edjr 5,564 Posted July 25, 2018 you'll have to help me here. What is the left going apeshit about? what is here? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted July 25, 2018 Trump speaks about method of payment and selective editing for the CNN broadcast had him stop before finishing 'Check'. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/07/24/cnn-obtains-trump-cohen-recording-from-lanny-davis/ I'm sure the Sky Screamers have already rubbed one out to this 'smoking gun'. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted July 25, 2018 No matter what a breathless MSCNNBC has to say about it, the fact that Trump paid for it himself means it's not an FEC issue. And the fact that he lied about it? Well if it was anybody else any other time it might actually be something. At best this one out of 12 tapes might serve to impeach his character in future matters. LOL But I tell you what. I don't ever want to hear another fuucking fundamentalist or Evangelical biitching and moaning about morality issues ever again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LOD01 191 Posted July 25, 2018 Another big 'ole CNN nothing burger. CNN has been batting ZERO since the day Trump took office. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,083 Posted July 25, 2018 Do attorneys normally secretly tape their own clients? Seems weird. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted July 25, 2018 Do attorneys normally secretly tape their own clients? Seems weird. Cohen wasn't much of an attorney in the first place. But yeah he'll never be an attorney again. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted July 25, 2018 Cohen wasn't much of an attorney in the first place. But yeah he'll never be an attorney again. Exactly. He was a focking bagman and for more than just Trump. A lot of folks should be concerned with that office raid a few months ago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofTEK 71 Posted July 25, 2018 Exactly. He was a focking bagman and for more than just Trump. A lot of folks should be concerned with that office raid a few months ago. What me worry? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted July 25, 2018 wish sho were here to enlighten me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,080 Posted July 25, 2018 Do attorneys normally secretly tape their own clients? Seems weird. This is what i'm focking wondering. That focker should be locked away, sued and tattooed. Focking lawyer scum. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted July 25, 2018 wish sho were here to enlighten me Ah.................is he in 'timeout'? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted July 25, 2018 But I tell you what. I don't ever want to hear another fuucking fundamentalist or Evangelical biitching and moaning about morality issues ever again. It's nearly as bad as the godless left screaming about immorality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted July 25, 2018 It's nearly as bad as the godless left screaming about immorality. The immorality of people stereotyping radicals and/or illegals yet want the taxpayers/actual citizens to continue being prey to these cretins. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,380 Posted July 25, 2018 GET ME A COKE, PLEASE! Drumph is finished!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted July 25, 2018 GET ME A COKE, PLEASE! Drumph is finished!!!! We know that's secret lingo. No stupid bastard today drinks soda straight up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,380 Posted July 25, 2018 We know that's secret lingo. No stupid bastard today drinks soda straight up I bet Drumph uses a straw too that evil bastard!!!! A FOCKING STRAW!!!! IMPEACH NOW!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted July 25, 2018 Most others...this would be big news. Trump...all excuses. You have audio proof he and his attorney use shell corps to pay people off and speak in code like wannabe gangsters. And rather than realizing the stupidity of all of that...all people here can do (like Trump) is whine that his attorney covered his own ass recording a known liar to be able to show he is focking lying. Does that make Cohen less shady...no, just big picture people. My favorite quote from all the paying off..."Trump paid two women 280,000 for sex...and we want him negotiating trade deals?" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted July 25, 2018 Most others...this would be big news. Trump...all excuses. You have audio proof he and his attorney use shell corps to pay people off and speak in code like wannabe gangsters. And rather than realizing the stupidity of all of that...all people here can do (like Trump) is whine that his attorney covered his own ass recording a known liar to be able to show he is focking lying. Does that make Cohen less shady...no, just big picture people. My favorite quote from all the paying off..."Trump paid two women 280,000 for sex...and we want him negotiating trade deals?" That's nothing compared to the $850,000 Clinton paid to Paula Jones. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/20/bill-clinton-facing-four-sexual-assault-lawsuits-fresh-allegations/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted July 25, 2018 That's nothing compared to the $850,000 Clinton paid to Paula Jones. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/20/bill-clinton-facing-four-sexual-assault-lawsuits-fresh-allegations/ Most of us were 8 when that happened. May have even been a different millennium. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted July 25, 2018 Most of us were 8 when that happened. May have even been a different millennium. Beave went with what about Bill?And lets see...settled lawsuits (pretty sure Trump doesnt want to discuss those) vs secret payoffs to strippers via shel companies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,517 Posted July 25, 2018 Most of us were 8 when that happened. May have even been a different millennium. Sure, but the concept of a payout and the hypocrisy from both sides has stayed the same. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted July 25, 2018 That's nothing compared to the $850,000 Clinton paid to Paula Jones. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/20/bill-clinton-facing-four-sexual-assault-lawsuits-fresh-allegations/ Clinton went to court for harassment (and committed perjury), while Trumps was consensual. That probably explains the payoffs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted July 25, 2018 Most others...this would be big news. Trump...all excuses. You have audio proof he and his attorney use shell corps to pay people off and speak in code like wannabe gangsters. Trump was okay with it being released...........and speaking in code? He says cash or check........... That's nothing compared to the $850,000 Clinton paid to Paula Jones. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/20/bill-clinton-facing-four-sexual-assault-lawsuits-fresh-allegations/ At least got paid instead of kilt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted July 25, 2018 Most others...this would be big news. Trump...all excuses. You have audio proof he and his attorney use shell corps to pay people off and speak in code like wannabe gangsters. And rather than realizing the stupidity of all of that...all people here can do (like Trump) is whine that his attorney covered his own ass recording a known liar to be able to show he is focking lying. Does that make Cohen less shady...no, just big picture people. My favorite quote from all the paying off..."Trump paid two women 280,000 for sex...and we want him negotiating trade deals?" Most people see a difference between paying a few hundred k to a playmate of the year and a stripper in her heydey for keeping quiet about consensual sex a decade earlier vs paying a million to settle a rape case with an Arkansas pig and focking a chunky 22 year old intern in the oval office. And speaking in code? Is that the best that the crack team of investigators at pedoguys.com could come up with? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted July 25, 2018 Sure, but the concept of a payout and the hypocrisy from both sides has stayed the same. By this line of thinking, we can never be critical of anyone again for as long as we exist......if someone else also did anything comparable weeks/months/decades/centuries/millenniums ago. I know each side wants the other to be the one to stop saying BUT WHAT ABOUT, meanwhile they still want to use it....but I think you should be able to see the issue there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofTEK 71 Posted July 25, 2018 Most people see a difference between paying a few hundred k to a playmate of the year and a stripper in her heydey for keeping quiet about consensual sex a decade earlier vs paying a million to settle a rape case with an Arkansas pig and focking a chunky 22 year old intern in the oval office. And speaking in code? Is that the best that the crack team of investigators at pedoguys.com could come up with? I guess I missed the speaking in code. Why would they be speaking in code in his lawyers office? I'm lost. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alias Detective 1,179 Posted July 25, 2018 By this line of thinking, we can never be critical of anyone again for as long as we exist......if someone else also did anything comparable weeks/months/decades/centuries/millenniums ago. I know each side wants the other to be the one to stop saying BUT WHAT ABOUT, meanwhile they still want to use it....but I think you should be able to see the issue there No you are, as usual, wrong. Wrong is wrong regardless who is doing it. Just be sure to make proper comparisons. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casual Observer 597 Posted July 25, 2018 Most others...this would be big news. Trump...all excuses. You have audio proof he and his attorney use shell corps to pay people off and speak in code like wannabe gangsters. And rather than realizing the stupidity of all of that...all people here can do (like Trump) is whine that his attorney covered his own ass recording a known liar to be able to show he is focking lying. Does that make Cohen less shady...no, just big picture people. My favorite quote from all the paying off..."Trump paid two women 280,000 for sex...and we want him negotiating trade deals?" Oh please. "Shell corporation" is a vehicle to hold whatever asset they were paying for. Done all day long all over the country. Gangsters? Cohen says financing and Trump asks what financing, use cash. The difference being cash is money on hand in a bank account, which presumably would be paid by check, versus financing, which means borrowing. Once in a while, try to use independent thought, rather than left-wing talking points. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,814 Posted July 25, 2018 This on its own is nothing. The part I would be concerned about is if he taped this what else did he tape that might have even worse stuff on it? the problem the left has is they have cried about every single thing he is done so the effectiveness of this is not going to be as impactful. Most people will play this off like more liberal crying. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,432 Posted July 25, 2018 So, Trump had his panties (actually, probably Ivanka's) in a bunch because he thought Obama had him wire-tapped, but it was actually his lawyer that was secretly taping him? You can't make this stuff up. It is just so interestingly focked up. Bill Clinton really paved the way for complete debauchery, lying, and hypocrisy in the WH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted July 25, 2018 Too bad all of our fake lawyers are missing, but, here you have conversations with your lawyer under the reasonable expectation of privacy, discussing business transactions. I am wondering whether the release of such material renders it harmless to everyone involved. Not that there's much harm here to begin with, but how would this stuff be admissible? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted July 25, 2018 Too bad all of our fake lawyers are missing, but, here you have conversations with your lawyer under the reasonable expectation of privacy, discussing business transactions. I am wondering whether the release of such material renders it harmless to everyone involved. Not that there's much harm here to begin with, but how would this stuff be admissible? Laws and rules don't seem to apply anymore. Donald Sterling had to sell the clippers from a private conversation, recorded without his knowledge. Sh1t would be thrown out of court, but when it comes to the Twitter Courts, it is totally admissible Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,814 Posted July 25, 2018 Too bad all of our fake lawyers are missing, but, here you have conversations with your lawyer under the reasonable expectation of privacy, discussing business transactions. I am wondering whether the release of such material renders it harmless to everyone involved. Not that there's much harm here to begin with, but how would this stuff be admissible? I assume because you are a lawyer chastising Us fake lawyers you would know the answer to this? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casual Observer 597 Posted July 25, 2018 Too bad all of our fake lawyers are missing, but, here you have conversations with your lawyer under the reasonable expectation of privacy, discussing business transactions. I am wondering whether the release of such material renders it harmless to everyone involved. Not that there's much harm here to begin with, but how would this stuff be admissible? One of the Cardinal duties a lawyer owes his client is the duty of confidentiality. I was under the impression this audio was seized as part of a criminal investigation into Cohen. How did it get released by law enforcement? Why is Cohen's lawyer, who was the Clintons' former hatchet man, giving play-by-play on TV? There's all kinds of wrong here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted July 25, 2018 Most people see a difference between paying a few hundred k to a playmate of the year and a stripper in her heydey for keeping quiet about consensual sex a decade earlier vs paying a million to settle a rape case with an Arkansas pig and focking a chunky 22 year old intern in the oval office. And speaking in code? Is that the best that the crack team of investigators at pedoguys.com could come up with? Pedoguys? Any more on your bogus Podesta Story that you have been predictably absent in after it was shown to be bs? And yes...if you read the transcript and listen to it...there is the code...talking without specifics and mentioning past situations to talk wbaout whats going on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted July 25, 2018 Oh please. "Shell corporation" is a vehicle to hold whatever asset they were paying for. Done all day long all over the country. Gangsters? Cohen says financing and Trump asks what financing, use cash. The difference being cash is money on hand in a bank account, which presumably would be paid by check, versus financing, which means borrowing. Once in a while, try to use independent thought, rather than left-wing talking points. It was independent thought...and your excuses are the right wing crap...but no worries. Im used to it here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted July 25, 2018 Laws and rules don't seem to apply anymore. Donald Sterling had to sell the clippers from a private conversation, recorded without his knowledge. Sh1t would be thrown out of court, but when it comes to the Twitter Courts, it is totally admissible Sterling lost out in the court of public opinion. Which is the most powerful court in the land. Legally he didn't have to sell. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted July 25, 2018 Sterling lost out in the court of public opinion. Which is the most powerful court in the land. Legally he didn't have to sell ed zachary Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DankNuggs 305 Posted July 25, 2018 Oh please. "Shell corporation" is a vehicle to hold whatever asset they were paying for. Done all day long all over the country. Gangsters? Cohen says financing and Trump asks what financing, use cash. The difference being cash is money on hand in a bank account, which presumably would be paid by check, versus financing, which means borrowing. Once in a while, try to use independent thought, rather than left-wing talking points. They prey on ignorance, allows them to so easily conflate unrelated ideas Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tanatastic 2,061 Posted July 25, 2018 We know that's secret lingo. No stupid bastard today drinks soda straight up Hold on there. An ice cold Coca Cola by itself is one of life’s great pleasures. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
