Coronavirus - Doomsday

[TimHauck 2,942]

5 minutes ago, nobody said:

Fraud is clearly rampant.  In this thread alone there has to be 20 studies called out as BS.

Most of which are about ivermectin

[TimHauck 2,942]

6 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

Link

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2779044
 

man it’s so easy and fun making you guys look like the idiots you are

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,367]

13 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

FYI for the people that can’t do their own research (last updated in April btw):

https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/

Sorry you got duped by your mass formation psychosis

yep, clinical trials, approval, nothing but positive success, good thing they waited til Trump was out to allow these trials, that other countries have approved and have been doing since day 1

I don't even know what mass formation psychosis is, but it sounds similar to either you agree with us 100% or you are a fascist threat to democracy and an extremist

I saw the study, I read the study, I followed the study in 2020 from Argentina and Chile, my doctor gave me ivermectin in 2020 for covid, I got better.  End of story

 

[Baker Boy 1,704]

6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2779044
 

man it’s so easy and fun making you guys look like the idiots you are

 

2 hours ago, lod001 said:

Opps. Tim wrong again once the truth comes out.

 

#scaredshitless

[TimHauck 2,942]

5 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

 

#scaredshitless

HT’s quote was about HCQ.  I still need to look into that ivermectin study, that looks like it’s actually new unlike the other stuff you idiots have been linking to recently that’s months or years old.

[Baker Boy 1,704]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

HT’s quote was about HCQ.  I still need to look into that ivermectin study, that looks like it’s actually new unlike the other stuff you idiots have been linking to recently that’s months or years old.

 

16 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2779044
 

man it’s so easy and fun making you guys look like the idiots you are

This link is from April 2021. 

[TimHauck 2,942]

9 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

 

This link is from April 2021. 

I never proclaimed it as new information like RaiderHater did, dumbass

[Hardcore troubadour 15,518]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I never proclaimed it as new information like RaiderHater did, dumbass

Bawwwwww!

[TimHauck 2,942]

31 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

yep, clinical trials, approval, nothing but positive success, good thing they waited til Trump was out to allow these trials, that other countries have approved and have been doing since day 1

I don't even know what mass formation psychosis is, but it sounds similar to either you agree with us 100% or you are a fascist threat to democracy and an extremist

I saw the study, I read the study, I followed the study in 2020 from Argentina and Chile, my doctor gave me ivermectin in 2020 for covid, I got better.  End of story

 

Link to a large RCT that other countries have done on Ivermectin with positive results?  ( Ivmeta or c19ivermectin.com are not what I’m asking for)

And the ivermectin trials are certainly not “nothing but positive success,” liar.

Mass formation psychosis was a phrase coined by either Robert Malone or Peter McCullough, can’t remember which of those crazies for people that believe everything they read from “their side.” But it’s funny because I think it’s more true of the Covid skeptics.

[jerryskids 6,863]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

 

Edit: but looks like I misspoke as it appears he may not have admitted to being wrong, lol

Sorry for the confusion, I meant that I was unaware that he was pimping dexamethasone as a prophylactic.  I admitted in my post that he has advocated ivermectin.

[TimHauck 2,942]

11 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Sorry for the confusion, I meant that I was unaware that he was pimping dexamethasone as a prophylactic.  I admitted in my post that he has advocated ivermectin.

Ah sorry, thought you were saying he never claimed it was 100% effective as a prophylactic 

[TimHauck 2,942]

1 hour ago, Baker Boy said:

 

#scaredshitless

Observational study

[Chronic Fockster 106]

covid is over and you guys are still arguing that you were right about HQC and Ivermectin

[jerryskids 6,863]

13 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Ah sorry, thought you were saying he never claimed it was 100% effective as a prophylactic 

You should avoid pronouns in this discussion if you want to minimize confusion.   

[TimHauck 2,942]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

You should avoid pronouns in this discussion if you want to minimize confusion.   

Sorry, was too busy laughing at your claim that “ivermectin seems effective for both”

[jerryskids 6,863]

14 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Sorry, was too busy laughing at your claim that “ivermectin seems effective for both”

It must be quite peaceful in your head, the way you blindly believe everything you are told.   

[phillybear 366]

I spent time arguing with the doctors at the hospital this week. 

