crackattack 520 Posted March 28, 2016 Its one group that is running away from a candidate Nobody worth a damn is willing to work with Trump is the overall point. He is utterly clueless...but his supporters don't care how unqualified he is. Ok then. But the one group running away from trump is a group made up people who supported the cluster fock that is Iraq and the middle east, so I'd say it's a good thing that they are nowhere near advising. Now, back to the question. Who do you like as far a foreign policy? Hillary? She helped create a vacuum in Libya. Are you happy with Obama? You complain about trump, who has done absolutely nothing with foreign policy, but offer nothing in return. Are you afraid of scrutiny? Why won't you tell us who you like as a great or good foreign policy maker? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hoytdwow 202 Posted March 28, 2016 Interesting read from a trump campaign defector http://www.xojane.com/issues/stephanie-cegielski-donald-trump-campaign-defector Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 28, 2016 Ok then. But the one group running away from trump is a group made up people who supported the cluster fock that is Iraq and the middle east, so I'd say it's a good thing that they are nowhere near advising. Now, back to the question. Who do you like as far a foreign policy? Hillary? She helped create a vacuum in Libya. Are you happy with Obama? You complain about trump, who has done absolutely nothing with foreign policy, but offer nothing in return. Are you afraid of scrutiny? Why won't you tell us who you like as a great or good foreign policy maker? Its not the one group...and I doubt you looked past one or two names. I'd like Hillary over trump as far as foreign policy...Bernie too, Kasich too. Cruz...not at all. Obama has been adequate. Though all of them speak about foreign policy and sound like they know what they are talking about. And this is a thread about Trump...so of course the criticism is about him. This does seem the typical defense...well, we won't answer about Trump...but who do you like so I can try to pick them apart. Yes, that is textbook deflection by you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TD Ryan2 316 Posted March 28, 2016 Interesting read from a trump campaign defector http://www.xojane.com/issues/stephanie-cegielski-donald-trump-campaign-defector Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,498 Posted March 28, 2016 I like his trade strategy I like his halting of bringing in refugees I like his aggressive approach to fighting Isis I like that he recognizes that the biggest threat is radical Islamic terrorism I like that he disagrees with our treaty with Iran I like his support of Israel I like that he says that the countries we provide protection for have to start paying up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted March 28, 2016 Its not the one group...and I doubt you looked past one or two names. I'd like Hillary over trump as far as foreign policy...Bernie too, Kasich too. Cruz...not at all. Obama has been adequate. Though all of them speak about foreign policy and sound like they know what they are talking about. And this is a thread about Trump...so of course the criticism is about him. This does seem the typical defense...well, we won't answer about Trump...but who do you like so I can try to pick them apart. Yes, that is textbook deflection by you. Again, not true. I'm no trump supporter. My guy was Paul, but I think it's fair questions. Allllllllll this ant-trump stuff is just hypotheticals, since Trump has done nothing to affect, change, or influence foreign policy. Since it's all hypothetical, what if, and only what if, Trump got Paul to be his VP. Trump was able to get Gary johnson as his military and foreign policy advisor? Does that change your mind? I think it's fair for people who scrutinize one candidate, to show who they like. No candidate is perfect, they all have flaws. Your candidate isn't above scrutiny. But yes, it is a Trump thread. And all this noise is just speculation and hypotheticals, since nobody knows what he'll do, and who would be his advisors. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 28, 2016 Again, not true. I'm no trump supporter. My guy was Paul, but I think it's fair questions. Allllllllll this ant-trump stuff is just hypotheticals, since Trump has done nothing to affect, change, or influence foreign policy. Since it's all hypothetical, what if, and only what if, Trump got Paul to be his VP. Trump was able to get Gary johnson as his military and foreign policy advisor? Does that change your mind? I think it's fair for people who scrutinize one candidate, to show who they like. No candidate is perfect, they all have flaws. Your candidate isn't above scrutiny. But yes, it is a Trump thread. And all this noise is just speculation and hypotheticals, since nobody knows what he'll do, and who would be his advisors. Its not a hypothetical...read what I posted or any other interview with him. He is incompetent and has zero clue...people have to ask him questions multiple times because he can't answer. Not just that he doesn't know, he doesn't seem even willing to learn. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted March 28, 2016 Its not a hypothetical...read what I posted or any other interview with him. He is incompetent and has zero clue...people have to ask him questions multiple times because he can't answer. Not just that he doesn't know, he doesn't seem even willing to learn. It is hypothetical, unless you can see in the future. So what about my question? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,294 Posted March 28, 2016 I just realized that the title of this thread was supposed to be "comparing". Been trying to figure out what a picture company was for 3 days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 28, 2016 It is hypothetical, unless you can see in the future. So what about my question? I can see how he answers questions and it shows his incompetence. I didn't comment on the future. This is just more of your pathetic deflection. Have fun Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TD Ryan2 316 Posted March 28, 2016 I can see how he answers questions and it shows his incompetence. I didn't comment on the future. This is just more of your pathetic deflection. Have fun Trump's appeal, with his answers, is his "this isn't that hard" tone and tenor - it's likeable.. but oversimplifies things and puts them in black and white- - and the fact is, it isn't simple, and it's rarely black/white. (I'm paraphrasing) On Education: Well, you know Dr. Ben Carson is gonna' endorse me tomorrow. This guy... this guy... I mean... He REALLY knows education, We're gonna' do great things. We're gonna get rid of common core. It's a disaster. On Foreign Policy /Terrorism / Trade: (yes, this answer could be for all three) You know.... I'm tired of losing... the American People are tired of losing. We're gonna' have the best people... I mean THE BEST and BRIGHTEST... not these losers who can't get anything done. See, I fund my own campaign... I don't owe anyone anything... so I'll have who I want and they'll be the best minds to fix all this. How are we gonna' do it? We'll have a meeting and get it done. It's not hard... we all know what needs to be done... and I'll get it done. "well.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted March 28, 2016 I can see how he answers questions and it shows his incompetence. I didn't comment on the future. This is just more of your pathetic deflection. Have fun Pathetic. You can make assumptions about the future, but can't answer a question. Your claim is he's incompetent on foreign policy, I'm not disputing that. You then show all the GOP foreign policy "experts" running away from him. Most who probably supported the worse foreign policy decision in decades, if not ever. Even you say was a bad decision. My only point was what if Trump surrounded himself with people you find credible like Paul or Johnson or both. You couldn't even answer. Pathetic is right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mookz 1,349 Posted March 28, 2016 I had to read that a few times myself, but he meant "comparing" instead of "company". I just realized that the title of this thread was supposed to be "comparing". Been trying to figure out what a picture company was for 3 days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,294 Posted March 28, 2016 ... Figured someone else mentioned it, but no way was I reading 5 pages of Donald Trump vs Heidi Cruz, just couldn't do it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,790 Posted March 28, 2016 I am still waiting for him to explain how he's going to totally overhaul the libel laws to make it easier to sue newspapers. Because there is no federal libel laws. Only state. That'll be really special to watch the executive branch Start over ruled state rights. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 28, 2016 Pathetic. You can make assumptions about the future, but can't answer a question. Your claim is he's incompetent on foreign policy, I'm not disputing that. You then show all the GOP foreign policy "experts" running away from him. Most who probably supported the worse foreign policy decision in decades, if not ever. Even you say was a bad decision. My only point was what if Trump surrounded himself with people you find credible like Paul or Johnson or both. You couldn't even answer. Pathetic is right. I have made zero assumptions...why must you keep mischaracterizing what I have actually said? I didn't show all of anything...I showed one list as an example. He can't surround her nself with those people...they want nothing to do with him. You call me pathetic because you falsely claim I made assumptions...them you come up with the some foolish hypothetical where guys that want nothing o do with Trump end up as his advisors. Holy focking throw the gun dude. Its OK to admit he doesn't have a clue ..its really not hard to see that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 28, 2016 I am still waiting for him to explain how he's going to totally overhaul the libel laws to make it easier to sue newspapers. Because there is no federal libel laws. Only state. That'll be really special to watch the executive branch Start over ruled state rights. Because he loves the 1st amendment Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,485 Posted March 28, 2016 I don't disagree as far as putting troops back in the middle east. Eta: what are your other examples of infinitely better? I'm not asking for a pissing match, just context. For example: I didn't care for the Iran deal. It wasn't horrible, but making appeasement type deals with one of, if not the biggest sponsors of terrorism, wasn't great. Libya is a mess due to the removal of Gaddafi, that created a vacuum. Just a couple of examples. Didn't support the war in Iraq, ended the war in Iraq, did not get baited into putting troops on the ground in Syria or elsewhere, no major terrorist attacks on US soil in his time in office. I wouldn't say he's been great but Obummer was a million times better than his predecessor. The opposition party on the other hand can't even decide whether Iraq was a mistake in the first place or if we should have left or doubled down on that mistake by keeping our troops there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted March 28, 2016 I am still waiting for him to explain how he's going to totally overhaul the libel laws to make it easier to sue newspapers. Because there is no federal libel laws. Only state. That'll be really special to watch the executive branch Start over ruled state rights. He'll pass some federal libel laws then get rid of them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,790 Posted March 28, 2016 He'll pass some federal libel laws then get rid of them. Lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hoytdwow 202 Posted March 28, 2016 It's going to be great Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ken8080 6 Posted March 29, 2016 Its OK to admit he doesn't have a clue ..its really not hard to see that. You must be pretty smart to figure out that Trump hasn't a clue. Wait a minute, you're just some know-nothing punk on a lightly trafficked FF message board with a know-it-all attitude. Obviously no important job or you wouldn't be here day in and day out. And Trump is a billionaire who runs several multi-million dollar companies, owns multi-million dollar properties and who not only is running for POTUS but will in all likelihood be his party's nominee. And YOU have the audacity to infer that HE hasn't a clue. YOU sir are an idiot .. and you don't even know it. It's YOU sir who hasn't a clue. Done deal. Nuff said. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gocolts 300 Posted March 29, 2016 You must be pretty smart to figure out that Trump hasn't a clue. Wait a minute, you're just some know-nothing punk on a lightly trafficked FF message board with a know-it-all attitude. Obviously no important job or you wouldn't be here day in and day out. And Trump is a billionaire who runs several multi-million dollar companies, owns multi-million dollar properties and who not only is running for POTUS but will in all likelihood be his party's nominee. And YOU have the audacity to infer that HE hasn't a clue. YOU sir are an idiot .. and you don't even know it. It's YOU sir who hasn't a clue. Done deal. Nuff said. POW!!! Dude was falt OWNED in the last couple pages of this thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 29, 2016 You must be pretty smart to figure out that Trump hasn't a clue. Wait a minute, you're just some know-nothing punk on a lightly trafficked FF message board with a know-it-all attitude. Obviously no important job or you wouldn't be here day in and day out. And Trump is a billionaire who runs several multi-million dollar companies, owns multi-million dollar properties and who not only is running for POTUS but will in all likelihood be his party's nominee. And YOU have the audacity to infer that HE hasn't a clue. YOU sir are an idiot .. and you don't even know it. It's YOU sir who hasn't a clue. Done deal. Nuff said. When it comes to many major issues... He doesn't have a focking clue. But you are a terrible alias who always tries to get personal but only shows you dont know anything about anyone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 29, 2016 POW!!! Dude was falt OWNED in the last couple pages of this thread. Owned? Then you can find me some foreign policy people that think Trump doesn't sound incompetent. And the best you have is pow to bad alias guys ignorant post? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ken8080 6 Posted March 29, 2016 When it comes to many major issues... He doesn't have a focking clue. But you are a terrible alias who always tries to get personal but only shows you dont know anything about anyone. You have to learn when to just shut the fock up torridjunior. Because changing the subject to aliases is too easy to see through. Btw, you're so smart .. what alias am I? I don't need no stinkin' alias like you do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 29, 2016 You have to learn when to just shut the fock up torridjunior. Because changing the subject to aliases is too easy to see through. Btw, you're so smart .. what alias am I? I don't need no stinkin' alias like you do. So this is your only name here. That may be more pathetic than being an alias. And hey, dumbfock, we were talking about Trump not having a clue about foreign policy and you brought up a bunch of irrelevant be to change the subject So bring something of substance to the table or fock off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ken8080 6 Posted March 29, 2016 So this is your only name here. That may be more pathetic than being an alias. And hey, dumbfock, we were talking about Trump not having a clue about foreign policy and you brought up a bunch of irrelevant be to change the subject So bring something of substance to the table or fock off. YOU need to know when to shut the fock up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 29, 2016 YOU need to know when to shut the fock up. Or what? You going to make up more crap about me? Have anything to add to the actual topic? Or your usual fake stalker bull? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ken8080 6 Posted March 29, 2016 Or what? You going to make up more crap about me? Have anything to add to the actual topic? Or your usual fake stalker bull? YOU need to know when to shut the fock up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 29, 2016 YOU need to know when to shut the fock up. Quality posting here...troll on ken. Or try actually saying anything of substance when you post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gocolts 300 Posted March 29, 2016 Owned? Then you can find me some foreign policy people that think Trump doesn't sound incompetent. And the best you have is pow to bad alias guys ignorant post? Do you not know what that word means. It means folks destroyed your posts with facts in this case. I would rather watch you trot out a bunch of guys that are clearly HUGE failures at foreign policy that say how bad someone else might be. THAT was focking hilarious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 29, 2016 Do you not know what that word means. It means folks destroyed your posts with facts in this case. I would rather watch you trot out a bunch of guys that are clearly HUGE failures at foreign policy that say how bad someone else might be. THAT was focking hilarious. What facts colts? Crack whining about the list I brought...not one person did more than look at the author of that list. Not one person has been able to post anything to refute my claim that Trump is incompetent on foreign policy (I posted one interview of his on the topic...there are plenty more). Not one person has shown where any credible person will be with Trump on foreign policy. I know what the word means...its a childish tactic on message boards when people have zero to say and brought nothing to the table. Trump is a focking joke...bring something to prove me wrong just once colts...rather than your usual bull crap. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted March 29, 2016 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Donald_Trump_presidential_campaign_endorsements,_2016&ved=0ahUKEwjHo-za8OTLAhUMmoMKHfFPCVwQFggeMAE&usg=AFQjCNGwv2R7Jk8ksJv0g6JWkfn0LSV67w Look at all these qualified individuals running away from Trump. Not one decent candidate for foreign policy. Ohhh wait, they're endorsing him. Michael Flynn looks highly qualified. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted March 29, 2016 And crackattack wasn't whining, just trying to have a decent conversation. I should've known better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gocolts 300 Posted March 29, 2016 What facts colts? Crack whining about the list I brought...not one person did more than look at the author of that list. Not one person has been able to post anything to refute my claim that Trump is incompetent on foreign policy (I posted one interview of his on the topic...there are plenty more). Not one person has shown where any credible person will be with Trump on foreign policy. I know what the word means...its a childish tactic on message boards when people have zero to say and brought nothing to the table. Trump is a focking joke...bring something to prove me wrong just once colts...rather than your usual bull crap. Your wisdom is unmatched. Your brilliance knows no bounds. You are always right and have never been wrong. It is impossible to agree to disagree as you know everything. You are super smart and there is not a single subject you are not completely versed on. You are a political, social, and financial genius. You are superior to all and are the beacon of hope and logic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 29, 2016 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Donald_Trump_presidential_campaign_endorsements,_2016&ved=0ahUKEwjHo-za8OTLAhUMmoMKHfFPCVwQFggeMAE&usg=AFQjCNGwv2R7Jk8ksJv0g6JWkfn0LSV67w Look at all these qualified individuals running away from Trump. Not one decent candidate for foreign policy. Ohhh wait, they're endorsing him. Michael Flynn looks highly qualified. You listed all endorsements...not foreign policy endorsements. Sure...lots of people have jumped on board. Have not denied that... Are you really denying his lack of competence in answering foreign policy questions? Since that is what started this all? Can any of you actually say he sounds like he knows what he is talking about when questioned about foreign policy? Don't just try and argue...be honest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 29, 2016 Your wisdom is unmatched. Your brilliance knows no bounds. You are always right and have never been wrong. It is impossible to agree to disagree as you know everything. You are super smart and there is not a single subject you are not completely versed on. You are a political, social, and financial genius. You are superior to all and are the beacon of hope and logic. More complete crap from you. Just try having a real conversation Colts...try actually bringing something to the table for once. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ken8080 6 Posted March 29, 2016 Your wisdom is unmatched. Your brilliance knows no bounds. You are always right and have never been wrong. It is impossible to agree to disagree as you know everything. You are super smart and there is not a single subject you are not completely versed on. You are a political, social, and financial genius. You are superior to all and are the beacon of hope and logic. Good post colts. Old torridjuniorsnuff thinks getting in the last word is winning. He's like a Boxer who gets knocked out in the 6th round and is unconscious for an hour and after everyone leaves the arena and his opponent has gone home, he jumps up and yells who wants to fight me, who wants to fight me. And did I mention, he doesn't know when to just shut the fock up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 29, 2016 Good post colts. Old torridjuniorsnuff thinks getting in the last word is winning. He's like a Boxer who gets knocked out in the 6th round and is unconscious for an hour and after everyone leaves the arena and his opponent has gone home, he jumps up and yells who wants to fight me, who wants to fight me. And did I mention, he doesn't know when to just shut the fock up. You keep making false accusations about me...you have done this with many people for years. Yet you try to claim others don't know when to shut the fock up. Again...question, do you really claim this is your only ID here? Do you think anyone buys that bullshit? As for getting knocked out...you have yet to even land a glancing blow chief. Your schtick is old, tired, and weak. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites