any of his policies that will restrict free speech.  Care to name one?

Apparently you didn't look at my link.  Shocking.

[McBonokon 13]

Just now, jerryskids said:

Apparently you didn't look at my link.  Shocking.

I looked at your link but didn't see any policy proposals.  The Google search right?  I didn't review all 12,000 hits.

Do you have one to share?