I kept telling them about the 5 people in my life that died from the "vaccine" and the adverse effects on numerous others, and they kept telling me that I was wrong because their training told them otherwise. I offered to give them a shovel and we could go dig up the bodies. They still weren't buying it. Ostrich, head in hole. 

[TimHauck 2,942]

6 hours ago, jerryskids said:

It must be quite peaceful in your head, the way you blindly believe everything you are told.   

If by “everything I am told,” you mean large randomized controlled trials, then sure.

And here you go @Baker Boy, although I’m sure you guys will complain about the dosing schedule or something.  I’m pretty sure if you have to take a medicine at a super specific schedule for it to work…then it probably doesn’t work.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2201662
 

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869
 

[shorepatrol 1,871]

Poor Tim will die on this hill. And many others. Poor Tim 

[TimHauck 2,942]

1 hour ago, shorepatrol said:

Poor Tim will die on this hill. And many others. Poor Tim 

Not as many as that died (mostly in 2021) because they didn’t get vaccinated

[jerryskids 6,863]

Good news everyone, new boosters are on the way!

Quote

While many Americans say they’re over COVID-19, the virus doesn’t seem to have taken the hint. Instead, it’s been spinning off new variants and subvariants at a furious pace and continuing to infect hundreds of thousands of people every day.

But now that frantic pattern could finally be coming to an end — and (fingers crossed) the more predictable COVID future we’ve been promised could be on its way.

As early as Wednesday, the Food and Drug Administration is expected to authorize new Pfizer and Moderna booster shots tailor-made to fight the Omicron subvariants that have been triggering the vast majority of new U.S. COVID cases for months. A combined 175 million doses should be available shortly after Labor Day.

That moment, in turn, will mark an important milestone. It will be the first time since the start of the pandemic that the vaccine has been updated to target the latest version of the virus — and the first time this year that the virus itself has stopped evolving so fast that we can’t keep up.

Which means that if current trends hold — admittedly a huge “if” — fall 2022 may prove to be the beginning of the endgame that Americans have been awaiting for two and a half years: a more stable, sustainable coexistence with COVID.

In contrast, consider all the upheaval we’ve endured since the ultra-transmissible Omicron variant first emerged in South Africa last November. By mid-December, the initial version of Omicron — BA.1 — had displaced Delta in the U.S.; average reported cases soon skyrocketed to 800,000 a day, the most ever. With mutations that helped it spread fast and dodge immunity, Omicron crowded out all other competitors for three and a half months, until the end of March 2022.

https://news.yahoo.com/new-covid-boosters-could-mark-turning-point-in-pandemic-191546745.html

[craftsman 1,045]

19 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Not as many as that died (mostly in 2021) because they didn’t get vaccinated

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,367]

On 9/2/2022 at 11:07 AM, Chronic Fockster said:

covid is over and you guys are still arguing that you were right about HQC and Ivermectin

and you're still arguing that there is a vaccine

[jerryskids 6,863]

Cali to punish doctors who spread Covid misinformation.

Quote

California approves bill that could punish doctors for spreading false COVID-19 claims

 

Tue, August 30, 2022 at 8:58 AM

 

 

Yahoo Finance's Anjalee Khemlani discusses a new California bill that could revoke medical licensing for doctors that spread COVID-19 misinformation.

Video Transcript

[AUDIO LOGO]

AKIKO FUJITA: California lawmakers are looking to tackle medical misinformation head on. The state legislature approved a bill that could punish doctors for spreading false claims about COVID-19. Yahoo Finance's Anjalee Khemlani here with the details. And Anjalee, I guess, the question here with California is what broader implications are there beyond this state?

ANJALEE KHEMLANI: Well, we know that other states could follow suit. California would be the first. And I want to make sure that we understand that misinformation and disinformation are in fact two separate concepts. And that's really important to understand.

So misinformation is actually the spread of information that goes against what scientific data tells us. And you can see that definition, according to the legislation, on your screen there.

And then disinformation is really propagated by anyone intentionally trying to spread that misinformation. So they're used interchangeably, you know, often but they do mean two very specific things. And that's important, because this could affect the medical licenses of these health individuals if they are caught spreading that misinformation and being proponents of that disinformation.

And that's where the law really comes down on health officials. Right now, you've seen, of course, like Twitter discourse and other social media discourse, where these health officials or experts are able to freely tout their opinion or speak about what the information they feel is the best.

We know that was the best example of that is the hydroxychloroquine debate, right? We saw so much, literally a circus around that. And so this really would help put an end to that, especially if we're going into an era of more focus on public health outbreaks and messaging, and the potential damage that comes from that.

BRIAN CHEUNG: Just underscoring the amount of noise that's out there. Yahoo Finance's Anjalee Khemlani, thanks so much.

https://finance.yahoo.com/video/california-approves-bill-could-punish-155856954.html

Top comment is a good one

Quote

Doctors better keep a dated record of CDC statements and recommendations; because, we know how much they have changed over the last 2 years. Information a doctor may have acquired from the CDC and told patients at the time, could be accused of spreading 'misinformation' after the CDC changes their mind.

Not to mention the further censoring of any discussion regarding alternative ideas

[Chronic Fockster 106]

9 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

and you're still arguing that there is a vaccine

No, there is no argument.  Everyone knows we have several vaccines.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,367]

14 minutes ago, Chronic Fockster said:

No, there is no argument.  Everyone knows we have several vaccines.

Cool let me know when they work

let me know when they do what Biden says they will do

[Hardcore troubadour 15,518]

2 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Cool let me know when they work

let me know when they do what Biden says they will do

This. When it starts working I’ll get it  again. I’m out for now. 

[TimHauck 2,942]

2 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Cool let me know when they work

let me know when they do what Biden says they will do

Revisionist history.  While not 100% like he claimed, the vaccines were 90 something % effective against infection pre-Delta, and around 60-80% effective against Delta infection.   It wasn’t until Omicron that their effectiveness against infection became minimal.  And their effectiveness against hospitalization and death of course has always been strong.  

[TimHauck 2,942]

27 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

This. When it starts working I’ll get it  again. I’m out for now. 

So you got the first 2?  They do work

[lickin_starfish 1,942]

I don't personally know anyone who died of coovids, the deadliest virus to ever strike mankind.

 

I do know multiple people with injection side effects.

[TimHauck 2,942]

19 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

I don't personally know anyone who died of coovids, the deadliest virus to ever strike mankind.

 

I do know multiple people with injection side effects.

Cool anecdotes, but even so, do you know anyone that died from the vaccine?  Do you know anyone that got really sick with Covid?  Your comparisons aren’t exactly equal.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,518]

57 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So you got the first 2?  They do work

Did I get it? 

[lickin_starfish 1,942]

 

6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Cool anecdotes, but even so, do you know anyone that died from the vaccine?  Do you know anyone that got really sick with Covid?  Your comparisons aren’t exactly equal.

I don't know anyone who got really sick from coof. I don't know anyone who died from the injections either.

My sister has been having seizures since getting the shots. In my personal world, it looks like the shots are worse than the coofs. Time will tell, I guess.

[Baker Boy 1,704]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

So you got the first 2?  They do work

I didn’t get the first 2, does that mean they work?

[nobody 2,699]

29 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

 

I don't know anyone who got really sick from coof. I don't know anyone who died from the injections either.

My sister has been having seizures since getting the shots. In my personal world, it looks like the shots are worse than the coofs. Time will tell, I guess.

You're doing the right thing by following personal experience.  Studies have shown to be rife with fraud... Despite Tim's ludicrous assertion that the fraud is limited to ivermectin studies.

[Baker Boy 1,704]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Revisionist history.  While not 100% like he claimed, the vaccines were 90 something % effective against infection pre-Delta, and around 60-80% effective against Delta infection.   It wasn’t until Omicron that their effectiveness against infection became minimal.  And their effectiveness against hospitalization and death of course has always been strong.  

Link

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,367]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Revisionist history.  While not 100% like he claimed, the vaccines were 90 something % effective against infection pre-Delta, and around 60-80% effective against Delta infection.   It wasn’t until Omicron that their effectiveness against infection became minimal.  And their effectiveness against hospitalization and death of course has always been strong.  

Sure when you change what it means to be effective. Like they’ve done with this “vaccine”

 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,367]

16 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

Link

Fauci said so. He’s the parrot 

[TimHauck 2,942]

19 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

Link

Read the thread

[TimHauck 2,942]

3 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Sure when you change what it means to be effective. Like they’ve done with this “vaccine”

 

Nope, not all vaccines are 100% effective, and I’m not having another argument with you about how you think the measles vaccine is 100% effective except when it’s not.