Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Pimpadeaux

Guns: The No. 1 cause of death for U.S. children

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

It's mind boggling how dumb these people are.

Put a 1 year old out in a field and see if it can take care of itself.  

You couldn't do this as a grown-ass man.

Why?

Because you're an idiot!

:banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reduce gun violence is to level the playing field we're moving time and again.

 

We need to start arming our toddlers.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

Babies ate my Dingo! 😧

That has been known to happen.  I kept my child out of dingo country for that very reason.  And by out of "dingo country" I meant __________(Fill in your own joke here)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Nope, but any schmo can do that, doesn’t have to be the mother 

Ohhh, so it CAN'T live outside the womb on its own?? You don't have kids, let me learn you. 

The majority of mother's can't make milk or enough to sustain a newborn. So unless that baby can crawl it's one day old ass to Walgreens for baby formula, it's going to die. 

A baby at 20 weeks, 1 day old or 1 year old needs it's mother to survive. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, League Champion said:

Ohhh, so it CAN'T live outside the womb on its own?? You don't have kids, let me learn you. 

The majority of mother's can't make milk or enough to sustain a newborn. So unless that baby can crawl it's one day old ass to Walgreens for baby formula, it's going to die. 

A baby at 20 weeks, 1 day old or 1 year old needs it's mother to survive. 

So you're saying a bottle-fed baby can't survive unless the mother is still around?

How much dumbass did you eat for lunch?

:wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, League Champion said:

Ohhh, so it CAN'T live outside the womb on its own?? You don't have kids, let me learn you. 

The majority of mother's can't make milk or enough to sustain a newborn. So unless that baby can crawl it's one day old ass to Walgreens for baby formula, it's going to die. 

A baby at 20 weeks, 1 day old or 1 year old needs it's mother to survive. 

Not sure what you don’t understand.  A baby doesn’t need a mother to survive.  It needs a human being to give it breastmilk/formula and clean its butt, maybe also make sure it doesn’t choke on its own vomit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Nope, but any schmo can do that, doesn’t have to be the mother 

It's dependent on an adult. You are arguing in circles and are going nowhere. Losing big. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pimpadeaux said:

You couldn't do this as a grown-ass man.

Why?

Because you're an idiot!

:banana:

oh boy. Gooo Waaarrrr in Europe!!! 🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

It's dependent on an adult. You are arguing in circles and are going nowhere. Losing big. 

You really don’t see the difference between literally needing to be attached to its mother and only its mother (hence it’s really still a part of its mother’s body), and needing any human (maybe even a well-trained dog) to hold a bottle for it?  If not, not sure I can help you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wiffleball said:

Babies ate my Dingo! 😧

Surprised they could find your dingo when even your mommy can't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You really don’t see the difference between literally needing to be attached to its mother and only its mother (hence it’s really still a part of its mother’s body), and needing any human (maybe even a well-trained dog) to hold a bottle for it?  If not, not sure I can help you

It's dependent on life. And as that woman is responsible for creating that life, she needs to be held responsible for taking care of it. If a mother abandons a 1 year old in a field what happens to the mother if she is caught for that crime? Because it is a crime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If a mother leaves a baby alone in a home and it dies, what happens to the mother?Nothing? Because obviously anyone can take care of it. Even itself. :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

It's dependent on an adult. You are arguing in circles and are going nowhere. Losing big. 

League Chumpion specified that a baby could not live without its mother.

That's some next-level dumbass there.

Not surprising you buy it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Pimpadeaux said:

League Chumpion specified that a baby could not live without its mother.

That's some next-level dumbass there.

Not surprising you buy it!

Liberals think 1 year olds can live on their own. Focking idiots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, seafoam1 said:

Liberals think 1 year olds can live on their own. Focking idiots.

Go dumbass! Weeeeeeeeee, dumbass!

🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️

WPE!

WORST. POSTER. EVER.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Not sure what you don’t understand.  A baby doesn’t need a mother to survive.  It needs a human being to give it breastmilk/formula and clean its butt, maybe also make sure it doesn’t choke on its own vomit

Or anyone else's for that matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Not sure what you don’t understand.  A baby doesn’t need a mother to survive.  It needs a human being to give it breastmilk/formula and clean its butt, maybe also make sure it doesn’t choke on its own vomit

Great. So a mother should be allowed to kill a kid at one year old then. Why should she be held responsible for caring for it or forcing that responsibility on someone else? Just kill it. It's dependent on someone. Kill it. Just like women kill kids in the womb. They just don't want them. So kill them. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Go dumbass! Weeeeeeeeee, dumbass!

🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️

WPE!

WORST. POSTER. EVER.

 

 

Go war in Europe!!!!!!! 🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Great. So a mother should be allowed to kill a kid at one year old then. Why should she be held responsible for caring for it or forcing that responsibility on someone else? Just kill it. It's dependent on someone. Kill it. Just like women kill kids in the womb. They just don't want them. So kill them. 

 

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Not sure what you don’t understand.  A baby doesn’t need a mother to survive.  It needs a human being to give it breastmilk/formula and clean its butt, maybe also make sure it doesn’t choke on its own vomit

That's why we have a vice president

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

 

Like Stewart cares about kids being killed in Chicago or any of the outer urban shitholes. If he did he’d be calling for criminals to go to prison for carrying guns. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/29/2023 at 10:31 AM, GobbleDog said:

Be interesting if hypothetically people had no idea where their party stood on issues and had to decide for themselves. They certainly wouldn't match up.

And that's exactly my thoughts.

I'm not "Republican" because I follow what "Republicans" tell me what to do.  I  have a firm belief on most topics in life, and I see that USUALLY those align with what Repulicans say.

I think that many democrats though, repeat the verbiage that is said by their higher ups. 

There are few folks out there pissed that the transphobic police just shot a transgender person without justifiable reason.   Those folks are simply just following the agenda and are NOT thinking on their own.  There are more non-thinking, toe-ing the line dems than there are repubs.


I think those on the right more often follow their personally beliefs, and the left (at a higher rate than the right) simply go with what is "expected of them" by the democrat agenda.

I use the word "liberal" often to describe liberals. 


What REALLY bugs me, example... I posted this somewhere today...and I referenced them being a liberal.    I had lots of folks say "How do you know they are liberal"

Seriously?  How do I know?  It's hard to explain why I know.  I guess I equate it to "How do I know that pile of snow over there is cold, even though I didn't actually go over and touch that pile of snow to know if its cold or not?"

I have another tidbit of info on that video but I want to see if any known liberal on this board says "How do you know they are liberal?"

Anyway...check out this liberal:  https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cnkps1ThUAE/?igshid=YjNmNGQ3MDY%3D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

 

Let's think about that teacher (and let's face it, the entire crowd agrees with her).
"I would never carry a gun to school, I love my students, I would not shoot them"

 

Part 1:  "I would never carry a gun to school".   Well lady, you called the police, BEGGING for a good guy with a gun to show up and take out the person shooting up the school.  BEG AND PLEADING over the phone to hurry and get a good guy with a gun to show up.

Part 2: "I love my students, I would not shoot them.". Whoooooaaaaaaa.   Umm. I'm not sure if the woman realizes this, but you just because you have a gun, doesn't mean you need to shoot your students.  The police showed up.  They had guns, they didn't shoot the students. 

That woman is not fit to teach.  Those folks cheering for her aren't fit to vote or make their own decisions.  They should be locked up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, tubby_mcgee said:

Let's think about that teacher (and let's face it, the entire crowd agrees with her).
"I would never carry a gun to school, I love my students, I would not shoot them"

 

Part 1:  "I would never carry a gun to school".   Well lady, you called the police, BEGGING for a good guy with a gun to show up and take out the person shooting up the school.  BEG AND PLEADING over the phone to hurry and get a good guy with a gun to show up.

Part 2: "I love my students, I would not shoot them.". Whoooooaaaaaaa.   Umm. I'm not sure if the woman realizes this, but you just because you have a gun, doesn't mean you need to shoot your students.  The police showed up.  They had guns, they didn't shoot the students. 

That woman is not fit to teach.  Those folks cheering for her aren't fit to vote or make their own decisions.  They should be locked up.

Gutterboy attempts to make the same stupid strawman arguments as #2. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Gutterboy attempts to make the same stupid strawman arguments as #2. 

Guns are the ONLY "3rd party" object that folks scream to ban. 

Is there anything like it out there?


No one seriously pushes the:
"ban spoons because they make me fat"
"ban pencils because they make kids fail tests"
"ban cars because they cause auto accidents"

Is there any other thing on the planet that as "accused" like guns? 



I'm guessing/assuming that if questioned, that woman would say "self defense" as a reason why she owns a gun. 
Her life is apparently good enough to defend with a gun, but students aren't?  That's weird to me. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Cloaca du jour said:

2020 there were 627,000 abortions

2019 4300 kids and teens killed by guns

Liberal says what??

 

Including 13,923 of your posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Including 13,923 of your posts.

Lol....babykiller

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, tubby_mcgee said:

Guns are the ONLY "3rd party" object that folks scream to ban. 

Is there anything like it out there?


No one seriously pushes the:
"ban spoons because they make me fat"
"ban pencils because they make kids fail tests"
"ban cars because they cause auto accidents"

Is there any other thing on the planet that as "accused" like guns? 



I'm guessing/assuming that if questioned, that woman would say "self defense" as a reason why she owns a gun. 
Her life is apparently good enough to defend with a gun, but students aren't?  That's weird to me. 

So you'd bring a spoon to a gunfight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cloaca du jour said:

Lol....babykiller

13,924.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GutterBoy said:

You're equating aborting a fetus to the murder of a grown child?  The fock is wrong with you?

Meanwhile, dumbass_mcgee is comparing an AR-15 to a No. 2 led pencil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GutterBoy said:

You're equating aborting a fetus to the murder of a grown child?  The fock is wrong with you?

Wtf is wrong with you?  Dead is dead.  Cant wait to hear you back out this..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×