Dems drop $20M on bizarre 'American men' strategy plan study in effort to dig out of 2024 political hole

[seafoam1 3,025]

This just keeps getting better. Trump has officially laid waste to the democrats.  

Side note: "How dare you cut USAID! People will go hungry!! " 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-drop-20m-bizarre-american-men-strategy-plan-study-effort-dig-out-2024-political-hole

Democrats are spending $20 million on a study examining how to speak to "American men" after losing ground with the demographic during the 2024 election cycle, The New York Times revealed. 

"Speaking with American Men: A Strategic Plan" is a $20 million project crafted by Democrats to "study the syntax, language and content that gains attention and virality in these spaces" of male voters, the Times reported Sunday. 

Known as "SAM," the study will specifically examine young male voters and how the party can connect with the demographic. Additionally, the study advised rolling out pro-Democrat ads in video games. 

The study's revelation was made in an overarching article detailing the uphill battle Democrats face after the 2024 election, which included Democrats scrambling to replace former President Joe Biden as the nominee with just more than 100 days left in the election cycle and ultimately delivering all seven battleground states to President Donald Trump. 

Trump's support among young Black and Latino male voters jumped by about 20% compared to his 2020 support, the AP reported. 

Democratic strategist Michael Ceraso told Fox News Digital on Tuesday that he does not take issue with Democrats investing in voter engagement strategies but added that he found it "hilarious" that "people in suits are hanging out at luxury hotels asking how they can talk to day-to-day Americans."

"We're having an issue with the messenger more than the message," Ceraso said, arguing that voters support longstanding Democratic policies such as affordable housing, but that "Democrats just need to take a reality check" on how they convey their messaging to voters. 

"I just don't understand how, after all these years and all these Democrats who've been in the game, how we continue to make those same choices," he added. "Like Rahm Emmanuel, or all these sort of big names, they're just like, 'Yeah, we're going to figure out how to win in, you know, rural North Carolina by hanging out in a New York hotel.' That makes no sense to me. And strategically, I don't care how much money you spend on focus groups, if you're doing that, you're just negating any type of investment you're putting into how to have a conversation with voters." 

Democrats spending millions studying American male "syntax" sparked condemnation from conservatives and Democrats alike on social media, Fox News Digital found. 

"Democratic donors treating men like an endangered species on a remote island they need to study probably won’t rebuild trust," MSNBC contributor Rotimi Adeoy posted to X in response to the Times' report. "This kind of top-down, anthropological approach misses the point: people don’t want to be decoded, they want to be understood and met where they are." 

"The idea that you can "fix" the male voter problem that exists with Black, Latino, and white men by spending $20 million to study their syntax like they’re a foreign culture is exactly why there’s a disconnect," Adeoy continued. "These voters aren’t a research subject. They’re citizens." 

Chief political analyst at the Liberal Patriot, Michael Baharaeen, posted to X, "This really says it all," in response to a tweet quoting the article regarding how "Democratic donors and strategists have been gathering at luxury hotels to discuss how to win back working-class voters, commissioning new projects that can read like anthropological studies of people from faraway places."

"The fact that Democrats need to drop $20 million just to figure out how to speak to American men tells you everything you need to know. This is the same move they pull on black people. They don't care about you they only care about your vote!" conservative podcaster DeVory Darkins posted to X. 

"Democratic donors are planning to spend $20 million to figure out how to talk to dudes," polster Frank Luntz posted to X. 

A handful of critics reposted a video from the 2024 campaign cycle that featured men declaring they were "man enough" to support Harris for president. The grassroots ad went viral in October 2024 as social media commenters panned it as "the cringiest political ad ever created" and pointed out it was created by a former producer for Jimmy Kimmel and featured actors vowing support for Harris. 

The video featured six self-described manly men who claimed they were so masculine that they ate "carburetors for breakfast" and were not "afraid of bears," while adding they also do not fear women and would support Harris for the Oval Office. 

[listen2me 23 1,873]

Little to no men left in the Democratic party to understand how to talk to other men.  So this is a good strategy for them.  

[Frozenbeernuts 2,264]

It's all so fake. How to use words to convince men to vote blue rather than change policy.

$20 million. I wonder whose pocket that mostly goes into.

[avoiding injuries 1,580]

Here is the democrats secret weapon to win back college aged males. Hahaha 

https://x.com/ericldaugh/status/1928200182744719546?s=46

[Tree of Knowledge 1,859]

Frat boys got recruited heavily to vote.  They like hot chicks not fatties, purple haired nut jobs with bad hygiene and trannies.  Dems have nothing to entice them.  

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

3 hours ago, listen2me 23 said:

Little to no men left in the Democratic party to understand how to talk to other men.  So this is a good strategy for them.  

Makes sense.  I mean, they LITERALLY have no idea what a woman is so it probably goes w/out saying that they have no idea what a man is either.

[5-Points 3,533]

Mebbe stop telling men they're toxic and the root of all evil. 

[MDC 7,428]

 

[Maximum Overkill 1,989]

6 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

 

Democrats are spending $20 million on a study examining how to speak to "American men" after losing ground with the demographic during the 2024 election cycle, The New York Times revealed. 

They need a study on to HOW TO BE MEN.   

@Ron_Artest @MDC @Sandy Loam @Fnord

[seafoam1 3,025]

5 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

They need a study on to HOW TO BE MEN.   

@Ron_Artest @MDC @Sandy Loam @Fnord

$20M wouldn't be enough funding for those four. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,989]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

$20M won't be enough funding for those four. 

Hermaphrodites aren't applicable 

[Fnord 2,272]

Further proof that the democratic party is totally inept, devoid of leadership, and wholly unprepared for the moment we find ourselves in. What an embarrassment. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,989]

Just now, Fnord said:

Further proof that the democratic party is totally inept, devoid of leadership, and wholly unprepared for the moment we find ourselves in. What an embarrassment. 

Wait, are you feeling OK? 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

The problem is the men that are still in the Democratic Party.  They nod along with the foolishness and stupidity.  I mean once one of these idiots talks about tampons in the middle school boys room shouldn’t you tell them to STFU and call them an assshole? And then to go along with the toxic masculinity and anti racist garbage, when they are attacking you? Nah, the problem is in house. Maybe you pansies still there should start speaking up. 

[Fnord 2,272]

2 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Wait, are you feeling OK? 

Pay attention, Russkie. I've never been shy about my disdain of the Democratic party. The fact that they more closely align with my views doesn't give them a pass for being pathetic.

[Maximum Overkill 1,989]

1 minute ago, Fnord said:

Pay attention, Russkie. I've never been shy about my disdain of the Democratic party. The fact that they more closely align with my views doesn't give them a pass for being pathetic.

Maybe you're not so bad after all, for being a Transtifa Bot I mean. 

[Strike 5,546]

2 hours ago, avoiding injuries said:

Here is the democrats secret weapon to win back college aged males. Hahaha 

https://x.com/ericldaugh/status/1928200182744719546?s=46

She should have lost that extra 65 pounds before making that video, but I'm not sure that would be enough.  Probably more like 100 and we can start talking......

[seafoam1 3,025]

4 minutes ago, Strike said:

She should have lost that extra 65 pounds before making that video, but I'm not sure that would be enough.  Probably more like 100 and we can start talking......

Even if she lost 100 and somehow miraculously became hot, no chance any normal guy would put up with what comes out of her mouth. 

[Strike 5,546]

3 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Even if she lost 100 and somehow miraculously became hot, no chance any normal guy would put up with what comes out of her mouth. 

That's ok.  We've got something to put in to it to shut her up.

[iam90sbaby 2,611]

Stop pandering to nogs and I might vote dem 

[lickin_starfish 1,937]

4 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

Stop pandering to nogs and I might vote dem 

If the Dems stopped pushing the gay agenda, closed the border and deported illegals, supported gun rights, and dropped the climate bullschit, then I would vote for them.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

7 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

If the Dems stopped pushing the gay agenda, closed the border and deported illegals, supported gun rights, and dropped the climate bullschit, then I would vote for them.

Nah.  It would all be just  a ruse. It’s ruled by cucks and psycho women now. Gonna have to form a new party.  

[TheNewGirl 1,491]

15 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

Stop pandering to nogs and I might vote dem 

This. 

I have voted Dem in the past several times and vote across party lines occasionally.  

Just keep putting people like Bernie, AOC, Gavin, Warren and that blue haired grandma Senator out as your spokespersons. No thanks. 

 

[iam90sbaby 2,611]

15 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Nah.  It would all be just  a ruse. It’s ruled by cucks and psycho women now. Gonna have to form a new party.  

Facts. 

[iam90sbaby 2,611]

7 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

This. 

I have voted Dem in the past several times and vote across party lines occasionally.  

Just keep putting people like Bernie, AOC, Gavin, Warren and that blue haired grandma Senator out as your spokespersons. No thanks. 

 

I’m in favor of socialized healthcare and education. But the most important thing to me is immigration and not changing the identity of our country, which is why I vote republican. Until immigration is dealt with there is nothing more important to me. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,989]

1 hour ago, Fnord said:

Pay attention, Russkie. I've never been shy about my disdain of the Democratic party. The fact that they more closely align with my views doesn't give them a pass for being pathetic.

On a serious note, what don't the Democrats understand? 

Simply stop pandering to the mentally ill and ditch Woke. It's that simple, people might start taking them serious. But they keep doing the same things that drew them to the Republican side, but even more so. 

Stop pandering to 1% of your base and you'd probably win in a landslide.  

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

1 minute ago, iam90sbaby said:

I’m in favor of socialized healthcare and education. But the most important thing to me is immigration and not changing the identity of our country, which is why I vote republican. Until immigration is dealt with there is nothing more important to me. 

That's weird. I was told ABORTION is the #1 voting issue for all voters.  We were told that this was the single most important issue of our time and that the Republicans would pay a very heavy price in 2024 for it.

Have I been lied too? 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

1 hour ago, Fnord said:

Pay attention, Russkie. I've never been shy about my disdain of the Democratic party. The fact that they more closely align with my views doesn't give them a pass for being pathetic.

You only think them pathetic because they lost, not because of what they push. Now Thats pathetic.  

[TheNewGirl 1,491]

5 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

I’m in favor of socialized healthcare and education. But the most important thing to me is immigration and not changing the identity of our country, which is why I vote republican. Until immigration is dealt with there is nothing more important to me. 

I agree with you. 

There are a few social programs that I believe in as well, but they need more oversight. We spend so much money and it's due to things like fraud. that's not fair to the hard workers who are law-abiding citizens both at the Federal and State levels. 

[iam90sbaby 2,611]

22 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

I agree with you. 

There are a few social programs that I believe in as well, but they need more oversight. We spend so much money and it's due to things like fraud. that's not fair to the hard workers who are law-abiding citizens both at the Federal and State levels. 

Based. 

[MDC 7,428]

Dems lost their reason to exist with 30+ years of supporting corporate interests in favor of the working class. Now they’re basically Republican Lite with a side of identity politics.

Dems should run on a platform of economic populism and a return to basic government competence. They also desperately need some candidates who can compete outside the coasts and other true blue strongholds.

The problem is their candidates suck too. 

[Fnord 2,272]

1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You only think them pathetic because they lost, not because of what they push. Now Thats pathetic.  

Nope. 

26 minutes ago, MDC said:

Dems lost their reason to exist with 30+ years of supporting corporate interests in favor of the working class. Now they’re basically Republican Lite with a side of identity politics.

Dems should run on a platform of economic populism and a return to basic government competence. They also desperately need some candidates who can compete outside the coasts and other true blue strongholds.

The problem is their candidates suck too. 

Agree with all of this. If Republicans gave a fock about actually taking care of their voters, I'd consider voting for them. But instead they gaslight us and try to demolish every aspect of the American safety net so the 1% can slurp up even more wealth. 

58 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

There are a few social programs that I believe in as well, but they need more oversight. We spend so much money and it's due to things like fraud. that's not fair to the hard workers who are law-abiding citizens both at the Federal and State levels. 

I agree, but the fundamental problem is that to create oversight, bureaucracy needs to be added. Nobody wants more bureaucracy, and Republicans are in the process of destroying every shred of oversight they can. They act as though they are attempting to build a criminal enterprise by removing everyone that has the ability to identify it.

[weepaws 3,193]

Only reason why we have a red team and a blue team is because of supporters. 

Without the stupid supporting their with their vote maybe this country can truly become the Untied States.  

[Fnord 2,272]

3 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Only reason why we have a red team and a blue team is because of supporters. 

Without the stupid supporting their with their vote maybe this country can truly become the Untied States.  

Your wish is granted! We are presently untied.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

14 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Your wish is granted! We are presently untied.

Weepaws doesn't get that there will ALWAYS be at least two sides.  Who da' f@ck are people supposed to vote for if there are no sides? 

Oh, that's right, his brilliant stategery is DON'T vote which, of course, we all know is actually a VOTE itself but just allows for even more corruption and imbalance.  What a ret@rd.

Weepaws:  "EVERYONE!  DON'T VOTE!  WE'LL REALLY SHOW THEM!!!"

[Nomad99 743]

Can you imagine a Democrat advertisement in call of duty

[iam90sbaby 2,611]

5 hours ago, Fnord said:

Nope. 

Agree with all of this. If Republicans gave a fock about actually taking care of their voters, I'd consider voting for them. But instead they gaslight us and try to demolish every aspect of the American safety net so the 1% can slurp up even more wealth. 

I agree, but the fundamental problem is that to create oversight, bureaucracy needs to be added. Nobody wants more bureaucracy, and Republicans are in the process of destroying every shred of oversight they can. They act as though they are attempting to build a criminal enterprise by removing everyone that has the ability to identify it.

Its always some over engineered bullsh!t with you people instead of the obvious problems. Deport non-Americans. Fock you.

[5-Points 3,533]

3 hours ago, Nomad99 said:

Can you imagine a Democrat advertisement in call of duty

"After we ban assault weapons in real life, we will ban guns in video games like this one. Only the police in games like Grand Theft Auto should have guns. But we want to defund them too, so, soon, you will be able to commit crimes without fear of the police shooting you and bringing your crime spree to an untimely end."

'Vote Blue, no matter who."

 

- The DNC supports this message

 

[avoiding injuries 1,580]

2 hours ago, 5-Points said:

"After we ban assault weapons in real life, we will ban guns in video games like this one. Only the police in games like Grand Theft Auto should have guns. But we want to defund them too, so, soon, you will be able to commit crimes without fear of the police shooting you and bringing your crime spree to an untimely end."

'Vote Blue, no matter who."

 

- The DNC supports this message

 

They should implement all of the liberals policies into the video games like GTA and CoD so the younger generation can see what would happen in the real world. Instant growth to the republican party. 
 

[Maximum Overkill 1,989]

2 hours ago, 5-Points said:

assault weapons

Democrats can't even define "assault weapons '