phillybear 366 Posted January 6, 2008 Bring on the sorry ass Packers and their loser attitude. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenryChinaski 1 Posted January 6, 2008 I hope you're right. Fock Green Bay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 19 Posted January 6, 2008 You seem almost as sure of this as you were about Hawaii clobbering Georgia Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted January 6, 2008 You seem almost as sure of this as you were about Hawaii clobbering Georgia I was wrong about that game. But I do believe that Green Bay is a MUCH MUCH bigger fraud that Hawaii was. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 19 Posted January 6, 2008 I'm in a charitable mood so I will predict Packers 38, seahawks 20 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
listen2me 23 1,952 Posted January 6, 2008 Packers 40 Seattle 17 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted January 6, 2008 Seattle 27 Green Bay 21 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,095 Posted January 6, 2008 As a Vikings fan this kills me: Packers 33 Seahawks 17 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted January 6, 2008 over/under on # of times they show the hasselbeck prediction before the game....55.... # of times that i have to remind people that the win for gb led to the 4th and 26 debacle the following week....55... gb hasnt won a playoff game since that game and have only won 2 playoff games since their sb loss to denver..yikes... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phurfur 70 Posted January 6, 2008 Bring on the sorry ass Packers and their loser attitude. Talk is cheap, 34 -3 I'll take that bet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 19 Posted January 6, 2008 gb hasnt won a playoff game since that game and have only won 2 playoff games since their sb loss to denver..yikes... seattle has won 6 total playoff games in the history of their franchise.... yikes... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jarvis Basnight 119 Posted January 6, 2008 Before watching that game, I didn't want the Seahawks to win and play the Pack. After watching the game, I'm fine with the Seahawks coming to Lambeau. Not impressed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted January 6, 2008 seattle has won 6 total playoff games in the history of their franchise.... yikes... are u implying that the seahawks franchise also started in the early 20s? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CornKobb 48 Posted January 6, 2008 weather.com is forecasting high 20 low 14 w/ snow showers for next Sunday.......... yikes... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted January 6, 2008 over/under on # of times they show the hasselbeck prediction before the game....55....# of times that i have to remind people that the win for gb led to the 4th and 26 debacle the following week....55... gb hasnt won a playoff game since that game and have only won 2 playoff games since their sb loss to denver..yikes... holy focking suck franchise Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 6, 2008 Rock on Philly!! The Cheesed!cks want us! They got us!! WE WANT THE BALL AND WE WILL SCORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
listen2me 23 1,952 Posted January 6, 2008 Rock on Philly!! The Cheesed!cks want us! They got us!! WE WANT THE BALL AND WE WILL SCORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The question is ...score for who? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 6, 2008 The question is ...score for who? Well don't think too hard you'll weaken the nation Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jarvis Basnight 119 Posted January 6, 2008 Well don't think too hard you'll weaken the nation Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
t.j 35 Posted January 6, 2008 Living in Seattle, although not being a Seahawks fan, I can appreciate how much Mike Holmgren and Matt Hasselbeck have brought to this franchise. Seattle is probably the 3rd-best team in the NFL over the last 5 years despite getting no attention. However, they are year in and year out the most disappointing road team I can imagine. It'll be fun to see Hasselbeck vs Favre on more time, and I'll be rooting for the Hawks, but it'll be Favre and the Pack advancing to the NFC Championship game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
49ers_suck 0 Posted January 6, 2008 Before watching that game, I didn't want the Seahawks to win and play the Pack. After watching the game, I'm fine with the Seahawks coming to Lambeau. Not impressed. are you kidding? their defense was money. it should be a tight game, imo. i could see favre having one of his patented crappy outings against that defense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
49ers_suck 0 Posted January 6, 2008 mr favre meet mr kerney! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 6, 2008 Living in Seattle, although not being a Seahawks fan, I can appreciate how much Mike Holmgren and Matt Hasselbeck have brought to this franchise. Seattle is probably the 3rd-best team in the NFL over the last 5 years despite getting no attention.However, they are year in and year out the most disappointing road team I can imagine. It'll be fun to see Hasselbeck vs Favre on more time, and I'll be rooting for the Hawks, but it'll be Favre and the Pack advancing to the NFC Championship game. I still don't understand how playing .500 ball on the road is disappointing. I mean do you expect them to be undefeated on the road? Every year I always say if you go 4-4 on the road, and then win 6-8 home games, which means you are a dominant home team, then you will win 10-12 games a year. that's pretty damn good. The Hawks are 12-12 on the road the past 3 years and have been a dominant home team. That's pretty damn good. That means thay have a 50/50 shot at winning in GB. I like those odds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
49ers_suck 0 Posted January 6, 2008 man this game is interesting. the SEA defense looked like the best unit in the league tonite. the running game may be the deciding factor in the GB v. SEA matchup. SEA isnt the same rush first offense they were a couple years ago, but i thought SA looked pretty good with the carries he got. GB has run the ball with success towards the end of the regular season. i'm thinkin whoever runs the ball more effectively will then be able to open up the passing game. simple football strategy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Torque666 0 Posted January 6, 2008 I assure you, GB will not try and have thier TE block Kearny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted January 6, 2008 weather.com is forecasting high 20 low 14 w/ snow showers for next Sunday.......... yikes... i dont put much stock in weather forecasts for 6 days from now..its supposed to lower 40s here for the first part of the week...warm enough for mccarthy to maybe suck it up and practice once outside seattle wont be rattled by any weather..they ran into it in carolina and at home..they are used to it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 6, 2008 man this game is interesting. the SEA defense looked like the best unit in the league tonite. the running game may be the deciding factor in the GB v. SEA matchup. SEA isnt the same rush first offense they were a couple years ago, but i thought SA looked pretty good with the carries he got. GB has run the ball with success towards the end of the regular season. i'm thinkin whoever runs the ball more effectively will then be able to open up the passing game. simple football strategy. You have hit the nail on the head. IMO the key to this game is Ryan Grant. If the Seahawks can't control him the way they controlled Portis, the Pack wins big. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remote controller 143 Posted January 6, 2008 Packers by 17!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murf74 461 Posted January 6, 2008 I still don't understand how playing .500 ball on the road is disappointing. I mean do you expect them to be undefeated on the road? Every year I always say if you go 4-4 on the road, and then win 6-8 home games, which means you are a dominant home team, then you will win 10-12 games a year. that's pretty damn good. The Hawks are 12-12 on the road the past 3 years and have been a dominant home team. That's pretty damn good. That means thay have a 50/50 shot at winning in GB. I like those odds. I think half your problem on the road is the travel.....take the Steelers....besides the AFC Championship game vs. Den in 2005 I can't think of the last time the Steelers won out west. Heck they even lost to Oakland last year. At home, they were genius in how they designed the stadium to keep that noise in. It's like playing in a dome with actual fans (as opposed to Indy and their piped in noise). That and every year you are guaranteed home game vs. Arizona, SF and Rams which is almost half your home games. That's not intended to demine the division, it is what it is, you play your schedule but those teams are always bad on the road let alone in Seattle Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 6, 2008 are you kidding? their defense was money. it should be a tight game, imo. i could see favre having one of his patented crappy outings against that defense. I could see Favre doing fine...because he won't be just dropping back in 5 and 7 step drops like Collins was nearly all day. And Washington did not have the receiving weapons that GB has. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 6, 2008 mr favre meet mr kerney! Mr Kerney...meet Mr. Tauscher and a 3 step drop. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,898 Posted January 6, 2008 This is better than watching the special olympics, seeing these retarded slap fights. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 6, 2008 I still don't understand how playing .500 ball on the road is disappointing. I mean do you expect them to be undefeated on the road? Every year I always say if you go 4-4 on the road, and then win 6-8 home games, which means you are a dominant home team, then you will win 10-12 games a year. that's pretty damn good. The Hawks are 12-12 on the road the past 3 years and have been a dominant home team. That's pretty damn good. That means thay have a 50/50 shot at winning in GB. I like those odds. That they are .500 on the road in the past several years does not mean they have a 50/50 shot at winning in GB. That is based on random competition...not based on what their record is on the road when playing against a team that is better than Seattle. HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 6, 2008 i dont put much stock in weather forecasts for 6 days from now..its supposed to lower 40s here for the first part of the week...warm enough for mccarthy to maybe suck it up and practice once outside seattle wont be rattled by any weather..they ran into it in carolina and at home..they are used to it... Remind me the score of that game in Carolina? Though, I agree...forecasts this early are pointless. And barring a torrential downpour, or high winds...weather will most likely not be a factor. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 19 Posted January 6, 2008 This is better than watching the special olympics, seeing these retarded slap fights. You are the biggest, most-retarded slapfighter at this forum Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GBFAVRE4 0 Posted January 6, 2008 This is better than watching the special olympics, seeing these retarded slap fights. Classy as usual edjr..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seattle_pt1 0 Posted January 6, 2008 The Packers are weak..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GBFAVRE4 0 Posted January 6, 2008 The Packers are weak..... What the 'H' makes you say something so ignorant?? Send us some facts Mr Seattle Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
