Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 You didn't read all what he said now did you? And all that was said about his apology? Nunes’s apology was “generic,” Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.), a member of the Intelligence Committee, said on CNN, adding that it was “not clear” precisely which actions his apology covered. You're a hack that can't begin to understand that he didn't backtrack. He's still saying the same thing; this information was disseminated far and wide, the NSA is cooperating but the FBI is not. The requesting to unmask names in this stuff is being run down and might lead to charges. It's definitely got legs and it's like I said weeks ago; too many people (like yourself) yammering 'There's no evidence' just wanting this to go away and not get investigated. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTSkiBum 1,595 Posted March 24, 2017 I didn't read any of this thread, anyone make a joke about an FBI surveillance van yet? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 24, 2017 Nuness apology was generic, Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.), a member of the Intelligence Committee, said on CNN, adding that it was not clear precisely which actions his apology covered. You're a ###### hack that can't begin to understand that he didn't backtrack. He's still saying the same thing; this information was disseminated far and wide, the NSA is cooperating but the FBI is not. The requesting to unmask names in this stuff is being run down and might lead to charges. It's definitely got legs and it's like I said weeks ago; too many people (like yourself) yammering 'There's no evidence' just wanting this to go away and not get investigated. Wow...one quote...read more chief. Lots of may haves...talk that the only name unmasked was one that wasn't even related to Trump in any way...But you don't want to see that. Just want this to go away? What part? It's been shown multiple times that Trump was full of ahi (he admitted in his interviews that he got it from the TV...read that ridiculous Time interview "they said wiretap...I was just quoting...") You are just gullible enough to believe the he tweets. Meanwhile actual evidence is there about Russian involvement and you dismiss it. That's how deep in Trumps ass you are. Got legs? Nunes even said it all seemed appropriate. He won't even deny the WH was possibly his source when directly asked. How hard was it to say no to that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 I didn't read any of this thread, anyone make a joke about an FBI surveillance van yet? Nope but you're the first. Apparently the EffBeeEye's van was disguised as a Hairclub for Men vendor outside Trump Tower and nobody thought to question it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 Wow...one quote...read more chief. Lots of may haves...talk that the only name unmasked was one that wasn't even related to Trump in any way... But you don't want to see that. Just want this to go away? What part? It's been shown multiple times that Trump was full of ahi (he admitted in his interviews that he got it from the TV...read that ridiculous Time interview "they said wiretap...I was just quoting...") You are just gullible enough to believe the ###### he tweets. Meanwhile actual evidence is there about Russian involvement and you dismiss it. That's how deep in Trumps ass you are. Your boy's sins are catching up to him and he's going to look good in that orange jumpsuit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,432 Posted March 24, 2017 I didn't read any of this thread, anyone make a joke about an FBI surveillance van yet? I think someone got to it on page 1 or 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 24, 2017 Your boy's sins are catching up to him and he's going to look good in that orange jumpsuit. Yeah...Obamas going to jail...you are dumber than I already think you are if you believe that. You think this possible surveillance is worse than if Trump and his team get busted for having cooperated with the Russians. You are more worried about possible legal surveillance than you are about colluding with a hostile foreign government. As usual...party over country. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 Yeah...Obamas going to jail...you are dumber than I already think you are if you believe that. You think this possible surveillance is worse than if Trump and his team get busted for having cooperated with the Russians. You are more worried about possible legal surveillance than you are about colluding with a hostile foreign government. As usual...party over country. Just another facet of Obama's abortion of a legacy coming to light. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 Wow...one quote...read more chief. Lots of may haves...talk that the only name unmasked was one that wasn't even related to Trump in any way... But you don't want to see that. As usual wrong again. Nunes just said multiple names were unmasked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted March 24, 2017 As usual wrong again. Nunes just said multiple names were unmasked. He also said nothing was done illegally. Get out of here with that weak sauce. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 He also said nothing was done illegally. Get out of here with that weak sauce. Unmasking of the names of American Citizens without proper reasoning is illegal. HTH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted March 24, 2017 Unmasking of the names of American Citizens without proper reasoning is illegal. HTH. Link to that happening? Nunes said everything was legal. You're grasping at straws, son. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,678 Posted March 24, 2017 Somebody has got their stupid on full blast this morning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 Link to that happening? Nunes said everything was legal. You're grasping at straws, son. Jesus H. even your pillow biting buddy ShoFlake admitting One name was unmasked (it was actually multiple). Quit being a meathead and instead of swinging first, you read. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,899 Posted March 24, 2017 We've all met the kind of guy who's always got an excuse for everything. He ails to deliver at work but it's someone else's fault cause an email didn't go through, the deadline wasn't clear etc. He says or does something stupid but it's someone else's fault for making him do it. We all know the type. Usually this guy doesn't become president though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,814 Posted March 24, 2017 We've all met the kind of guy who's always got an excuse for everything. He ails to deliver at work but it's someone else's fault cause an email didn't go through, the deadline wasn't clear etc. He says or does something stupid but it's someone else's fault for making him do it. We all know the type. Usually this guy doesn't become president though. Yeah....that guy just usually blames Bush for 8 years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted March 24, 2017 Jesus H. even your pillow biting buddy ShoFlake admitting One name was unmasked (it was actually multiple). Quit being a meathead and instead of swinging first, you read. I didn't say no one was unmasked. I said that no one was illegally unmasked. hth Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted March 24, 2017 We've all met the kind of guy who's always got an excuse for everything. He ails to deliver at work but it's someone else's fault cause an email didn't go through, the deadline wasn't clear etc. He says or does something stupid but it's someone else's fault for making him do it. We all know the type. Usually this guy doesn't become president though. He didn't really mean what he typed. etc Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 24, 2017 Just another facet of Obama's abortion of a legacy coming to light. Only tothat small percentage of simpletons like you(a number getting smaller every day) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 24, 2017 As usual wrong again. Nunes just said multiple names were unmasked. And Schiffcorrected him. Of course you believe the member of Trumps transition team who has shown nothing but interference for Trump so far. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 24, 2017 Unmasking of the names of American Citizens without proper reasoning is illegal. HTH. And he said nothing was done illegally...meaning any names unmasked were done legally. HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 24, 2017 He didn't really mean what he typed. etc He was just given that information by someone else. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 I didn't say no one was unmasked. I said that no one was illegally unmasked. hth No..........he said the surveillance was legal (so far). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 And Schiff corrected him. Schiff is wanting to shut this down now. He's clearly wanting the sidebar of these unrelated surveillance and the associated unmasking (which shouldn't have occurred) to stop. Why? Why can't they look into both? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,678 Posted March 24, 2017 And he said nothing was done illegally...meaning any names unmasked were done legally. HTH So, there was no crime commited when Flynn was unmasked. Boy oh boy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 Sho you believe Schiff and I'll believe the guy calling the shots Nunes. Adios. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bandrus1 413 Posted March 24, 2017 So how many people who leaked classified information to the press have been identified? And that sh!t is gobbled right down by you guys. Well there is one person who leaked classified info identified.............maybe she'll finally get prosecuted. Cant tell when u r being mocked Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTSkiBum 1,595 Posted March 24, 2017 The geek club has got their stupid on full blast every morning. Fixed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTSkiBum 1,595 Posted March 24, 2017 Fixed. Just thought I should follow a quote manipulation with a quote of myself. Winning! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 Cant tell when u r being mocked Just redirecting the retards. If you guys get too far away the short bus will leave without you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 24, 2017 No..........he said the surveillance was legal (so far). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 24, 2017 Schiff is wanting to shut this down now. He's clearly wanting the sidebar of these unrelated surveillance and the associated unmasking (which shouldn't have occurred) to stop. Why? Why can't they look into both? You are again reaching...weak effort sport. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 24, 2017 Sho you believe Schiff and I'll believe the guy calling the shots Nunes. Adios. Yes...you believe the guy who was a part of the Trump transition team who, when presented information, ran to Trump rather than his committee. Who then has backpedaled on some of his statements and apologized. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 You can multiquote Sho..............doesn't make you less crazy but the thread is less cluttered. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,678 Posted March 24, 2017 Anyone have a good reason why Obama changed the rules on dissemination of classified material with only days left in his tenure? Can't seem to find one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 Anyone have a good reason why Obama changed the rules on dissemination of classified material with only days left in his tenure? Can't seem to find one. To get these multiple unmasked names out to more moles in the government? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 24, 2017 Anyone have a good reason why Obama changed the rules on dissemination of classified material with only days left in his tenure? Can't seem to find one.they can't and won't answer this question, why is that ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,678 Posted March 24, 2017 they can't and won't answer this question, why is that ? Because it is the indicator. The blinking red light to what we are all now seeing went down here. Obama spied, Comey lied. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,678 Posted March 24, 2017 To get these multiple unmasked names out to more moles in the government? That and to obscufate. Send whoever starts looking into it in 16 different directions. Create as many layers as possible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 24, 2017 That and to obscufate. Send whoever starts looking into it in 16 different directions. Create as many layers as possible. Certainly. Now the March 28th hearing is postponed until Comey and Rogers come back to do some follow ups. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites