Cocaine Found in the White House - CNN Reluctantly Acknowledges it Two Days Later in an Interestingly Worded Article

[lod001 1,344]

So anyone can walk into what should be the safest building on the planet, and drop a bag of cocaine on a table.

THAT is what the secret service just admitted. 100% incompetence or its Asshat Biden's. Those are the only 2 conclusions.

[League Champion 1,897]

4 minutes ago, lod001 said:

THAT is what the secret service just admitted. 100% incompetence or its Asshat Biden's. Those are the only 2 conclusions.

Shhhh, we don't discuss that 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,171]

Secret service said they are unable to find out who’s it is. Case closed.  Scary to think that if it were anthrax they couldn’t find out either based on this “investigation”.  Whatever. 

[Mike Honcho 5,250]

1 hour ago, lod001 said:

So anyone can walk into what should be the safest building on the planet, and drop a bag of cocaine on a table.

THAT is what the secret service just admitted. 100% incompetence or its Asshat Biden's. Those are the only 2 conclusions.

Why Secret Service did not detect cocaine at the White House

While it may be a felony crime to carry cocaine, it’s a substance not typically screened at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

Cocaine at the White House is a felony crime. However, believe it or not, it’s a substance not typically screened for at what is arguably the most recognized place on the planet.

Powdery substances like anthrax and ricin are some of the lethal materials that law enforcement and detection systems around and near the White House typically search for with radiological, biological, chemical and nuclear devices. There are also police dogs that sniff for detection of the chemicals.

After a substance later confirmed to be cocaine was found in the White House’s West Wing on Sunday, officials confirmed that dogs on surveillance detail at the White House do not sniff for drugs.

A former senior high-ranking law enforcement official, who agreed to speak on security matters at the White House on condition of anonymity, told theGrio that identifying drugs like cocaine is “not what we police for.” The objective of the Secret Service and security measures at the White House are about “protecting the president.”

[Ultra Max Power 214]

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Secret service said they are unable to find out who’s it is. Case closed.  Scary to think that if it were anthrax they couldn’t find out either based on this “investigation”.  Whatever. 

No one could have seen this conclusion coming....

I wonder if they ever drug tested the staff.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,171]

4 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Why Secret Service did not detect cocaine at the White House

While it may be a felony crime to carry cocaine, it’s a substance not typically screened at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

Cocaine at the White House is a felony crime. However, believe it or not, it’s a substance not typically screened for at what is arguably the most recognized place on the planet.

Powdery substances like anthrax and ricin are some of the lethal materials that law enforcement and detection systems around and near the White House typically search for with radiological, biological, chemical and nuclear devices. There are also police dogs that sniff for detection of the chemicals.

After a substance later confirmed to be cocaine was found in the White House’s West Wing on Sunday, officials confirmed that dogs on surveillance detail at the White House do not sniff for drugs.

A former senior high-ranking law enforcement official, who agreed to speak on security matters at the White House on condition of anonymity, told theGrio that identifying drugs like cocaine is “not what we police for.” The objective of the Secret Service and security measures at the White House are about “protecting the president.”

That’s all gobbly gook, but thanks.  The point is, if anthrax had gotten in, are we to believe that they couldn’t find out who it was? 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,171]

4 minutes ago, Ultra Max Power said:

No one could have seen this conclusion coming....

I wonder if they ever drug tested the staff.  

Nope. It was in a locker. Now they can’t find the key to the locker. It’s a Fockin joke. Whatever. 

[Reality 3,121]

9 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Secret service said they are unable to find out who’s it is. Case closed.  Scary to think that if it were anthrax they couldn’t find out either based on this “investigation”.  Whatever. 

That tells us all we need to know.

[squistion 2,078]

38 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

That’s all gobbly gook, but thanks.  The point is, if anthrax had gotten in, are we to believe that they couldn’t find out who it was? 

You are honestly comparing some coke found in the WH to an anthrax type terrorist attack? 

Yes, if it was anthrax they probably would have put more time into the investigation. 

You really need to work on your analogies - they are horrible. 

[Strike 5,360]

4 minutes ago, squistion said:

You are honestly comparing some coke found in the WH to an anthrax type terrorist attack? 

Yes, if it was anthrax they probably would have put more time into the investigation. 

You really need to work on your analogies - they are horrible. 

So you're admitting they CAN identify the person who left the Coke but they just choose not to?  Got it.

[Ultra Max Power 214]

1 minute ago, squistion said:

You are honestly comparing some coke found in the WH to an anthrax type terrorist attack? 

Yes, if it was anthrax they probably would have put more time into the investigation. 

You really need to work on your analogies - they are horrible. 

You do know they evacuated the white house when the powder was found and the Hazmat team had to come in to check it out.  So lets not pretend that it isn't a realistic possibility.  

[lod001 1,344]

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

So you're admitting they CAN identify the person who left the Coke but they just choose not to?  Got it.

Yeah, he's too stupid to understand what he wrote.

[Mike Honcho 5,250]

1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

That’s all gobbly gook, but thanks.  The point is, if anthrax had gotten in, are we to believe that they couldn’t find out who it was? 

You must have been a hell of an officer.   

[dogcows 1,030]

3 hours ago, lod001 said:

So anyone can walk into what should be the safest building on the planet, and drop a bag of cocaine on a table.

THAT is what the secret service just admitted. 100% incompetence or its Asshat Biden's. Those are the only 2 conclusions.

They screen for guns, knives, explosives, and other dangerous items. Not sure why they would screen for drugs, since weed or coke aren’t a threat to the president. Their job is to keep the president alive, not nail somebody for sneaking in drugs.

[squistion 2,078]

54 minutes ago, Strike said:

So you're admitting they CAN identify the person who left the Coke but they just choose not to?  Got it.

No, Straw Man, I am not admitting that. 

[squistion 2,078]

57 minutes ago, Ultra Max Power said:

You do know they evacuated the white house when the powder was found and the Hazmat team had to come in to check it out.  So lets not pretend that it isn't a realistic possibility.  

Which they also would have done for any powdery substance that resembled anthrax, like baking soda. 

[Strike 5,360]

4 minutes ago, squistion said:

No, Straw Man, I am not admitting that. 

To paraphrase lod001, no one ever accused you of being the smartest pigeon in the nest.

[Fnord 2,146]

Are we all missing the obvious here? Of course the WH security teams don't screen for drugs. If they did, WH staff and all the other pols going in and out wouldn't be able to do the drugs they bring in. Can't have that. Is it surprising that a bunch of power hungry, paranoid, type-A narcissists would take necessary steps to ensure they can freely consume substances they perceive as giving them an edge, a quick pick-me-up, or relaxing? I'm guessing drug use, especially cocaine, is quite prevalent in DC. Too much money and too many ass holes for it not to be. 

 

[seafoam1 2,880]

5 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Are we all missing the obvious here? 

 

You are. You always are corky.

[jerryskids 6,686]

So, no videos of the cubbies, eh?

As I said earlier, they maybe can't see a small bag going in, but they should see who used the cubby in question

[Hawkeye21 2,389]

7 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Are we all missing the obvious here? Of course the WH security teams don't screen for drugs. If they did, WH staff and all the other pols going in and out wouldn't be able to do the drugs they bring in. Can't have that. Is it surprising that a bunch of power hungry, paranoid, type-A narcissists would take necessary steps to ensure they can freely consume substances they perceive as giving them an edge, a quick pick-me-up, or relaxing? I'm guessing drug use, especially cocaine, is quite prevalent in DC. Too much money and too many ass holes for it not to be. 

 

I was thinking the same thing.

[squistion 2,078]

6 minutes ago, Strike said:

To paraphrase lod001, no one ever accused you of being the smartest pigeon in the nest.

Reading is fundamental, these were my exact words:

Quote

Yes, if it was anthrax they probably would have put more time into the investigation.

Meaning only that they would have devoted more time to the investigation, not that they can identify the perpetrator who left the coke but have chosen not to. 

[Mike Honcho 5,250]

21 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

So, no videos of the cubbies, eh?

As I said earlier, they maybe can't see a small bag going in, but they should see who used the cubby in question

I did a search and haven't seen a picture of the 'cubby' area, just a general location. 

It would go a long way in determining how easy/hard it would be to identify the person, if the secret service is incompetent or is there a possibility of a coverup?  Without more info I find all the speculation and conclusions to be pretty silly. 

ETA, just saw this.

Quote

 

The Secret Service, in a lengthy statement, outlined the hurdles to finding a suspect. Those included the FBI laboratory results not finding “latent fingerprints” and not finding sufficient DNA, meaning that “the Secret Service is not able to compare evidence against the known pool of individuals.” There also isn’t surveillance video footage, according to the Secret Service.

“Without physical evidence, the investigation will not be able to single out a person of interest from the hundreds of individuals who passed through the vestibule where the cocaine was discovered,” the Secret Service added.

A law enforcement official previously told POLITICO that it was unlikely a culprit would be found because the area where it was found is highly trafficked.

 

I don't find that all surprising, since the people going to those rooms for tours as I understand it have to get access in the form of a special invite. Probably extremely well-vetted before hand.  And as far as cameras everywhere, for it to be useful means you have to have a pretty sophisticated recording and storage system.  If you have a camera outside of the room or hallway where people are just dropping off their electronic devices, do you need a redundant camera that shows them putting cellphones in a cubby? 

[Mike Honcho 5,250]

OH and let's discuss this...

Quote

The Secret Service told lawmakers that it had to sort through a list of roughly 500 people that includes both staff and visitors. Secret Service officials told lawmakers that they had found roughly .007 grams of cocaine, according to Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), who was in the briefing.

what's that like, 4 flakes?

 

1 Gram of rice.

 

[League Champion 1,897]

3 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

OH and let's discuss this...

what's that like, 4 flakes?

 

1 Gram of rice.

 

It's a bump. Perfect for a junkie like Hunter Biden 

[Engorgeous George 2,249]

3 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

OH and let's discuss this...

what's that like, 4 flakes?

 

1 Gram of rice.

 

In this case my main suspect would be Leon Spinks.  He is the only man I have heard of who holds on to so little coke.

[Mike Honcho 5,250]

If that .007 is right and let's go for 150 bucks a gram...this entire thing was over 1 cent worth of cocaine!!!!!  

[seafoam1 2,880]

They know who it is. It's not a political opponent to biden so it gets buried. 

Just like hunter's laptop.

Next.

[Engorgeous George 2,249]

11 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

If that .007 is right and let's go for 150 bucks a gram...this entire thing was over 1 cent worth of cocaine!!!!!  

My math would have that at $1.05  Still, I have never heard of $150 grams of Peruvian marching powder.  More likely it is around 70 cents worth of blow.

[RogerDodger 797]

2 hours ago, squistion said:

You are honestly comparing some coke found in the WH to an anthrax type terrorist attack? 

Yes, if it was anthrax they probably would have put more time into the investigation. 

You really need to work on your analogies - they are horrible. 

Comparing two white powders is a horrible analogy?

For someone that reads 300 tweets an hour you think you'd understand that it doesn't take long to review a few hours of video.  

You're the example sheep that they want to keep voting for them.  

 

[RogerDodger 797]

17 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

If that .007 is right and let's go for 150 bucks a gram...this entire thing was over 1 cent worth of cocaine!!!!!  

You think Hunter would leave a full bag of coke?

[RogerDodger 797]

49 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

  And as far as cameras everywhere, for it to be useful means you have to have a pretty sophisticated recording and storage system. 

Right.  I'm sure they just installed a couple ring doorbells and called it a day.  It's the foking White House moron.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,171]

Morons think that they can’t find out who it belongs to is because it’s Coke. I guess they think they could lift prints off the actual cocaine, and not the bag it was in. 

[Alias Detective 1,392]

Secret Service Forensic Services

 

* Advanced accredited laboratory

 

* Fingerprint analysis

 

* Questioned document examination to establish authenticity

 

* DNA collection

 

* Quality assurance and scientific services

 

* Process and analyze digital multimedia items of evidence

 

 COSKSUCKING  liars!

 

 

[seafoam1 2,880]

1 hour ago, RogerDodger said:

Right.  I'm sure they just installed a couple ring doorbells and called it a day.  It's the foking White House moron.  

For real. They know what type of toilet paper a person who was outside the capital on jan 6 uses, but they don't who left drugs in the white house. 

[thegeneral 3,077]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

For real. They know what type of toilet paper a person who was outside the capital on jan 6 uses, but they don't who left drugs in the white house. 

The J6 neckbeards were posting pics on Facebook and a tweeting about tyranny 

[seafoam1 2,880]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

The J6 neckbeards were posting pics on Facebook and a tweeting about tyranny 

Who epstein? Changing the subject?

[thegeneral 3,077]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

Who epstein?

Among others. Hint to future patriots and criminals: Don’t live blog your crime!

[seafoam1 2,880]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

Among others. Hint to future patriots and criminals: Don’t live blog your crime!

Yep. As a pedo, you should keep your name private. 

[RogerDodger 797]

I had a couple instances where I needed to find out who left packages on my porch.  The $50 cameras from Amazon that I set up myself captured the person both times.  

I guess I'm just way better at pointing cameras than the Secret Service.