Kavanaugh sexual misconduct in High School

[KSB2424 3,083]

Wait? Everybody stop for one second.

 

Why in the world would the FB freaking I start investigating a he said - she said High School sexual misconduct case from over 30 years ago?

[titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745]

He can sue, and she would have to prove her case. Good luck with no witnesses.

 

Actually it appears she wants the FBI to do it for her. That ain't happening for about 1000 reasons, the least of which is there is no evidence a crime occurred, the most of which is the statute of limitations ran out decades ago.

 

Not exactly. In order to successfully sue for defamation, he would have to prove she acted with actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth. He can no more disprove her story than she can prove hers, so I don't see that working.

 

Now, could he yank her in and out of court and cost her time and money? Sure. But for one, thats a bad look, and for another, she could force him to be deposed under oath.

[Sho Nuff 719]

so now it is a delay tactic

Make up your mind hack

Tactic? No.

Delay...yes because if he is guilty and lying he should not sit in the highest court in this land.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Wait? Everybody stop for one second.

 

Why in the world would the FB freaking I start investigating a he said - she said High School sexual misconduct case from over 30 years ago?

If asked...why wouldnt they? They are pretty damn good at their jobs.

[drobeski 3,061]

Tactic? No.

Delay...yes because if he is guilty and lying he should not sit in the highest court in this land.

can that be proven ?

Simple yes or no

[Bert 1,091]

Tactic? No.

Delay...yes because if he is guilty and lying he should not sit in the highest court in this land.

amazing

[wiffleball 4,640]

Because the moment thatbhearing is over Kavanaugh will be pushed through and confirmed and you think anything will happen after that?

So they come to an agreement that the hearing ends no sooner than 2 weeks from today for example. Hell, let the FBI chime in on the timing. But don't give them an open-ended fishing Expedition.

 

Honestly, how does this shake out? FBI takes two weeks and says yeah we got nothing good or bad. Might have happened, might not have happened. We got nothing.

 

Miss Blondie? Care to sit through days worth of questions?

 

Well why should she? you guys have come to your conclusion before she ever gets a chance to say a word!

 

But uh, she wanted..

 

This is Anita Hill all over again! Ladies! Grab your pink cats!

 

 

 

Uh, don't you mean hats?

 

 

 

 

 

Yeah.

 

F'ng Wiffleball!

[Sho Nuff 719]

can that be proven ?

Simple yes or no

Can it? Yes

[Sho Nuff 719]

So they come to an agreement that the hearing ends no sooner than 2 weeks from today for example. Hell, let the FBI chime in on the timing. But don't give them an open-ended fishing Expedition.

 

Honestly, how does this shake out? FBI takes two weeks and says yeah we got nothing good or bad. Might have happened, might not have happened. We got nothing.

 

Miss Blondie? Care to sit through days worth of questions?

 

Well why should she? you guys have come to your conclusion before she ever gets a chance to say a word!

 

But uh, she wanted..

 

This is Anita Hill all over again! Ladies! Grab your pink cats!

 

 

 

Uh, don't you mean hats?

 

 

 

 

 

Yeah.

 

F'ng Wiffleball!

They are good at what they do when questioning people. I agree it shouldnt be some open ended thing.

Im stating why it should be before Confirmation

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Here's a quote from a story from NPR:

 

 

Republicans and the Trump White House argue that isn't the FBI's role. The Justice Department seems to agree. In a statement, a Justice Department spokeswoman said the FBI — which has added a letter from Christine Blasey Ford to Kavanaugh's already completed background report file — had already done all it was going to do, because "the allegation does not involve any potential federal crime."

"The FBI does not make any judgment about the credibility or significance of any allegation," the statement reads. "The purpose of a background investigation is to determine whether the nominee could pose a risk to the national security of the United States. The allegation does not involve any potential federal crime. The FBI's role in such matters is to provide information for the use of the decision makers."

