Meglamaniac 801 Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Are you trying to argue that “the move” in her quote is not referring to being moved to the phone room? She was moved to the phone room for her allegations about the conditions. There, she got access to the emails. She then shared the emails and was fired for sharing the emails. wrong Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 691 Posted 5 hours ago 9 hours ago, HellToupee said: Comer: “I expect the Clintons to be met with the same fate that Bannon and Navarro were met with.” Bannon might be the most incriminated person outside of those who knew what Epstein was doing while he was doing it. Epstein was a consultant for him. Who knows what insight & dirt on Trump Epstein was giving his clients, but it’s a totally separate issue from the sex crimes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,335 Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, Meglamaniac said: wrong What specifically is wrong? Everything I said there is accurate. I’d think you were just trolling me but you started this dumb argument claiming sharing the emails isn’t why she was fired when talking to someone else, so seems like you actually believe it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,364 Posted 5 hours ago 2 hours ago, thegeneral said: You don’t hear the Prez wish her the best. You probably ignored that. Well that happened. You think the AG just decided to reopen the closed investigations. She already said they were done, then they just happen to reopen as soon as this vote occurred that Donald couldn’t stop. You miss a lot! Yes, those things happened. The issue is, you don't know why. I don't expect you to understand what I mean. You aren't capable. But that's ok. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 691 Posted 5 hours ago 3 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said: Did you read the quote from yesterday? Seems like he wants them released. Like I said. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt refers to the victims as “so called victims” & “a classic Washington hoax.” Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,173 Posted 5 hours ago 58 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: Oh? And when Epstein described Trump as “the dog that didn’t bark” what do you think he meant? The one he couldn’t turn. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 691 Posted 5 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: The one he couldn’t turn. I’m sorry, turn how? You mean he tempted him with access to the girls? {Jeapordy theme} Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 691 Posted 4 hours ago “Oh.” Yeah, oh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,093 Posted 4 hours ago 19 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: The one he couldn’t turn. It’s actually a reference to a Sherlock Holmes book… https://brieflywriting.com/2012/07/25/the-dog-that-didnt-bark-what-we-can-learn-from-sir-arthur-conan-doyle-about-using-the-absence-of-expected-facts/ About a dog not barking when a crime was committed because it recognized the criminal as its owner or somebody else it knew well. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,661 Posted 4 hours ago 37 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said: Yes, those things happened. The issue is, you don't know why. I don't expect you to understand what I mean. You aren't capable. But that's ok. It’s very clear why they all happened. Just a matter of why the Prez is being such a sketchball about this. My guess is he’s lied so much about his relationship with his good friend the world’s most notorious human trafficker that he doesn’t want to look bad. Maybe it’s worse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites