Strike 5,535 Posted January 18, 2023 2 minutes ago, RLLD said: So perhaps we have a reason why its all coming to light out of the blue, AND why its Biden's lawyers that are locating these things.....subpoenas associated with the Hunter Biden investigation, this is what seems to correlate. I don't understand your point. Can you expand? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,230 Posted January 18, 2023 1 hour ago, Strike said: I don't understand your point. Can you expand? Earlier in this thread I noted that I found it odd that this suddenly came up. It just did not seem "right". I would not expect the Democrat cabal to allow such truth to emerge into the spot light, so why? And moreover, why are we hearing it is the lawyers involved.....that is also rather odd... What makes the most sense is that there was a subpoena that arose from the Hunter Biden investigations, that would explain the involvement of the lawyers. Then things were discovered, which led to a wider look and then more were discovered. I was wondering how it all came to pass and I bet this is how. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted January 18, 2023 6 minutes ago, RLLD said: Earlier in this thread I noted that I found it odd that this suddenly came up. It just did not seem "right". I would not expect the Democrat cabal to allow such truth to emerge into the spot light, so why? And moreover, why are we hearing it is the lawyers involved.....that is also rather odd... What makes the most sense is that there was a subpoena that arose from the Hunter Biden investigations, that would explain the involvement of the lawyers. Then things were discovered, which led to a wider look and then more were discovered. I was wondering how it all came to pass and I bet this is how. Now his lawyers are witnesses, yet I bet they access and sit in on meetings that they really shouldn't be involved in because they are witnesses. But that didn't stop Hillary's witness lawyers some years back and I bet it doesn't stop Biden's either. I seriously am losing track of this most likely because Biden and his posse want the confusion and at the right time this will be washed away in one manner or another. I wish they would get their hands more dirty into Hunter's laptop honestly. Everyone knows there is stuff on there that is bad as can be. And even the left would have to impeach Joe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,408 Posted January 18, 2023 Obama gave the green light. Get him. Just a matter of time Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,408 Posted January 18, 2023 So, Biden was allowed to have e his lawyers go over the documents and turn over what they wanted to. The cover up is on, and it’s right in your face. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,535 Posted January 18, 2023 1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said: So, Biden was allowed to have e his lawyers go over the documents and turn over what they wanted to. The cover up is on, and it’s right in your face. Oh yeah, without a doubt. They're using the same playbook they used with Hitlery's e-mail server. The FBI didn't memorialize their initial interview with Biden's attorney on a 302 form: https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/17/politics/patrick-moore-attorney-interviewed-biden-classified-documents Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zsasz 369 Posted January 18, 2023 Love the hand wringing from the Right on this. Gonna love even more the heads exploding on the Right when Biden pardons himself, Hunter and anyone else. Gonna be EPIC! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted January 18, 2023 2 minutes ago, zsasz said: Love the hand wringing from the Right on this. Gonna love even more the heads exploding on the Right when Biden pardons himself, Hunter and anyone else. Gonna be EPIC! Of course you do, the left has no soul. Everything you accuse the right of being, you actually are. None of this is surprising to any of us. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted January 18, 2023 Just now, Reality said: Of course you do, the left has no soul. Everything you accuse the right of being, you actually are. None of this is surprising to any of us. Right? Shocking I tell you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zsasz 369 Posted January 18, 2023 41 minutes ago, Reality said: Of course you do, the left has no soul. Everything you accuse the right of being, you actually are. None of this is surprising to any of us. Neither Right nor Left, Chooch. I sit in the Center mocking both sides because of your hypocritical natures. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted January 18, 2023 3 minutes ago, zsasz said: Neither Right nor Left, Chooch. I sit in the Center mocking both sides because of your hypocritical natures. Sure, bud. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,408 Posted January 18, 2023 3 minutes ago, zsasz said: Neither Right nor Left, Chooch. I sit in the Center mocking both sides because of your hypocritical natures. Sure you do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zsasz 369 Posted January 18, 2023 1 minute ago, Reality said: Sure, bud. Just now, Hardcore troubadour said: Sure you do. What...you guys got those matching sweaters couples wear, too? Fecking Stantler and Waldorf here...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,408 Posted January 18, 2023 5 minutes ago, zsasz said: What...you guys got those matching sweaters couples wear, too? Fecking Stantler and Waldorf here...... No. We have just heard this schtick enough times at this point. You won’t be anywhere near being down the middle. A that’s ok, just admit it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted January 18, 2023 6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: No. We have just heard this schtick enough times at this point. You won’t be anywhere near being down the middle. A that’s ok, just admit it. Yup, just own it. It's odd how afraid those on the left are of admitting what they are. Like, hey, maybe I'm just left of center... Nope, can't even go that far. Says quite a bit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,408 Posted January 18, 2023 27 minutes ago, Reality said: Yup, just own it. It's odd how afraid those on the left are of admitting what they are. Like, hey, maybe I'm just left of center... Nope, can't even go that far. Says quite a bit. Self delusion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,230 Posted January 19, 2023 16 hours ago, Reality said: Of course you do, the left has no soul. Everything you accuse the right of being, you actually are. None of this is surprising to any of us. It is fascinating how true this is. As soon as I hear a liberal accusation I know that is EXACTLY what they are doing….. DOJ should investigate any accusation….to