Coronavirus - Doomsday

[League Champion 1,896]

TOLD YOU SO LIBERALS. WE WERE RIGHT, ABOUT ALL OF IT. 

YOU SHOULD BE IN JAIL IF YOU FORCED IT ON YOUR KIDS. 

[lod001 1,344]

Yeah, I already knew this. When questioned, who words it the way he just did? No, you say 'Sir, there is no difference between batches of vaccines. Pfizer employees got the same vaccine everyone else did.' But he didn't say that. They got a placebo. Now a complete idiot would still call this a conspiracy theory even after this criminal's statement.

 

[League Champion 1,896]

Mask up, nevermind, they're useless

[TimHauck 2,615]

3 hours ago, lickin_starfish said:

 

Lol if you believe this nonsense.  Nevermind the fact that the vax has been around for 2+ years with no impact on births

[lod001 1,344]

Now here is someone who got the real crapola. Had to take it or lose her job. 

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/hayley-lopez-pfizer-covid-vaccine-injury-air-traffic-controller/

[TimHauck 2,615]

22 minutes ago, lod001 said:

Yeah, I already knew this. When questioned, who words it the way he just did? No, you say 'Sir, there is no difference between batches of vaccines. Pfizer employees got the same vaccine everyone else did.' But he didn't say that. They got a placebo. Now a complete idiot would still call this a conspiracy theory even after this criminal's statement.

 

Lol if you believe this nonsense.  Sure, there were a few “conspiracy theories” that  became true: lab leak (always possible), you can get infected if you’re vaccinated (always true), masks don’t do much if anything (always possible), the vaccines will sometimes have side effects (always possible and known since early 2021), Omicron is causing more “incidental” hospitalizations and death (only true since Omicron) to name a few.

But that doesn’t mean every conspiracy theory is true, you’re just making the battle harder for people arguing for things that are actually true.  Some things that are not true, to name a few:

-the vaccines did not help anyone

-the vaccines are causing mass deaths

-the vaccines are causing mass infertility

-good or bad batches of the vaccine

-the vaccine sheds

-no one or few people actually died “from” Covid”

-ivermectin is a miracle drug that cures both Covid and vaccine side effects

 

[Reality 3,096]

 

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

Why is this still being discussed? 

[League Champion 1,896]

1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Why is this still being discussed? 

Because you're due for your 35th booster next month. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

Just now, League Champion said:

Because you're due for your 35th booster next month. 

The pandemic is over, son. Time to go home.

[League Champion 1,896]

2 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

The pandemic is over, son. Time to go home.

It was over before it began, but you didn't listen to us. 

[Sagging Scrot 44]

15 minutes ago, League Champion said:

It was over before it began, but you didn't listen to us. 

Liberals are so stupid 

[TimHauck 2,615]

53 minutes ago, Reality said:

 

A “large meta analysis” of 3 studies, lol, with 98% of the weighting coming from 1…

 

 

[TimHauck 2,615]

Author of “large meta analysis” dodges simple question.  @Reality and “chief nerd” are sheep, confirmed

 

 

 

[Baker Boy 1,688]

Judge rules in favor of 7 Massachusetts State Troopers who lost jobs over refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine

The 7 Massachusetts State Troopers will be reinstated and receive back pay

https://www.foxnews.com/us/judge-rules-favor-7-massachusetts-state-troopers-who-lost-jobs-over-refusing-get-covid-19-vaccine

[Baker Boy 1,688]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Author of “large meta analysis” dodges simple question.  @Reality and “chief nerd” are sheep, confirmed

 

 

 

579 pages in this thread, with Timmy posting most  of them, and everyone of his links is from Twitter. What a pear-shaped loser.

[TimHauck 2,615]

7 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

Judge rules in favor of 7 Massachusetts State Troopers who lost jobs over refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine

The 7 Massachusetts State Troopers will be reinstated and receive back pay

https://www.foxnews.com/us/judge-rules-favor-7-massachusetts-state-troopers-who-lost-jobs-over-refusing-get-covid-19-vaccine

Good

[lickin_starfish 1,893]

It's funny how the covidnazis want to stop talking about how they acted. We aren't going to let it go. You don't get a pass.

[weepaws 3,155]

Just ask the people that lost their business and jobs homes and because of that lost their families if they get a pass.  Any suggestion of a pass is an insult to those that lost everything for the chase of the government attempt to destroy.  

[TimHauck 2,615]

1 hour ago, lickin_starfish said:

It's funny how the covidnazis want to stop talking about how they acted. We aren't going to let it go. You don't get a pass.

Except most of the Covid minimizers aren’t talking about that, most of the talk I see is blaming every death that happens on the vaccine

[TimHauck 2,615]

This doosh thinks because Florida’s “study” was from a “state health department,” that means it was peer reviewed.  I guess everything from the CDC was peer reviewed then too? 

 

 

 

[League Champion 1,896]

 

[jerryskids 6,564]

On 8/2/2023 at 5:17 AM, TimHauck said:

Some good points here from Prasad that a centrist like myself can agree with:

 

 

I don't follow what doesn't make sense.  Is he saying that Ivermectin could have had 100% success rate and they still would have pushed and maintained the EUA?  If so that seems pretty... conspiratorial for you.  

7 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

The pandemic is over, son. Time to go home.

I will bet you that it is used at some point by the Biden camp to try to get him out of an in-person debate, or perhaps a debate period.

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

24 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I don't follow what doesn't make sense.  Is he saying that Ivermectin could have had 100% success rate and they still would have pushed and maintained the EUA?  If so that seems pretty... conspiratorial for you.  

I will bet you that it is used at some point by the Biden camp to try to get him out of an in-person debate, or perhaps a debate period.

T-pump is such an ass in debates that I don't see any point in having one. It's embarrassing. 

[jerryskids 6,564]

57 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

T-pump is such an ass in debates that I don't see any point in having one. It's embarrassing. 

MmmHmm...  

You know what else is embarrassing?  Not being able to string coherent words together into a sentence.   

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

55 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

MmmHmm...  

You know what else is embarrassing?  Not being able to string coherent words together into a sentence.   

That sentence is concise and well-written, and T-pump is such an ass in debates that it would be embarrassing to have a presidential debate in 2024, particularly if it's on Zoom from his prison cell.

Seventy-eight felonies!

 

[nobody 2,564]

16 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

That sentence is concise and well-written, and T-pump is such an ass in debates that it would be embarrassing to have a presidential debate in 2024, particularly if it's on Zoom from his prison cell.

Seventy-eight felonies!

 

I think he's talking about B-pump's ability to strong coherent words together into a sentence.  Everyone knows you're a master of language.

[Gepetto 1,288]

Keep that Twitter sh!t, which is called X now by the way, over there. 

[TimHauck 2,615]

12 hours ago, jerryskids said:

I don't follow what doesn't make sense.  Is he saying that Ivermectin could have had 100% success rate and they still would have pushed and maintained the EUA?  If so that seems pretty... conspiratorial for you.  

Yes, I think part of his point is that with Covid being an “emergency,” they wouldn’t have been as strict with that EUA requirement.

Also even if ivermectin was 100% effective  (remember when Weinstein implied it was? lol), it wasn’t a vaccine.   You either needed to get sick first or take a pill every day.  With the initial vaccine trials showing 95% efficacy against symptomatic infection, they still would have gotten EUA.

The idea that people at the CDC/FDA “knew ivermectin worked but intentionally suppressed it,” is so far fetched.   The goal was to end the pandemic.   If ivermectin could have helped do that, it would have been embraced.  And of course other cheap drugs such as Dexamethasone were found to be effective. Yes, people “attacked” ivermectin once it became political, but it’s clear now that it was not a miracle drug, as much as Weinstein and Pierre Kory want people to believe.

I find it funny 99% of the “free thinkers” think both ivermectin works against severe Covid and the vaccine doesn’t.  So much for “doing their own research,” because those conclusions are the opposite of the best data available.  I do actually give Alex Berenson some credit for going against the grain and pissing off a lot of his followers by acknowledging that ivermectin doesn’t work, and also that it wasn’t “suppressed so that the vaccines could get an EUA.”

 

 

 

[League Champion 1,896]

18 hours ago, weepaws said:

Just ask the people that lost their business and jobs homes and because of that lost their families if they get a pass.  Any suggestion of a pass is an insult to those that lost everything for the chase of the government attempt to destroy.  

Ask any Liberal, they'll tell you that it was all worth it. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

16 hours ago, jerryskids said:

I don't follow what doesn't make sense.  Is he saying that Ivermectin could have had 100% success rate and they still would have pushed and maintained the EUA?  If so that seems pretty... conspiratorial for you.  

I will bet you that it is used at some point by the Biden camp to try to get him out of an in-person debate, or perhaps a debate period.

Looks like T-pump is the one thinking about skipping a debate.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-trump-show-debate-100000316.html

[jerryskids 6,564]

3 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Looks like T-pump is the one thinking about skipping a debate.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-trump-show-debate-100000316.html

I know, and I think it sets a bad precedent that Team Dementia will exploit.  That being said, I think Trump has a stronger case for the primary, with such a lead and the fact that he is a former POTUS (basically, what does he have to gain?).

Biden will try the "I'm not going to debate a felon" argument, but with about a 50/50 polling between the prior two POTUSes, that's weak sauce.

[thegeneral 2,908]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

I know, and I think it sets a bad precedent that Team Dementia will exploit.  That being said, I think Trump has a stronger case for the primary, with such a lead and the fact that he is a former POTUS (basically, what does he have to gain?).

Biden will try the "I'm not going to debate a felon" argument, but with about a 50/50 polling between the prior two POTUSes, that's weak sauce.

Has Joe said he won’t debate the Republican nom?

[jerryskids 6,564]

14 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Has Joe said he won’t debate the Republican nom?

No, I am speculating that he won't.  Biden can't even read a cue card these days, and the debates would be a year deeper into his cognitive decline.  No way his handlers let him near a debate platform.

[thegeneral 2,908]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

No, I am speculating that he won't.  Biden can't even read a cue card these days, and the debates would be a year deeper into his cognitive decline.  No way his handlers let him near a debate platform.

If he doesn’t debate the Republican nom that would be weak. 

How can anyone possibly compete with this guy!

 

[League Champion 1,896]

 

[League Champion 1,896]

 

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

4 hours ago, jerryskids said:

I know, and I think it sets a bad precedent that Team Dementia will exploit.  That being said, I think Trump has a stronger case for the primary, with such a lead and the fact that he is a former POTUS (basically, what does he have to gain?).

Biden will try the "I'm not going to debate a felon" argument, but with about a 50/50 polling between the prior two POTUSes, that's weak sauce.

I totally think Biden should debate him, and they need to keep a leash on Trump so he doesn't turn it into a circus.

[lickin_starfish 1,893]

http://www.breakingthenews.net/news/details/60451917

[Flipper 60]

55 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

http://www.breakingthenews.net/news/details/60451917

?