 

https://www.npr.org/2018/09/18/649085712/democrats-want-fbi-to-investigate-kavanaugh-allegations-it-likely-wont

 

 

Eat it Slo Tard. Yet another time you're proven to be a liar.

[Bert 1,091]

Can it? Yes

not in this case. A women claiming she was assaulted 30 years ago but can't remember when it happened, where it happened or who was present. She is as credible as Giants Fan.

[Reality 2,710]

Sho is next level man, that's all you can really say about that dude.

 

[Sho Nuff 719]

not in this case. A women claiming she was assaulted 30 years ago but can't remember when it happened, where it happened or who was present. She is as credible as Giants Fan.

Actually yes it can be proven under examination any number of ways. By talking to her and others they can likely determine the time frame...and of pressed may be able to get him to admit it (not saying its likely...saying its possible which is wjatvwas asked).

[Sho Nuff 719]

Sho is next level man, that's all you can really say about that dude.

 

True...several levels above you Neanderthals...there is a reason none of you can refute what Im saying. You are just pissed I dont immediately claim she is lying and support the Republican. Its pathetic.

[wiffleball 4,640]

I remember every party I got laid at in High School.

 

Well, I would have.

 

[Alias Detective 1,179]

Im hedging at your attempted gotcha...like saying she got one detail wrong and you try and pounce because you won't actually be specific.

You mean misremember something? I remember hearing in Kavanaugh’s hearing; misremembering something means you are hiding something. At least that’s what the Dems kept saying.....

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

If asked...why wouldnt they? They are pretty damn good at their jobs.

 

Rogue agents starting the Russian Collusion investigation, missing the flight training by 9/11 terrorists, rigging the Hillary email investigation, anthrax investigation, etc...........

 

Bang up job they do.

[Bert 1,091]

Actually yes it can be proven under examination any number of ways. By talking to her and others they can likely determine the time frame...and of pressed may be able to get him to admit it (not saying its likely...saying its possible which is wjatvwas asked).

It is equally possible that Wiffleball gets hit by a meteorite while having sex with a girl he picked up by telling her she smells nice.

[wiffleball 4,640]

a girl he picked up by telling her she smells nice.

Hey! That would have worked!

 

 

 

 

 

 

If I hadn't been tying my shoes at the time.

[Reality 2,710]

What we've seen in the last 24 hours is Democrats demand she get a hearing, her lawyer saying she's ready and willing to tell her story, and Republicans agreeing to all of it. Then Democrats and Ford's attorney change their minds and demand something completely different....

[kilroy69 994]

Yeah really logical that a woman just lying to stall actively calls for the FBI to be involved.

cory booker raped me when I was 10. I have no proof of this but I think you should take my word on it and ruin his life. Because I believe it happened

[Strike 3,975]

No one cares to comment about the THIRD person this chick named as being at the party saying he has no recollection of it? Seriously, how many people who were supposedly at the party have to deny it?

[Sho Nuff 719]

What we've seen in the last 24 hours is Democrats demand she get a hearing, her lawyer saying she's ready and willing to tell her story, and Republicans agreeing to all of it. Then Democrats and Ford's attorney change their minds and demand something completely different....

Not quite what the GOP offered though.

[Bert 1,091]

Hey! That would have worked!

 

 

 

 

 

 

If I hadn't been tying my shoes at the time.

[vuduchile 1,941]

Wait? Everybody stop for one second.

 

Why in the world would the FB freaking I start investigating a he said - she said High School sexual misconduct case from over 30 years ago?

As I understand, it wouldnt be a criminal investigation. It would be a re opening of the background check investigation they previously conducted and closed.

[vuduchile 1,941]

No one cares to comment about the THIRD person this chick named as being at the party saying he has no recollection of it? Seriously, how many people who were supposedly at the party have to deny it?

Hes also stated that he will not testify about something he knows nothing about.

