dogcows 1,441 Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Hawkeye21 said: It all starts with her. After that, he has responsibility for his actions. Regardless, it all starts with her. No, it starts with ICE storming residential neighborhoods. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 8,264 Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said: It all starts with her. After that, he has responsibility for his actions. Regardless, it all starts with her. I’d put the blame on her first, then Trump / Noem for picking Minneapolis for a target in the first place and announcing their presence there, then the actual ICE officer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,234 Posted 3 hours ago I’d like to know what the people that ICE is pulling out of their homes are being charged with. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,441 Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: I’d like to know what the people that ICE is pulling out of their homes are being charged with. Here’s a good summary (paywall removed by internet archive) https://archive.is/diLZf Quote Federal immigration agents in recent days have arrested dozens of refugees in Minnesota who had passed security screenings before being admitted to the United States, according to their lawyers and immigrant rights advocates. The arrests of the refugees, who are mainly from Somalia and include children, come after an announcement last Friday that the Trump administration would “re-examine thousands of refugee cases through new background checks,” focusing on people who have yet to obtain green cards after arriving in the United States. But that announcement, by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, did not say that the refugees would be subject to arrest and transfer to immigrant detention facilities. I may have mentioned this before, but reviewing somebody’s refugee case doesn’t require you to storm their neighborhood and whisk them away to Texas. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fireballer 2,712 Posted 3 hours ago 24 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: Because he was walking across the front of the car which is not standard procedure. I wish we could all agree that both Good and Ross have culpability in this. It doesn't have to be- nor is it- that one side is right and the other is wrong I went over this with Tim the other day. If you want to say that he contributed slightly, fine. But her maneuver was the overwhelming move that place him there. In his video, he was well clear of the right front fender when she reverses. He was far enough away from the car to see her right front tire rotating backwards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,762 Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, jerryskids said: It's not a red herring, it's the discussion we are having, which is gutter's belief that gunshots occur instantaneously. If you want to introduce a new discussion, feel free to. You ever fire a gun Jerry? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,762 Posted 3 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: I’d like to know what the people that ICE is pulling out of their homes are being charged with. Many are just being beat up, detained and then dumped on the street hours later Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,234 Posted 3 hours ago 11 minutes ago, dogcows said: Here’s a good summary (paywall removed by internet archive) https://archive.is/diLZf I may have mentioned this before, but reviewing somebody’s refugee case doesn’t require you to storm their neighborhood and whisk them away to Texas. I’d say you’re right in other states, but in Minnesota there is a good chance that the facility will be attacked like in Portland. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,091 Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Fireballer said: I went over this with Tim the other day. If you want to say that he contributed slightly, fine. But her maneuver was the overwhelming move that place him there. In his video, he was well clear of the right front fender when she reverses. He was far enough away from the car to see her right front tire rotating backwards. The video does not agree with the story you are telling. She was backing up to get clearance to drive and had her wheels pointed to the right past him. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,441 Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Hardcore troubadour said: I’d say you’re right in other states, but in Minnesota there is a good chance that the facility will be attacked like in Portland. My point is that they don’t need to be detained, period. Review the case. If you find they broke the law or there’s some other good reason to send them home, do so. They are arresting first, THEN opening their cases. They’re doing it backwards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,234 Posted 3 hours ago Just now, dogcows said: My point is that they don’t need to be detained, period. Review the case. If you find they broke the law or there’s some other good reason to send them home, do so. They are arresting first, THEN opening their cases. They’re doing it backwards. I can see your point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,441 Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said: The video does not agree with the story you are telling. She was backing up to get clearance to drive and had her wheels pointed to the right past him. 100% And in the video you can actually see her continuing to turn the wheel to the right. She was clearly trying to avoid him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fireballer 2,712 Posted 2 hours ago 10 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: The video does not agree with the story you are telling. She was backing up to get clearance to drive and had her wheels pointed to the right past him. Yawn. Watch his video at approx :37 sec. He is clear of the car. He is far enough away that you can see the tires suddenly rotate rearward, he is then placed in front of the car by her angular movement rearward. In addition, in the original video from the left rear, you can’t even see him at all until she reverses, and then there he is in front. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,234 Posted 2 hours ago I think it would be good politically for Trump to have ICE tamp it down a bit in Minnesota. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,441 Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Fireballer said: Yawn. Watch his video at approx :37 sec. He is clear of the car. He is far enough away that you can see the tires suddenly rotate rearward, he is then placed in front of the car by her angular movement rearward. You definitely need a nap Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fireballer 2,712 Posted 2 hours ago 5 minutes ago, dogcows said: She was clearly trying to avoid him. But she didn’t. Too bad for her. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,270 Posted 2 hours ago 50 minutes ago, dogcows said: Local PD. If somebody was blocking my driveway and refused to move, I’d call them. They know how to handle these situations; they do it every day. What if local PD choose not to help, or they don't have an hour to wait for local PD to arrive? 19 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: You ever fire a gun Jerry? Many. Never with a car about to hit me, though. Are you going to drop some first-hand knowledge on me for that scenario? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,091 Posted 2 hours ago 22 minutes ago, Fireballer said: Yawn. Watch his video at approx :37 sec. He is clear of the car. He is far enough away that you can see the tires suddenly rotate rearward, he is then placed in front of the car by her angular movement rearward. In addition, in the original video from the left rear, you can’t even see him at all until she reverses, and then there he is in front. That's just not true. He panicked is what you are saying. Your argument seems to boil down not understanding camera placement and depth perception. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,385 Posted 2 hours ago These Somalis don’t seem to like Nick Shirley. Good thing he brought security. These somali thieves can’t control their emotions “After my last video exposing over $110 Million in fraud Tim Walz dropped his run for reelection and multiple federal investigations were launched to stop fraud across the country. In this 51 minute video David and I expose another $16 Million in fraud as Minnesota welfare programs continue to operate fraudulently and steal from law-abiding taxpayers, Like it and share it around everywhere! Accountability and the law must come for the fraudsters and corrupt politicians who have let this happen. The fraud must end.“ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,762 Posted 2 hours ago 10 minutes ago, jerryskids said: What if local PD choose not to help, or they don't have an hour to wait for local PD to arrive? Many. Never with a car about to hit me, though. Are you going to drop some first-hand knowledge on me for that scenario? Well you should know that when you fire a gun it shoots pretty damn fast. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,589 Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said: Well you should know that when you fire a gun it shoots pretty damn fast. Just say you don't know what you are talking about already. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fireballer 2,712 Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: That's just not true. He panicked is what you are saying. Your argument seems to boil down not understanding camera placement and depth perception. When the right front tire starts rotating rearward and the car starts angling towards the officer at :37, he is not in front of the car. He’s so far away from the car that he can catch almost the entire tire in his camera frame. His position changes slightly, if at all between :37 and :38, when he’s ends up pretty much dead center with the Honda emblem. The car movement is overwhelmingly what puts him in front. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,441 Posted 2 hours ago 29 minutes ago, jerryskids said: What if local PD choose not to help, or they don't have an hour to wait for local PD to arrive? Then find somebody who’s not a hothead and has local PD experience to defuse the situation. Or here’s a novel concept. Just drive around. If it was a broken down car they’d have to wait an hour for a tow truck anyway. The ICE agents could have (and IMO should have) ignored her. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,589 Posted 1 hour ago 20 minutes ago, dogcows said: Then find somebody who’s not a hothead and has local PD experience to defuse the situation. Or here’s a novel concept. Just drive around. If it was a broken down car they’d have to wait an hour for a tow truck anyway. The ICE agents could have (and IMO should have) ignored her. too bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,270 Posted 1 hour ago 18 minutes ago, dogcows said: Then find somebody who’s not a hothead and has local PD experience to defuse the situation. Or here’s a novel concept. Just drive around. If it was a broken down car they’d have to wait an hour for a tow truck anyway. The ICE agents could have (and IMO should have) ignored her. Local PD experience would help, and I'm all for improved training. But IMO, that wouldn't resolve the problem, because an ICE agent with such experience has a big disadvantage over an actual local PD person. That being, he's wearing an ICE uniform, not a PD uniform. It's clear from the videos of the Good incident, and other videos since, that the people (mostly women it seems) in these anti-ICE groups have no fear or respect, or at least didn't have fear until now. You can argue they don't deserve respect, but that's a red herring at this point. There is more discussion regarding your suggestion of ignoring, but I'd prefer to focus on this part first. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,091 Posted 1 hour ago 45 minutes ago, Fireballer said: When the right front tire starts rotating rearward and the car starts angling towards the officer at :37, he is not in front of the car. He’s so far away from the car that he can catch almost the entire tire in his camera frame. His position changes slightly, if at all between :37 and :38, when he’s ends up pretty much dead center with the Honda emblem. The car movement is overwhelmingly what puts him in front. Dude- when you match it up with the other video the other cops are grabbing her door handle and trying to enter which I believe they don't have the right to do. While that is happening the guy with the camera is walking around the front of the vehicle. She isn't looking at him. And if he is clear of the vehicle- there's no danger. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,371 Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said: She still put him in that situation. It pisses me off how people can completely deny responsibility just because the resulting actions were worse. People pull this crap all the time. They escalate the situation until someone gets hurt or killed and then the public blames the opposite person. It's stupid. Do not precipitate a crisis and then be shocked by how others respond in a chaotic, crisis situation. That's the rule. Just as you say. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,371 Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, dogcows said: No, it starts with ICE storming residential neighborhoods. Or it could be phrased as ICE interdicting enclaves of illegal immigrants giving aid and comfort to the criminals among them. You say potato I say tuber Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,371 Posted 1 hour ago 58 minutes ago, dogcows said: Then find somebody who’s not a hothead and has local PD experience to defuse the situation. Or here’s a novel concept. Just drive around. If it was a broken down car they’d have to wait an hour for a tow truck anyway. The ICE agents could have (and IMO should have) ignored her. Some folks wont be ignored. You see it here, and there, in Minnesota. If they went to a new scene she followed them. That's what she lived for, and unfortunately died for. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,589 Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said: Some folks wont be ignored. You see it here and there, in Minnesota, if they went to a new scene she followed them. That's what she lived for, and unfortunately died for. Yep. Later.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fireballer 2,712 Posted 1 hour ago 20 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: Dude- when you match it up with the other video the other cops are grabbing her door handle and trying to enter which I believe they don't have the right to do. While that is happening the guy with the camera is walking around the front of the vehicle. She isn't looking at him. And if he is clear of the vehicle- there's no danger. At this point, I have no idea what point you’re trying to make. To your second point, yes, if they were removing her to prepare for arrest for interfering with operations, it’s not up to her whether she exits the car. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,684 Posted 52 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Fireballer said: But she didn’t. Too bad for her. Women drivers. Am I right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,270 Posted 52 minutes ago 41 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: Dude- when you match it up with the other video the other cops are grabbing her door handle and trying to enter which I believe they don't have the right to do. While that is happening the guy with the camera is walking around the front of the vehicle. She isn't looking at him. And if he is clear of the vehicle- there's no danger. If they don't have a right to grab her door handle or try to enter, then how do they get her to comply? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,234 Posted 49 minutes ago 2 hours ago, dogcows said: No, it starts with ICE storming residential neighborhoods. Actually, it starts with illegals storming our borders. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,270 Posted 46 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Actually, it starts with illegals storming our borders. Next comes sanctuary cities releasing criminal illegal aliens instead of turning them over to ICE. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
easilyscan 1,116 Posted 44 minutes ago https://alphanews.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IMG_3669.jpeg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,520 Posted 42 minutes ago 3 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said: You just skipped over why he was there. Why was he dealing with her? How can you deny any of it being her fault? He was there to own the libs because of Nick Shirley’s video. You think it was coincidence there was a DHS operation in Minneapolis which included the presence of Greg Bovino so soon after the video went viral? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,829 Posted 36 minutes ago Internal bleeding lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,234 Posted 25 minutes ago Shot in the face. lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,234 Posted 12 minutes ago American Patriot / Crack Journalist Nick Shirley exposing more Somali fraud in Minnesota, this time transportation companies. Great job young man. Be careful Share this post Link to post Share on other sites