Trump's residence raided by the FBI

[Hardcore troubadour 15,493]

11 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Just so I'm on the same page, exactly what is the "Russia hoax"?  Exactly what was the hoax?

The Steele dossier, you know, the one with the pee tape. The whole basis for it. I’ll hang up and listen.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,493]

9 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I don't like or care for Biden.  I am fully on board with him being investigated as well.  Do whatever needs to be done to take down Joe and Hunter and whatever other crap you want done with the Bidens.  I don't defend the Bidens.

But it won’t be done. It’s been obstructed. Why is that ok? You’re good with the DOJ only going after one guy? One political party? Don’t bother standing for the National Anthem if you are. 

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

Just now, craftsman said:

Ok. No valid investigations. Now you. Of all the 5000 investigations on Trump, which ones were valid?

Are you saying every single one of these in not valid?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2022/feb/07/donald-trump-list-legal-cases

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

But it won’t be done. It’s been obstructed. Why is that ok? You’re good with the DOJ only going after one guy? One political party? Don’t bother standing for the National Anthem if you are. 

I never said it's ok.  I'm not ok with them only going after one person or one party but that's what this specific thread is about.

You can take your, I'm more American that everyone else, BS and shove it up your ass.  Could you be any more insecure with yourself?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,493]

4 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Are you saying every single one of these in not valid?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2022/feb/07/donald-trump-list-legal-cases

So they are O-fer so far.  You really helped your case here. Again, you want to investigate a person, not a crime. That’s not how it works. It’s sad you don’t believe in that. It really is. 

[Mike Honcho 5,294]

12 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The Steele dossier, you know, the one with the pee tape. The whole basis for it. I’ll hang up and listen.  

What is it---what is the hoax?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,493]

1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I never said it's ok.  I'm not ok with them only going after one person or one party but that's what this specific thread is about.

You can take your, I'm more American that everyone else, BS and shove it up your ass.  Could you be any more insecure with yourself?

One thing I’m not is insecure. I’m other stuff that’s not so great, but not that. I have too many pelts on my wall to be insecure. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,493]

1 minute ago, Mike Honcho said:

What is it---what is the hoax?

Oh Fock off. You obviously don’t have a clue. If it wasn’t a hoax then why wasn’t he charged after a three year investigation? 

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So they are O-fer so far.  You really helped your case here. Again, you want to investigate a person, not a crime. That’s not how it works. It’s sad you don’t believe in that. It really is. 

If a man's wife was killed, would you find it reasonable to investigate the husband?  Even if they found him to be innocent there was still a legit reason to investigate him.  A person doesn't need to be found guilty in order for that investigation to be considered legit.  Does that make sense?

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I have too many pelts on my wall to be insecure. 

Comments like this is what makes you sound insecure.  I'm sure you're not but you sure sound like it when posting on here.  You put people down and tell them they aren't real Americans or real men.  That's like textbook for a person who is insecure and doesn't like himself.

[TimmySmith 2,782]

3 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

If a man's wife was killed, would you find it reasonable to investigate the husband?  Even if they found him to be innocent there was still a legit reason to investigate him.  A person doesn't need to be found guilty in order for that investigation to be considered legit.  Does that make sense?

Nope doesn't make sense at all because obviously her death is not a legit reason,  Dumass.    

[Hardcore troubadour 15,493]

3 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

If a man's wife was killed, would you find it reasonable to investigate the husband?  Even if they found him to be innocent there was still a legit reason to investigate him.  A person doesn't need to be found guilty in order for that investigation to be considered legit.  Does that make sense?

You would be investigating the crime in that instance. Crime first idiot. 

[Mike Honcho 5,294]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Oh Fock off. You obviously don’t have a clue. If it wasn’t a hoax then why wasn’t he charged after a three year investigation? 

