Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Sandy Loam

Supreme Court weighing same-sex marriage case

Recommended Posts

We knew this was coming when Clarence Thomas said he wanted to revisit the issue of same-sex marriage decided inĀ Obergefell v. Hodges.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The federal government shouldn't be involved in personal contracts.Ā  I say remove same and opposite sex marriage from the governments purview.Ā  This would open the door to fixing a ton of other issues.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Illegal gets my vote. Ā 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

The federal government shouldn't be involved in personal contracts.Ā  I say remove same and opposite sex marriage from the governments purview.Ā  This would open the door to fixing a ton of other issues.

I agree.Ā 

Marriage for the sake of knowing who the father of your kids is, or if you're the father of your kids is kind of obsolete with the introduction of paternity tests. Marriage is almost more of a business arrangement or partnership now, IMO.Ā 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it gets overturned - good.Ā  The left has done this to themselves by promoting the degeneracy and perversion of these Rainbow Mob members.Ā  All one has to do go to a SF pride parade to see what the real agenda is.

Also, going after kids severely hurt their cause.Ā  Grooming kids was the "+" in LGBTQ+.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

All one has to do go to a SF pride parade to see what the real agenda is.

Ā 

I've never been. Tell us what it was like

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sandy Loam said:

I've never been. Tell us what it was like

Like a bunch of you running around princess.Ā 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Sandy Loam said:

https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-faces-decision-same-sex-marriages-2111822

Let the thoughtful, intellectual discussion commence!

Ā 

From your link that you didn't read:

Quote

The U.S.Ā Supreme CourtĀ is facing a choice about whether to take up a case filed by former Kentucky clerk Kim Davis urging the overturn its decision inĀ Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark case that guaranteed the right to same-sex marriage nationwide.

Davis' attorney, Matthew Staver, toldĀ NewsweekĀ he is optimistic the court will take the case. William Powell, the attorney who represented the couple that sued Davis, wrote in a statement provided toĀ NewsweekĀ he is "confident the Supreme Court will likewise agree that Davis's arguments do not merit further attention."

Daniel Urman, law professor at Northeastern University, toldĀ NewsweekĀ it is unlikely the Supreme Court would agree to overturn same-sex marriage.

Lawyer for overturning it thinks SCOTUS will take it.Ā  Other lawyer doesn't.Ā  Law professor says it is unlikely to be overturned.

Thanks for posting this nothing-burger which the leftist media provided as a butterfly to get you spun up, center-right guy.Ā  :thumbsup:Ā 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

The federal government shouldn't be involved in personal contracts.Ā  I say remove same and opposite sex marriage from the governments purview.Ā  This would open the door to fixing a ton of other issues.

Agree 100%Ā Ā 

But now later in life enjoying the financial benefits of the government being involved.Ā 

I'd much rather get the government and incentives out of how many kids you decide to spit out.Ā  Magnitudes more beneficial.Ā 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

Ā 

From your link that you didn't read:

Lawyer for overturning it thinks SCOTUS will take it.Ā  Other lawyer doesn't.Ā  Law professor says it is unlikely to be overturned.

Thanks for posting this nothing-burger which the leftist media provided as a butterfly to get you spun up, center-right guy.Ā  :thumbsup:Ā 

I read the link, carefully chose my thread-topic words and offered no opinions on the matter. It's a major news story whether you like it or not and worth discussing.

You're free to ply your literary wares elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

I read the link, carefully chose my thread-topic words and offered no opinions on the matter. It's a major news story whether you like it or not and worth discussing.

You're free to ply your literary wares elsewhere.

Poor princess sandy.Ā šŸ˜†

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, TheNewGirl said:

I agree.Ā 

Marriage for the sake of knowing who the father of your kids is, or if you're the father of your kids is kind of obsolete with the introduction of paternity tests. Marriage is almost more of a business arrangement or partnership now, IMO.Ā 

Marriage is pointless for men, they take all the risk. AndĀ let’s be honest not to many modern American women are ā€œwifeyā€ material these days.Ā 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

Marriage is pointless for men, they take all the risk. AndĀ let’s be honest not to many modern American women are ā€œwifeyā€ material these days.Ā 

In other words, no woman wants you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Maximum Overkill said:

No problem with it, love who you wanna love. I've said that from day 1.Ā 

Did I nuke your narrative? šŸ’„Ā 

:wub:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

In other words, no woman wants you.

It’s stupid to sign contracts where the other person is rewarded for breaking them. I have zero problems picking up women I’d just never marry any of themĀ 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, iam90sbaby said:

It’s stupid to sign contracts where the other person is rewarded for breaking them. I have zero problems picking up women I’d just never marry any of themĀ 

You're a better Man than I am. I married 2 psychos. I'm still married to one of them šŸ˜€Ā 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sandy Loam said:

I read the link, carefully chose my thread-topic words and offered no opinions on the matter. It's a major news story whether you like it or not and worth discussing.

You're free to ply your literary wares elsewhere.

I’m actually with @jerryskidsĀ on this one. It’s only a major news story IF the SC takes it up which seems unlikely.Ā 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m ok with the gays getting married just like regular folk and don’t have hi k it would ever happen. Although seeing the lil squissy meltdown would be enjoyable šŸæ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

It’s stupid to sign contracts where the other person is rewarded for breaking them. I have zero problems picking up women I’d just never marry any of themĀ 

Street-corner fentanyl-fueled prostitutes carry a low probability of being wife and mother material, but at least you're getting some action, albeit paid-for action with a high probability of catching something of which science cannot rid you, but good luck and godspeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sandy Loam said:

Street-corner fentanyl-fueled prostitutes carry a low probability of being wife and mother material, but at least you're getting some action, albeit paid-for action with a high probability of catching something of which science cannot rid you, but good luck and godspeed.

šŸ‘†šŸæStupid post. Ā 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, HellToupee said:

I’m ok with the gays getting married just like regular folk and don’t have hi k it would ever happen. Although seeing the lil squissy meltdown would be enjoyable šŸæ

Wait, What, you’re ok with people living and dying in sin, and going to hell? That’s exactly what you’re saying šŸ‘†šŸæHere catholic. .Ā 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, weepaws said:

Wait, What, you’re ok with people living and dying in sin, and going to hell? That’s exactly what you’re saying šŸ‘†šŸæHere catholic. .Ā 

Here's what the Bible says. Do you agree that Homosexuals should die??Ā 

- You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.

-Ā If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.

-Ā Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Could this lead to a mass exodus or alphabet people? Ā The Middle East is tolerable with great weather and art communities. Ā 

No unfortunately. But they will "threaten" it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Maximum Overkill said:

You're a better Man than I am. I married 2 psychos. I'm still married to one of them šŸ˜€Ā 

I made that mistake with the first one. Lucky for me I found a woman that is awesome. But that first one would scare Stephen King.Ā 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, iam90sbaby said:

Marriage is pointless for men, they take all the risk. AndĀ let’s be honest not to many modern American women are ā€œwifeyā€ material these days.Ā 

Married men live longer than single men, so not entirely pointless. Men do better with a wife. šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø

The paradox is that married women live shorter lives than single women.Ā 

I WILL agree with you that there aren't many modern women, or men for that matter that are marriage material. Lots of man babies out there.Ā 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

I’m ok with this. Put the focus back on the gays and watch trans, queers andĀ pronouns all disappear.Ā 

Never going to happen.Ā 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×