Jump to content
listen2me 23

Charlie Kirk was just shot

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said:

He was not an American Patriot. He was a grifter who pissed off half the country for money, Fame and power. I wish to God he was never assassinated. Because now the administration is using his death to further take away American rights. He should have been allowed to live long enough to see the damage he actually did to America.

Also, thanks for showing your true colors. You only care that he was assassinated because of what’s happening to your side now…Not because it was a horrific act that should have NEVER happened.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

leftist, leftist, leftist

nobody has been sent to a terrorist prison for entering the country illegally

criminals with more than just entering the country illegally look for work at Home Depot

Fauci funded covid, but you are worried about Israel killing some future terrorists more than all the people hes responsible for killing

Obama was divisive, but you worship him

we should murder anyone we think is responsible for bringing in Fentanyl 

Yes numerous people were sent to a terrorist prison for entering the country illegally, unless you’re trying to play semantics by saying they also had tattoos that idiot ICE agents thought were gang tattoos (mind you, border patrol agents are allowed to have gang tattoos).

I voted for Obama in 2008 but not 2012.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Yes numerous people were sent to a terrorist prison for entering the country illegally, unless you’re trying to play semantics by saying they also had tattoos that idiot ICE agents thought were gang tattoos (mind you, border patrol agents are allowed to have gang tattoos).

I voted for Obama in 2008 but not 2012.

no they all have additional criminal charges

you probably think they are sending abuela to alligator alcatraz too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

 

we should murder anyone we think is responsible for bringing in Fentanyl 

A big part of the problem. What does “we think” mean? Who thinks? Who makes that decision? What if we get it wrong? Is your response “oh well?” I don’t want government killing people based on “we think”. 
 

As an aside: you’re using the word “murder” incorrectly. A murder is a wrongful killing by definition. Your position is that these are justified killings therefore you should write “we should kill”. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

no they all have additional criminal charges

 

No most of the ones I was talking about are now in Venezuela after we freed some innocent Americans and a murderer in exchange for sending some non-gang members that we sent to CECOT to Venezuela.  Yes, we.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

more people disagree with you than agree

you lost, cry more, then we can vote for trump again in 28, I know Tim is looking forward to being the only leftist who voted for Trump 4 times

Nope.  Trump has a negative approval rating and got less than half the vote in the election.  You're on the minority side here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

Also, thanks for showing your true colors. You only care that he was assassinated because of what’s happening to your side now…Not because it was a horrific act that should have NEVER happened.

He didn't deserve to be murdered.  Don't put words in my mouth 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Nope.  Trump has a negative approval rating and got less than half the vote in the election.  You're on the minority side here.

so he didnt win, cool story bro

cry longer

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

more people disagree with you than agree

you lost, cry more, then we can vote for trump again in 28, I know Tim is looking forward to being the only leftist who voted for Trump 4 times

I definitely won’t vote for Trump if he runs again.  I prefer to follow the constitution

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

A big part of the problem. What does “we think” mean? Who thinks? Who makes that decision? What if we get it wrong? Is your response “oh well?” I don’t want government killing people based on “we think”. 
 

As an aside: you’re using the word “murder” incorrectly. A murder is a wrongful killing by definition. Your position is that these are justified killings therefore you should write “we should kill”. 

ok we should play semantics games, I am sure you had no problem with the killing of columbian drug warlords in the 80's 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’ve never claimed to lean right, I vote for Dems too and probably the only politician I legitimately like (NC Attorney General Jeff Jackson) is a Dem.

Can you provide an example of something I argued against that a centrist should support?

A few of my opinions:

-Charlie Kirk was divisive, but didn’t deserve to get killed for it.

-covid was dangerous and the vaccine was effective, especially before Omicron

-we shouldn’t fund another country murdering civilians, especially when they don’t even need our help to do so

-we shouldn’t murder people in international waters because we think they might be drug traffickers

-we shouldn’t send people to terrorist prisons simply for entering the country illegally

-we were told we’d be focusing the deportations on the “worst of the worst,” yet we are spending more resources just trying to hit a made up quota and rounding up roofers and people outside of Home Depot 

I don’t think these are leftist positions, but let me know if I missed any.

- we shouldn’t allow you to foster children 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

A big part of the problem. What does “we think” mean? Who thinks? Who makes that decision? What if we get it wrong? Is your response “oh well?” I don’t want government killing people based on “we think”. 
 

As an aside: you’re using the word “murder” incorrectly. A murder is a wrongful killing by definition. Your position is that these are justified killings therefore you should write “we should kill”. 

You can't even get the definition of the word murder correct.  ROFLMAO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Anonymous sources, but three of them, claim no evidence yet tying Robinson to left-wing groups.

 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/no-evidence-charlie-kirk-shooting-left-wing-groups-rcna232513

ahh so he has to be part of a left wing group, just the ideology now isnt enough?  I thought he was a groyper?

 

One person familiar with the federal investigation said that “thus far, there is no evidence connecting the suspect with any left-wing groups.”

“Every indication so far is that this was one guy who did one really bad thing because he found Kirk’s ideology personally offensive,” this person continued.

 

also a person "familiar" with an investigation could be me.  This entire article is a waste of time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Strike said:

You can't even get the definition of the word murder correct.  ROFLMAO

funny the people who are now trying to define a word literally changed the definition of WOMAN, RACIST, HOMOPHOBIC, SEXIST, etc etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

ahh so he has to be part of a left wing group, just the ideology now isnt enough?  I thought he was a groyper?

 

One person familiar with the federal investigation said that “thus far, there is no evidence connecting the suspect with any left-wing groups.”

“Every indication so far is that this was one guy who did one really bad thing because he found Kirk’s ideology personally offensive,” this person continued.

 

also a person "familiar" with an investigation could be me

I was not commenting on what his ideology was.  However his mom said he was only left “leaning.”  Strike seems to think his dad also commented about his ideology but pretty sure that’s yet another lie that he’ll refuse to acknowledge.

I thought the link was relevant because multiple posters here were quick to jump in to post the articles saying something to the effect of law enforcement was investigating possible ties to Robinson and left wing terror groups

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I definitely won’t vote for Trump if he runs again.  I prefer to follow the constitution

I don't understand how Trump is gonna run again. Are you making stuff up again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tim: i am a centrist

Also tim: there is no proof that this killer is a leftist! 

Also tim: you are going to trust the governor? And the fbi? Pfffft here are some anomymous lefties. They are reliable. 

Also tim: i voted for trump three times

Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

so he didnt win, cool story bro

cry longer

 

I picture Ron artest sitting in his right winged mom's basement. Wearing mom's bra and panties, carving all our names in his bullet shells. While he's covered in dorito cheese that his parents paid for.

He's by far. Whatever name he goes by. The most unglued person we have here. Either side.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jonnyutah said:

Tim: i am a centrist

Also tim: there is no proof that this killer is a leftist! 

Also tim: you are going to trust the governor? And the fbi? Pfffft here are some anomymous lefties. They are reliable. 

Also tim: i voted for trump three times

Lol

1 and 4 are correct.  I don’t automatically believe any anonymous sources, hence me saying that’s what they claim.  #2 may depend on your definition of “leftist.”  Current evidence suggests he is in fact left “leaning,” but not necessarily “leftist.”  And I do think that’s an important distinction because if he was only left “leaning,” then “leftist ideology” probably wasn’t his motivation for the murder.   I’m coming around to the possibility that the lover was trans, and maybe that was his bigger motivation for the murder, although it’s still weird to me that I believe Daily Mail was the only mainstream source that actually reported Twigg’s female name. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

A leftist … that didn’t vote at all in 2022 or 2024?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/charlie-kirk-shooting-arrest-tyler-robinson/

 

You should leave. You’re the worst poster.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m thankful this is in the hands of Utah prosecutors. Just await the facts in court filings & the trial. Right now it looks like Robinson is from a traditional conservative, religious & possibly even maga background. He may personally be apolitical incel. He could be a liberal or progressive militant LGTBQer. He might be an isolated youth lost in the gamer war-sphere of Far Cry & Helldivers. He could be clinically insane. Just await the pleaded facts in the four square corners of the courtroom and hopefully when that happens magaverse will just accept the findings of what is obviously a very Republican, conservative, Christian state prosecutor’s team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said:

Nope.  Trump has a negative approval rating and got less than half the vote in the election.  You're on the minority side here.

He’s keeping an open mind 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

1 and 4 are correct.  I don’t automatically believe any anonymous sources, hence me saying that’s what they claim.  #2 may depend on your definition of “leftist.”  Current evidence suggests he is in fact left “leaning,” but not necessarily “leftist.”  And I do think that’s an important distinction because if he was only left “leaning,” then “leftist ideology” probably wasn’t his motivation for the murder.   I’m coming around to the possibility that the lover was trans, and maybe that was his bigger motivation for the murder, although it’s still weird to me that I believe Daily Mail was the only mainstream source that actually reported Twigg’s female name. 

Timhack the commie trying to hide as a centrist. Talk about tranny wannabe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said:

FYI, trump has not ruled out running again.  He is selling trump 2028 hats.

I think these are mostly a joke and also implying that it might be Don Jr.  I wonder how JD feels about that possibility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

I think these are mostly a joke and also implying that it might be Don Jr.  I wonder how JD feels about that possibility.

He would have might vote. And I would laugh at you for another 4 years while you cry your life away like you are doing now. :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I’m thankful this is in the hands of Utah prosecutors. Just await the facts in court filings & the trial. Right now it looks like Robinson is from a traditional conservative, religious & possibly even maga background. He may personally be apolitical incel. He could be a liberal or progressive militant LGTBQer. He might be an isolated youth lost in the gamer war-sphere of Far Cry & Helldivers. He could be clinically insane. Just await the pleaded facts in the four square corners of the courtroom and hopefully when that happens magaverse will just accept the findings of what is obviously a very Republican, conservative, Christian state prosecutor’s team.

It took Trump hours after the death of his close personal friend to start pointing fingers. Fortunately Don is handling his loss well. Have you heard about the new White House ballroom? 🤡 

It won’t matter what the facts are. MAGA bends reality to fit Daddy’s wishes. :wub: 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Grace Under Pressure said:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/no-evidence-charlie-kirk-shooting-left-wing-groups-rcna232513

“Three people familiar with the federal probe into Kirk’s assassination told NBC News that investigators have yet to find a link between the alleged shooter and left-wing groups.”

Not a game. Wake up. 

They will find one. Even if they have to falsify it. Think Marinus van der Lubbe: 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marinus_van_der_Lubbe

Trump and his folks don’t care about the truth. He just forced out a prosecutor in Virginia because the guy refused to prosecute Letitia James (there was no evidence of wrongdoing.) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

They will find one. Even if they have to falsify it. Think Marinus van der Lubbe: 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marinus_van_der_Lubbe

Trump and his folks don’t care about the truth. He just forced out a prosecutor in Virginia because the guy refused to prosecute Letitia James (there was no evidence of wrongdoing.) 

This is a problem for Patel. I agree with you, if he doesn’t slake their demand for the right suspects it will land at his doorstep. Btw Siebert in EDVA was loyal maga too, it doesn’t matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

They will find one. Even if they have to falsify it. Think Marinus van der Lubbe: 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marinus_van_der_Lubbe

Trump and his folks don’t care about the truth. He just forced out a prosecutor in Virginia because the guy refused to prosecute Letitia James (there was no evidence of wrongdoing.) 

Fatboy says no evidence. 

Letitia James signed an "Affidavit of Occupancy" at closing, stating the home was her primary residence.

I’ll help you out fatso. Affidavit | ˌafəˈdāvət | A written statement confirmed by oath, used as evidence in court: INTENT!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Fatboy says no evidence. 

Letitia James signed an "Affidavit of Occupancy" at closing, stating the home was her primary residence.

I’ll help you out fatso. Affidavit | ˌafəˈdāvət | A written statement confirmed by oath, used as evidence in court: INTENT!

I’m sorry no. 
 

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/u-s-attorney-pressured-to-charge-letitia-james-in-mortgage-fraud-case-has-resigned

She sent an email to her mortgage broker A FEW DAYS after she signed the affidavit stating that she had done it mistakenly and it was not her primary residence. This happens all the time. The justice Department has spent months investigating this, at Trump’s insistence, and found nothing to charge her on. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×