Jump to content
The Real timschochet

Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Strike said:

Man, this is when this bored just gets very tedious.  I shouldn't have to go through this detailed analysis but you're forcing me to.  No, I didn't misunderstand.  Your post, that I replied to, was in response to a post about how @The Real timschochet hopes the GOP campaigns against her in a certain way.  And you replied:

 

The clear meaning of your post is that they should ALSO campaign against her as a DEI hire.  You support that by saying ALL left leaning minority politicians are DEI hires.  I assume you mean to right leaning people.   You may have been trying to open the door to a discussion about all minority lefty politicians but I'm only concerned about Kameltoe.  So I responded accordingly, limiting my comment to Kameltoe.   Your subsequent posts make no logical sense.  Because Kameltoe IS part of that minority group you're talking about.  So, when I say Kameltoe is in fact a DEI hire that's a valid statement.   Either you dispute that she's a DEI hire, which really can't be done since Joe did in fact choose her because of her minority status, or the discussion should be over. 

For some reason you're fixated on expanding the pool of discussion to all minority candidates.  I'm not really interested in that discussion because this thread is about the Presidential election.  But, you'd be wrong anyways.  Most politicians are elected to their position.  That's by definition not a DEI hire.  So no, righties don't think ALL minority politicians are DEI hires.

 

 

Did you name one who the GC doesn’t call a DEI hire in all this word salad?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MDC said:

Did you name one who the GC doesn’t call a DEI hire in all this word salad?

WTF does this have to with anything?   :wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Strike said:

WTF does this have to with anything?   :wacko:

My pointe was that the GC calls every black Dem a DEI hire. Try to keep up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Strike said:

Here, I'll play your game.  Josiah T. Walls.

He was a Republican, nitwit. :lol: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MDC said:

My pointe was that the GC calls every black Dem a DEI hire. Try to keep up.

That wasn't your point  You were responding to a Tim post about how the republicans should campaign against Kameltoe and you said they should paint her as a DEI hire.  Why do you keep pretending you didn't say that?  :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MDC said:

He was a Republican, nitwit. :lol: 

Yep, and I deleted that post.  Here you go:  Troy Carter.  So you're wrong again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Strike said:

That wasn't your point  

Yes stupid, it was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

You replied to me initially, did you not?  Thanks for playing.

I don’t think I did 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Strike said:

Yep, and I deleted that post.  Here you go:  Troy Carter.  So you're wrong again.

Never heard of him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is it that the most popular ticket EVER in election history may have both people removed from the running this year? Unpossible

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

How is it that the most popular ticket EVER in election history may have both people removed from the running this year? Unpossible

They collected the most votes (not most popular) going against Trump in 2020. Not really hard to figure out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be good that if Trump wins we finally get a proper investigation into the election fraud in 2020. Justice demands it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MDC said:

Yes stupid, it was.

Sure buddy.  Anyways, I answered your question.  Want some more? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, MDC said:

Never heard of him.

Moving the goalposts, huh?   Quit wasting my time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It will be good that if Trump wins we finally get a proper investigation into the election fraud in 2020. Justice demands it. 

I would rather not. 
 

The people would be better served if he instead focused on restoring all those policies the Biden ruined.

Now, if he also wants anted to fit the DOJ….i could get behind that. The partisan lawfare has been unacceptable.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RLLD said:

I would rather not. 
 

The people would be better served if he instead focused on restoring all those policies the Biden ruined.

Now, if he also wants anted to fit the DOJ….i could get behind that. The partisan lawfare has been unacceptable.

 

Nah. I want him to take a flamethrower to the place. Must burn it to save it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang in there Joe, rest up and get over this COVID. The media and their allies: Pelosi, Schumer, and Obama all want you to leave/ They are all hiding stilettos when they claim they just want to 'talk to' you and cannot be trusted anymore.

Tell them to fock off and get in line. Just start campaigning again next week. When you lock up the nomination, this will all pass.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It will be good that if Trump wins we finally get a proper investigation into the election fraud in 2020. Justice demands it. 

Was there something stopping the House from doing one? :wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Strike said:

Moving the goalposts, huh?   Quit wasting my time.

You responded to me Bud. I’m never sitting here thinking, “I wonder what Strike has to say about this.” 😂 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MDC said:

You responded to me Bud. I’m never sitting here thinking, “I wonder what Strike has to say about this.” 😂 

You asked me 3+ times to name a politician the Geek Club hasn't called a DEI hire.  I do that and proved your entire assertion incorrect.  You're acting like a baby.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with @Strike’s argument is that it assumes that because Biden determined to have a black female Vice President, that in itself makes Kamala Harris unqualified. “DEI hire” is used as a slur or put down. 
But the actual facts contradict this. It’s not like Biden, after deciding to appoint a black woman, chose somebody off the street with race and sex as the only consideration. To the contrary: once Biden determined to appoint a black woman, he then looked at a list of black women who are qualified to be vice-President. He chose Kamala Harris from that list. 
 

And this is what conservatives so often ignore about DEI or affirmative action: it’s not a qualifier in itself, but only the first specification. You still have to be very good at what you do or you’re never getting that job or appointment.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Strike said:

You asked me 3+ times to name a politician the Geek Club hasn't called a DEI hire.  I do that and proved your entire assertion incorrect.  You're acting like a baby.

Dear Lord. I was having a conversation with someone else entirely when you insisted that what I said was wrong. When I asked you which minority left politicians the GC doesn’t consider DEI hires, you named a Republican from the 1800s and a rep I’ve never heard of. 

What are you even sobbing about? I go to the gym at 7:30 so please make it fast. :doh: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

The problem with @Strike’s argument is that it assumes that because Biden determined to have a black female Vice President, that in itself makes Kamala Harris unqualified. “DEI hire” is used as a slur or put down. 
But the actual facts contradict this. It’s not like Biden, after deciding to appoint a black woman, chose somebody off the street with race and sex as the only consideration. To the contrary: once Biden determined to appoint a black woman, he then looked at a list of black women who are qualified to be vice-President. He chose Kamala Harris from that list. 
 

And this is what conservatives so often ignore about DEI or affirmative action: it’s not a qualifier in itself, but only the first specification. You still have to be very good at what you do or you’re never getting that job or appointment.

I don’t like Kamala as a politician and I thought it was dumb of Biden to insist on only picking a black woman as Veep, potentially passing over more qualified candidates. But I generally agree with what you said here.

And let’s get real here, most VPs aren’t picked because they’re most qualified. JD Vance has been a Senator for 1.5 years and nobody cares. The DEI / affirmative action thing is only used to disparage Democrat minorities. The opposite is when Dems call black conservatives Uncle Tom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

DEI hire is the modern way to call someone the n word.

Who else uses that term as a pejorative outside of racists? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

DEI hire is the modern way to call someone the n word.

I'm watching On Patrol Live. There's a lot of DEIs on the show tonight. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

The problem with @Strike’s argument is that it assumes that because Biden determined to have a black female Vice President, that in itself makes Kamala Harris unqualified. “DEI hire” is used as a slur or put down. 
But the actual facts contradict this. It’s not like Biden, after deciding to appoint a black woman, chose somebody off the street with race and sex as the only consideration. To the contrary: once Biden determined to appoint a black woman, he then looked at a list of black women who are qualified to be vice-President. He chose Kamala Harris from that list. 
 

And this is what conservatives so often ignore about DEI or affirmative action: it’s not a qualifier in itself, but only the first specification. You still have to be very good at what you do or you’re never getting that job or appointment.

Your premise is incorrect.  A DEI hire is not necessarily unqualified and I don't believe that.  They might be, or they might not be the best qualified person for the job.  I mean, let's be serious, if they were the best qualified they wouldn't need to be a DEI hire.  But when someone says they're going to hire someone based upon race, or sex, they're purposely limiting their candidate pool to those groups.  As a result, we will never know if they were the best qualified.  And we should strive for the best qualified to get jobs.    If being a DEI hire is such a great thing, no one should consider being called a DEI hire a slur.  The fact that you consider it such just reinforces how much of a crutch it is.  DEI hires should be proud of that designation.  Unless deep down they know they wouldn't have been picked but for that designation.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, MDC said:

Dear Lord. I was having a conversation with someone else entirely when you insisted that what I said was wrong. When I asked you which minority left politicians the GC doesn’t consider DEI hires, you named a Republican from the 1800s and a rep I’ve never heard of. 

What are you even sobbing about? I go to the gym at 7:30 so please make it fast. :doh: 

You were wrong.  Twice.  And I proved it.  Twice.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/18/2024 at 4:33 PM, JuneJuly said:

Kamala -275

Biden +410

You can only get so many votes with the 1am ballot dumps. Biden wasn’t keeping it close enough to work. They’re hoping Kamala can. 

All the way down to

Kamala -165

Biden +225

Nuts.  Joe making a comeback!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

DEI hire is the modern way to call someone the n word.

The head of the Secret Service is black? How about those white female agents that performed so well? Another loss.  Sad.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I did feel a little sorry for all the old white folks last night that were forced to endure Kid Rock: Man was he bad. 

Agree with you on that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, squistion said:

Who else uses that term as a pejorative outside of racists? 

It definitely is one of those “tell me you’re a racist without telling me you’re a racist” things 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

So apparently Biden’s grown bitter, especially at Barry Hussein 

Obama trying to get his wife in there so he can get 8 more years.  Threat to our democracy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×