Media Event!! Jan 6th Propaganda!! Tonight!! Official Thread!!

[Reality 3,121]

 

 

[Voltaire 5,316]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They’ll get it back somehow. It’s a circular flow of money. Tax breaks , no regulation, access.  Jobs for has been politicians. Lizard Cheney will be the next ugly woman on MSNBC 

One hand is always washing the other in the crooked leftoid elite media, government, academia, big tech, Hollywood, corporatist insider world.

[Mike Honcho 5,281]

27 minutes ago, Reality said:

 

 

As the video production guy --- this is why we always tell our clients "if it's really important, you probably want the people who do this for a living to do i rather than a couple of people who say they used Premiere a few times"

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

1 minute ago, Mike Honcho said:

As the video production guy --- this is why we always tell our clients "if it's really important, you probably want the people who do this for a living to do i rather than a couple of people who say they used Premiere a few times"

Don’t they have a producer from ABC running this? 

[Utilit99 4,099]

30 minutes ago, Reality said:

 

 

Why are they calling it a "hearing" again?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

Just now, Utilit99 said:

Why are they calling it a "hearing" again?

Because they want to get to the bottom of the foregone conclusion. 

[Utilit99 4,099]

6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Because they want to get to the bottom of the foregone conclusion. 

Right. I would call it more of a speech. 

And if they have all this "evidence", why the heck are they sitting on it and spending all this time and money on these sitcoms instead of hauling Trump to court and putting him away for life right now?

Are they spending millions in tax payer's money to just savor the moment? To flaunt what they have? 

[Mike Honcho 5,281]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Don’t they have a producer from ABC running this? 

I saw they had a former producer from ABC involved, though I don't know to what extent.  And it wouldn't change the fact that 'in-house' video staffs are generally manned by people who couldn't cut it in real environments.

Just a guess, but here's how it went---Committee members at 8am, "Hey, we are going to change up the order of these files, pull those clips and insert these from guy B, and we are going to need that by 10".  
In-house staff.   

[Voltaire 5,316]

21 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

I saw they had a former producer from ABC involved, though I don't know to what extent.  And it wouldn't change the fact that 'in-house' video staffs are generally manned by people who couldn't cut it in real environments.

Just a guess, but here's how it went---Committee members at 8am, "Hey, we are going to change up the order of these files, pull those clips and insert these from guy B, and we are going to need that by 10".  
In-house staff.   

Not ready for Prime Time.... literally.

[Utilit99 4,099]

26 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

I saw they had a former producer from ABC involved, though I don't know to what extent.  And it wouldn't change the fact that 'in-house' video staffs are generally manned by people who couldn't cut it in real environments.

Just a guess, but here's how it went---Committee members at 8am, "Hey, we are going to change up the order of these files, pull those clips and insert these from guy B, and we are going to need that by 10".  
In-house staff.   

Adds to the sitcom value. This whole witch hunt can trend more towards 'Curb Your Enthusiasm' like style.  

[Reality 3,121]

Clownshow, plain all simple. 

[RLLD 4,230]

4 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So this is just a really long commercial for the DNC paid for by the tax payer. An infomercial if you will. Meant to get idiots to buy something that doesn’t work.  

So they think this will work perhaps to prevent Trump from getting back in and fixing all this sh!t.  Nice.....

[Utilit99 4,099]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

So they think this will work perhaps to prevent Trump from getting back in and fixing all this sh!t.  Nice.....

biden said "who cares about prices, we need to spend because it's helping people damnit."

[Fnord 2,272]

Just now, RLLD said:

So they think this will work perhaps to prevent Trump from getting back in and fixing all this sh!t.  Nice.....

Donald Trump doesn't know how to fix his own toast. He's gonna magically make the oil companies stop gouging us and end the war in Ukraine? You're funny. Trump is done, even if this doesn't end in him being indicted. 

[Hawkeye21 2,399]

4 minutes ago, RLLD said:

So they think this will work perhaps to prevent Trump from getting back in and fixing all this sh!t.  Nice.....

What would Trump be able to do?

[Utilit99 4,099]

4 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

What would Trump be able to do?

There's the "centrist" coming to speak up. 

Trump would have prevented all of this as he did while he was in office.

You really want to go down that road? Or is your TDS simply flairing up for a short bit?

[Hawkeye21 2,399]

Just now, Utilit99 said:

There's the "centrist" coming to speak up. 

Trump would have prevented all of this as he did while he was in office.

I'm curious what he would have down to do that.  How would he have done it?

What does not being left or right have anything to do with this?

[RLLD 4,230]

8 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Donald Trump doesn't know how to fix his own toast. He's gonna magically make the oil companies stop gouging us and end the war in Ukraine? You're funny. Trump is done, even if this doesn't end in him being indicted. 

I see, based on what?  Based on your logic, these oil companies had to wait for Trump to leave before they could do this. Or, are you going to pretend its a "Putin"thing.  Of courser you are free to believe what you want. But the available evidence supports standard macroeconomic factors, of course gas is expensive, it was easy to predict that based on failed Democrat policies

[Utilit99 4,099]

6 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I'm curious what he would have down to do that.  How would he have done it?

What does not being left or right have anything to do with this?

Trump would have kept the US energy independent. He quite possibly could have had an affect on deterring the Russian attack on Ukraine.

The US border would be closed. 

Simply put, a whole bunch of things would be better right now.

Your TDS is hurting your ability to think rationally.

[RLLD 4,230]

5 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I'm curious what he would have down to do that.  How would he have done it?

What does not being left or right have anything to do with this?

The easy answer is that he would not have stupidly attacked the energy companies.

Energy costs are a result of many factors, and one of them is speculation in the market. When Biden announced that he was going to take down oil companies you could see them starting to contract, hoarding cash, limiting risky source exploration.  It made perfect sense, it was the right thing to do.  They rightly understood that the Democrat policies were going to be ruinous so they setup to weather the next four years, until sane leadership would come back in and end the threat. 

Biden played his hand, too much, warned the oil companies, then shut down the pipeline, which was massively stupid as that ended it as a factor in supply speculation. 

This issue is 100% Democrat-driven failure. 

[wiffleball 4,790]

Huh, so Fox started carrying it now huh?

[RLLD 4,230]

4 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

Huh, so Fox started carrying it now huh?

I wonder why, its a loser from  ratings standpoint, its political theater.....what a waste. 

[Hawkeye21 2,399]

7 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Trump would have kept the US energy independent. He quite possibly could have had an affect on deterring the Russian attack on Ukraine.

The US border would be closed. 

Simply put, a whole bunch of things would be better right now.

Your TDS is hurting your ability to think rationally.

No TDS here, just wanting to here legit details for what he would have done.

[wiffleball 4,790]

5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I wonder why, its a loser from  ratings standpoint, its political theater.....what a waste. 

I don't blame them. The last time a republican went to the theater...

[Hawkeye21 2,399]

1 minute ago, wiffleball said:

I don't blame them. The last time a republican went to the theater...

Too soon, man.

[Utilit99 4,099]

9 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

I don't blame them. The last time a republican went to the theater...

Again, violent liberals....

[wiffleball 4,790]

11 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Again, violent liberals....

if the lanky dumbass had Netflix...

[dogcows 1,030]

21 hours ago, jerryskids said:

I do think it does.  By unbiased law enforcement agencies, not a partisan hack made-for-TV dog and pony show.  

 

If you have a Republican Senator, write to them and ask why they opposed an independent commission then. America deserves an independent commission to investigate this!

IMHO, they did it because they knew an investigation would expose a lot of things they wanted covered up. So, they blocked the independent commission, then when a House commission was created, McCarthy intentionally picked members with known connections to the events of that day. He knew that was not going to be allowed, so when they got rejected, he claimed that the commission is biased.

You can call it a dog and pony show all you want, but so far it’s been mostly sworn testimony and footage of events on that day.

A majority of Americans voted for Dems in 2020, and they want this commission, so it’s happening whether Republicans like it or not. They had a chance for an independent commission, and blocked it. This tells me that they have plenty to hide, and when it all gets exposed, they will only be able to fall back on the “but they’re biased against me!” claim.

[dogcows 1,030]

1 hour ago, RLLD said:

I wonder why, its a loser from  ratings standpoint, its political theater.....what a waste. 

Fox made the decision based on money probably. The cable networks that DID cover it live got more viewers than Fox, who usually gets the most.

[Utilit99 4,099]

2 minutes ago, dogcows said:

If you have a Republican Senator, write to them and ask why they opposed an independent commission then. America deserves an independent commission to investigate this!

IMHO, they did it because they knew an investigation would expose a lot of things they wanted covered up. So, they blocked the independent commission, then when a House commission was created, McCarthy intentionally picked members with known connections to the events of that day. He knew that was not going to be allowed, so when they got rejected, he claimed that the commission is biased.

You can call it a dog and pony show all you want, but so far it’s been mostly sworn testimony and footage of events on that day.

A majority of Americans voted for Dems in 2020, and they want this commission, so it’s happening whether Republicans like it or not. They had a chance for an independent commission, and blocked it. This tells me that they have plenty to hide, and when it all gets exposed, they will only be able to fall back on the “but they’re biased against me!” claim.

You know, you can easily show off your liberal ignorance in many less words. That would be be nice.

 

[RLLD 4,230]

17 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Fox made the decision based on money probably. The cable networks that DID cover it live got more viewers than Fox, who usually gets the most.

Well then that would make it make some sense. 

[Utilit99 4,099]

15 hours ago, dogcows said:

Fox made the decision based on money probably. The cable networks that DID cover it live got more viewers than Fox, who usually gets the most.

All networks together totalled 20M viewers. 

That's less than half of the state of the union.

People are seriously getting disinterested with this administration and their retarded followers.

[Baker Boy 1,699]

25 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Fox made the decision based on money probably. The cable networks that DID cover it live got more viewers than Fox, who usually gets the most.

Fox News Channel crushes CNN, MSNBC viewership combined for 43rd straight week

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/fox-news-crushes-cnn-msnbc-combined-43rd

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

2 hours ago, Fnord said:

Donald Trump doesn't know how to fix his own toast. He's gonna magically make the oil companies stop gouging us and end the war in Ukraine? You're funny. Trump is done, even if this doesn't end in him being indicted. 

That was fast. Not even a day. Clown shoes here lays out a whole essay on all the crimes Trump committed as per the “investigation” and now an indictment doesn’t matter. These jerkoffs never fail to amuse. 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

7 hours ago, Voltaire said:

One hand is always washing the other in the crooked leftoid elite media, government, academia, big tech, Hollywood, corporatist insider world.

i really dont think lefties wash , use soap, etc.

[Utilit99 4,099]

1 minute ago, JustinCharge said:

i really dont think lefties wash , use soap, etc.

Maybe they wipe their asses with leaves?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

In the 2020 election Joe Biden got the most votes in history by a wide margin, and yet the democrats lost seats in the house. Weird. 

[Voltaire 5,316]

So Fox is broadcasting this now? 

It's half done, right? :tubgirl:

[Utilit99 4,099]

13 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

That was fast. Not even a day. Clown shoes here lays out a whole essay on all the crimes Trump committed as per the “investigation” and now an indictment doesn’t matter. These jerkoffs never fail to amuse. 

You are spoiling fnord's glorious return to this board which just happened to coincide with the liberal sitcom they are putting on.

He came ready to bring it and now you hurt his feelers. 

[Reality 3,121]

Dog and pony show.