 

I suppose he could be subpoenaed if criminal charges were somehow brought. That doesnt seem likely.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

As I understand, it wouldnt be a criminal investigation. It would be a re opening of the background check investigation they previously conducted and closed.

 

In a statement, a Justice Department spokeswoman said the FBI — which has added a letter from Christine Blasey Ford to Kavanaugh's already completed background report file — had already done all it was going to do, because "the allegation does not involve any potential federal crime."

"The FBI does not make any judgment about the credibility or significance of any allegation," the statement reads. "The purpose of a background investigation is to determine whether the nominee could pose a risk to the national security of the United States. The allegation does not involve any potential federal crime. The FBI's role in such matters is to provide information for the use of the decision makers."

[kilroy69 994]

Lets be honest about what is happening here. The democrats sat on a letter from a supposed sexual assault victim 30 years ago till just before the confirmation in order to delay it till after the midterms. It is their way of getting back for the garland nomination. This is tit for tat and the #metoo movement is going to suffer. More baseless allegations that can neither be proven nor disproven. But the woman should be believed. No woman would ever lie...right brian banks?

[Reality 2,710]

 

 

In a statement, a Justice Department spokeswoman said the FBI — which has added a letter from Christine Blasey Ford to Kavanaugh's already completed background report file — had already done all it was going to do, because "the allegation does not involve any potential federal crime."

"The FBI does not make any judgment about the credibility or significance of any allegation," the statement reads. "The purpose of a background investigation is to determine whether the nominee could pose a risk to the national security of the United States. The allegation does not involve any potential federal crime. The FBI's role in such matters is to provide information for the use of the decision makers."

 

 

Well yea but, have you run this by Sho's anonymous source yet?

 

[HellToupee 749]

I remember every party I got laid at in High School.

 

Well, I would have.

 

I always tried my damnedest

[Reality 2,710]

Lets be honest about what is happening here. The democrats sat on a letter from a supposed sexual assault victim 30 years ago till just before the confirmation in order to delay it till after the midterms. It is their way of getting back for the garland nomination. This is tit for tat and the #metoo movement is going to suffer. More baseless allegations that can neither be proven nor disproven. But the woman should be believed. No woman would ever lie...right brian banks?

 

This is obvious to everyone but sho.

[HellToupee 749]

Sho is next level man, that's all you can really say about that dude.

 

One thing learning is sho a big to do over here. Hes a pissant at Jesusguys

[Mike Honcho 4,034]

No one cares to comment about the THIRD person this chick named as being at the party saying he has no recollection of it? Seriously, how many people who were supposedly at the party have to deny it?

 

IF this occurred he would be a party to attempted rape(according to the story presented so far). So a denial of recollection would be pretty self-serving.

[Reality 2,710]

 

IF this occurred he would be a party to rape(according to the story presented so far). So a denial of recollection would be pretty self-serving.

 

Jesus... Now we are saying she was actually raped...

 

[Mike Honcho 4,034]

 

Jesus... Now we are saying she was actually raped...

 

 

fixed for rushing my post. And i said "attempted "earlier in the thread, so settle down Francis.

[Reality 2,710]

 

fixed for rushing my post. And i said "attempted "earlier in the thread, so settle down Francis.

 

[wiffleball 4,640]

Bunch of men trying to Define what rape is.

[TimmySmith 2,782]

 

fixed for rushing my post. And i said "attempted "earlier in the thread, so settle down Francis.

Yep, here it is bot.

 

Rebuffed now = attempted rape to the left.

[Reality 2,710]

Yep, here it is bot.

 

Rebuffed now = attempted rape to the left.

 

Murder also, haven't you heard..

 

[Mike Honcho 4,034]

Yep, here it is bot.

 

Rebuffed now = attempted rape to the left.

 

Another example of why you aren't ever to be taken seriously, you can't stick to the facts. The allegation is that he pinned her to a bed, put his hand over her mouth while trying to remove her clothes to forcibly have sex with her....that would be pretty much the definition of attempted rape.