I don't think any of you have a clue--Trump says 'Russia hoax" and you just parrot it,  cause the Mueller report(that investigation) was an investigation into Russian interference and attempts to sway the 2016 US election.  Are you saying that Putin/Russia didn't put a finger on the scales during that election, that's the hoax...cause all the evidence says otherwise. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,493]

5 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

I don't think any of you have a clue--Trump says 'Russia hoax" and you just parrot it,  cause the Mueller report(that investigation) was an investigation into Russian interference and attempts to sway the 2016 US election.  Are you saying that Putin/Russia didn't put a finger on the scales during that election, that's the hoax...cause all the evidence says otherwise. 

Yeah, and the reason for the investigation is because it was alleged Trump colluded. That’s the hoax part. Damn man, you people can just forget anything and just jump to the next bullshit OMB conspiracy as if the prior ones never happened. You’re like the guy at roulette who keeps playing the same number and then celebrates when it finally hits, forgetting the other 30x it didn’t. But you’re still waiting for it to hit. 

[TimmySmith 2,782]

6 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

I don't think any of you have a clue--Trump says 'Russia hoax" and you just parrot it,  cause the Mueller report(that investigation) was an investigation into Russian interference and attempts to sway the 2016 US election.  Are you saying that Putin/Russia didn't put a finger on the scales during that election, that's the hoax...cause all the evidence says otherwise. 

OK, but what does it have to do with Trump? 

[Mike Honcho 5,294]

34 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Yeah, and the reason for the investigation is because it was alleged Trump colluded. That’s the hoax part. Damn man, you people can just forget anything and just jump to the next bullshit OMB conspiracy as if the prior ones never happened. You’re like the guy at roulette who keeps playing the same number and then celebrates when it finally hits, forgetting the other 30x it didn’t. But you’re still waiting for it to hit. 

This isn't true, the investigation started because Russia interfered into the election, allegations of Trump/campaign collusion came after---when it became clear people like Manafort and Stone were sharing information and having associations with Russian Intelligence.  "you people" and your ability to twist, forget, change facts, move the goalposts, anything to reason your way to it's a conspiracy is unparalleled. 

32 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

OK, but what does it have to do with Trump? 

Trump campaign members shared information with Russia/operatives.  Manafort has admitted this and Stone went to jail for lying about it.  The biggest reason it has to do with Trump is that he's a giant baby who doesn't want anything to take the shine off his election. He's the one that made it as big as it was cause his fragile little ego couldn't handle the fact that without PUTIN'S interference, he doesn't see the White House without buying a ticket.

[avoiding injuries 1,592]

Our friend from Iowa is having a rough page 56. 

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

7 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

Our friend from Iowa is having a rough page 56. 

I’m doing fine. It’s just a forum with a bunch of goofballs. 

[MDC 7,484]

1 hour ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Comments like this is what makes you sound insecure.  I'm sure you're not but you sure sound like it when posting on here.  You put people down and tell them they aren't real Americans or real men.  That's like textbook for a person who is insecure and doesn't like himself.

HT keeps a Tough Guy Resume. lol 

[avoiding injuries 1,592]

7 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I’m doing fine. It’s just a forum with a bunch of goofballs. 

To clarify, are you going back to before Trump was POTUS to validate an investigation, or do you think there was a valid investigation on him while he was President? 

[nobody 2,690]

3 hours ago, Horseman said:

Right on cue. 

Link?

Time to go clean the cat litter!

I saw you said "mute point" awhile back.  Although I think a second grader would make that mistake too.

[Horseman 2,476]

32 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

This isn't true, the investigation started because Russia interfered into the election, allegations of Trump/campaign collusion came after---when it became clear people like Manafort and Stone were sharing information and having associations with Russian Intelligence.  "you people" and your ability to twist, forget, change facts, move the goalposts, anything to reason your way to it's a conspiracy is unparalleled. 

Trump campaign members shared information with Russia/operatives.  Manafort has admitted this and Stone went to jail for lying about it.  The biggest reason it has to do with Trump is that he's a giant baby who doesn't want anything to take the shine off his election. He's the one that made it as big as it was cause his fragile little ego couldn't handle the fact that without PUTIN'S interference, he doesn't see the White House without buying a ticket.

False. 

[Chronic Fockster 106]

1 minute ago, nobody said:

I saw you said "mute point" awhile back.  Although I think a second grader would make that mistake too.

Oh great now he's make his grammar police post again.

[Mike Honcho 5,294]

Andrew P. Napolitano thinks Trump will soon be indicted.    

[Hardcore troubadour 15,493]

17 minutes ago, MDC said:

HT keeps a Tough Guy Resume. lol 

Someone has to be. Imagine counting on you, mascara tranny? 

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

15 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Andrew P. Napolitano thinks Trump will soon be indicted.    

I'm assuming they will discredit it or not read it because it's the Washington Times.

[craftsman 1,045]

2 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Are you saying every single one of these in not valid?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2022/feb/07/donald-trump-list-legal-cases

Which one is valid?

[craftsman 1,045]

1 hour ago, nobody said:

I saw you said "mute point" awhile back.  Although I think a second grader would make that mistake too.

Jeez, another grammer/spelling cop? 

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

2 minutes ago, craftsman said:

Which one is valid?

They all looked to have good reason for investigating.

[craftsman 1,045]

1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said:

Andrew P. Napolitano thinks Trump will soon be indicted.    

So a guy gets indicted for declassifying documents and taking them home?

I don't put anything past the liberals in this country. They have been trying for 7 years now. 

Talk about obsessive hatred waiting to take down a political opponent. And you cheer this sh*t on? 

I bet if you were a German in Germany in the late 1930's you would be all in for building ovens to gas the Jews. Except without the little smiley faces.

[wiffleball 4,790]

Trump kinda shot himself in the foot in this case. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

But it won’t be done. It’s been obstructed. Why is that ok? You’re good with the DOJ only going after one guy? One political party? Don’t bother standing for the National Anthem if you are. 

The DOJ is investigating Hunter Biden. When will the indictment come?

[taco breath 424]

update

[craftsman 1,045]

10 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

The DOJ is investigating Hunter Biden. When will the indictment come?

Hunter Biden is not a politician and the DOJ openly admitted they won't say whether they are investigating him or not.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,493]

15 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

The DOJ is investigating Hunter Biden. When will the indictment come?

You think that helps your point? Lol. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

25 minutes ago, craftsman said:

So a guy gets indicted for declassifying documents and taking them home?

I don't put anything past the liberals in this country. They have been trying for 7 years now. 

Talk about obsessive hatred wating to take down a political opponent. And you cheer this sh*t on? 

I bet if you were a German in Germany in the late 1930's you would be all in for building ovens to gas the Jews. Except without the little smiley faces.

Quote

Under the law, it doesn’t matter if the documents on which NDI is contained are classified or not, as it is simply and always criminal to have NDI in a non-federal facility, to have those without security clearances move it from one place to another, and to keep it from the feds when they are seeking it. Stated differently, the absence of classification — for whatever reason — is not a defense to the charges that are likely to be filed against Mr. Trump.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

You think that helps your point? Lol. 

You asked if it were OK for the DOJ "only going after one guy."

Well, they're not. They're investigating Hunter Biden as well. 

So your point is about as useless as teets on a chicken.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,493]

1 hour ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I'm assuming they will discredit it or not read it because it's the Washington Times.

I’ll discredit it because it’s Napolitano. Besides the fact that he’s a bitter Trump hater because he wasn’t nominated for the SC after carrying Trumps water, he’s almost certainly a pedophile. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,493]

2 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

You asked if it were OK for the DOJ "only going after one guy."

Well, they're not. They're investigating Hunter Biden as well. 

So your point is about as useless as teets on a chicken.

The same DOJ that buried the laptop is now dragging its heels and you think that proves they aren’t biased?  They “investigated “ Hillary too. Lol. You live in a delusional state. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,493]

1 hour ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I'm assuming they will discredit it or not read it because it's the Washington Times.

Also, the Washington Times is considered right leaning you uninformed dolt.