Jump to content
Cdub100

Coronavirus - Doomsday

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Great post.

Will the Ultra Moron Closeted Crew dare to respond?

Unlikely 

With memes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

How is this thread still going?

There’s an election coming up so the Libtards have to recreate Covid. You know their playbook, come on. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/14/2023 at 6:52 AM, TimHauck said:

 

 

A twofer.  Heart attacks are potentially racist, too.

Hopefully this study isn't as flawed as all the other studies seem to be.  Did you do an analysis on this one to make sure you approved of the methodology?  I suppose not since it agrees with your POV.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, nobody said:

A twofer.  Heart attacks are potentially racist, too.

Hopefully this study isn't as flawed as all the other studies seem to be.  Did you do an analysis on this one to make sure you approved of the methodology?  I suppose not since it agrees with your POV.

I wouldn’t say there’s an overwhelmingly large number of studies that I “disagree” with, mostly just the small non-randomized and sometimes fraudulent ivermectin studies.

Most of the time it’s more an issue of people misrepresenting what the study’s data actually says.  Off the top of my head, some examples include the  “Cleveland clinic study” which people have incorrectly claimed proves “more shots, more infections;” and the Christine Stabell Benn study which I’ve discussed with @jerryskids that people have used to incorrectly claim the mRNA vaxxes are causing a significant number of cardiac deaths.  One that’s maybe a mixture of disagreeing and people misinterpreting is the Ladapo “study,” where the misinterpretations are coming from the anonymous authors who removed data contrary to their goal, and yet whose published data still showed no increase in all cause mortality (and IIRC, may have even shown a decrease among vaxx’ed).

But I don’t agree with all studies on my “side” either.  The CDC has pushed some garbage mask studies, and there have also been some pro-vax studies that try to minimize the myocarditis risk.  But of course on the flip side there have been many studies that do show that myocarditis is the one risk from the vax that there is actually real data on, and I don’t question those.

The fact of the matter is there are few actual studies out there claiming to show harm from the vaccines other than myocarditis.  It’s usually just memes and blog posts.

I’m not even sure what your point is with your repeated comments that have been similar to this though.  Should we believe all studies?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, nobody said:

We already knew it!  Please don't keep bringing it up.

It’s fine to bring up and it is part of the reason why additional boosters shouldn’t be recommended for young men.

But claiming “Fauci finally admits it” is retarded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, TimHauck said:

I wouldn’t say there’s an overwhelmingly large number of studies that I “disagree” with, mostly just the small non-randomized and sometimes fraudulent ivermectin studies.

Most of the time it’s more an issue of people misrepresenting what the study’s data actually says.  Off the top of my head, some examples include the  “Cleveland clinic study” which people have incorrectly claimed proves “more shots, more infections;” and the Christine Stabell Benn study which I’ve discussed with @jerryskids that people have used to incorrectly claim the mRNA vaxxes are causing a significant number of cardiac deaths.  One that’s maybe a mixture of disagreeing and people misinterpreting is the Ladapo “study,” where the misinterpretations are coming from the anonymous authors who removed data contrary to their goal, and yet whose published data still showed no increase in all cause mortality (and IIRC, may have even shown a decrease among vaxx’ed).

But I don’t agree with all studies on my “side” either.  The CDC has pushed some garbage mask studies, and there have also been some pro-vax studies that try to minimize the myocarditis risk.  But of course on the flip side there have been many studies that do show that myocarditis is the one risk from the vax that there is actually real data on, and I don’t question those.

The fact of the matter is there are few actual studies out there claiming to show harm from the vaccines other than myocarditis.  It’s usually just memes and blog posts.

I’m not even sure what your point is with your repeated comments that have been similar to this though.  Should we believe all studies?

Here’s an example of what usually happens

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/14/2023 at 9:55 AM, Hawkeye21 said:

How is this thread still going?

Would you rather 10 different threads created? For the most part, it's all contained here and can be indexed easier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gave blood today. Yep it's still the last question they ask. Goes like this exactly, including all caps & bolded.

Have you EVER been vaccinated for covid-19.

Now if it was even remotely as safe as they have claimed, there would be ZERO reason to ever ask such a question. There is no better proof that this garbage is deadly than asking if your blood is tainted with this sh1t. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, lod001 said:

Gave blood today. Yep it's still the last question they ask. Goes like this exactly, including all caps & bolded.

Have you EVER been vaccinated for covid-19.

Now if it was even remotely as safe as they have claimed, there would be ZERO reason to ever ask such a question. There is no better proof that this garbage is deadly than asking if your blood is tainted with this sh1t. 

Actually moron, being vaccinated makes your blood more valuable.  The dirty unvaxxed blood gets set aside for emergencies.

Damn you stupid son. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Actually moron, being vaccinated makes your blood more valuable.  The dirty unvaxxed blood gets set aside for emergencies.

Damn you stupid son. 


 

Quote
  • If you’ve received a COVID-19 vaccine, you’ll need to provide the manufacturer name when you come to donate. Upon vaccination, you should receive a card or printout indicating what COVID-19 vaccine was received, and we encourage you to bring that card with you to your next donation. In most cases, there is no deferral time for individuals who received a COVID-19 vaccine as long as they are symptom free and feeling well at the time of donation.  
  • Eligible blood donors who received a live attenuated COVID-19 vaccine or do not know what type of COVID-19 vaccine they received must wait two weeks before giving blood.


https://www.redcrossblood.org/donate-blood/dlp/coronavirus--covid-19--and-blood-donation.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Actually moron, being vaccinated makes your blood more valuable.  The dirty unvaxxed blood gets set aside for emergencies.

Damn you stupid son. 

OMG. There has never been a more retarded post than yours right here.🤣

Holy sh1t, this guy is the dumbest fucktard ever.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Actually moron, being vaccinated makes your blood more valuable.  The dirty unvaxxed blood gets set aside for emergencies.

Damn you stupid son. 

The Bronze Body Glow, Steroids and semen has gone to his head. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, League Champion said:

The Bronze Body Glow, Steroids and semen has gone to his head. 

We get it.  You love trannies and drag queens and your butt buddy with the gay twitter links.

You don't really need to advertise it so crudely in every post.  Now you're talking about semen?  Please don't start posting gay pics like your buddy did.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BeachGuy23 said:

We get it.

You were doing so well BOYO, you officially spun yourself out like some Sillie AssRot. 

Can you please go back to being BOYO again? The bit was so much better, this one is queer as the day is long. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, League Champion said:

You were doing so well BOYO, you officially spun yourself out like some Sillie AssRot. 

Can you please go back to being BOYO again? The bit was so much better, this one is queer as the day is long. 

You’re clearly obsessed and coming across like a stalker.  I don’t understand why though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

You’re clearly obsessed and coming across like a stalker.  I don’t understand why though.

Of course you don't get it BOYO, I wouldn't expect you to. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×