Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Filthy Fernadez

Donna Brazille breaks rank and blames Hillary

Recommended Posts

Now for those like strike that are whining about how unfair things are. A little history lesson. And as I often do I am amazed at how short people's memories are.

 

There's a reason why the parties had conventions in the first place. They wouldn't need them if they just went by primary results. Not too long ago, the primaries were pretty worthless and the convention was the big thing. That's why they still have the Roll Call of all the states at the convention. Deals are made and votes are switched.

 

Sure, now with the internet and so much more television, the conventions have turned basically into a large infomercial. But that's not the point. For those of you that think that the primaries are the end-all and be-all of the nomination process let me remind you of something.

 

If you really really believe that. Then you should be f****** furious that Ronald Reagan ever became our president. Because he never should have gotten the nomination. Because he lost the f****** primaries.

 

By your whiny way of thinking, Gerald Ford would have had the job.

 

Look it up.

 

Mic Drop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now for those like strike that are whining about how unfair things are. A little history lesson. And as I often do I am amazed at how short people's memories are.

 

There's a reason why the parties had conventions in the first place. They wouldn't need them if they just went by primary results. Not too long ago, the primaries were pretty worthless and the convention was the big thing. That's why they still have the Roll Call of all the states at the convention. Deals are made and votes are switched.

 

Sure, now with the internet and so much more television, the conventions have turned basically into a large infomercial. But that's not the point. For those of you that think that the primaries are the end-all and be-all of the nomination process let me remind you of something.

 

If you really really believe that. Then you should be f****** furious that Ronald Reagan ever became our president. Because he never should have gotten the nomination. Because he lost the f****** primaries.

 

By your whiny way of thinking, Gerald Ford would have had the job.

 

Look it up.

 

Mic Drop.

 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to be a jerk about this, and I've already told you I hate Hillary so I'm sure as hell not going to defend her, but what do I have to do? Hold your nose to the screen? The article isn't that long.

 

Of course it focuses on the first 3 months. The article was written when Bernie Sanders basically threw up the White Flag in late April. Nobody's going to contribute to a campaign that has quit. So they focus on the first three months in order to do an apples-to-apples comparison.

 

It's a pretty common mistake to sit there and look at everything that Hillary pulled in in 2016 vs Sanders. But it's stupid. Hillary was pulling in money for the general election at a time when Sanders all but quit after the first quarter of 2016.

 

So this is the only paragraph you really need to read. Bernie outspent her to 2-1 in the three months where it was straight up heads up competition. And even then Hilary 1 enough delegates to effectively lock the primaries in. As the article says, there were only two more big primaries left after that.

 

So Bernie blue her doors off in terms of money collected and money spent and still couldn't stay competitive with her.

 

The point being, it sure as hell isn't the Hillary won because she outspent the guy. And it sure as hell isn't because she out collected the guy. The numbers are right there.

 

You are adding another 6 or 7 months of collection and spending by Hilary after Bernie basically laid off the majority of his staff and started coasting. Nobody keeps placing bets on a horse they quits running after the first turn.

The article I linked says this: On June 20, candidates and the super PACs supporting them filed reports with the Federal Election Commission on their finances through April, providing a picture of how the campaigns and other groups raised and spent their money.

 

 

So, through April 2016 is when this money was raised. Not an additional 6-7 months. Unless your counting October 2015 through April 2016 as your "6 or 7 months"? She out raised him by 100 million + by April 2016.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sigh....

 

Let's just pretend you're right - 'cause it's late and I'm sick of this.

SOOOO - Shes sitting on a MOUNTAIN of money (allegedly). It's NOT right, but....

Let's just agree we have two radically different sources. I'm too tired to reconcile it now.

 

Doesn't change the point at all. Should I do this in pig-latin?

 

Bernie outspent her 2 to 1 - and STILL LOST to the point of no return!.

 

I'm done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sigh....

 

Let's just pretend you're right - 'cause it's late and I'm sick of this.

SOOOO - Shes sitting on a MOUNTAIN of money (allegedly). It's NOT right, but....

Let's just agree we have two radically different sources. I'm too tired to reconcile it now.

 

Doesn't change the point at all. Should I do this in pig-latin?

 

Bernie outspent her 2 to 1 - and STILL LOST to the point of no return!.

 

I'm done.

not sure why you bother. You gave strike the worst beating I've ever seen on any board. It should have just ended on the mic drop. He was left with nothing to do but an awkward laugh. He was probably at his computer crying. Hopefully you aren't waiting for him to admit that he was wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sigh....

 

Let's just pretend you're right - 'cause it's late and I'm sick of this.

SOOOO - Shes sitting on a MOUNTAIN of money (allegedly). It's NOT right, but....

Let's just agree we have two radically different sources. I'm too tired to reconcile it now.

 

Doesn't change the point at all. Should I do this in pig-latin?

 

Bernie outspent her 2 to 1 - and STILL LOST to the point of no return!.

 

I'm done.

Good it will save bandwidth for those who get it.

 

Bernie could have out earned and out spent her by billions. Didn't matter. She controlled the DNC. It wasn't like Bernie had an uphill battle, he was never, ever in the race. It was fraud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who's begrudging? I'm asking.

 

As a rule i don't understand the political obsessions here--just like i don't understand the celebrity obsession in america. So I ask the question.

 

I don't understand you b!tching about the Hillary threads and yet you still read through them. Kind of...............obsessive?

 

I'm not trying to defend that count Hillary. Just tap down a little bit of the stupid here. It had nothing to do with the general election. And obviously, if the DNC felt so strongly the Bernie give them a better shot they should have stepped up. Not bring some b**** who got fired months ago to the table to sell a book or whatever today.

 

"I'm not defending her BUT................" says everyone on the left trying to p!ss out this brush fire.

 

Does the party need to run a fair and equal game? No, as we found out several months ago when Bernie Supporters took the DNC to court and they stated as much. Far be it for people to think Democrats will be Democratic.

 

Now the revelation is that the DNC leadership supported her not because they wanted her, they supported her because they had to as part of the financial agreement. This wasn't a deal being struck; it was Hillary taking over full control of the DNC (financials, hirings, strategy, etc).

 

No wonder why the Dems continue to lose; Hillary is the one running the playbook.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I don't understand you b!tching about the Hillary threads and yet you still read through them. Kind of...............obsessive?

 

 

"I'm not defending her BUT................" says everyone on the left trying to p!ss out this brush fire.

 

Does the party need to run a fair and equal game? No, as we found out several months ago when Bernie Supporters took the DNC to court and they stated as much. Far be it for people to think Democrats will be Democratic.

 

Now the revelation is that the DNC leadership supported her not because they wanted her, they supported her because they had to as part of the financial agreement. This wasn't a deal being struck; it was Hillary taking over full control of the DNC (financials, hirings, strategy, etc).

 

No wonder why the Dems continue to lose; Hillary is the one running the playbook.

Oh you completely misplace my obsession...Im obsessed with you guys here and the lunacy that exists. It's entertainment!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh you completely misplace my obsession...Im obsessed with you guys here and the lunacy that exists. It's entertainment!

 

I get it. NFL sucks and you need some innerweb interaction. :cheers:

 

Welcome to the political rant zone. :argue:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I get it. NFL sucks and you need some innerweb interaction. :cheers:

 

Welcome to the political rant zone. :argue:

Don't care if the NFL sucks. The LIONS suck....That's my cross to bear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure why you bother. You gave strike the worst beating I've ever seen on any board. It should have just ended on the mic drop. He was left with nothing to do but an awkward laugh. He was probably at his computer crying. Hopefully you aren't waiting for him to admit that he was wrong?

 

This might make some sense had I actually spent time reading his GFIAFPesque rant. But why would I? Wiff hasn't posted a coherent thought in a year. And noone gives you any credibility considering you were banned for wishing the President was assassinated. What a loser you have to be to even think that. Even Voltaire realized how sick that kind of thinking is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its just so funny these hardcore right wingers b1tching about the democratic primary.

 

WTF do you care? :wacko:

 

Bernies a G0ddamn socialist!! Like you wanted him to be president. :lol: The same guys that spent 8 years hating obama because they thought he might harbor some socialist views. (Well and because of other reasons we wont get into here.)

 

Thats like me whining that ted Cruz got hosed in the republican primary. I dont give a sh1t! I hate Ted Cruz!! I wouldnt have voted for him if Satan was his opponent.

 

Now I actually DID like Bernie. So if anyone oughta be b1tching and crying about this, its me. But Ive moved on. The general election was over a year ago. The primary much longer than that. Yet you freaks are still obsessed a primary for a party you focking hate! :lol: :doh:

 

Fact is, Bernie lost. It was because of the black vote more than anything else. Those folks were always in the bag for Clinton and were always going to be in the bag for her. I dont know why, I guess because her husband was supposedly the first black president or something. It doesnt sit well with me that the dnc was behind Clinton but I mean cmon, she was the establishment candidate. Bernie ran a dark horse outsider campaign, of course he wasnt getting the establishment support. Thats half the reason people liked him!!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand you b!tching about the Hillary threads and yet you still read through them. Kind of...............obsessive?

 

 

 

"I'm not defending her BUT................" says everyone on the left trying to p!ss out this brush fire.

 

Does the party need to run a fair and equal game? No, as we found out several months ago when Bernie Supporters took the DNC to court and they stated as much. Far be it for people to think Democrats will be Democratic.

 

Now the revelation is that the DNC leadership supported her not because they wanted her, they supported her because they had to as part of the financial agreement. This wasn't a deal being struck; it was Hillary taking over full control of the DNC (financials, hirings, strategy, etc).

 

No wonder why the Dems continue to lose; Hillary is the one running the playbook.

 

B-bu-but Newbie says that Hillary has no influence because she has no title!!! :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its just so funny these hardcore right wingers b1tching about the democratic primary.

WTF do you care?

Bernies a G0ddamn socialist!! Like you wanted him to be president. :lol: The same guys that spent 8 years hating obama because they thought he might harbor some socialist views. (Well and because of other reasons we wont get into here.)

:doh:

 

I'm not surprised that a "lawyer" wouldn't understand integrity, and the upset created when a lack of integrity is demonstrated. It's corruption, "lawyer". We care because we always oppose attempts to tear down rules of law and decorum.

 

But you don't. You don't have a moral compass. You think "all's fair in love and war". B.A.M.N. is the call of the morally bankrupt.

 

Thats like me whining that ted Cruz got hosed in the republican primary. I dont give a sh1t! I hate Ted Cruz!! I wouldnt have voted for him if Satan was his opponent.

Now I actually DID like Bernie. So if anyone oughta be b1tching and crying about this, its me. But Ive moved on. The general election was over a year ago. The primary much longer than that. Yet you freaks are still obsessed a primary for a party you focking hate! :lol: :doh:

Fact is, Bernie lost. It was because of the black vote more than anything else. Those folks were always in the bag for Clinton and were always going to be in the bag for her. I dont know why, I guess because her husband was supposedly the first black president or something. It doesnt sit well with me that the dnc was behind Clinton but I mean cmon, she was the establishment candidate. Bernie ran a dark horse outsider campaign, of course he wasnt getting the establishment support. Thats half the reason people liked him!!

Bernie may have lost all by himself. But he didn't. He had 'help' - and that sort of corruption leaves you paralyzed to object - which is exactly why it is happening.

 

It is taking people like Donna Brazile to actually stand up instead of you? :lol:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its just so funny these hardcore right wingers b1tching about the democratic primary.

 

WTF do you care? :wacko:

 

Bernies a G0ddamn socialist!! Like you wanted him to be president. :lol: The same guys that spent 8 years hating obama because they thought he might harbor some socialist views. (Well and because of other reasons we wont get into here.)

 

Thats like me whining that ted Cruz got hosed in the republican primary. I dont give a sh1t! I hate Ted Cruz!! I wouldnt have voted for him if Satan was his opponent.

 

Now I actually DID like Bernie. So if anyone oughta be b1tching and crying about this, its me. But Ive moved on. The general election was over a year ago. The primary much longer than that. Yet you freaks are still obsessed a primary for a party you focking hate! :lol: :doh:

 

Fact is, Bernie lost. It was because of the black vote more than anything else. Those folks were always in the bag for Clinton and were always going to be in the bag for her. I dont know why, I guess because her husband was supposedly the first black president or something. It doesnt sit well with me that the dnc was behind Clinton but I mean cmon, she was the establishment candidate. Bernie ran a dark horse outsider campaign, of course he wasnt getting the establishment support. Thats half the reason people liked him!!

You still aren't getting it. This is not the same old argument. Hillary's campaign was running the whole show. Any candidate for local races that needed money had to go to her to get it. Any questions on why superdelegates committed to her before the campaigning even started are answered. The democratic primaries were a sham. You should be furious. This should be 24/7 on CNN and MSNBC. There should be lawsuits. The fact you divert and don't care is absolute great focking news for the right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You still aren't getting it. This is not the same old argument. Hillary's campaign was running the whole show. Any candidate for local races that needed money had to go to her to get it. Any questions on why superdelegates committed to her before the campaigning even started are answered. The democratic primaries were a sham. You should be furious. This should be 24/7 on CNN and MSNBC. There should be lawsuits. The fact you divert and don't care is absolute great focking news for the right.

 

He gets it; he simply doesn't care. He doesn't give a sh1t because he is just like Hillary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You still aren't getting it. This is not the same old argument. Hillary's campaign was running the whole show. Any candidate for local races that needed money had to go to her to get it. Any questions on why superdelegates committed to her before the campaigning even started are answered.

Which might be worth b1tching about if it came down to the superdelegates, but it didnt.

 

Fock even if it did thats the way these party primaries are conducted. Like Wiff keeps trying to tell you idiots. You guys are acting like this is the general election where there can be unfairness and fraud and all that (like, say, colluding with a hostile foreign power against your opponent aka treason). But that just isnt how it works

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't really care and haven't commented until now but, it is pretty impressive what the left will let their part get away with..

 

:dunno:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bernie may have lost all by himself. But he didn't. He had 'help' - and that sort of corruption leaves you paralyzed to object.

 

This.

 

Bernie didn't lose and Hillary didn't win (either). The left leaners here think this isn't a huge deal and that it's over when in actuality Hillary still is in full control. Anyone think she didn't strongarm people into voting for her sock puppet Perez? :lol:

 

Add this to the list of things that Worms, Newbie and wiff doesn't care about; an actual Democratic process.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He gets it; he simply doesn't care. He doesn't give a sh1t because he is just like Hillary.

Dude what part of I hate the Clintons dont you get? :wacko:

 

I dont think Ive seen anyone in here defending her since the election, and even then it was halfhearted at absolute best.

 

Its over. YOUR GUY WON.

 

So bizarre that you guys cant get over this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude what part of I hate the Clintons dont you get? :wacko:

 

I dont think Ive seen anyone in here defending her since the election, and even then it was halfhearted at absolute best.

 

Its over. YOUR GUY WON.

 

So bizarre that you guys cant get over this

 

 

It's bizarre not to be outraged instead of trying to down play this as 'in the past' when she still controls your party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which might be worth b1tching about if it came down to the superdelegates, but it didnt.

Fock even if it did thats the way these party primaries are conducted. Like Wiff keeps trying to tell you idiots. You guys are acting like this is the general election where there can be unfairness and fraud and all that (like, say, colluding with a hostile foreign power against your opponent aka treason). But that just isnt how it works

:doh:

 

And the clueless lemmings continue to delude themselves into thinking that politicians that act absolutely corrupt during elections are suddenly going to be pillars of virtue when representing them.

 

:first:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude what part of I hate the Clintons dont you get? :wacko:

I dont think Ive seen anyone in here defending her since the election, and even then it was halfhearted at absolute best.

Its over. YOUR GUY WON.

So bizarre that you guys cant get over this

You don't have to 'like' Hillary to be just like her. And you are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which might be worth b1tching about if it came down to the superdelegates, but it didnt.

 

Fock even if it did thats the way these party primaries are conducted. Like Wiff keeps trying to tell you idiots. You guys are acting like this is the general election where there can be unfairness and fraud and all that (like, say, colluding with a hostile foreign power against your opponent aka treason). But that just isnt how it works

The only takeaways from this post is that you agree with wiff, you don't know that Trump self financed, and you are buying into the lie that the Russians wanted Trump as President. Oh and you don't care that the Clintons used the election for personal monetary gain.

 

The only sad part about this thread is sho nuts isn't here to take his beating. This is well above newbie's pay grade so he wouldn't enter it on a bet. Wiff, Supermike and worms are trying to deflect, but this is a tarbaby that is going nowhere.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

This might make some sense had I actually spent time reading his GFIAFPesque rant. But why would I? Wiff hasn't posted a coherent thought in a year. And noone gives you any credibility considering you were banned for wishing the President was assassinated. What a loser you have to be to even think that. Even Voltaire realized how sick that kind of thinking is.

 

Take it up with the guy who said it, loadchewer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is this chick still alive?

 

I'm sure someone in the DNC/Clinton is weighing all the options.

 

 

It's important to note, this woman sought to become the head of the DNC but when the emails revealed she gave Hillary the questions she was too radioactive for the job. She lost to Perez and does have an ax to grind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clintons getting lazy with their killing :thumbsdown:

Maybe losing the election made her lose her eye of the tiger. I fully expected Brazille to have been found dead on her floor of 'natural causes' by now. At the very least, unexplainably disappeared. It's sad when a family who once had moxie decides to go through the motions. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only possible explanation for the Clintons not killing her is because no one cares what they do anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only possible explanation for the Clintons not killing her is because no one cares what they do anymore.

You obviously haven't been following this board. The righties are as obsessed with Hillary now as they were when she held office and/or was a candidate. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Take it up with the guy who said it, loadchewer

Only a real pvssy would pretend to be someone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only a real pvssy would pretend to be someone else.

You got me. I'm not Jesus Chrysler on my birth certificate. Ok, Mr. Man? Also, tell your parents that 12th is a stupid first name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You got me. I'm not Jesus Chrysler on my birth certificate. Ok, Mr. Man? Also, tell your parents that 12th is a stupid first name.

Shut up Newbie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×