Step down Joe

[The Real timschochet 6,447]

2 hours ago, BunnysBastatrds said:

 Wow. Just WOW. That’s your intellectual response and rebuttal? It’s an example you  blind ignorant follower. Do you have an intelligent coherent response other than the one above? I hope so. I don’t know how to respond now. But will full throttle if you do. 

 

Dude I’m just joking around. 

I couldn’t really respond to the rest of your post because honestly I find it ridiculous. I know it’s a popular meme among conservatives to claim these days that the media is the tool of the liberal government, but it’s just absurd. There’s no point in arguing against it. It doesn’t deserve further attention. 

[Dizkneelande 1,086]

None of Biden’s policies are racist except that time he worked with a segregationist to specifically target Black people for mass incarceration which devastated an entire generation.

[Casual Observer 597]

14 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

As to who the candidate should be I’ve no idea at the moment. Anti-semite RFK Jr is a nonstarter. I like Kamala more than some, but she has even worse ratings than Biden. Gavin Newsom is slick and sleazy and unethical, sort of a California version of Bill Clinton, but he might make a good President. I’ve heard great things about Shapiro in Pennsylvania. 

Of course you have.

[RLLD 4,143]

14 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

As to who the candidate should be I’ve no idea at the moment. Anti-semite RFK Jr is a nonstarter. I like Kamala more than some, but she has even worse ratings than Biden. Gavin Newsom is slick and sleazy and unethical, sort of a California version of Bill Clinton, but he might make a good President. I’ve heard great things about Shapiro in Pennsylvania. 

JMHO, Newsome is the likely replacement.  He would likely be worse for the country than Joe has been, which bothers me a bit. 

[BuckSwope 654]

11 hours ago, Voltaire said:

He's already said a few bajillion times that he's running again and I hope he does because he's likely to lose to Trump. If he doesn't run, I'm worried the Dems may turn to somebody with better odds.

Yeah, who is that?   That's the point for them, there is nobody currently.  

[seafoam1 2,804]

5 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Dude I’m just joking around. 

I couldn’t really respond to the rest of your post because honestly I find it ridiculous. I know it’s a popular meme among conservatives to claim these days that the media is the tool of the liberal government, but it’s just absurd. There’s no point in arguing against it. It doesn’t deserve further attention. 

First you say you like kamala harris and now this. You are one lost puppy. 

[Mike Hunt 262]

14 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

So I’ve made no bones about the fact that, though I dislike Joe Biden, I think he’s done a pretty good job as President. And if he is on the ballot next year I will happily vote for him again, especially if the opponent is, as appears will be, Donald Trump. 

But…

Unlike some here, I believe in polls. Polls don’t lie. And every poll I’ve been reading lately tell me the same damn things: 

1. Biden’s  ratings remain dismally low. We’ve been told that this will change when people see the results of the infrastructure bill or the Reduce Inflation Act. We’ve been told this will change when folks start to feel better about the economy. But guess what? It’s not happening. And there’s no reason to believe it will happen a year from now. Public attitudes about Joe Biden seem to be entrenched. 

2. The public thinks he’s too old. Personally I don’t see anything wrong with Joe’s faculties, but the majority of Americans disagree. And this is not going to get any better. This issue is going to stick around all the way to the election. And there’s no good way to fight it. 

3. It was announced today that Hunter is going to be indicted next month. I still don’t think Joe had anything to do with this but at best it’s an unnecessary distraction. At worst it could be real trouble. Like Hillary’s emails, it’s a headache that we (those who want to see Democrats do well) don’t need. 
 

The bottom line is this: Trump could win. He could actually win. 
 

Since I do not want to see Trump win, I reluctantly have reached the conclusion that Joe Biden should announce that he is not seeking re-election. Now. Before it’s too late. 

 

 

 

Is is not that the public thinks he is too old, let be honest Biden is too old.  The gaffes and blunders keep piling up as he shuffles around and slurs his words.  Do we want him starting a new term at 82? That will assure Harris would be POTUS and she is worse.

As far as would  run.  In primaries Harris would not have a chance.  Newsome?  I guess he talks a smooth game but California is a disaster.

What I don`t want is Trump vs Biden again.  

[Voltaire 5,203]

4 hours ago, BuckSwope said:

Yeah, who is that?   That's the point for them, there is nobody currently.  

They have Transportation mastermind, Pete Buttguy. Amy Klobuchar is only obnoxious to her staff, not the greater public. In Michigan we have half-wit whose message resonates with leftoids.

[seafoam1 2,804]

13 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

They have Transportation mastermind, Pete Buttguy. Amy Klobuchar is only obnoxious to her staff, not the greater public. In Michigan we have half-wit whose message resonates with leftoids.

I think pete buttplug is still on maternity leave.

[RLLD 4,143]

32 minutes ago, Mike Hunt said:

 

Is is not that the public thinks he is too old, let be honest Biden is too old.  The gaffes and blunders keep piling up as he shuffles around and slurs his words.  Do we want him starting a new term at 82? That will assure Harris would be POTUS and she is worse.

As far as would  run.  In primaries Harris would not have a chance.  Newsome?  I guess he talks a smooth game but California is a disaster.

What I don`t want is Trump vs Biden again.  

I have a slightly different take on this.  I think there are men his age who are rather alert and coherent, and certainly could be up to the task of the role of President. It is less his numerical age so much as his obvious issues.....

If he were 60 and showing the obvious decline that is he now, I would be more or less in the same spot....he is not fit for the job. I doubt he is actually doing much of anything. I presume the WH is being run by the Chief of Staff who is more or less balancing the competing special interest elements within the white house staff. 

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I doubt he is actually doing much of anything. I presume the WH is being run by the Chief of Staff who is more or less balancing the competing special interest elements within the white house staff. 

 

Neera Tanden is running day to day operations in the White House. In effect, she's deciding policy, and of course, she was never elected. 

This is why there's a split right now with establishment Democrats. When Susan Rice was ousted, Obama was effectively shut out. Hence why Obama's personal Bib Fortuna in David Axelrod kept going into the press and talking up Gavin Newsom. 

Klobuchar lined up with Biden and Tanden. She should have been VPOTUS in the 2020 cycle. She's the only high level Democrat left who actually understands policy. Klobuchar understands that the DNC would rather line up behind Gretchen Whitmer in the future instead. Which, again, is totally insulting. Klobuchar is a sadist, but she's actually competent. To be shelved for these endless parades of incompetents was just too much. Of course the Biden Administration was going to fail, no one at a high level understood basic policy. Ron Klain is a dark money bundler, he has no business running logistics in the White House. Jennifer Dillon was sent to run Beto O'Rourke's failed campaigns because no one else wanted to hire her. Susan Rice was best known for enabling the Rwandan genocide. Jen Psaki is an idiot. She's also a bigot, but the MSM won't cover that. I wouldn't give Blinken a job washing my car. Buttigieg clearly is in over his head and Harris is a pure disaster zone. 

The short answer is Obama is an idiot. Don't get me wrong, Trump might be a grifter and an imbecile on the other side, but Obama had all the horses and ran this country into the ground. How do you control most of the MSM, Hollywood, most of Big Social Media, Big Tech, Big Education and most of Big Finance and still fail? How do you not have total lock down over every major institution in this country with that kind of pure leverage? 

Obama gave us all identity politics, pro trans extremism, Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. But he's given a pass in the MSM because he's Team Blue and he's seen as the "cool black guy" in a sea of white wealthy leftists with too much guilt. But Obama did more than his share to utterly destroy this country. 

[Dizkneelande 1,086]

Good luck with Newsom

https://x.com/laurapowellesq/status/1699535716605472866?s=46&t=Fib7p2nPeGXuJiuDfFsfmA

[Dizkneelande 1,086]

 

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

1 hour ago, BuckSwope said:

Yeah, who is that?   That's the point for them, there is nobody currently.  

 

Tulsi Gabbard would be cruising to her 2nd POTUS term right now had she received full Party support in 2020.  She is EXACTLY everything that fits the checklist that comes with an ideal candidate for Team Blue, other than the fact that she can't be controlled and she was willing to oppose Clinton. 

The belief that "there is nobody" is a farce. The problem is there is "nobody" who fits a practical checklist who is also controllable by corporate interests. Abagail Spanberger would make a more than competent POTUS. She's also a Democrat. But she is more of a traditional liberal than a standard issue woke psychotic radical leftist. So the MSM pretends she doesn't exist. 

It's easier to control a caricature and a stooge.  DNC HQ wants Gavin Newsom. A human Ken doll from pure "privilege" from a Party that decries systemic racism. How thick is that irony for you? 

For those leftists in here who hate Trump, go ahead. If you want to denounce the Republican Party, go ahead. If you don't like tons of things that the GOP says and does, go ahead. There's actually A LOT wrong with Team Red. I won't deny that. But every single moment you support anything that lines up with identity politics, you are just enabling the kind of world where it's easier for your children to be future slaves and die. 

Do you think the radical left would show your kids any mercy if it's not "politically expedient" for them to do so? 

[The Real timschochet 6,447]

18 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Good luck with Newsom

https://x.com/laurapowellesq/status/1699535716605472866?s=46&t=Fib7p2nPeGXuJiuDfFsfmA

I get that you and many other conservatives believe that liberal acceptance of transgender people is a very important issue. But it’s naive of you to believe that it would ever be decisive in a national election. 

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

1 hour ago, Mike Hunt said:

 

Is is not that the public thinks he is too old, let be honest Biden is too old.  The gaffes and blunders keep piling up as he shuffles around and slurs his words.  Do we want him starting a new term at 82? That will assure Harris would be POTUS and she is worse.

As far as would  run.  In primaries Harris would not have a chance.  Newsome?  I guess he talks a smooth game but California is a disaster.

What I don`t want is Trump vs Biden again.  

 

Here's the unintentionally hilarious part of all this garbage from Team Blue - Nancy Pelosi is 82 years old as of today. 

If Newsom manages to somehow win 2024 POTUS, then Pelosi would be the defacto President. No one believes Newsom would actually be running this country. He would be what he has always been, a human sock puppet for Pelosi to use him to pull the strings. 

So the endless geriatric problem in top level US leadership would continue with Newsom. 

[RLLD 4,143]

3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I get that you and many other conservatives believe that liberal acceptance of transgender people is a very important issue. But it’s naive of you to believe that it would ever be decisive in a national election. 

I think the all-or-nothing approach whereby preventing biological men from competing with women is strawman'ed into non-acceptance is more problematic than might be appreciated.

I think most people feel sorry for those afflicted with mental illness, and I think most people are rather kind toward them (well, maybe not rappers lol).

Now a further problem is this thing where justification through science is tried, and that really makes people look silly.  Not being able to define a woman, pretending men can get pregnant.....it cartoonish, and naturally people might refuse to play along with the pychosis at that point. But the submit in total or else approach, that p!ssed people off

[Mike Hunt 262]

12 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I get that you and many other conservatives believe that liberal acceptance of transgender people is a very important issue. But it’s naive of you to believe that it would ever be decisive in a national election. 

I am all for the accepting trans people.  

As a father of a daughter, I don`t want bio men competing bio women in physical sporting events. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

Not just you

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/07/politics/cnn-poll-joe-biden-headwinds/index.html

Personally I don't want to vote for Biden.  I think he's a terrible candidate.  But Trump is worse.

Biden really needs to bow out.

[RLLD 4,143]

If it should arise that Democrats feel as though Biden cannot win they will of course move him out, one way or another.  Just who they put up is going to be interesting.

Of course I hope none of them get in, and frankly I do not need Trump either....but I must insist on the restoration of the path that Trump set down, I just want the policies....

[MDC 7,149]

Dems strategy will probably be to keep Joe off camera and out of the spotlight as much as possible and hope Trump hang’s himself with his own big fat mouth again.

[BuckSwope 654]

1 hour ago, Voltaire said:

They have Transportation mastermind, Pete Buttguy. Amy Klobuchar is only obnoxious to her staff, not the greater public. In Michigan we have half-wit whose message resonates with leftoids.

Like I said... 

[MTSkiBum 1,620]

16 hours ago, MDC said:

Biden and Trump should both step down but neither party has a viable alternative.

Both parties have plenty of alternatives, the problem is that the public votes for flashy speakers and soundbites instead of sound policies and compromise.

 

[MDC 7,149]

5 minutes ago, MTSkiBum said:

Both parties have plenty of alternatives, the problem is that the public votes for flashy speakers and soundbites instead of sound policies and compromise.

 

“Viable” alternative - no one who can win the nomination AND win the general. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,959]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

I get that you and many other conservatives believe that liberal acceptance of transgender people is a very important issue. But it’s naive of you to believe that it would ever be decisive in a national election. 

What does acceptance entail? Not notifying parents their kids is transitioning at school? I know you’re a supporter, but hardly anyone else is. 

[The Real timschochet 6,447]

1 hour ago, Mike Hunt said:

I am all for the accepting trans people.  

As a father of a daughter, I don`t want bio men competing bio women in physical sporting events. 

I agree with you. 

My point is only that whatever one’s views on this issue it’s not going to make any difference in a national election. It’s just not important enough to most people. 

[RLLD 4,143]

5 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I agree with you. 

My point is only that whatever one’s views on this issue it’s not going to make any difference in a national election. It’s just not important enough to most people. 

It wasn't for most I think, until they started placing this stuff in schools....I think that has captured the attention of parents at least.  I do not think you get Youngkin in VA if they weren't evangelizing this in schools....

[Dizkneelande 1,086]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

I get that you and many other conservatives believe that liberal acceptance of transgender people is a very important issue. But it’s naive of you to believe that it would ever be decisive in a national election. 

It’s naive of you to believe that punishing parents who refuse to affirm their 10 year olds gender will play with normal people.

[RogerDodger 797]

3 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

I get that you and many other conservatives believe that liberal acceptance of transgender people is a very important issue. But it’s naive of you to believe that it would ever be decisive in a national election. 

Confirmed Tranny Lover

[jerryskids 6,576]

13 hours ago, BunnysBastatrds said:

 It actually doesn’t  It doesn’t matter when. The media is  armed and ready for whomever now. They knew nothing about Palin and within days knew if she shaved her poosay clean or has an airstrip bush. The complete opposite of how they handle dems like Obama. The media is now the fourth branch of government whether or not you want it to be. It’s jus a matter of time till they really go after the Judical branch.

 

 

 

 

 

Well, which is it?!   

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

12 hours ago, BunnysBastatrds said:

 Wow. Just WOW. That’s your intellectual response and rebuttal? It’s an example you  blind ignorant follower. Do you have an intelligent coherent response other than the one above? I hope so. I don’t know how to respond now. But will full throttle if you do. 

 

 

Now timschochet will start attacking you with his aliases in other threads. That's his MO. If he's not getting enough "attention", he'll try to generate it. 

At the "other place", he used to get his aliases to argue with each other. Then they'd show up and back up his main account by agreeing with him. The pathology behind it was disturbing. The key to understanding Tim is he doesn't believe anything he actually says. If he could get more attention by supporting Trump to no end, he'd do that instead. 

He's going to eventually drive people off one by one from this place, just like he did at "the other place" Using the same gutless tactics and warped mindset and toxic behavior here. 

Everyone knows he's Dozer FBG and Francie Football and others here. He claims he's a parent. So maybe this place and the other place were actually indirectly doing his kids a favor. By generating decades and 250K plus posts at the other place with his aliases, it's possible that distracted him enough from ruining the lives of those kids in day to day life. There is no way anyone who acts like he does could be a functional parent, much less a good one. 

Don't argue with him, just pity his children. I genuinely pity his children. 

[The Real timschochet 6,447]

39 minutes ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

Now timschochet will start attacking you with his aliases in other threads. That's his MO. If he's not getting enough "attention", he'll try to generate it. 

At the "other place", he used to get his aliases to argue with each other. Then they'd show up and back up his main account by agreeing with him. The pathology behind it was disturbing. The key to understanding Tim is he doesn't believe anything he actually says. If he could get more attention by supporting Trump to no end, he'd do that instead. 

He's going to eventually drive people off one by one from this place, just like he did at "the other place" Using the same gutless tactics and warped mindset and toxic behavior here. 

Everyone knows he's Dozer FBG and Francie Football and others here. He claims he's a parent. So maybe this place and the other place were actually indirectly doing his kids a favor. By generating decades and 250K plus posts at the other place with his aliases, it's possible that distracted him enough from ruining the lives of those kids in day to day life. There is no way anyone who acts like he does could be a functional parent, much less a good one. 

Don't argue with him, just pity his children. I genuinely pity his children. 

Every sentence of this is wrong and delusional. 

[The Real timschochet 6,447]

I don’t have any aliases in here. At FBG I haven’t used aliases in over 10 years. I’m not Dozer. 
 

Also why would I attack @BunnysBastatrds? I think he’s wrong about the media, and what he wrote about Palin seems a little crude and weird, but I generally enjoy his posts around here: He’s a funny dude. Unlike you. However, I suppose I should be glad that you pity my kids since at least one other guy around here hopes that they get raped. Compared to that pity is a positive, I guess. 

[The Real timschochet 6,447]

5 hours ago, Casual Observer said:

Of course you have.

Ah the Jew Hater posts! 
 

I’ve noticed you around more lately. Did you lose your account at Stormfront? 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,959]

15 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t have any aliases in here. At FBG I haven’t used aliases in over 10 years. I’m not Dozer. 
 

Also why would I attack @BunnysBastatrds? I think he’s wrong about the media, and what he wrote about Palin seems a little crude and weird, but I generally enjoy his posts around here: He’s a funny dude. Unlike you. However, I suppose I should be glad that you pity my kids since at least one other guy around here hopes that they get raped. Compared to that pity is a positive, I guess. 

Who hopes your kid gets raped? 

[TommyGavin 790]

18 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Lol you must be bored to concern yourself with Sarah Palin&/ privates. 

Well that was MY question to BB. Which is it ?

[seafoam1 2,804]

8 minutes ago, TommyGavin said:

Well that was MY question to BB. Which is it ?

What does Bill Belichick have to do with this?

[RogerDodger 797]

6 hours ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

Now timschochet will start attacking you with his aliases in other threads. That's his MO. If he's not getting enough "attention", he'll try to generate it. 

At the "other place", he used to get his aliases to argue with each other. Then they'd show up and back up his main account by agreeing with him. The pathology behind it was disturbing. The key to understanding Tim is he doesn't believe anything he actually says. If he could get more attention by supporting Trump to no end, he'd do that instead. 

He's going to eventually drive people off one by one from this place, just like he did at "the other place" Using the same gutless tactics and warped mindset and toxic behavior here. 

Everyone knows he's Dozer FBG and Francie Football and others here. He claims he's a parent. So maybe this place and the other place were actually indirectly doing his kids a favor. By generating decades and 250K plus posts at the other place with his aliases, it's possible that distracted him enough from ruining the lives of those kids in day to day life. There is no way anyone who acts like he does could be a functional parent, much less a good one. 

Don't argue with him, just pity his children. I genuinely pity his children. 

Except Francie is Rusty.

[TommyGavin 790]

12 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

What does Bill Belichick have to do with this?

I was talking about the OG BB. 

[Casual Observer 597]

On 9/7/2023 at 1:12 PM, The Real timschochet said:

Ah the Jew Hater posts! 
 

I’ve noticed you around more lately. Did you lose your account at Stormfront? 

Ah, the shameless Jewish supremacist tries to boost someone named Shapiro!  That's funny because I'm rarely here.  You know, every time I read one of your posts I hear, in my mind's ear (if there is such a thing), the voice of Saul Rosenberg from the old Jerky Boys CDs.