Brad GLuckman 518 Posted October 13, 2017 I dont get why this dude just loved showering and jerking off in front of chicks so much. I read its a humiliation thing, but its not like hes humiliating them, hes humiliating himself, right? Also read he forced a woman to let him go down on her. That kind of doesnt make sense to me. Hes a weird dude. Hopefully he gets whats coming to him in prison. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,380 Posted October 13, 2017 Everyone in Hollywood knew? Yes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brad GLuckman 518 Posted October 13, 2017 Yes And was Michelle is part of Hollywood? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted October 13, 2017 Actually, you're the first one to claim "both sides do it" when your side is attacked. When someone on the right is the focus of these things, you don't make any such comparisons. If you're new here, link? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted October 13, 2017 I dont get why this dude just loved showering and jerking off in front of chicks so much. I read its a humiliation thing, but its not like hes humiliating them, hes humiliating himself, right? Also read he forced a woman to let him go down on her. That kind of doesnt make sense to me. Hes a weird dude. Hopefully he gets whats coming to him in prison. Definite weirdo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,432 Posted October 13, 2017 I dont get why this dude just loved showering and jerking off in front of chicks so much. I read its a humiliation thing, but its not like hes humiliating them, hes humiliating himself, right? Also read he forced a woman to let him go down on her. That kind of doesnt make sense to me. Hes a weird dude. Hopefully he gets whats coming to him in prison. Come on. Don't you know that all of those actresses are cold fish in the bedroom. They have never had to work at it for a guy to want to shag them, so they put in no effort. Harvey was just looking out for himself since no one knows what you like more than you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,485 Posted October 13, 2017 Oscar-Winning Director Oliver Stone Accused of Sexual Assault Carrie Stevens, a former Playboy Playmate, claims that some 26 years ago, when she was just 22 years-old, Stone grabbed her breast at a party. “He was really cocky, had this big grin on his face like he was going to get away with something,” Stevens, who was 22 at the time, told The News. At that point, Stone “reached out and…honked it like a horn,” she said, describing him as “an immature guy in elementary school who snaps your bra.” That’s what’s going on in Hollywood. That’s why things have to change. He’s Oliver Stone. Nobody’s going to say anything,” she told The News” http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/13/oscar-winning-director-oliver-stone-accused-sexual-assault/ Those pesky Socialist! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted October 13, 2017 So typical. None of these b****** want to be left out of the story. They all want attention. So they're trying out s*** from 10 15 20 30 years ago as if somehow they could possibly still be traumatized because Ben Affleck grab their ass as a 20 rookie himself. This is what invalidates all of their stories so many times. We saw this with Tigger. One b**** comes out and then 20 more come out of course individually in their own separate press conferences because God forbid they have to share the spotlight. But wait we're all sisters. No but wait we all get our own five minutes of fame. But wait.. I'm sorry, I think anybody who knows and loves anyone who has been legitimately viciously raped really have a bad view of these b****** who think that they're equally traumatize because some guy look down their blouse 12 years ago. But it was worse! I almost lost my big topless scene in the next movie because of it!puleese. F*** most of you skanky lying ass b******. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted October 13, 2017 So typical. None of these b****** want to be left out of the story. They all want attention. So they're trying out s*** from 10 15 20 30 years ago as if somehow they could possibly still be traumatized because Ben Affleck grab their ass as a 20 rookie himself. This is what invalidates all of their stories so many times. We saw this with Tigger. One b**** comes out and then 20 more come out of course individually in their own separate press conferences because God forbid they have to share the spotlight. But wait we're all sisters. No but wait we all get our own five minutes of fame. But wait.. I'm sorry, I think anybody who knows and loves anyone who has been legitimately viciously raped really have a bad view of these b****** who think that they're equally traumatize because some guy look down their blouse 12 years ago. But it was worse! I almost lost my big topless scene in the next movie because of it!puleese. F*** most of you skanky lying ass b******. I suggest having a drink. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 13, 2017 So typical. None of these b****** want to be left out of the story. They all want attention. So they're trying out s*** from 10 15 20 30 years ago as if somehow they could possibly still be traumatized because Ben Affleck grab their ass as a 20 rookie himself. This is what invalidates all of their stories so many times. We saw this with Tigger. One b**** comes out and then 20 more come out of course individually in their own separate press conferences because God forbid they have to share the spotlight. But wait we're all sisters. No but wait we all get our own five minutes of fame. But wait.. I'm sorry, I think anybody who knows and loves anyone who has been legitimately viciously raped really have a bad view of these b****** who think that they're equally traumatize because some guy look down their blouse 12 years ago. But it was worse! I almost lost my big topless scene in the next movie because of it!puleese. F*** most of you skanky lying ass b******. Yeah, heaven forbid one woman claims a little grab a$$ against this rapist. She'll invalidate everyone else's claim despite everyone knowing this guy is a sicko/rapist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Guy 1,400 Posted October 14, 2017 WATCH: 'The View' Mocks Child Star Who Warned of Sex Predators Back in 2013 https://www.hannity.com/content/2017-10-13-watch-the-view-mocks-child-star-who-warned-of-sex-predators-back-in-2013/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted October 14, 2017 Is there anyone with a paenis within a 3 continet radius who Rose McGowan HASN'T been'raped by'? Loved her as the one legged hooker in something something movie. You can tell she's really into women's dignity. You can always tell the nutter women; They ALL shave their heads. Dunno what it is. think about it - Britney Spears, that chick who ripped up the pope pic, that 'firework' broad from the SuperBowl, now her... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,584 Posted October 14, 2017 WATCH: 'The View' Mocks Child Star Who Warned of Sex Predators Back in 2013 https://www.hannity.com/content/2017-10-13-watch-the-view-mocks-child-star-who-warned-of-sex-predators-back-in-2013/ he was 100% right, however its hard to take his word serious when he doesn't think Michael was a predator 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,380 Posted October 14, 2017 And was Michelle is part of Hollywood? She sent her children off to intern for weinstein... So you tell me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted October 14, 2017 No, I think he's a focking creep. But being a creep doesn't get you arrested. If it did, Trump'd be under the jail right now. I also believe in holding adults responsible. If you know a guy's a creep - and you keep going up to his room (for example) AND you're a grown ass adult not threatened with physical violence, You have to take ownership for your own trade-offs. None of these biitches (as far as I know) Were watching this guy JO in order to get a kidney for their child. That's why you can't get laid. Women know you are a creep. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,485 Posted October 15, 2017 And was Michelle is part of Hollywood? They are all part of the swamp! Where have you been? Are you really this clueless that you don’t even know who is controlling your thoughts and actions? In other news: Visitor Records: Harvey Weinstein Visited Obama White House 13 Times http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/05/visitor-records-harvey-weinstein-visited-obama-white-house-13-times/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brad GLuckman 518 Posted October 15, 2017 They are all part of the swamp! Where have you been? Are you really this clueless that you dont even know who is controlling your thoughts and actions? In other news: Visitor Records: Harvey Weinstein Visited Obama White House 13 Timeshttp://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/05/visitor-records-harvey-weinstein-visited-obama-white-house-13-times/ Like CDub posted before me. If the Obamas knew Weinstein was a sexual predator, im sure they wouldnt let their daughter intern there. I know that doesnt fit your narrative, unfortunately the truth rarely does Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted October 15, 2017 Like CDub posted before me. If the Obamas knew Weinstein was a sexual predator, im sure they wouldnt let their daughter intern there. I know that doesnt fit your narrative, unfortunately the truth rarely does CDub likely believes the opposite of you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,380 Posted October 15, 2017 Like CDub posted before me. If the Obamas knew Weinstein was a sexual predator, im sure they wouldnt let their daughter intern there. I know that doesnt fit your narrative, unfortunately the truth rarely does You asked me if Michelle was part of Hollywood. Not only was she a part of Hollywood she and her husband invited hollywood into their home. As for your statement they wouldn't let their daughter intern there if she knew. They weren't worried. Nobody is touching the presidents daughter. She got a nice office and a staff to run little projects nobody gave two sh1ts about. Predators like wienstien and Clinton prey on people far less powerful than they are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brad GLuckman 518 Posted October 15, 2017 You asked me if Michelle was part of Hollywood. Not only was she a part of Hollywood she and her husband invited hollywood into their home. As for your statement they wouldn't let their daughter intern there if she knew. They weren't worried. Nobody is touching the presidents daughter. She got a nice office and a staff to run ###### little projects nobody gave two sh1ts about. Predators like wienstien and Clinton prey on people far less powerful than they are. Oh wow, totally misread that. Ya you're right. Most likely the Obamas delivered their daughter to a man they knew was a rapist because they thought he wouldn't dare rape THEIR daughter. His donations to Dems are worth the risk. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted October 15, 2017 You know, I don't blame them, but watching a little bit of the Gutfeld show tonight, it just points out how hypocritical Fox especially has been about all of this. They can't get enough of covering Weinstein and of course all the ancillary bulshit. But where were they with Rodger Ailes? Arguably just as powerful we're certainly in that upper echelon of media as Weinstein. And you didn't hear a f****** word about him or O'Reilly or their accusers or anything. Again, not so naive as to think they actually would discuss these things. But still, there is an inherent hypocracy there. You can sure should bet that if Joe Scarborough had been fired for this kind of stuff the board trolls would be all over the same kind of deal. Why is MSNBC all over Weinstein but didn't say anything about Scarborough? Just the way it is these days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted October 15, 2017 I believe that is what people of the left call whataboutism. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted October 15, 2017 I believe that is what people of the left call whataboutism. Reading Baker boys posts leads to whatthefockism. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted October 15, 2017 I believe that is what people of the left call whataboutism. This from the crowd of retards that still constantly dips into the 57 Bucket from 10 years ago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,380 Posted October 15, 2017 Oh wow, totally misread that. Ya you're right. Most likely the Obamas delivered their daughter to a man they knew was a rapist because they thought he wouldn't dare rape THEIR daughter. His donations to Dems are worth the risk. I'm not going to make you say I was right. There's no point. You thought someone wasn't what it was. Not your fault. You are constantly lied to by the media. Here's the thing Harvey is going to take the fall for all his Jew friends, but nothing will change. Hollywood will still prey on women and men who will do anything to "make it". Harvey will take one for the team and nobody else will go down. Just look at the media they either don't report it or focus only on Harvey. https://i.redd.it/mi644fwoa1sz.jpg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted October 15, 2017 If I hadn't made very clear that I think Rose McGowan is a Cont let me be clear. She has now started the liberal blackmail ball rolling. She went on Twitter and said CBS had to give money to some charity or they were complicit in rape! And that's an example of why nobody takes these b****** seriously. No CDs is not complicit in rape because they don't open up their checkbook for a charity you stupid c***. And, let's say they were physically complicit in a rape and then opened up their checkbook for a charity. You would be screaming bloody murder that they were trying to buy their way out of being complicit in rape! It'll be a lot easier to take this b**** seriously if she didn't over-exaggerate every thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brad GLuckman 518 Posted October 15, 2017 I'm not going to make you say I was right. There's no point. You thought someone wasn't what it was. Not your fault. You are constantly lied to by the media. Here's the thing Harvey is going to take the fall for all his Jew friends, but nothing will change. Hollywood will still prey on women and men who will do anything to "make it". Harvey will take one for the team and nobody else will go down. Just look at the media they either don't report it or focus only on Harvey. https://i.redd.it/mi644fwoa1sz.jpg I have no idea what you just typed. But to be clear, you believe that the Obamas were totally cool with their daughter working for a rapist? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,584 Posted October 16, 2017 I have no idea what you just typed. But to be clear, you believe that the Obamas were totally cool with their daughter working for a rapist? yep they knew he was safe Jews dont like dark meat Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted October 16, 2017 You people are focking mental. Harassment/rape/pedophilia isn't a partisan thing. How focking childish. "My side is good, and the other side is bad." No. Both sides are made up of millions of people. Most of them, on both sides, are pretty good folks. Some, on both sides, are lowlife pieces of sh!t. Seems like the further up the ladder of power you go, the higher percentage of POS you find. On both sides. Why? Because people up the ladder become used to doing whatever the fock they want and thinking they are special and untouchable. Harvey Weisenstein is a piece of sh!t. I hope he gets his. His political affiliations are irrelevant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brad GLuckman 518 Posted October 16, 2017 You people are focking mental. Harassment/rape/pedophilia isn't a partisan thing. How focking childish. "My side is good, and the other side is bad." No. Both sides are made up of millions of people. Most of them, on both sides, are pretty good folks. Some, on both sides, are lowlife pieces of sh!t. Seems like the further up the ladder of power you go, the higher percentage of POS you find. On both sides. Why? Because people up the ladder become used to doing whatever the fock they want and thinking they are special and untouchable. Harvey Weisenstein is a piece of sh!t. I hope he gets his. His political affiliations are irrelevant. But Cdub said Obama sold his daughter to Weinstein, because he wanted Chuck Schumer to get a $14k campaign contribution. Man, I dont know what to believe anymore Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 5,206 Posted October 16, 2017 But Cdub said Obama sold his daughter to Weinstein, because he wanted Chuck Schumer to get a $14k campaign contribution. Man, I dont know what to believe anymore You can believe one of three things: 1. The Obamas allowed their daughter to work for him knowing full well his is a sicko, and just sent her there. 2. The POTUS and his secret service did absolutely zero investigation into where she was going, because from everything coming out, his pervertedness was the worst kept secret there. 3. Same as #1 but Weinstein had a visit from some people that let it be known that she was off limits, unless he wanted to end up accidentally shooting himself in the head multiple times. Frankly I find this the most plausible. Which one do you believe? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brad GLuckman 518 Posted October 16, 2017 You can believe one of three things: 1. The Obamas allowed their daughter to work for him knowing full well his is a sicko, and just sent her there. 2. The POTUS and his secret service did absolutely zero investigation into where she was going, because from everything coming out, his pervertedness was the worst kept secret there. 3. Same as #1 but Weinstein had a visit from some people that let it be known that she was off limits, unless he wanted to end up accidentally shooting himself in the head multiple times. Frankly I find this the most plausible. Which one do you believe? I dont believe the Obamas had an agreement with Weinstein that rape was ok as long as he didnt rape their daughter, so Im going with #2. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted October 16, 2017 You can believe one of three things: 1. The Obamas allowed their daughter to work for him knowing full well his is a sicko, and just sent her there. 2. The POTUS and his secret service did absolutely zero investigation into where she was going, because from everything coming out, his pervertedness was the worst kept secret there. 3. Same as #1 but Weinstein had a visit from some people that let it be known that she was off limits, unless he wanted to end up accidentally shooting himself in the head multiple times. Frankly I find this the most plausible. Which one do you believe? I venture to guess that they had probably heard things, and didn't believe them, based on their own interactions with the man. I mean, if the Obamas believed everything they heard, then he is a pole smoking muslim terrorist. Have you ever had something come out about someone you know, and been shocked? I have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted October 16, 2017 As much as I despise Donald Trump, Id never suggest he would knowingly send his teenage daughter to intern for a rapist. It would be a shameful suggestion for me to make. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 5,206 Posted October 16, 2017 As much as I despise Donald Trump, Id never suggest he would knowingly send his teenage daughter to intern for a rapist. It would be a shameful suggestion for me to make. So, you choose option 2? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted October 16, 2017 As much as I despise Donald Trump, Id never suggest he would knowingly send his teenage daughter to intern for a rapist. It would be a shameful suggestion for me to make. Well of course not. Trump would get too jealous. Do you know any other father who refers to his teenage daughter as hot? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,941 Posted October 16, 2017 Post "Me Too" here if you've ever put the moves on a chick at work. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted October 16, 2017 Who knew the great Al Michaels had no balls? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,891 Posted October 16, 2017 As much as I despise Donald Trump, Id never suggest he would knowingly send his teenage daughter to intern for a rapist. Agreed, Daddy would never send Ivanka to another rapist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 16, 2017 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/16/clinton-foundation-to-keep-harvey-weinsteins-250000-donation.html Hillary and Bill are keeping his cash. I wonder how much they'll pledge to combat violence against women. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites