Jump to content
cmh6476

Cdumb = banned

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, MikeMatt said:

What did you do him ?

Nothing, he texted me the screenshot and said have a nice life :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The racist rope they give you at FFT is pretty long.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mike Honcho said:

FFTMike should post what they did to offend in a pinned post, sort of a wall of shame.  

I doubt he has a wall that big

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, edjr said:

The racist rope they give you at FFT is pretty long.

Yeah..Usually Mike gives you a warning.  So he must have had one prior

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, weepaws said:

After all, his best friend is a dancing banana

:unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

Oh no. We should all be sheltered from that talk because some small peepee old KC jerk doesn't know how to stand up for himself in life while some random guy on the internet emasculates him.  

It just sucks if it's true.

You're a clown i'm not fighting in threads with anyone or reporting anyone.   He texted me that he got banned.   STFU

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, cmh6476 said:

You're a clown in not fighting in threads with anyone or reporting anyone.   He texted me that he got banned.   STFU

CMH right for the 2nd time this year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, kutulu said:

:unsure:

:banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

I’m sorry he’s banned. I found his anti-Semitic and bigoted posts to be extremely repellent but also revealing. he strikes me as a sad human being; I hope he gets some help. 

I'm not, I found his posts vile and hateful. And no, I didn't report him as some have claimed. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said:

FFTMike should post what they did to offend in a pinned post, sort of a wall of shame.  

Like an old school police blotter 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, squistion said:

I didn't report him as some have claimed.

No one has posted this. You must have a guilty conscience 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

What a shame.  I thought he was a good racist poster.  
 

 

:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, squistion said:

I'm not, I found his posts vile and hateful. And no, I didn't report him as some have claimed. 

I think you're vile and hateful.  Perhaps you should self ban.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

No one has posted this. You must have a guilty conscience 

 

1 hour ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Someone got Squidward a TO for his porn post.  You can bet he is smashing that report button on everyone else.  

 

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, squistion said:

I'm not, I found his posts vile and hateful. And no, I didn't report him as some have claimed. 

This may or may not be true.  But, you have a history of reporting people and then denying it that goes back a decade.  FFS you got pigeon avatars banned and 20 people got warnings for having them at FBG's because they hurt your feelings.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Strike said:

FFS you got pigeon avatars banned and 20 people got warnings for having them at FBG's because they hurt your feelings

The hissy fit he threw about bird avatars was embarrassing.  He also tried to get people banned from using nicknames for players like KAPPY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

The hissy fit he threw about bird avatars was embarrassing.  He also tried to get people banned from using nicknames for players like KAPPY

Yup.   And we know he was reporting people left and right because no one else cared about the pigeon avatars.  There was no reason for Joe to get involved absent someone annoying the fock out of him by reporting people.  Same thing with Kappy but Joe had had enough and PUBLICLY called the pigeon focker out for reporting people and just being a general PITA about it and told him to stop.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Strike said:

This may or may not be true.  But, you have a history of reporting people and then denying it that goes back a decade.  FFS you got pigeon avatars banned and 20 people got warnings for having them at FBG's because they hurt your feelings.  

I thought it didn’t matter who did the reporting if the person who got banned violated the rules? Wasn’t that your line back when I got a TO in February?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MDC said:

I thought it didn’t matter who did the reporting if the person who got banned violated the rules? Wasn’t that your line back when I got a TO in February?

No.  Link to me saying it's ok to report people?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Strike said:

No.  Link to me saying it's ok to report people?

I could’ve sworn you told me (paraphrasing here) Mike bans people who are egregious violators of the rules so it was my fault for getting a TO not the puss who reported me? It’s been a minute so maybe I’m wrong and I’d have to dig the thread up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MDC said:

I could’ve sworn you told me (paraphrasing here) Mike bans people who are egregious violators of the rules so it was my fault for getting a TO not the puss who reported me? It’s been a minute so maybe I’m wrong and I’d have to dig the thread up. 

Why cant I think both?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Strike said:

No.  Link to me saying it's ok to report people?

You probably didn’t, but you did say this.  Do you acknowledge @Cdub100 often broke the rules? And no I didn’t report him either.

On 2/10/2025 at 1:33 PM, Strike said:

If you weren't breaking the rules getting reported wouldn't matter.  And No, I did not report you. 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Strike said:

Why cant I think both?

Here it is:

Just curious why it didn’t matter then but now you’re hung up on reporting? 

@TimHauck beat me to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll just respond to both @MDC and @TimHauck together:

1)  Don't break the rules.  Is that so hard to understand?

2)  If you do break the rules and get caught, accept your punishment and do better in the future.

3)  If you do get a punishment, including a permanent ban, don't skirt that punishment and come back with an alias.