both sides…. The projection is sustained and virulent Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,935 Posted January 19, 2023 https://media.communities.win/post/RroN8OAV4Xmn.jpeg 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted January 19, 2023 8 hours ago, RLLD said: It is fascinating how true this is. As soon as I hear a liberal accusation I know that is EXACTLY what they are doing….. DOJ should investigate any accusation….to both sides…. The projection is sustained and virulent It's how the liberals stay ahead of things. Their practice of doing that makes every correct conservative accusation against the liberals look more like base retaliation from the conservatives rather than the truth the conservatives actually are calling out correctly. It's like if I stole $200 from you and immediately I accuse you of stealing $200 from me. And later you retort with the accusation that I stole $200 from you. What do outsiders know of this situation and what initial reaction are they going to have? Possibly many would think that you are just saying it to get back at me and to deflect. Liberal voters fall for that crap all the time because they in general have a lower intelligence and are susceptible to such tricks and they are an angrier and more hate filled group than conservatives in general. So the lefty politicians solidify their base and even pull a few more dopes in from time to time. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,230 Posted January 20, 2023 The canary in the coal mine might be CNN, who has recently started to apparently uphold their role and do some real reporting on Biden. They are finally reporting (admitting) that ole Joe DID know about Hunters dealings with foreign nationals, and even met with these people directly. Sure it was evident to anyone with a brain a long time ago. He CNN welcome to the party Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted January 20, 2023 2 minutes ago, RLLD said: The canary in the coal mine might be CNN, who has recently started to apparently uphold their role and do some real reporting on Biden. They are finally reporting (admitting) that ole Joe DID know about Hunters dealings with foreign nationals, and even met with these people directly. Sure it was evident to anyone with a brain a long time ago. He CNN welcome to the party Maybe they actually found a doctor who has a cure for TDS. That type of malaise that TDS puts one in can be quite the destructive force on liberals. Either way, if they are really doing serious work, then they should be put on probation from now through the next presidential election and see how they stand up to actual fair and unbiased coverage standard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,408 Posted January 20, 2023 16 minutes ago, RLLD said: The canary in the coal mine might be CNN, who has recently started to apparently uphold their role and do some real reporting on Biden. They are finally reporting (admitting) that ole Joe DID know about Hunters dealings with foreign nationals, and even met with these people directly. Sure it was evident to anyone with a brain a long time ago. He CNN welcome to the party They aren’t joining the party. They are being given an order. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,230 Posted January 20, 2023 "I just answered your question"........."No you didnt" Fock yeah....they are finally holding that lying ###### to it.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,348 Posted January 20, 2023 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11646417/Joe-Biden-named-2017-email-discussing-multi-million-dollar-gas-deal-China.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,230 Posted January 20, 2023 Has Biden lost the protection of CNN? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,535 Posted January 22, 2023 So the doj searched biden's home yesterday and found more classified documents, some of which date back to his time in the Senate. Joe can no longer claim it was just an accident packing up his office as VP. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,755 Posted January 22, 2023 11 minutes ago, Strike said: So the doj searched biden's home yesterday and found more classified documents, some of which date back to his time in the Senate. Joe can no longer claim it was just an accident packing up his office as VP. If he really did something wrong here he needs to be held to account. I doubt that’s the case, but it’s pretty embarrassing either way. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorepatrol 1,870 Posted January 22, 2023 11 minutes ago, Strike said: So the doj searched biden's home yesterday and found more classified documents, some of which date back to his time in the Senate. Joe can no longer claim it was just an accident packing up his office as VP. But there is no "there there", just ask uncle shithispants. The hypocrisy is STUNNING and they say it with a straight face Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,535 Posted January 22, 2023 2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: If he really did something wrong here he needs to be held to account. I doubt that’s the case, but it’s pretty embarrassing either way. What do you mean if? He can't have classified documents. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,315 Posted January 22, 2023 On 1/19/2023 at 9:40 PM, craftsman said: Maybe they actually found a doctor who has a cure for TDS. That type of malaise that TDS puts one in can be quite the destructive force on liberals. Either way, if they are really doing serious work, then they should be put on probation from now through the next presidential election and see how they stand up to actual fair and unbiased coverage standard. The new ownership at CNN wants the network to be more down the middle impartial like they use to be back in the day with Bernard Shaw and them. I wouldn't know how dedicated they are or how successful that has been implemented since I'm not in the habit of watching TV att all, let alone CNN. But hey... it's worth monitoring. If they really are going to make an effort to adhere to what use to be old school journalistic ethics rather than pretending and mouthing the words, they'll deserve less criticism and to be taken seriously again moving forward. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted January 22, 2023 30 minutes ago, Voltaire said: The new ownership at CNN wants the network to be more down the middle impartial like they use to be back in the day with Bernard Shaw and them. I wouldn't know how dedicated they are or how successful that has been implemented since I'm not in the habit of watching TV att all, let alone CNN. But hey... it's worth monitoring. If they really are going to make an effort to adhere to what use to be old school journalistic ethics rather than pretending and mouthing the words, they'll deserve less criticism and to be taken seriously again moving forward. I haven't turned on a television news show since 2020 election night. So I'm with ya there. I do look at what stories are out there and what the different slants the different networks put on things. Some radio listen in the car too though not a lot lately. I hope CNN goes middle of the road, they have been so insufferable for years now. I think msnbc is still nut job crazy left and whatever those "The View" hags are on. I'm am so sick of liberals calling everybody racists and white supremacists and misogynists and whatever else they throw out there willy-nilly. I can't be the only one out there feeling the same way. It's so tiring. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,755 Posted January 22, 2023 1 hour ago, Strike said: What do you mean if? He can't have classified documents. I meant what I wrote. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,755 Posted January 22, 2023 55 minutes ago, Voltaire said: The new ownership at CNN wants the network to be more down the middle impartial like they use to be back in the day with Bernard Shaw and them. I wouldn't know how dedicated they are or how successful that has been implemented since I'm not in the habit of watching TV att all, let alone CNN. But hey... it's worth monitoring. If they really are going to make an effort to adhere to what use to be old school journalistic ethics rather than pretending and mouthing the words, they'll deserve less criticism and to be taken seriously again moving forward. I don’t think their news reporting was bad at all. Their opinion shows were certainly geared to the left but so what? That’s no proof of media bias. When it comes to reporting the news, there is no liberal bias in the MSM and never has been. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,315 Posted January 22, 2023 12 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: I don’t think their news reporting was bad at all. Their opinion shows were certainly geared to the left but so what? That’s no proof of media bias. When it comes to reporting the news, there is no liberal bias in the MSM and never has been. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,315 Posted January 22, 2023 23 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: I don’t think their news reporting was bad at all. Their opinion shows were certainly geared to the left but so what? That’s no proof of media bias. When it comes to reporting the news, there is no liberal bias in the MSM and never has been. After this, I don't ever believe when the media tells me a protest is peaceful. They may be, they may not, but .... how do people know when they see this happens? The words "mostly peaceful" don't have any meaning with this journalist and CNN's laughable chiron. I can see that they're lying to me. How deep does that run in corporate media outlets? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,755 Posted January 22, 2023 32 minutes ago, Voltaire said: After this, I don't ever believe when the media tells me a protest is peaceful. They may be, they may not, but .... how do people know when they see this happens? The words "mostly peaceful" don't have any meaning with this journalist and CNN's laughable chiron. I can see that they're lying to me. How deep does that run in corporate media outlets? Naturally you bring up the one extreme example that everybody and their mother has seen a million times. It’s an almost unique anecdote. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,755 Posted January 22, 2023 And BTW that protest, like most of the George Floyd protests, WERE mostly peaceful. The looting and riots were carried out a small minority who were not in any way representative of the vast majority who participated in the protests. CNN was trying to point this out and they did a poor job of it. But their intent was correct. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,315 Posted January 22, 2023 Just now, The Real timschochet said: And BTW that protest, like most of the George Floyd protests, WERE mostly peaceful. The looting and riots were carried out a small minority who were not in any way representative of the vast majority who participated in the protests. CNN was trying to point this out and they did a poor job of it. But their intent was correct. i watched like three hours of on the ground livefeed (I had not watched it live) footage on the day of the Rittenhouse shooting and before those two minutes or so, it was very NOT peaceful. In fairness, I don't recall if that was the day this happened or before or after. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted January 22, 2023 14 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: And BTW that protest, like most of the George Floyd protests, WERE mostly peaceful. The looting and riots were carried out a small minority who were not in any way representative of the vast majority who participated in the protests. CNN was trying to point this out and they did a poor job of it. But their intent was correct. Two billion dollars of insurance claims alone and multiple deaths and injuries of "mostly peaceful". You all are so ignorant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,315 Posted January 22, 2023 27 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: And BTW that protest, like most of the George Floyd protests, WERE mostly peaceful. The looting and riots were carried out a small minority who were not in any way representative of the vast majority who participated in the protests. CNN was trying to point this out and they did a poor job of it. But their intent was correct. I was in China at the time, there were two protests in Macomb County, Michigan that I paid attention to, one along Hall Road and another along Van Dyke. The media reported those as "peaceful protests" but I didn't believe a word of it because this was after what CNN had done. So each time, I expended a good deal of time and effort to find out the truth. By all accounts they actually were peaceful. So I believe those those were accurately reported and, in turn, I got some reassurance that the marchers were capable of marching peaceably as the media claimed they did. But any other reports of peaceful protests... I don't know to believe or not since I didn't put in the time to verify. I will say that my impression based on two actual protests I knew to be accurately peaceful improved markedly. Still, my trust in journalists is shattered. I've no more trust in paid corporate journalists than I do in JoeBlowYahoo6361 who I first learned about five minutes ago. Some journalists I trust implicitly like Glenn Greenwald, Bari Weiss, and Matt Taibi, but they have to earn my trust after years of professionalism and consistency. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites