Guns: The No. 1 cause of death for U.S. children

[wiffleball 4,645]

There's a recent case that I think is still ongoing. Basically, the parents are being held responsible for the actions of the kid who brought a gun and shot up a school.

 

In this case, it's such an extreme level of negligence and neglect that it stands a good chance of setting a precedent.

 

Of all the possible so-called solutions out there, this one may be the most viable in terms of something actually happening.

 

It won't solve anything absolutely. But these cases where a 6-year-old grabs a gun off the nightstand and goes to school got to drive really f****** fast if a few parents end up doing hard time and being civilly liable too. 

[Engorgeous George 1,179]

34 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

You've never really known pain until you wind up on the business end of a feather boa.

There was that one time Big Bird gave me a beat down.  Looked like a feather but felt like a stone.

[Pimpadeaux 2,271]

2 minutes ago, WhiskeyCash said:

You love yourself? Do you hear voices in your head? You’re sounding EXACTLY like these freaks that shoot up schools. Might need to let the FBI know so you won’t be able to buy a gun 

I see you've graduated from Seafoam1 Junior College of Comedy with an associate's degree. Congratulations, WhiskeyGash!

[TBayXXXVII 2,117]

35 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

What a loser Rusty is. Child. 

I'm starting to think Rusty is all of these alias's, including the utilit ones.

[Pimpadeaux 2,271]

Just now, TBayXXXVII said:

I'm starting to think Rusty is all of these alias's, including the utilit ones.

I'm everyone here but you.

This sociology experiment began Aug. 3, 2005.

[seafoam1 1,879]

6 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I'm starting to think Rusty is all of these alias's, including the utilit ones.

You are utilit ones. That must mean you are pimpledoosh too. Yikes. So wierd. Who's utiitones?

[seafoam1 1,879]

How about if someone murders someone, we impose a penalty of death on that person instead of putting them in jail and supporting them while they are in jail then letting them out.

How about we do the same penalty for attempted murder, and we start saying that felony assault is attempted murder?

Let penalties be tough on people who don't want to play civil.

 

[League Champion 1,593]

1 hour ago, wiffleball said:

There's a recent case that I think is still ongoing. Basically, the parents are being held responsible for the actions of the kid who brought a gun and shot up a school.

 

In this case, it's such an extreme level of negligence and neglect that it stands a good chance of setting a precedent.

 

Of all the possible so-called solutions out there, this one may be the most viable in terms of something actually happening.

 

It won't solve anything absolutely. But these cases where a 6-year-old grabs a gun off the nightstand and goes to school got to drive really f****** fast if a few parents end up doing hard time and being civilly liable too. 

I'm all for that. Lock these parents up!!!

 

[OldMaid 1,838]

1 hour ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I'm everyone here but you.

This sociology experiment began Aug. 3, 2005.

We don’t need a sociology experiment to know you’re on the spectrum.

[TheNewGirl 1,031]

1 hour ago, OldMaid said:

We don’t need a sociology experiment to know you’re on the spectrum.

I am curious about this "experiment" though. I mean, will there be peer reviewed articles on this shiite? What is the experiment trying to prove or theorize? 

I look forward to Rusty's long winded article in the Scientific American. Or maybe it will show up in Field and Stream, who knows. 

[TimHauck 1,802]

2 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

How about if someone murders someone, we impose a penalty of death on that person instead of putting them in jail and supporting them while they are in jail then letting them out.

How about we do the same penalty for attempted murder, and we start saying that felony assault is attempted murder?

Let penalties be tough on people who don't want to play civil.

 

Abortions included right?

[League Champion 1,593]

13 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Abortions included right?

After 3 months, excluding medical emergencies. ABSOLUTELY 

[TimHauck 1,802]

5 minutes ago, League Champion said:

After 3 months, excluding medical emergencies. ABSOLUTELY 

I have a feeling seafoam disagrees with you

[OldMaid 1,838]

28 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

 

I look forward to Rusty's long winded article in the Scientific American. Or maybe it will show up in Field and Stream, who knows. 

Retard’s Digest

[seafoam1 1,879]

12 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I have a feeling seafoam disagrees with you

I don't disagree with him. Medical emergencies should favor the mother over the child.

[TimHauck 1,802]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

I don't disagree with him. Medical emergencies should favor the mother over the child.

So abortion isn’t murder before 3 months?

[seafoam1 1,879]

Just now, TimHauck said:

So abortion isn’t murder before 3 months?

I didn't say that. But it's a start. 

[TimHauck 1,802]

2 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

I didn't say that. But it's a start. 

So you disagree with him, like I said 

[wiffleball 4,645]

Should look at NZ. Pretty interesting. 

[League Champion 1,593]

6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So abortion isn’t murder before 3 months?

I just threw a number out there but there has to be a point where a baby is a baby, right? What's your opinion? 

[seafoam1 1,879]

10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So you disagree with him, like I said 

I agree with what he says. 

Let me spell it out for you. If someone says they think a criminal should be punished, I would agree with them.

If I think they should be punished for something else that the person said in the first place, then I think they should be punished for something else not mentioned.

And I am perfectly fine if after 3 months of pregnancy someone kills their kid, they should be killed along with the kid as punishment or simply being fair. You take someone's life without good reason (self defense, etc), you should have the same done to you. 

[TimHauck 1,802]

5 minutes ago, League Champion said:

I just threw a number out there but there has to be a point where a baby is a baby, right? What's your opinion? 

20-24 weeks.  I even made a poll about it

I don’t think the parent should be murdered if they have one after that though obviously 

 

[seafoam1 1,879]

4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

20-24 weeks.  I even made a poll about it

I don’t think the parent should be murdered if they have one after that though obviously 

 

So you can pick arbitrary dates because....? But others can't.

A being is a being no matter its stage of existence. 

[TimHauck 1,802]

2 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

So you can pick arbitrary dates because....? But others can't.

A being is a being no matter it's stage of existence. 

It was an opinion question. You are certainly welcome to yours.  

[seafoam1 1,879]

16 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

It was an opinion question. You are certainly welcome to yours.  

It's either alive or not. No in between.

[League Champion 1,593]

25 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

20-24 weeks.  I even made a poll about it

If it's not a medical emergency then 6 months is a little extreme. At that point you had plenty of time to decide what you need/want to do. 

Do you have a Kid? Look at your wife's 6 months ultra sound that's a well developed living human being. 

I'm not here to debate you on this, we should let Women ultimately decide, that's just my opinion. 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,658]

If it’s growing it’s living. Science! 

[OldMaid 1,838]

7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

If it’s growing it’s living. Science! 

So it’s safe to assume your pen!s has been dead for quite some time. 

 

ZING!

[League Champion 1,593]

6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

If it’s growing it’s living. Science! 

I don't disagree but at the same time do you want Liberals raising babies that they don't want and can't afford? 

The friggin Libs breed like Rabbits, they're Pigs. 

[GutterBoy 2,281]

1 hour ago, OldMaid said:

Retard’s Digest

[Hardcore troubadour 12,658]

6 minutes ago, League Champion said:

I don't disagree but at the same time do you want Liberals raising babies that they don't want and can't afford? 

The friggin Libs breed like Rabbits, they're Pigs. 

I’m not telling anyone what to do. I just want them to know what they are doing.  No one on the left ever talks about women that live with regret about their abortion. Many do.  

[TimHauck 1,802]

20 minutes ago, League Champion said:

If it's not a medical emergency then 6 months is a little extreme. At that point you had plenty of time to decide what you need/want to do. 

Do you have a Kid? Look at your wife's 6 months ultra sound that's a well developed living human being. 

I'm not here to debate you on this, we should let Women ultimately decide, that's just my opinion. 

I’d say 20 weeks really.  My opinion is it’s not a “child” until it can survive outside the womb, and so far no baby has survived earlier than 21 weeks.  But I am open to pushing that date forward if technology advances to make it possible.

[League Champion 1,593]

Just now, TimHauck said:

I’d say 20 weeks really.  My opinion is it’s not a “child” until it can survive outside the womb, and so far no baby has survived earlier than 21 weeks.  But I am open to pushing that date forward if technology advances to make it possible.

Dude, a 2 year old can't survive outside of its Mother's womb without it's Mother either. That argument makes zero sense. 

[seafoam1 1,879]

13 minutes ago, League Champion said:

Dude, a 2 year old can't survive outside of its Mother's womb without it's Mother either. That argument makes zero sense. 

It's mind boggling how dumb these people are.

Put a 1 year old out in a field and see if it can take care of itself.  

[TimHauck 1,802]

15 minutes ago, League Champion said:

Dude, a 2 year old can't survive outside of its Mother's womb without it's Mother either. That argument makes zero sense. 

Yes it can retard 

[League Champion 1,593]

1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

It's mind boggling how dumb these people are.

Put a 1 year old out in a field and see if it can take care of itself.  

Exactly, that's the worst argument ever. 

[League Champion 1,593]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Yes it can retard 

Ohh really??? A 1 day old baby can feed itself and not get eaten by wolves?? . As opposed to a 20 week old. 

[seafoam1 1,879]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Yes it can retard 

How?  Retard...

[wiffleball 4,645]

5 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

It's mind boggling how dumb these people are.

Put a 1 year old out in a field and see if it can take care of itself.  

Babies ate my Dingo!

[TimHauck 1,802]

2 minutes ago, League Champion said:

Ohh really??? A 12 month old can feed itself and not get eaten by wolves??

Nope, but any schmo can do that, doesn’t have to be the mother