White people "get the hell away from black people"

[Hardcore troubadour 14,959]

12 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Statistically, a white person is MUCH more likely to be victimized by another white person. Over 80% of white murder victims (for example) were killed by other white people. That’s not unique to white people either. Almost all murders are among one’s own racial group.

So, it doesn’t actually make sense for white people to be afraid of black people. It DEFINITELY doesn’t make sense for them to teach their kids to be afraid of black people. That is, if we really are talking about being prudent, or doing the math.

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-29/race-and-homicide-in-america-by-the-numbers

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-data-racial-murder-idUSKCN24I2A9

Hispanics are white now? Why didn’t you just say so? What a joke. 

[Patented Phil 1,469]

44 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Ok so blacks are bad unless you first get to know them, then they can be tolerable, got it.  And whites?  Are whites assumed good when you don't know them?

Listen to this hypocrite. Pretty sure you judged Derek Chauvin as a racist, correct?  What evidence was that based on exactly?

[GutterBoy 2,898]

5 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

Listen to this hypocrite. Pretty sure you judged Derek Chauvin as a racist, correct?  What evidence was that based on exactly?

Pretty sure I never said anything about Derek chauvin here.

[HellToupee 1,596]

1 hour ago, Wade Garrett said:

cultist

[HellToupee 1,596]

59 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

cultist

[HellToupee 1,596]

57 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

cultist

[Patented Phil 1,469]

1 hour ago, dogcows said:

Statistically, a white person is MUCH more likely to be victimized by another white person. Over 80% of white murder victims (for example) were killed by other white people. That’s not unique to white people either. Almost all murders are among one’s own racial group.

So, it doesn’t actually make sense for white people to be afraid of black people. It DEFINITELY doesn’t make sense for them to teach their kids to be afraid of black people. That is, if we really are talking about being prudent, or doing the math.

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-29/race-and-homicide-in-america-by-the-numbers

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-data-racial-murder-idUSKCN24I2A9

Hey, um, Dogshitt?  The math doesn’t work that way pal.  I’ll keep it real simple for you…

Blacks make up 13% of the population

Through mid-May there were 400 interracial homicides.

All things being equal you’d expect 13% of those interracial homicides, or 52 to be precise, to have been committed by blacks.

In actuality, blacks committed 66% of all interracial homicides, or 264.

Whites committed only 12.8% of all interracial homicides, or 51.

FACT - Blacks kill whites at a MUCH higher rate than whites kill blacks.

[Patented Phil 1,469]

45 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Pretty sure I never said anything about Derek chauvin here.

 “here”

[GutterBoy 2,898]

1 minute ago, Patented Phil said:

Hey, um, Dogshitt?  The math doesn’t work that way pal.  I’ll keep it real simple for you…

Blacks make up 13% of the population

Through mid-May there were 400 interracial homicides.

All things being equal you’d expect 13% of those interracial homicides, or 52 to be precise, to have been committed by blacks.

In actuality, blacks committed 66% of all interracial homicides, or 264.

Whites committed only 12.8% of all interracial homicides, or 51.

FACT - Blacks kill whites at a MUCH higher rate than whites kill blacks.

As a white person, you're more likely to be murdered by another white person than a black person.  Fact.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

Just now, Patented Phil said:

 “here”

For the record, I have no idea if he's a racist or not.

[Patented Phil 1,469]

2 hours ago, avoiding injuries said:

RaCiSt!1!1!1

When you reach a certain point in your life you can avoid situations and places where you need to be cautious. Which most people, including yourself and the other loser liberals in this thread, do. Kids still have a lot of experiences to go through where they need to be cautious/careful/aware. You’re naive or obtuse. 
Oh, and chances are good that your black co-workers don’t like you. Now get off the internet and back into your pathetic life. 

Now THAT’S a smack down.

Unfortunately that feeble-minded WadeTard doesn’t know when to tap out.  He’s way out of his league in here.

[dogcows 1,030]

From the department of people being the different one, and feeling uncomfortable about it:

 

[Patented Phil 1,469]

54 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

As a white person, you're more likely to be murdered by another white person than a black person.  Fact.

And water is wet dumbass.  Who is arguing that blacks kill more whites than whites do?  YOU created that strawman.

[dogcows 1,030]

51 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

As a white person, you're more likely to be murdered by another white person than a black person.  Fact.

Weak-minded pillow-biters can’t handle facts like that. So they retreat to regurgitating talking points.

[dogcows 1,030]

2 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

And water is wet dumbass.  Who is arguing that blacks kill more whites than whites do?  YOU created that strawman.

Actually, it’s the exact topic we were discussing, until you hopped in with a bunch of unrelated numbers. The whole discussion is about whether people should feel nervous if they are the only white person in a black neighborhood. And they said “math” proved they should be scared. When the “math” actually shows they are in more danger from white people.

[Patented Phil 1,469]

On 5/5/2023 at 9:47 PM, GutterBoy said:

Speaking of epidemics, another cop child rapist.  At this point you have to assume they all are.

 

 

On 5/6/2023 at 5:01 PM, GutterBoy said:

At this point if you're a Christian conservative cop male, 98% chance you've abused a kid.  100% if you also wish rape on kids 

LOL at GutterPedo getting all indignant about prejudice.  

His lack of self awareness is scary.

[edjr 6,578]

3 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

I'm calling people racist who think blacks are dangerous based on skin color, and teach their kids this.

100% 

[Patented Phil 1,469]

13 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Actually, it’s the exact topic we were discussing, until you hopped in with a bunch of unrelated numbers. The whole discussion is about whether people should feel nervous if they are the only white person in a black neighborhood. And they said “math” proved they should be scared. When the “math” actually shows they are in more danger from white people.

Is it possible, just possible, that the frequency of interactions between white/white and white/black should be factored in here?  Good Lord dude, use your focking head.  EVERY statistic and every comparative analysis says that blacks are much more dangerous to whites than whites are.

Is this why you Libtards went on the kick that math is racist?  

[Patented Phil 1,469]

1 hour ago, edjr said:

100% 

Stop being such a virtue-signaler. It’s cowardly.  You’re smart enough to know this is a broader and more nuanced issue.

[seafoam1 2,804]

6 hours ago, dogcows said:

From the department of people being the different one, and feeling uncomfortable about it:

 

Who cares?

[Hardcore troubadour 14,959]

So yeah, black criminal justice walks up to two white people and murders them for no reason in front of their children and pretty much crickets from the left wing media. They have an agenda and that agenda is pushing a myth.  

[Voltaire 5,203]

1 hour ago, seafoam1 said:

Who cares?

I don't know why dogcows posted the image or felt it was relevant but that's pretty callous. The image is disturbing, implies she was bullied mercilessly and you have to assume she was. She's a lonely pioneering child integrating the school in the wake of Brown vs Board of Education. In that same era, Jackie Robinson endured terrible harassment and kids are much crueler than adults.

 

[seafoam1 2,804]

25 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

I don't know why dogcows posted the image or felt it was relevant but that's pretty callous. The image is disturbing, implies she was bullied mercilessly and you have to assume she was. She's a lonely pioneering child integrating the school in the wake of Brown vs Board of Education. In that same era, Jackie Robinson endured terrible harassment and kids are much crueler than adults.

 

Why would you use the words "bullied mercilessly" if you don't know if she was or not? She may have been beaten by her parents mercilessly. Or is that to hard to believe because that never happens?

But that all aside, kids of all races are bullied current day. Fat kids in current day are bullied. Kids that look different are bullied. In current day. WTF? Kids go back and shoot up schools because they were bullied but the topic then turns into guns or whatever. Not a race thing if they are white. But if they are black, IT'S RACIST!!

We are living in 2023. All the "keep the black man down" was real 60 years ago. Not today and there is no reason keep living in the past.  

In current day US, how many people are being killed daily in inner city democrat run cities? They never get these little pictures because it's black people who are killing them. Shhhh......

 

 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

32 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

I don't know why dogcows posted the image or felt it was relevant but that's pretty callous. The image is disturbing, implies she was bullied mercilessly and you have to assume she was. She's a lonely pioneering child integrating the school in the wake of Brown vs Board of Education. In that same era, Jackie Robinson endured terrible harassment and kids are much crueler than adults.

 

Disturbing?  Seriously?

Its heroic.  Look at how brave that little girl is.  Come on man.

[League Champion 1,896]

12 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Disturbing?  Seriously?

Its heroic.  Look at how brave that little girl is.  Come on man.

Heroic indeed 

 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,959]

Just now, League Champion said:

Heroic indeed 

 

 

Highly educated. 

[Voltaire 5,203]

53 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Why would you use the words "bullied mercilessly" if you don't know if she was or not? She may have been beaten by her parents mercilessly. Or is that to hard to believe because that never happens?

But that all aside, kids of all races are bullied current day. Fat kids in current day are bullied. Kids that look different are bullied. In current day. WTF? Kids go back and shoot up schools because they were bullied but the topic then turns into guns or whatever. Not a race thing if they are white. But if they are black, IT'S RACIST!!

We are living in 2023. All the "keep the black man down" was real 60 years ago. Not today and there is no reason keep living in the past.  

In current day US, how many people are being killed daily in inner city democrat run cities? They never get these little pictures because it's black people who are killing them. Shhhh......

 

 

I agree both that racism in America contains a noun + a verb + something that happened over 60 years ago. Also that crime-coddling drug-filled Democrat run urban sh*tholes and the various assortment of social problems that occur there are the major problems holding back the black community.

It doesn't make that image less heart-wrenching. And of course she's bullied, she's hiding behind her schoolbag. It's well known what some of these kids endured.

Two things can be true at the same time.

[Voltaire 5,203]

32 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Highly educated. 

I didn't catch the name but it's relevant because I'd recommend tossing her job application in the trash.

[Voltaire 5,203]

48 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Disturbing?  Seriously?

Its heroic.  Look at how brave that little girl is.  Come on man.

Sure she's brave, yes.

I can't help but look at the situation as a teacher and it sets me off. All the kids need to feel safe in the the classroom, you can't have an environment where the different/small one is hiding behind her schoolbag.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

4 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Sure she's brave, yes.

I can't help but look at the situation as a teacher and it sets me off. All the kids need to feel safe in the the classroom, you can't have an environment where the different/small one is hiding behind her schoolbag.

What would you do in this situation?

[dogcows 1,030]

1 hour ago, Voltaire said:

I don't know why dogcows posted the image or felt it was relevant but that's pretty callous. The image is disturbing, implies she was bullied mercilessly and you have to assume she was. She's a lonely pioneering child integrating the school in the wake of Brown vs Board of Education. In that same era, Jackie Robinson endured terrible harassment and kids are much crueler than adults.

 

This is the exact mentality that is leading to states banning the teaching of certain periods of history. Or banning books about this exact topic. American History isn’t all sunshine and lollipops. But we have laws stating that we can’t make kids feel bad? Kids should see something like this and feel bad. That’s the focking point of learning history… so we don’t repeat the bad stuff.

If I wanted to go darker, I could have shown far worse pictures of what could happen to a lone black person in a white neighborhood.I went soft and you still feel offended.

The narrative that black people are dangerous to white people is BS, so I thought I might remind people how dangerous white people have been to black people.

Not that it will stop the pillow-biter from cherry-picking and misinterpreting numbers to reinforce his prejudices.

[Voltaire 5,203]

5 minutes ago, dogcows said:

This is the exact mentality that is leading to states banning the teaching of certain periods of history. Or banning books about this exact topic. American History isn’t all sunshine and lollipops. But we have laws stating that we can’t make kids feel bad? Kids should see something like this and feel bad. That’s the focking point of learning history… so we don’t repeat the bad stuff.

If I wanted to go darker, I could have shown far worse pictures of what could happen to a lone black person in a white neighborhood.I went soft and you still feel offended.

The narrative that black people are dangerous to white people is BS, so I thought I might remind people how dangerous white people have been to black people.

Not that it will stop the pillow-biter from cherry-picking and misinterpreting numbers to reinforce his prejudices.

No one is banning the teaching of certain periods of history. That's a left wing delusion. Slavery and Jim Crow are a sad and shameful part of history that has to be sorted out and dealt with.

I think you hit the right tone with the pictue you chose. Emmitt Till is over the top obvious, this is much more subtle.

[dogcows 1,030]

21 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

No one is banning the teaching of certain periods of history. That's a left wing delusion.

Yes, they are. Look it up.  A judge even blocked part of the Florida “stop woke” law because of it.. here’s what the law says:

Quote

The Florida law deems it discrimination if a student was exposed to anything that compelled them to believe “he or she must feel guilt, anguish, or other forms of psychological distress for actions, in which he or she played no part, committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex.”

So even if the intent wasn’t to make a kid feel guilty, if they DO feel guilty from something they were exposed to in class, the teacher has broken the law. We also saw books get banned, including one about Ruby Bridges (written by her), a little girl (at the time) who was in a similar situation in the 1960s.

I will say that this is a very vague law. Which many think is the point. If teachers aren’t sure whether they should teach something, they will self-censor to avoid jail. A teacher should not have to be thinking “will this topic make a kid feel guilty?” What if they teach about Hitler and some kid is a distant relative of the guy? 

[Voltaire 5,203]

7 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

What would you do in this situation?

This would have been a nightmare mission for Tennessee teachers in 1957. President Eisenhower had to send in the National Guard to pry the governor of Arkansas out of the schoolhouse door, just to get the kids in the building. Tennessee of that era likely had similar sentiments. 

It takes ten seconds to get inside the building but once inside... fock man...  that's another 7-8 hours. You'd have to set strict rules straight out of the gate that respect and dignity of each child is of primary concern and lay down the law when you see someone get out of line. Being a complete hardass for the first couple of weeks by crackdowning hard on the worst offender(s) would be key.

Specifically, I'd have put the black girl in the corner and insulated her with the white children sitting nearby that showed some compassion. Offer her some one-on-one time. During recess, somebody, hopefully not the teacher who needs rest and/or lesson planning time as well as a break from burning out due to constant vigilance, would chase the bullies away. 

But day one is important. Bullying needs to be no-tollerance at the start. Once that gets ingraned, the flare ups would be less often and things can settle down.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

3 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Yes, they are. Look it up.  A judge even blocked part of the Florida “stop woke” law because of it.. here’s what the law says:

So even if the intent wasn’t to make a kid feel guilty, if they DO feel guilty from something they were exposed to in class, the teacher has broken the law. We also saw books get banned, including one about Ruby Bridges (written by her), a little girl (at the time) who was in a similar situation in the 1960s.

I will say that this is a very vague law. Which many think is the point. If teachers aren’t sure whether they should teach something, they will self-censor to avoid jail. A teacher should not have to be thinking “will this topic make a kid feel guilty?” What if they teach about Hitler and some kid is a distant relative of the guy? 

All the Republican culture war laws are vague.  I think it's by design, although I do not believe they are actually competent enough to craft better laws anyway.  Everything from crt to transgender care to drag shows, hell even the marriage bill in Tennessee.

[Wade Garrett 155]

Racist cultist.

Whites are far far more lucky to be the victims of violent crime from other whites.

I know you uneducated hicks don't care for math or science.

But that's simple math.  No matter how much you screech like racist deplorables.

"hur dur 13% of the population commits 50% of violent crimes hur dur"

If you're white.  Other whites are a far far greater risk you scared little inbred babies.

[Voltaire 5,203]

15 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Yes, they are. Look it up.  A judge even blocked part of the Florida “stop woke” law because of it.. here’s what the law says:

So even if the intent wasn’t to make a kid feel guilty, if they DO feel guilty from something they were exposed to in class, the teacher has broken the law. We also saw books get banned, including one about Ruby Bridges (written by her), a little girl (at the time) who was in a similar situation in the 1960s.

I will say that this is a very vague law. Which many think is the point. If teachers aren’t sure whether they should teach something, they will self-censor to avoid jail. A teacher should not have to be thinking “will this topic make a kid feel guilty?” What if they teach about Hitler and some kid is a distant relative of the guy? 

It just so happens, that if things go to plan, I'm personally going to be teaching social studies in one of the reddest parts of Florida come September. The national embarrassment that is Jim Crow will be included in the curriculum - unapologetically. I have zero fear of teaching this material nor do I fear getting reprimanded for doing so. 

Florida law is designed to keep CRT out of the classroom, not discussions of Jim Crow. This is just smoke-fed nonsense from the left who love CRT and want to push anti-Amerika bullsh*t. We learned bad things that happened in history when I was in school. I don't have to reinvent the wheel, I just have to approach it and teach it the way my own teachers did.

[RLLD 4,143]

57 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Racist cultist.

Whites are far far more lucky to be the victims of violent crime from other whites.

I know you uneducated hicks don't care for math or science.

But that's simple math.  No matter how much you screech like racist deplorables.

"hur dur 13% of the population commits 50% of violent crimes hur dur"

If you're white.  Other whites are a far far greater risk you scared little inbred babies.

While racism does exist, it is not a serious problem in our culture, no matter how much marxist raise it to divide us.

The rest of your content is spot on. Moreover, violence tends to be more statistically prevalent within cultural groups than from without. And it tends to focus on those who embrace it.

This logic is why the entire BLM movement is such a farce, driven by marxists who hate organized society and who seek only to exploit through fear .

[Wade Garrett 155]

6 minutes ago, RLLD said:

While racism does exist, it is not a serious problem in our culture, no matter how much marxist raise it to divide us.

The rest of your content is spot on. Moreover, violence tends to be more statistically prevalent within cultural groups than from without. And it tends to focus on those who embrace it.

This logic is why the entire BLM movement is such a farce, driven by marxists who hate organized society and who seek only to exploit through fear .

Maybe aware your friends here who think every black person they meet is gonna shank them.  I get that they're scared sheep, that's how conservatives keep their folks in line through fear, but the reality of the situation is that white folks are much much much more likely to be harmed by other white folks.

Math

[jerryskids 6,576]

10 hours ago, dogcows said:

Actually, it’s the exact topic we were discussing, until you hopped in with a bunch of unrelated numbers. The whole discussion is about whether people should feel nervous if they are the only white person in a black neighborhood. And they said “math” proved they should be scared. When the “math” actually shows they are in more danger from white people.

Actually, it's not the topic.  The topic was violence, which Gutter strawmanned into murder.  Of course you are most likely to be murdered by someone you know.  Regardless, even for violence the sheer number of encounters a person has with their own race vs. other races is very high.  This idiocy of "a white person is more likely to be killed by another white person" is the very essence of lying with statistics.