4)  Mike decides who broke the rules and what punishment should be levied for doing so.  He has multiple ways of finding out who broke the rules.  On occasion he has been known to just browse the crap in here when things got particularly nasty and drop the ban hammer.  Not lately but he has done that.  So it isn't just reporting that can get you in trouble, although that is one way.

5)  I don't believe in reporting. It's chicken sh*t.  If you don't like what someone posts skip their post.  If you don't like the topic of a thread skip the thread and don't derail it.

6)  I stopped reading Cdub's posts a long time ago.  They make me uncomfortable.  To me they come off as racist but I will allow others to make that judgment for themselves.  Racism is easy to define/spot when someone says "black people not welcome here." in their establishment   It's a lot harder to do so in the written word.  Certainly there are some blatant examples of it in writing but we need to be careful when trying to define it in words/discussion because we want to allow for the free discussion of ideas without shutting topics down due to Muh Racism.  Example: @jerryskids has cited "The Bell Curve" a lot in race discussions here, and some have accused him of being racist for doing so.  I find it a little uncomfortable I'll admit but I know for a fact he brings it up and the associated discussion out of a desire for intelligent discourse on the topic of race.  Discomfort sometimes is ok in good discussion.  There is not one little bit of me that thinks Jerry has ANY bit of racism in him but some here would shut down the discussion and call him a racist.  That being said, I just skip Cdub's posts so I don't have to deal with his.  And that's what others should do.  And we have an ignore feature that makes it easy to skip a person's posts if you don't like them.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Strike said:

I'll just respond to both @MDC and @TimHauck together:

1)  Don't break the rules.  Is that so hard to understand?

2)  If you do break the rules and get caught, accept your punishment and do better in the future.

3)  If you do get a punishment, including a permanent ban, don't skirt that punishment and come back with an alias.

4)  Mike decides who broke the rules and what punishment should be levied for doing so.  He has multiple ways of finding out who broke the rules.  On occasion he has been known to just browse the crap in here when things got particularly nasty and drop the ban hammer.  Not lately but he has done that.  So it isn't just reporting that can get you in trouble, although that is one way.

5)  I don't believe in reporting. It's chicken sh*t.  If you don't like what someone posts skip their post.  If you don't like the topic of a thread skip the thread and don't derail it.

6)  I stopped reading Cdub's posts a long time ago.  They make me uncomfortable.  To me they come off as racist but I will allow others to make that judgment for themselves.  Racism is easy to define/spot when someone says "black people not welcome here." in their establishment   It's a lot harder to do so in the written word.  Certainly there are some blatant examples of it in writing but we need to be careful when trying to define it in words/discussion because we want to allow for the free discussion of ideas without shutting topics down due to Muh Racism.  Example: @jerryskids has cited "The Bell Curve" a lot in race discussions here, and some have accused him of being racist for doing so.  I find it a little uncomfortable I'll admit but I know for a fact he brings it up and the associated discussion out of a desire for intelligent discourse on the topic of race.  Discomfort sometimes is ok in good discussion.  There is not one little bit of me that thinks Jerry has ANY bit of racism in him but some here would shut down the discussion and call him a racist.  That being said, I just skip Cdub's posts so I don't have to deal with his.  And that's what others should do.  And we have an ignore feature that makes it easy to skip a person's posts if you don't like them.

What rules? The Guidelines and Rules link in Mike’s pinned thread goes to a dead page. If there are rules, they’re obviously not enforced consistently. 

Anyway, just thought it was interesting that you blamed me for violating these non existent rules when I got a TO in February. Now you’re hung up on who reported who on a whole other website.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You probably didn’t, but you did say this.  Do you acknowledge @Cdub100 often broke the rules? And no I didn’t report him either.

 

 

38 minutes ago, MDC said:

Here it is:

Just curious why it didn’t matter then but now you’re hung up on reporting? 

@TimHauck beat me to it.

 

eh, I would say you both are stretching what Strike said to fit what you want it to fit.  In this quote, he never says "it doesn't matter WHO reported you".  He is simply saying if you don't break the board rules, then the concept of being reported doesn't matter. No one would have a reason to report you and if they did, Mike would ignore it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MDC said:

What rules? The Guidelines and Rules link in Mike’s pinned thread goes to a dead page. If there are rules, they’re obviously not enforced consistently. 

Anyway, just thought it was interesting that you blamed me for violating these non existent rules when I got a TO in February. Now you’re hung up on who reported who on a whole other website.

I will again go back to comparing this board to a place of work. Mike owns and operates this site, yes? He sets the rules and things someone posts here can get them suspended or banned. Just like your place of work can terminate you for many different reasons. Your place of work hopefully has written policy and maybe there is no written policy here but most places of work also interpret things somewhat arbitrarily at times.  He (or your employer) does not need to enforce things consistently. You can hope they do but at the end of the day, they really don't have to. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Strike said:

I'll just respond to both @MDC and @TimHauck together:

1)  Don't break the rules.  Is that so hard to understand?

2)  If you do break the rules and get caught, accept your punishment and do better in the future.

3)  If you do get a punishment, including a permanent ban, don't skirt that punishment and come back with an alias.

4)  Mike decides who broke the rules and what punishment should be levied for doing so.  He has multiple ways of finding out who broke the rules.  On occasion he has been known to just browse the crap in here when things got particularly nasty and drop the ban hammer.  Not lately but he has done that.  So it isn't just reporting that can get you in trouble, although that is one way.

5)  I don't believe in reporting. It's chicken sh*t.  If you don't like what someone posts skip their post.  If you don't like the topic of a thread skip the thread and don't derail it.

6)  I stopped reading Cdub's posts a long time ago.  They make me uncomfortable.  To me they come off as racist but I will allow others to make that judgment for themselves.  Racism is easy to define/spot when someone says "black people not welcome here." in their establishment   It's a lot harder to do so in the written word.  Certainly there are some blatant examples of it in writing but we need to be careful when trying to define it in words/discussion because we want to allow for the free discussion of ideas without shutting topics down due to Muh Racism.  Example: @jerryskids has cited "The Bell Curve" a lot in race discussions here, and some have accused him of being racist for doing so.  I find it a little uncomfortable I'll admit but I know for a fact he brings it up and the associated discussion out of a desire for intelligent discourse on the topic of race.  Discomfort sometimes is ok in good discussion.  There is not one little bit of me that thinks Jerry has ANY bit of racism in him but some here would shut down the discussion and call him a racist.  That being said, I just skip Cdub's posts so I don't have to deal with his.  And that's what others should do.  And we have an ignore feature that makes it easy to skip a person's posts if you don't like them.

I've been reading this thread with anticipation seeing why I was tagged.  :lol: 

And yeah, the Bell Curve has been shot down by leftist socialogical circles because they know it is true and have no answer.  Anyone who doesn't believe it doesn't understand basic evolutionary adaptation.

Wait, where were we... oh yeah, Cdub.  IIRC he had some investment go belly up that involved a Jewish person, and that led him down the road to his utter and complete hatred of Jews.  I could be making that up though.  Anyway, I'm not personally offended by his posts; rather, I regard posts from people like him or 90sbaby as interesting, for lack of a better word.  I wonder how one gets to a point in life to have such a bigoted opinion of a large group of people.

I would expect any regular posters here to accept each others' foibles and avoid reporting people.  But, I'm neither Jew nor black, so perhaps that is easy for me to say.  Also, I imagine that some normie from the Main Bored might drop in here and be like whoa, wtf is this?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said:

 

 

eh, I would say you both are stretching what Strike said to fit what you want it to fit.  In this quote, he never says "it doesn't matter WHO reported you".  He is simply saying if you don't break the board rules, then the concept of being reported doesn't matter. No one would have a reason to report you and if they did, Mike would ignore it. 

Then why is Strike complaining about squish (allegedly) reporting people at FBG? If they didn’t break the board rules it wouldn’t matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MDC said:

Then why is Strike complaining about squish (allegedly) reporting people at FBG? If they didn’t break the board rules it wouldn’t matter.

I'm not.  He can report whoever he wants.  And I can mock him for it.  He can even say he didn't report people when he did, like he did in this thread.  And I will correct him and call him out if he does so.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MDC said:

Then why is Strike complaining about squish (allegedly) reporting people at FBG? If they didn’t break the board rules it wouldn’t matter.

If you ask me. The people reporting are the ones that should be banned.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said:

I will again go back to comparing this board to a place of work. Mike owns and operates this site, yes? He sets the rules and things someone posts here can get them suspended or banned. Just like your place of work can terminate you for many different reasons. Your place of work hopefully has written policy and maybe there is no written policy here but most places of work also interpret things somewhat arbitrarily at times.  He (or your employer) does not need to enforce things consistently. You can hope they do but at the end of the day, they really don't have to. 

I have no issue with how Mike enforces (or not) his rules. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since I was away... can someone explain to me this "squissy posted pron" thing?  I'm a little skeered to ask as I don't know what he would consider erotic, but much like driving past a car accident, it's hard to look away.  :unsure: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Since I was away... can someone explain to me this "squissy posted pron" thing?  I'm a little skeered to ask as I don't know what he would consider erotic, but much like driving past a car accident, it's hard to look away.  :unsure: 

Dude it was horrible. It was like Lemon Party Focking Tubgirl.  Mike had to pay for therapy sessions for some of the libs.  

 

 

 

 

 

Okay not really.  It was some tweet with what amounted to a couple of stick figures looking like they were focking IIRC.  Someone reported him, probably just because of who it was, and he got like a week suspension IIRC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, edjr said:

If you ask me. The people reporting are the ones that should be banned.

Judging from who gets banned most often, we’d be down a lot of sensitive MAGAs. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×