Meglamaniac 804 Posted November 20 2 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Are you trying to argue that “the move” in her quote is not referring to being moved to the phone room? She was moved to the phone room for her allegations about the conditions. There, she got access to the emails. She then shared the emails and was fired for sharing the emails. wrong Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 736 Posted November 20 9 hours ago, HellToupee said: Comer: “I expect the Clintons to be met with the same fate that Bannon and Navarro were met with.” Bannon might be the most incriminated person outside of those who knew what Epstein was doing while he was doing it. Epstein was a consultant for him. Who knows what insight & dirt on Trump Epstein was giving his clients, but it’s a totally separate issue from the sex crimes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,355 Posted November 20 1 minute ago, Meglamaniac said: wrong What specifically is wrong? Everything I said there is accurate. I’d think you were just trolling me but you started this dumb argument claiming sharing the emails isn’t why she was fired when talking to someone else, so seems like you actually believe it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,411 Posted November 20 2 hours ago, thegeneral said: You don’t hear the Prez wish her the best. You probably ignored that. Well that happened. You think the AG just decided to reopen the closed investigations. She already said they were done, then they just happen to reopen as soon as this vote occurred that Donald couldn’t stop. You miss a lot! Yes, those things happened. The issue is, you don't know why. I don't expect you to understand what I mean. You aren't capable. But that's ok. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 736 Posted November 20 3 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said: Did you read the quote from yesterday? Seems like he wants them released. Like I said. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt refers to the victims as “so called victims” & “a classic Washington hoax.” Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,199 Posted November 20 58 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: Oh? And when Epstein described Trump as “the dog that didn’t bark” what do you think he meant? The one he couldn’t turn. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 736 Posted November 20 16 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: The one he couldn’t turn. I’m sorry, turn how? You mean he tempted him with access to the girls? {Jeapordy theme} Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 736 Posted November 20 “Oh.” Yeah, oh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,159 Posted November 20 19 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: The one he couldn’t turn. It’s actually a reference to a Sherlock Holmes book… https://brieflywriting.com/2012/07/25/the-dog-that-didnt-bark-what-we-can-learn-from-sir-arthur-conan-doyle-about-using-the-absence-of-expected-facts/ About a dog not barking when a crime was committed because it recognized the criminal as its owner or somebody else it knew well. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,699 Posted November 20 37 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said: Yes, those things happened. The issue is, you don't know why. I don't expect you to understand what I mean. You aren't capable. But that's ok. It’s very clear why they all happened. Just a matter of why the Prez is being such a sketchball about this. My guess is he’s lied so much about his relationship with his good friend the world’s most notorious human trafficker that he doesn’t want to look bad. Maybe it’s worse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peenie 1,995 Posted November 21 Meh, this is a big mess. Nothing truthful will come of it, similar to the Iran Contra hearings. By the way, Fawn Hall and Oliver North got married a couple of months ago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 804 Posted November 21 22 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said: Get him yet? I want to hear Jasmine Crokett's opinion on this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,199 Posted November 24 And just like that the Borg forgot about Epstein Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,350 Posted November 24 3 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: And just like that the Borg forgot about Epstein Thanks for bumping this. Day 6 now that th files haven't been released since the law was passed. What's trump waiting for? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,199 Posted November 24 36 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Thanks for bumping this. Day 6 now that th files haven't been released since the law was passed. What's trump waiting for? They have been released Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 736 Posted November 24 On 9/6/2025 at 3:28 PM, Sandy Loam said: https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/news/press-releases/ranking-member-robert-garcia-statement-doj-acting-deputy-chief-joseph-schnitt Here's another take on it. Quote “All Americans should be outraged about the DOJ’s continued cover-up of the Epstein files. Deputy Chief Joseph Schnitt’s comments about potential efforts to redact Republican names from the files are alarming. Defying a congressional subpoena is highly illegal. We are calling on Attorney General Pam Bondi to directly address these statements and release the full files immediately.” MAGAs don't like getting a taste of their own medicine. Schnitt, the DOJ employee who was fired after getting secretly recorded by James O’Keefe claiming that the DOJ was scrubbing the Epstein files, is suing the DOJ. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,350 Posted November 24 7 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said: They have been released Link? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,699 Posted November 25 10 hours ago, Ron_Artest said: Thanks for bumping this. Day 6 now that th files haven't been released since the law was passed. What's trump waiting for? You know how long it takes to erase all the mentions of Donald? He’s in that thing wall to wall. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,159 Posted November 25 9 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said: They have been released Where they at? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,476 Posted November 25 2 minutes ago, dogcows said: Where they at? Princess rusty dogshlt is hurting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 736 Posted Wednesday at 07:56 PM FBI worked overtime as Epstein files release was thought to be imminent – then Trump and Bondi tried to shut it down ~~~ FBI agents racked up more than $850,000 in overtime work while reviewing and redacting the Epstein files in March alone >>>FBI personnel reportedly devoted more than 3,000 hours of overtime to obtaining and redacting the Epstein Files back in March, at the direction of FBI Director Kash Patel – only to have President Donald Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi throw cold war on the release. After Attorney General Pam Bondi’s botched attempt to release “Phase 1” of the Epstein files in February, Patel ordered around 1,000 FBI agents to team up and dedicate extensive hours to adding more to “Phase 1” and preparing “Phase 2” of the files for release. Emails and documents exchanged between FBI officials in March, recently obtained by Bloomberg, show that agents across multiple departments communicated consistently about progress and racked up more than $850,000 in overtime work between March 17 and March 22 alone. In the emails obtained by Bloomberg, FBI officials received continuous updates on agents reviewing documents that needed to be redacted, surveillance photos the Justice Department took during its investigation into Epstein and the infamous video of the hallway outside of Epstein’s jail cell before he died. By March 24, FBI personnel were preparing “Phase 2” for “final delivery” to the Department of Justice. That appeared to be completed around May 2, when FBI agents in New York sent the Information Management Division the “Epstein Overview FINAL.” However, “Phase 2” was ultimately never released, and by July, the Department of Justice released a memo stating that “no further disclosures” were warranted after agents thoroughly reviewed the Epstein files. …. Bloomberg previously reported that the investigators who completed the final review of the Epstein files redacted Trump’s name, as well as other high-profile figures. … <<< Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,947 Posted 22 hours ago So, a sitting member of Congress, while conducting a hearing in 2019, was texting with Epstein, and no one mentioned it? I thought you were all concerned about who was involved with Epstein? Fockin frauds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 736 Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said: So, a sitting member of Congress, while conducting a hearing in 2019, was texting with Epstein, and no one mentioned it? I thought you were all concerned about who was involved with Epstein? Fockin frauds. It’s definitely in here, it’s been mentioned. One issue is Epstein was in USVI with access to public officials. Same issue in Palm Beach. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,350 Posted 20 hours ago Anyone complicit needs to be held accountable. Release the files. Trump refuses to do so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites