Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
easilyscan

Minnesota

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, jerryskids said:

 

I never saw your response to why your "they could just let her sit there riding her horn and impeding traffic" solution didn't work.

She was stopped for the purpose of riding her horn, impeding traffic, and goading ICE agents while they were performing their duties.  Is this a trick question?

They could have just told her to leave, which apparently one guy did just before a different one told her to get out.   I’m sure people here will say, “no, she needs to be prosecuted for being un-American!!!” but from what I’m seeing DHS has been dropping a lot of these charges when they’re trying to prosecute people for minor stuff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

They could have just told her to leave, which apparently one guy did just before a different one told her to get out.   I’m sure people here will say, “no, she needs to be prosecuted for being un-American!!!” but from what I’m seeing DHS has been dropping a lot of these charges when they’re trying to prosecute people for minor stuff

I said from the start- all reports and the initial video have her getting told by one office to "get out of here" and by the other to "get out of her car."

Again- she handled things badly. The ICE agents did as well. It ended in her death. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Why the bold part?  Minneapolis has major issues.

Minneapolis isn’t a hotbed of illegal migrants. Trump deployed ICE there to sow chaos. Noem announced the were going. Someone told ICE they’re entitled to demand people show their papers or detain them without cause. The admin claims ICE has blanket immunity.

Everything they’ve done has made conflict there and elsewhere more likely, because that’s their goal. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

They could have just told her to leave, which apparently one guy did just before a different one told her to get out.   I’m sure people here will say, “no, she needs to be prosecuted for being un-American!!!” but from what I’m seeing DHS has been dropping a lot of these charges when they’re trying to prosecute people for minor stuff

We don't know if there was any contact prior to the videos we see.  We can determine that she didn't start to leave when the first officer told her to get out, and her wife yelled to drive only when the officer reached for the door handle.  We'll never know if more words would have worked; my guess is not so much, your guess is that she would have agreed to move I guess?

My question is more in the hypothetical; let's say beyond all belief she chooses not to move despite a request to move.  What do the officers do then?

I'm fine with prosecuting her, not because she was Un-American, but because she was violating the law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

We don't know if there was any contact prior to the videos we see.  We can determine that she didn't start to leave when the first officer told her to get out, and her wife yelled to drive only when the officer reached for the door handle.  We'll never know if more words would have worked; my guess is not so much, your guess is that she would have agreed to move I guess?

My question is more in the hypothetical; let's say beyond all belief she chooses not to move despite a request to move.  What do the officers do then?

I'm fine with prosecuting her, not because she was Un-American, but because she was violating the law.

Prosecution is what competent officers would have done if they couldn’t de-escalate. I don’t think most people would have had a problem with that. And you mention “if they couldn’t get her to move” - well… moving is what inspired them to kill her.

I posted a video analysis above showing that Ross was not actually in front of the car. His legs were well outside its path, and he was leaning on it with his arms. Another point, the video from his phone led some people to believe he was hit. But they show frame by frame synced with other video that he was just fumbling his phone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, dogcows said:

moving is what inspired them to kill her.

I don't think he was inspired to kill her.  I can't imagine that was his intent.  If his goal the entire time was to kill her, then he deserves to be tried for murder.  I honestly don't think that's what happened though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I don't think he was inspired to kill her.  I can't imagine that was his intent.  If his goal the entire time was to kill her, then he deserves to be tried for murder.  I honestly don't think that's what happened though.

Inspired was the wrong word, my bad…

They wanted her to move, but when she did so she ended up dead.

As for murder, it need not be premeditated… that’s 1st degree. If she angered him and that’s why he fired (crime of passion), that could be motive for a 3rd degree charge.

If he just panicked when the car started to move and he was slipping a bit on the ice, one could argue negligence as the reason for the killing, which could also qualify as 3rd degree murder. (Negligence due to not following his training and having his gun un-holstered in the first place)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dogcows said:

Inspired was the wrong word, my bad…

They wanted her to move, but when she did so she ended up dead.

As for murder, it need not be premeditated… that’s 1st degree. If she angered him and that’s why he fired (crime of passion), that could be motive for a 3rd degree charge.

If he just panicked when the car started to move and he was slipping a bit on the ice, one could argue negligence as the reason for the killing, which could also qualify as 3rd degree murder. (Negligence due to not following his training and having his gun un-holstered in the first place)

I would agree with negligence. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Inspired was the wrong word, my bad…

They wanted her to move, but when she did so she ended up dead.

As for murder, it need not be premeditated… that’s 1st degree. If she angered him and that’s why he fired (crime of passion), that could be motive for a 3rd degree charge.

If he just panicked when the car started to move and he was slipping a bit on the ice, one could argue negligence as the reason for the killing, which could also qualify as 3rd degree murder. (Negligence due to not following his training and having his gun un-holstered in the first place)

Yeah, if she lived through the gunshot, she should have been charged with attempted murder. 

Thank God the officer neutralized her threat before she killed someone.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I fired to explain to MDC and Gutterboy that you need pre mediation for a murder charge. They chose to remain ignorant. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all so simple... dbags (Gov, mayor, etc) in Minnesota, told their citizens to interfere with law enforcement.  Idiots listened to them.  This particular one died because of it.  The blame falls on the woman for being stupid and the elected officials who told her to do it.  Not that hard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I fired to explain to MDC and Gutterboy that you need pre mediation for a murder charge. They chose to remain ignorant. 

You only need pre meditation for murder 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

I fired to explain to MDC and Gutterboy that you need pre mediation for a murder charge. They chose to remain ignorant. 

@MDC thinks he knows all about murder just because he lives in Fishtown, PA. Granted most residents there fear for their lives and know someone who's been murdered, BUT THAT DOES NOT MAKE HIM AN EXPERT. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AI answer but I don't feel like chasing the links.  At most you could try to make a case for Man 2:

Quote
AI Overview
 
 
 
In Minnesota, the key difference between murder and manslaughter is 
intent and malice: murder involves intent to kill (or extreme recklessness in third-degree), while manslaughter is an unintentional killing resulting from heat of passion (voluntary) or extreme negligence/recklessness (involuntary), with murder carrying much harsher penalties like life imprisonment compared to manslaughter's shorter sentences. 
 
Murder (Involves Intent/Malice)
  • First-Degree Murder: Premeditated killing with intent to kill (not detailed in snippets, but generally the most severe).
  • Second-Degree Murder: Intentional killing, but not premeditated, or causing death with intent to cause fear/harm (up to 40 years).
  • Third-Degree Murder: Unintentional killing showing depraved mind, indifference to human life, without intent to kill (up to 25 years). 
 
Manslaughter (No Intent to Kill/Malice)
  • First-Degree Manslaughter: Intentionally causing death in the heat of passion (provoked) or causing death by administering certain controlled substances (up to 15 years).
  • Second-Degree Manslaughter: Culpable negligence, creating unreasonable risk, or during dangerous activities (e.g., reckless hunting) (up to 10 years). 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Strike said:

You only need pre meditation for murder 1.

Thank you. You’d think a cop would know this. 🤦‍♂️ 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, League Champion said:

@MDC thinks he knows all about murder just because he lives in Fishtown, PA. Granted most residents there fear for their lives and know someone who's been murdered, BUT THAT DOES NOT MAKE HIM AN EXPERT. 

He's an expert at hiding in his basement. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

This is all so simple... dbags (Gov, mayor, etc) in Minnesota, told their citizens to interfere with law enforcement.  Idiots listened to them.  This particular one died because of it.  The blame falls on the woman for being stupid and the elected officials who told her to do it.  Not that hard.

Sounds exactly like Jan 6th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, League Champion said:

His Moms basement 🤣

"MOM!! You need to knock before you come down here!!! I'm a grown man now!" 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Sounds exactly like Jan 6th.

No it doesn't. 

It looks like 2020.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, seafoam1 said:

No it doesn't. 

This is all so simple... Trump in DC, told the citizens to interfere with our government.  Idiots listened to them.  One woman died because of it.  The blame falls on the woman for being stupid and the Trump who told her to do it.  Not that hard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

This is all so simple... dbags (Gov, mayor, etc) in Minnesota, told their citizens to interfere with law enforcement.  Idiots listened to them.  This particular one died because of it.  The blame falls on the woman for being stupid and the elected officials who told her to do it.  Not that hard.

Link to all the dbags in MN telling their citizens to directly interfere? I'll wait. I certainly never got that memo, and I live here, unlike you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, MDC said:

Thank you. You’d think a cop would know this. 🤦‍♂️ 

More like a Mall Cop School Dropout.

Hmm that sounds like a potential title for a series of pornos now that I look at it… 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

This is all so simple... Trump in DC, told the citizens to interfere with our government.  Idiots listened to them.  One woman died because of it.  The blame falls on the woman for being stupid and the Trump who told her to do it.  Not that hard.

You obviously didn't watch him telling them to be peaceful. And a group of dumbasses got rowdy then went homw when they were told to.

Liberals burn down buildings, smash up cars, beat up police, take over zones of public lands, topple landmarks, loot stores, vandalize anything they can, and do it all in multiple states for many months and had the future vice president and the liberal media both funding their release from prisons, and saying to the public that they should continue to riot. Also, killary not heeding Trumps warning of upping security and the liberal mayors telling police to stand down when it comes to the rioters. 

There is a dinstinct difference. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d like to know the breakdown of the people here who think both ICE shooter and Rittenhouse committed murder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×