Cloaca du jour 2,147 Posted August 23, 2014 All the signs point to yes. All of these rumblings...seems like tensions are near boiling over. People are getting fed up. Perhaps bad wording...not so much a race war..but a war against those who leech off society...regardless of race. People expressing frustration in the double standards, income disparity, lack of faith in government, unemployment. The purge..... Maybe people start living The Walking Deadbeat. Just mow down anyone who leeches off society. They ramble around in packs...lookin for food or handouts... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted August 23, 2014 It's Fox News that's creating the divide with their propaganda. They won't cause a civil war, but they've managed to succeed in nearly splitting the country in half. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cloaca du jour 2,147 Posted August 23, 2014 I dont think its just fox news...people are just getting fed up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,612 Posted August 23, 2014 It's Fox News that's creating the divide with their propaganda. They won't cause a civil war, but they've managed to succeed in nearly splitting the country in half. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted August 23, 2014 More like :lol: . Tax and spend doesn't work. The middle class is tired of treading water. Even so, there will be no civil war. The mainstream media loves fanning the racism flames. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,612 Posted August 23, 2014 More like :lol: . Tax and spend doesn't work. The middle class is tired of treading water. Even so, there will be no civil war. The mainstream media loves fanning the racism flames. True, either one of them would have worked... And the liberals here will deny it, but the mainstream media and Democrats in general do love to bring up racism all the time... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frank 2,276 Posted August 23, 2014 I don't need your civil war. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,057 Posted August 23, 2014 G0d you are annoying Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kpbuckeye 3 Posted August 23, 2014 Yea, its fox news...lol make more excuses Obama. so much for the hope and change garbage. Should have called it divide and lie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted August 23, 2014 This post is racist ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Googballz 39 Posted August 23, 2014 It's Fox News that's creating the divide with their propaganda. They won't cause a civil war, but they've managed to succeed in nearly splitting the country in half. Excellent analysis from someone who claims to never watch the news.....much less Fox. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,182 Posted August 23, 2014 Hopefully the second amendment extremists and the Ferguson looters kill each other off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted August 23, 2014 Yea, its fox news...lol make more excuses Obama. so much for the hope and change garbage. Should have called it divide and lie. Did NewbieJr. change his name to Obama? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 23, 2014 Did NewbieJr. change his name to Obama? And did the division in this country start with Obama? Seems like it was around the time of Clinton...was just as divisive under Bush, and continues under Obama. Prediction...it will be the same with the next president as the most vocal of followers of either party will continue to be dismissive about anything the other party does. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Googballz 39 Posted August 23, 2014 And did the division in this country start with Obama? Nope. But Obama is the first President to consistently cry about a single network because they don't lick his boots. Newbie falls lockstep behind Obama in crying about a network he says he never watches.......and then you come in to defend Newbie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shovelheadt 68 Posted August 23, 2014 The same people causing the issues in MO aren't capable of organizing a civil war. If they somehow did get organized, the slack jawed, country folk of this nation would hand them their asses as soon as it spilled outside of the cities. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted August 24, 2014 I don't need your civil war Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naomi 356 Posted August 24, 2014 This nation can undo itself over racism related tensions if we choose to. Embarrassingly stupid though. It makes me like the idea of living in a culture that's ~90%+ one ethnicity, doesn't matter what the ethnicity is, just to get away from about something that should be totally irrelevant to humanity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frank 2,276 Posted August 24, 2014 I don't need your civil war What we have here is failure to communicate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cloaca du jour 2,147 Posted August 24, 2014 So much for educated discourse... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted August 24, 2014 This nation can undo itself over racism related tensions if we choose to. Embarrassingly stupid though. It makes me like the idea of living in a culture that's ~90%+ one ethnicity, doesn't matter what the ethnicity is, just to get away from about something that should be totally irrelevant to humanity. Doesn't matter what the ethnicity is huh? Go live in a 90% African American neighborhood! and get back to us on that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naomi 356 Posted August 24, 2014 Doesn't matter what the ethnicity is huh? Go live in a 90% African American neighborhood! and get back to us on that. I had national culture in mind... should have said country. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,123 Posted August 24, 2014 No, the country will survive a few bad presidents, we've seen worse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mungwater 593 Posted August 24, 2014 Doesn't matter what the ethnicity is huh? Go live in a 90% African American neighborhood! and get back to us on that. I heard a stat on the income inequality among the races, it said that if the African American community was its own nation, it would be a top fifteen in the world in income. Don't know if that's true or not, but if that's the case, there is something more in the AA community that is driving the crime. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted August 24, 2014 No, the country will survive a few bad presidents, we've seen worse. Not to sure we've seen worse. He's horribly bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,123 Posted August 24, 2014 Not to sure we've seen worse. He's horribly bad. I think the one before was even worse, but we're talking about the difference between getting punched in the face vs kicked in the nuts at this point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted August 24, 2014 I think the one before was even worse, but we're talking about the difference between getting punched in the face vs kicked in the nuts at this point. True. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,057 Posted August 24, 2014 I think the one before was even worse, but we're talking about the difference between getting punched in the face vs kicked in the nuts at this point. The guy before "wins" due to 9/11 and the Iraq War. But otherwise they are pretty much equally bad Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,182 Posted August 24, 2014 No, the country will survive a few bad presidents, we've seen worse. We've had fourteen on our way to sixteen bad years of presidenting. Meanwhile contemplating the choices in 2016 is not provinding me any hope. If electing Hillary brought about Bill's third term, that'd be a cause for joyous celebration, but we all know that's not the type of person Hillary is. So then you have to hope the GOP provides somebody decent, which hasn't worked since Bob Dole. The last two GOP started off fine if they'd stuck to what got them onto the national stage to begin with. But they both proved to be quite willing and anxious to discard any semblance of decency to get through the primary. Rand Paul would be great. Call me extremely enthusiastic. Maybe the Humpty-shaped one can be reassembled despite falling off the bridge. I'd really like a viable alternative to Hillary. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted August 24, 2014 We've had fourteen on our way to sixteen bad years of presidenting. Meanwhile contemplating the choices in 2016 is not provinding me any hope. If electing Hillary brought about Bill's third term, that'd be a cause for joyous celebration, but we all know that's not the type of person Hillary is. So then you have to hope the GOP provides somebody decent, which hasn't worked since Bob Dole. The last two GOP started off fine if they'd stuck to what got them onto the national stage to begin with. But they both proved to be quite willing and anxious to discard any semblance of decency to get through the primary. Rand Paul would be great. Call me extremely enthusiastic. Maybe the Humpty-shaped one can be reassembled despite falling off the bridge. I'd really like a viable alternative to Hillary. anything with a pulse is a viable alternative to that lousy excuse for a human Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,057 Posted August 24, 2014 We've had fourteen on our way to sixteen bad years of presidenting. Meanwhile contemplating the choices in 2016 is not provinding me any hope. If electing Hillary brought about Bill's third term, that'd be a cause for joyous celebration, but we all know that's not the type of person Hillary is. So then you have to hope the GOP provides somebody decent, which hasn't worked since Bob Dole. The last two GOP started off fine if they'd stuck to what got them onto the national stage to begin with. But they both proved to be quite willing and anxious to discard any semblance of decency to get through the primary. Rand Paul would be great. Call me extremely enthusiastic. Maybe the Humpty-shaped one can be reassembled despite falling off the bridge. I'd really like a viable alternative to Hillary. Sadly for the GOP, their candidates have to act like raving loons in the primary if they want any hope of the drobeskis of the world voting for them Huntsman was the best candidate they had last time around he was getting, what, 2% of the vote? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted August 24, 2014 Democratics are the party of raging loons, see it in the streets everyday. Wackos Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Googballz 39 Posted August 25, 2014 Sadly for the GOP, their candidates have to act like raving loons in the primary if they want any hope of the drobeskis of the world voting for them Huntsman was the best candidate they had last time around he was getting, what, 2% of the vote? 1. A raging libtard telling Republicans who their best candidate is is laughable. 2. Huntsman had no $$$$. 3. The fact you are so ignorant of Presidential politics, and how #2 plays into it, is not surprising. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,123 Posted August 25, 2014 I liked Huntsman. Then again I liked Romney and McCain before they checked their principles at the door. From my outsider perspective the GOP needs to come to the center, particularly on social issues but instead they've doubled down on the stupid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted August 25, 2014 Doubled down on stupid Perfect bumper sticker for tards who elected the idiot we have in there again. Dyyyyum Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mungwater 593 Posted August 25, 2014 I liked Huntsman. Then again I liked Romney and McCain before they checked their principles at the door. From my outsider perspective the GOP needs to come to the center, particularly on social issues but instead they've doubled down on the stupid. Both parties have doubled down on stupid, the have to reach the lowest common denominator on both sides, and those are where the retards lie. Unfortunately, that retard base counts for both. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Googballz 39 Posted August 25, 2014 Both parties have doubled down on stupid, the have to reach the lowest common denominator on both sides, and those are where the retards lie. Unfortunately, that retard base counts for both. Dem retard base is much bigger, apparently. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mungwater 593 Posted August 25, 2014 Dem retard base is much bigger, apparently. Obviously, theirs is give me free stuff and the others is Jesus rode a dinosaur, just like swiping a Kroger card for the savings. It is what it is Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted August 25, 2014 Dem retard base is much bigger, apparently. Dem retard side isn't quite as batshit crazy frightening as the Repub side, meaning the moderates tend to drift towards Democrat. Crazy + give aways vs. Crazy + armed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites