posty 2,876 Posted March 6, 2009 http://www.kmbc.com/money/18866748/detail.html KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- Jackson County Executive Mike Sanders said he's concerned the Chiefs and Royals could leave Kansas City because of the city's budget proposal. Kansas City has an $85 million budget shortfall that has to be fixed by the end of the month. Thursday, Mayor Mark Funkhouser put forward his plan, which includes eliminating nearly $2 million the city gives each year to the Truman Sports Complex. "This came with no notice to us. We were unaware that this was even going to be an issue," Sanders said in a KMBZ radio interview. "The money would be the violation. But the fact that we would have violated a substantive provision would mean those leases are now gone … We would be on a tightrope or a high wire with no safety net." Sanders said if the city pulls its $2 million annual contribution, it would break the lease and leave the city with no written guarantee keeping the Royals and Chiefs in Kansas City for the long term. "The teams would then be, to use the sports phrase, free agents to do whatever they wanted to do. Re-negotiate the deal or to not honor any of the provisions of the lease they did not want to honor," Sanders told KMBC's Martin Augustine. "I don't think it would jeopardize leases," Funkhouser said. "We're trying to focus on services that directly matter to Kansas Citians. For example, our city services, basic services like police. That is a core function. Operating a sports venue is not." Sanders said he believes the issue will eventually be worked out. He called the Royals and Chiefs "good civic partners." A Royals representative said team officials are just learning about the issue, and it's too early to comment. KMBC was unable to get a comment from a Chiefs representative. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brad GLuckman 519 Posted March 6, 2009 Why is the city giving $2mil per year to a sports complex in the first place? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,121 Posted March 6, 2009 cmh suicide watch starts now :popcorn: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,283 Posted March 6, 2009 cmh suicide watch starts now :popcorn: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pimptastic69 0 Posted March 6, 2009 At least KC will still have a mayor named "Funkhouser". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dain11279 986 Posted March 6, 2009 Ok, so let me get this straight. The Chiefs and Royals are about to become extinct and that's supposed to be a bad thing? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
patweisers44 877 Posted March 6, 2009 Who will the Tigers be fighting on a yearly basis for the AL Central Cellar? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,800 Posted March 6, 2009 Ladies and Gentlemen, YOUR Los Angeles CHIEFS!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craphouse rats 0 Posted March 6, 2009 Ladies and Gentlemen, YOUR Los Angeles CHIEFS!!! LA Chiefs rolls of the tongue better. How about the Oklahoma City Royals Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted March 6, 2009 LA Chiefs rolls of the tongue better. How about the Oklahoma City Royals On behalf of Nashville, let me invite the Royals to make us your new home. I still won't give a crap about baseball, but somebody might. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GettnHuge 2 Posted March 6, 2009 salary cap salary minimum full revenue sharing problem solved Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nomad99 872 Posted March 6, 2009 Ok, so let me get this straight. The Chiefs and Royals are about to become extinct and that's supposed to be a bad thing? No room for reason here son Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,121 Posted March 6, 2009 Ladies and Gentlemen, YOUR Los Angeles CHIEFS!!! That sounds a whole lot better than Los Angeles Vikings Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jocstrap 8 Posted March 6, 2009 Doesn't Canada want an NFL team? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pimptastic69 0 Posted March 6, 2009 That sounds a whole lot better than Los Angeles Vikings and the Los Angeles Lakers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tikigods 77 Posted March 6, 2009 Boston Royals - NL team? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LOD01 199 Posted March 6, 2009 The teams can counter with a new stadium proposal. Isn't that how it works? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
patweisers44 877 Posted March 6, 2009 Boston Royals - NL team? a team to hate in the NL too? sweet! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RicemanX 20 Posted March 6, 2009 Mexico City Chiefs! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 828 Posted March 6, 2009 The Royals and Chiefs should just combine teams and have the same group of guys play both sports. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tikigods 77 Posted March 6, 2009 a team to hate in the NL too? sweet! I would love Boston to have an NL team....so all the bandwagoneers will leave Fenway for the cheap seats of the Boston West. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Blue 06 196 Posted March 6, 2009 So the Chiefs and Royals may leave KC, but the real question is... would anyone notice? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted March 6, 2009 So the Chiefs and Royals may leave KC, but the real question is... would anyone notice? didnt realize the royals were still there til this post.... scratch kc off the nhl list..no pheonix coyotes for you.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gocolts 300 Posted March 7, 2009 Bring the Chiefs to Chandler Indiana. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites