War in Israel

[Strike 5,542]

3 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

3. I’m not suggesting nuclear fusion as a specific solution to this problem, I’m suggesting it will be a solution to ALL of our problems, and make issues like this one that is causing us so much worry irrelevant. It will completely change the nature of human society. 

This is ridiculous.  Nuclear power is NOT going to resolve religious wars.  it's certainly not going to change the mindset of people who are still acting like Christians did thousands of years ago.  How is Nuclear Fusion going to stop Muslims from executing homosexuals Tim?

[The Real timschochet 6,764]

29 minutes ago, Strike said:

This is ridiculous.  Nuclear power is NOT going to resolve religious wars.  it's certainly not going to change the mindset of people who are still acting like Christians did thousands of years ago.  How is Nuclear Fusion going to stop Muslims from executing homosexuals Tim?

There is a theory among historians that the more prosperous societies are, the more advanced, the less amount of savage horror. This is not a perfect theory but I believe it’s generally true. Nuclear fusion would mean technological advancement and standard of living for all mankind beyond our imagination. I think it will change their mindsets. 

[Gepetto 1,368]

3 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The Hamas human filth were hunting down women and shooting them at point blank range while the women pleaded for their life. Exterminate the whole lot of them. They are savages. 

If the Israeli forces hadn't secured all areas in Israel on or immediately after the October 7th attack, Hamas had plans to stay and occupy those towns at a minimum, with potential to expand toward the West Bank.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

Just now, Gepetto said:

If the Israeli forces hadn't secured all areas in Israel, Hamas had plans to stay and occupy those towns at a minimum, with potential to expand toward the West Bank.

We really need to stay out of this upon further analysis. Let us know when you’re done. 

[jonnyutah 287]

4 hours ago, nobody said:

So Semetic tribes -> Roman conquest -> Arab conquest -> Ottoman conquest -> Britain conquest -> Ceded to Israel

I guess I can see why Palestinians are adamant the land belongs to them.

Palestinians are among the lowest IQ groups in the world. Mostly because they bang their cousins at an insane frequency. 

Of course they think the land is theirs. 

[jonnyutah 287]

Cousin Ahmed and Fatima sitting in a tree

[League Champion 1,911]

45 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

Palestinians are among the lowest IQ groups in the world. Mostly because they bang their cousins at an insane frequenc

This is fact

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

Wow. American liberals and radical Islamists alligned now. Where’s that asteroid? 

[DonS 3,292]

1 hour ago, jonnyutah said:

Palestinians are among the lowest IQ groups in the world. Mostly because they bang their cousins at an insane frequency. 

At least this gives the goats in the region a break every now and then. 

[jonnyutah 287]

44 minutes ago, DonS said:

At least this gives the goats in the region a break every now and then. 

Sure, but at least the goats don't give birth to mentally handicapped future terrorists as a result. 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

Four day truce and release of 50 hostages agreed to

[thegeneral 3,214]

39 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Four day truce and release of 50 hostages agreed to

Some more details:

“Under the terms of the agreement, Hamas is to free 50 women and children of the 239 hostages it is holding in the Gaza Strip over a four-day period, the Israeli government said. It said it would extend the lull by an additional day for every 10 hostages released.

Hamas is to release 12 Israeli women and children every night for four days. In return, Israel will allow three hundred aid trucks into Gaza every day of the ceasefire and free 150 Palestinians held in Israeli jails, according to sources close to the talks. It was not immediately clear when the truce would go into effect.”

Link

[League Champion 1,911]

 

[League Champion 1,911]

THE IGNORANT LEFT

 

 

[Voltaire 5,316]

3 hours ago, League Champion said:

THE IGNORANT LEFT

 

 

Trans liberation is a reality in California, maybe they're inviting the Palestinians to come join them.

[League Champion 1,911]

'I will be haunted forever’: Israel’s horrific video of Hamas atrocities leaves viewers shocked and sickened

https://www.foxnews.com/world/i-will-be-haunted-forever-israels-horrific-video-hamas-atrocities-leaves-viewers-shocked-sickened

[HellToupee 1,776]

On 11/23/2023 at 11:17 AM, League Champion said:

THE IGNORANT LEFT

 

 

Even @squistionhas to laugh when he sees this level of stupidity 

[League Champion 1,911]

4 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Even @squistionhas to laugh when he sees this level of stupidity 

I wouldn't be too sure about that, he's pretty stupid. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,103]

On 11/23/2023 at 1:33 PM, Voltaire said:

Trans liberation is a reality in California, maybe they're inviting the Palestinians to come join them.

God bless, liberals.  They are so f'n stupid and easily led. 

Of course, they'll also be the death of us all, including themselves. 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

Israel has cast the deaths of civilians in the Gaza Strip as a regrettable but unavoidable part of modern conflict, pointing to the heavy human toll from military campaigns the United States itself once waged in Iraq and Syria.

But a review of past conflicts and interviews with casualty and weapons experts suggest that Israel’s assault is different.

While wartime death tolls will never be exact, experts say that even a conservative reading of the casualty figures reported from Gaza shows that the pace of death during Israel’s campaign has few precedents in this century.

People are being killed in Gaza more quickly, they say, than in even the deadliest moments of U.S.-led attacks in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, which were themselves widely criticized by human rights groups.

…

Civilian casualties are notoriously hard to calculate, and officials in the Hamas-run Gaza Strip do not separate the deaths of civilians and combatants.

Researchers point instead to the roughly 10,000 women and children reported killed in Gaza as an approximate — though conservative — measure of civilian deaths in the territory. International officials and experts familiar with the way figures are compiled by health officials in Gaza say the overall numbers are generally reliable.

The Israeli military acknowledged that children, women and older people have been killed in Gaza, but said the death toll reported in Gaza could not be trusted because the territory is run by Hamas. The military did not provide a count of its own, but said that civilians “are not the target” of its campaign.

“We do a lot in order to prevent and, where possible, minimize the killing or wounding of civilians,” said Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus, an Israeli military spokesman. “We focus on Hamas.”

Still, researchers say the pace of deaths reported in Gaza during the Israeli bombardment has been exceptionally high.

More than twice as many women and children have already been reported killed in Gaza than in Ukraine after almost two years of Russian attacks, according to United Nations estimates.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,103]

Just now, IGotWorms said:

Israel has cast the deaths of civilians in the Gaza Strip as a regrettable but unavoidable part of modern conflict, pointing to the heavy human toll from military campaigns the United States itself once waged in Iraq and Syria.

But a review of past conflicts and interviews with casualty and weapons experts suggest that Israel’s assault is different.

While wartime death tolls will never be exact, experts say that even a conservative reading of the casualty figures reported from Gaza shows that the pace of death during Israel’s campaign has few precedents in this century.

People are being killed in Gaza more quickly, they say, than in even the deadliest moments of U.S.-led attacks in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, which were themselves widely criticized by human rights groups.

…

Civilian casualties are notoriously hard to calculate, and officials in the Hamas-run Gaza Strip do not separate the deaths of civilians and combatants.

Researchers point instead to the roughly 10,000 women and children reported killed in Gaza as an approximate — though conservative — measure of civilian deaths in the territory. International officials and experts familiar with the way figures are compiled by health officials in Gaza say the overall numbers are generally reliable.

The Israeli military acknowledged that children, women and older people have been killed in Gaza, but said the death toll reported in Gaza could not be trusted because the territory is run by Hamas. The military did not provide a count of its own, but said that civilians “are not the target” of its campaign.

“We do a lot in order to prevent and, where possible, minimize the killing or wounding of civilians,” said Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus, an Israeli military spokesman. “We focus on Hamas.”

Still, researchers say the pace of deaths reported in Gaza during the Israeli bombardment has been exceptionally high.

More than twice as many women and children have already been reported killed in Gaza than in Ukraine after almost two years of Russian attacks, according to United Nations estimates.

Thanks for admitting being pro-Hamas.  Any other terrorist organizations you look up to?  Terrorist leaders?  Lemme - guess: Bin Laden is your personal OG fave, right?

You're a f'n disgusting POS.

[Strike 5,542]

59 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Israel has cast the deaths of civilians in the Gaza Strip as a regrettable but unavoidable part of modern conflict, pointing to the heavy human toll from military campaigns the United States itself once waged in Iraq and Syria.

But a review of past conflicts and interviews with casualty and weapons experts suggest that Israel’s assault is different.

While wartime death tolls will never be exact, experts say that even a conservative reading of the casualty figures reported from Gaza shows that the pace of death during Israel’s campaign has few precedents in this century.

People are being killed in Gaza more quickly, they say, than in even the deadliest moments of U.S.-led attacks in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, which were themselves widely criticized by human rights groups.

…

Civilian casualties are notoriously hard to calculate, and officials in the Hamas-run Gaza Strip do not separate the deaths of civilians and combatants.

Researchers point instead to the roughly 10,000 women and children reported killed in Gaza as an approximate — though conservative — measure of civilian deaths in the territory. International officials and experts familiar with the way figures are compiled by health officials in Gaza say the overall numbers are generally reliable.

The Israeli military acknowledged that children, women and older people have been killed in Gaza, but said the death toll reported in Gaza could not be trusted because the territory is run by Hamas. The military did not provide a count of its own, but said that civilians “are not the target” of its campaign.

“We do a lot in order to prevent and, where possible, minimize the killing or wounding of civilians,” said Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus, an Israeli military spokesman. “We focus on Hamas.”

Still, researchers say the pace of deaths reported in Gaza during the Israeli bombardment has been exceptionally high.

More than twice as many women and children have already been reported killed in Gaza than in Ukraine after almost two years of Russian attacks, according to United Nations estimates.

Couldn't even include a link? 

[Reality 3,121]

33 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Thanks for admitting being pro-Hamas.  Any other terrorist organizations you look up to?  Terrorist leaders?  Lemme - guess: Bin Laden is your personal OG fave, right?

You're a f'n disgusting POS.

Yup, their behavior was so predictable. Feigning concern for Israel while simultaneously warning Israel not to respond too harshly. As if it were any of their business how Israel responds after such grotesque atrocities. Anti-semites, the lot of them.

The only proper response is the complete eradication of Hamas.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,103]

8 minutes ago, Reality said:

Yup, their behavior was so predictable. Feigning concern for Israel while simultaneously warning Israel not to respond too harshly. As if it were any of their business how Israel responds after such grotesque atrocities. Anti-semites, the lot of them.

The only proper response is the complete eradication of Hamas.

Absolutely 100%.  They just need to take over the entire West Bank and Palestine and ship all of those people out to the surrounding muslim countries.  All those two areas do is breed, foment and support Hamas terrorists and terrorism.  Israel does itself no favors by ceding this land to them.  Kick them all out.

Unfortunately, they (Hamas, palestine, etc...) will NEVER change. 

[Strike 5,542]

25 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Absolutely 100%.  They just need to take over the entire West Bank and Palestine and ship all of those people out to the surrounding muslim countries.  All those two areas do is breed, foment and support Hamas terrorists and terrorism.  Israel does itself no favors by ceding this land to them.  Kick them all out.

Unfortunately, they (Hamas, palestine, etc...) will NEVER change. 

Come on man.  All they need is a little Nuclear Fission and they'll totally change their tune!!!

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,103]

Just now, Strike said:

Come on man.  All they need is a little Nuclear Fission and they'll totally change their tune!!!

Right? It's only The White Man™ and The Jews™ that are violent and colonizers.  Everyone else is peaceful, kumbayah, can't we all just get along types.  They would never harm anyone!!!  

[Gepetto 1,368]

Strength and intelligence wins. Wipe them off the earth. This is how it works in this world since the beginning of time.

[The Real timschochet 6,764]

1 hour ago, Strike said:

Come on man.  All they need is a little Nuclear Fission and they'll totally change their tune!!!

Fusion. Fission won’t get it done. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

I’d like to give the people in Israel a new homeland and give Israel to the sand Nazis. Within ten years the new Israel would be thriving and the old one would be ashes. A relic of a once civilized, modern country. We all know this.  

[Gepetto 1,368]

On 11/25/2023 at 3:45 PM, Hardcore troubadour said:

I’d like to give the people in Israel a new homeland and give Israel to the sand Nazis. Within ten years the new Israel would be thriving and the old one would be ashes. A relic of a once civilized, modern country. We all know this.  

They would never accept a country that doesn't include the land Jerusalem is in, so that won't work.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

23 hours ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Thanks for admitting being pro-Hamas.  Any other terrorist organizations you look up to?  Terrorist leaders?  Lemme - guess: Bin Laden is your personal OG fave, right?

You're a f'n disgusting POS.

Um, it was just a news article pertinent to the discussion

[IGotWorms 4,058]

22 hours ago, Strike said:

Couldn't even include a link? 

You can use google. You’re dumb, but not that dumb  

[Strike 5,542]

10 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

You can use google. You’re dumb, but not that dumb  

Sure I can, and I did.  That doesn't change the fact that it's a poosey move not to include a link to begin with.  But since you so rarely post anything of value and/or from an external source one can understand how you'd not be familiar with the courtesies associated with posting articles.  I find it humorous that, while you say " it was just a news article pertinent to the discussion", it actually isn't.  You posted cherry picked excerpts from an article, only including maybe 25% of the total article.  One has to wonder why you'd do that if you were just trying to post "news."  If you were posting "news" one would think you'd post the entire article.  It's like you had an agenda when posting your "news article."  Once a poosey, always a poosey, I guess. 

And, in case anyone wants to read the entire article that the Poosey quoted from, here is the link:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/25/world/middleeast/israel-gaza-death-toll.html

[IGotWorms 4,058]

16 minutes ago, Strike said:

Sure I can, and I did.  That doesn't change the fact that it's a poosey move not to include a link to begin with.  But since you so rarely post anything of value and/or from an external source one can understand how you'd not be familiar with the courtesies associated with posting articles.  I find it humorous that, while you say " it was just a news article pertinent to the discussion", it actually isn't.  You posted cherry picked excerpts from an article, only including maybe 25% of the total article.  One has to wonder why you'd do that if you were just trying to post "news."  If you were posting "news" one would think you'd post the entire article.  It's like you had an agenda when posting your "news article."  Once a poosey, always a poosey, I guess. 

And, in case anyone wants to read the entire article that the Poosey quoted from, here is the link:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/25/world/middleeast/israel-gaza-death-toll.html

I can’t post the whole article, dipsh1t. It’s a copyright issue. You want to read The NY Times, you have to pay for a subscription

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,103]

20 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

I can’t post the whole article, dipsh1t. It’s a copyright issue. You want to read The NY Times, you have to pay for a subscription

I think the big takeaway here is that you're a f'n useful idiot for your masters at the DNC.  Oh, also a PRO-HAMAS/Pro-Terrorist sack of shiate too. 

[Strike 5,542]

46 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

I can’t post the whole article, dipsh1t. It’s a copyright issue. You want to read The NY Times, you have to pay for a subscription

Are you f'ing kidding me?   People post entire articles all the freaking time.  That's what you're going with?  All the more reason to post a link and note that you're posting excerpts.  But we all know the real reason.  As I noted above, you had an agenda and posted specifically chosen excerpts from the article.   Man you're a bigger poosey than I thought.

[Reality 3,121]

2 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

I can’t post the whole article, dipsh1t. It’s a copyright issue. You want to read The NY Times, you have to pay for a subscription

You're a focking idiot.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,103]

14 minutes ago, Reality said:

You're a focking idiot.

Calling worms an idiot is an insult to actual idiots.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

G0d damn have I got you little bitches’ panties in a twist

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,103]

19 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

G0d damn have I got you little bitches’ panties in a twist

Yeah, your pro-terrorist dumb f'n idiot shtick has really fooled everyone.